The Matrix Visual Comparison
Chris Gould has taken a look at the differing versions of the Wachowski's martial arts action flick. Compared are the region ...
With the release of The Ultimate Matrix Collection just a few days behind us, I thought it might be prudent to perform a brief comparison between the old and new versions of The Matrix. Originally released way back in 1999, the film that eventually spawned a trilogy was, at the time, a cutting edge DVD presentation. In fact, the disc was so cutting edge it wasn’t actually compatible with a lot of DVD players! Thankfully I was one of the lucky ones who experienced no playback issues, which was handy considering I nearly wore my region two copy of the disc out, so often did I play it!
A couple of years on, as my appreciation and understanding of the DVD format continued to grow, I decided it was time to invest in the fabled region four release of the film. For those of you who are not familiar with the story, the region four release reportedly featured superior picture quality to the region one and two efforts, while containing the uncut version of the film (the UK region two release suffered at the hands of the BBFC).
It is this ‘superior’ region four edition that will be used as the benchmark for quality when examining the new digital transfer housed on disc one of the new ‘Ultimate’ set. Additionally, this article has now been updated to incorporate the original region one release to allow for a ‘like for like’ comparison between two NTSC sources. In the shots below, the images are taken from the DVDs in the following order: region four, region one, and region one Special Edition. So, without further ado, let’s move on to the comparison.
















































As you can see from the above images, the new transfer is far closer to the look of the sequels than the original effort. For the most part, contrast is greatly improved, with the superior black levels being the most noticeable change (at times, blacks the original release bordered on grey). Harder to spot in these images is the reduction in grain. Again, the first release contained too much grain, even for a film shot in Super-35. In fact, the Wachowski brothers cited excessive grain as one of the main reasons for this new transfer. Brightness has also been elevated in many scenes, with shots one, seven, eight and sixteen illustrating this perfectly. Oddly enough, the Sentinel in shot nine reveals slightly more detail in the original transfer, although the colours are not as vibrant.
However, perhaps the biggest, and most noticeable change, is the colour timing. The shots above illustrate just how different scenes inside the Matrix now appear, with many of the scenes that used to appear a murky brown now having the familiar green tint. The new transfer really does bring the original film in line with the sequels, and I feel that this is particularly apparent in shots five, eleven and twelve. In scene twelve you can see that the Agents’ suits are now far closer to those in The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions than they originally were. Although there may be some who are against the changes made to the film’s pallet, I feel that in this instance the good far outweighs the bad. At least the content of the films hasn’t been ‘tweaked’ like another trilogy I could mention…
Hopefully this short comparison will give those of you debating whether to purchase the new boxed set a glimpse of what’s on offer. To this end it’s worth noting that it’s not only the original film that has received a makeover, but also the sequels. Both follow-ups feature ever-so-slightly cleaner transfers than those found on the two-disc releases, with improved colour and slightly enhanced levels of detail. This is particularly apparent during one scene in The Matrix Reloaded. After beating the Agents at the beginning of the film, Neo flies off to look for the Oracle. While doing his ‘Superman’ thing, Neo flies in front of the moon. It was at this point the original DVD release featured some nasty posterisation and a little bit of blocking. Thankfully this is all but eliminated on the new DVD.
All images we captured using PowerDVD 6.0 at 1280x720 using the default profile, with no software filters applied. The images were then automatically re-sized and compressed into .jpg format by DVDActive's automated upload process. However, as with any level of compression, the introduction of a few minor visual artefacts was unavoidable.
Editorial by Chris Gould
A couple of years on, as my appreciation and understanding of the DVD format continued to grow, I decided it was time to invest in the fabled region four release of the film. For those of you who are not familiar with the story, the region four release reportedly featured superior picture quality to the region one and two efforts, while containing the uncut version of the film (the UK region two release suffered at the hands of the BBFC).
It is this ‘superior’ region four edition that will be used as the benchmark for quality when examining the new digital transfer housed on disc one of the new ‘Ultimate’ set. Additionally, this article has now been updated to incorporate the original region one release to allow for a ‘like for like’ comparison between two NTSC sources. In the shots below, the images are taken from the DVDs in the following order: region four, region one, and region one Special Edition. So, without further ado, let’s move on to the comparison.
Scene One: "Hands on your head!"



Scene Two: "We have the name of their next target."



Scene Three: "Whaddaya think, Dejour?"



Scene Four: "You have a problem with authority, Mr Anderson."



Scene Five: "You help your landlady carry out her garbage."



Scene Six: "Let me tell you why you are here."



Scene Seven: The Matrix



Scene Eight: Dojo Showdown



Scene Nine: Sentinels



Scene Ten: "Ahhh."



Scene Eleven: "I’m a Smith."



Scene Twelve: "Never send a human to do a machine’s job."



Scene Thirteen: The Lobby Shootout



Scene Fourteen: Neo Begins to Believe



Scene Fifteen: "No."



Scene Sixteen: Matrix Code



As you can see from the above images, the new transfer is far closer to the look of the sequels than the original effort. For the most part, contrast is greatly improved, with the superior black levels being the most noticeable change (at times, blacks the original release bordered on grey). Harder to spot in these images is the reduction in grain. Again, the first release contained too much grain, even for a film shot in Super-35. In fact, the Wachowski brothers cited excessive grain as one of the main reasons for this new transfer. Brightness has also been elevated in many scenes, with shots one, seven, eight and sixteen illustrating this perfectly. Oddly enough, the Sentinel in shot nine reveals slightly more detail in the original transfer, although the colours are not as vibrant.
However, perhaps the biggest, and most noticeable change, is the colour timing. The shots above illustrate just how different scenes inside the Matrix now appear, with many of the scenes that used to appear a murky brown now having the familiar green tint. The new transfer really does bring the original film in line with the sequels, and I feel that this is particularly apparent in shots five, eleven and twelve. In scene twelve you can see that the Agents’ suits are now far closer to those in The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions than they originally were. Although there may be some who are against the changes made to the film’s pallet, I feel that in this instance the good far outweighs the bad. At least the content of the films hasn’t been ‘tweaked’ like another trilogy I could mention…
Hopefully this short comparison will give those of you debating whether to purchase the new boxed set a glimpse of what’s on offer. To this end it’s worth noting that it’s not only the original film that has received a makeover, but also the sequels. Both follow-ups feature ever-so-slightly cleaner transfers than those found on the two-disc releases, with improved colour and slightly enhanced levels of detail. This is particularly apparent during one scene in The Matrix Reloaded. After beating the Agents at the beginning of the film, Neo flies off to look for the Oracle. While doing his ‘Superman’ thing, Neo flies in front of the moon. It was at this point the original DVD release featured some nasty posterisation and a little bit of blocking. Thankfully this is all but eliminated on the new DVD.
All images we captured using PowerDVD 6.0 at 1280x720 using the default profile, with no software filters applied. The images were then automatically re-sized and compressed into .jpg format by DVDActive's automated upload process. However, as with any level of compression, the introduction of a few minor visual artefacts was unavoidable.
Editorial by Chris Gould
Advertisements
Jonny "Me You"
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,863
awesome
Another job well done Chris! I always thought that colours on the old DVD werent how I remembered seeing it in theaters. Maybe this new transfer proves me right.
Report
Quote
| Reply
Awesome work!
I highly recommend picking up the new 10 disc set. The features are impressive and the transfers of the movies are viberant and crisp!
I highly recommend picking up the new 10 disc set. The features are impressive and the transfers of the movies are viberant and crisp!
:)
I love you Chris.
BTW, is a review of the set in the works?
BTW, is a review of the set in the works?
Those comparisons really illustrate what a crap transfer the original was. Well done Mr. Gould
Will you be following up on the quaility comparison when you recieve the regieon 1 version?
If I can obtain a copy at the right price (i.e. very cheaply) then yes. However, I've given more than my fair show of money to Warner as far as the Matrix series goes, so it really will have to be cheap. The R1 is reportedly inferior to the R4 anyway, so the new R1 will look even better by comparison.
Have to agree with you Chris m8.
I have all the films already...just can't afford to upgrade them all.
Got too many other films on my list already anyway.
I have all the films already...just can't afford to upgrade them all.
Got too many other films on my list already anyway.
I'm not a big enough Matrix fan to shell out 60 bucks for the new 10 disc set. I'm happy with the Matrix DVDs I have.
The new transfers look great though.
The new transfers look great though.
Well done!
Nice work on the article, Chris. I think I am just going to skip buying this and wait for either an individual release or the HD-DVD of the first film.
Nice work.
Too bad "The Matrix" has so much EE now. I havn't watched it myself yet (got only 32" TV anyway) but I read a review complaining about it.
That's odd, because every review of the region one set that I've read has said that there is minimal edge enhancement at best. Do you have links to the review you'e citing?
I've seen this so-called review where they make reference to the extensive edge-enhancement. Put frankly, it's bogus. I believe it came from thread on the Home Theater Forum, and from a guy who had a chip on his shoulder to disuade people from buying the new set.
It looked like the guy used screencaps that had post-capture "sharpening", giving the image that extra edge enhancement look. If you know what I mean.
This new transfer is great. I'd say a bit better than the Star Wars discs. Well, not really when it comes to grain, but certainly in contrast.
It looked like the guy used screencaps that had post-capture "sharpening", giving the image that extra edge enhancement look. If you know what I mean.
This new transfer is great. I'd say a bit better than the Star Wars discs. Well, not really when it comes to grain, but certainly in contrast.
Chris, this a PAL comparison isn't it? It's a Swedish review of R2 (which I guess should be same as R4) so a link won't do any good anyway.
Though here it is:
Though here it is:
As it says above, this is a comparison between the PAL R4 (supposedly the best of the old versions) and the new NTSC R1 release. Unfortunately I've not been able to translate what that site said about the video, but there really isn't a large problem with edge enhancement from what I've seen.
first film good.
I love the first film but thought the duff sequels didnt do it any justice (and yes I did understand them!). Just wanted to say thanks to Chris for his tireless work on great articles, The star wars ones were great and this one too. I really enjoy reading them.
James.
James.
I'll translate the thing about EE, I'm too lazy too do all video. I'll do whole video and audio tomorrow maybe if anyone wants it. But some R2UK reviews should finally (it was after all released 6/12) be out then.
Quote: But all changes aren't good, because they've instead used a lot of Edge Enhancement which will disappoint many projectors owners. Even though the other movies have EE, though not as much as the first part.
....I could accept if there were only a few scenes with EE, but not when it exist so much, which leads to that I unfortunately can't give it the highest score.
Translated from:
Ah, sorry Chris. Well, it wasn't so clear really. Though I see it now.
Quote: But all changes aren't good, because they've instead used a lot of Edge Enhancement which will disappoint many projectors owners. Even though the other movies have EE, though not as much as the first part.
....I could accept if there were only a few scenes with EE, but not when it exist so much, which leads to that I unfortunately can't give it the highest score.
Translated from:
Ah, sorry Chris. Well, it wasn't so clear really. Though I see it now.
Just a few quick questions:
1) Are there any technical differences between Region 2 and 4 DVDs in general? (Other than the actual region!). Am I correct in assuming they are both PAL, 25fps, etc?
2) Has the UK version of this box-set been cut again (I think the cut applied to the headbutting between Morpheus and Smith in the bathroom in the first film - not aware of any other cuts - if anyone knows of any, please enlighten me).
3) If it has been cut, do you recommend getting the Region 4 version as a way of obtaining an uncut version of the film? I assume packaging, content, extras, etc will all be identical, the only differences being the region of the discs, and the films not bein man-handled by the BBFC?
Thanks for your time!
1) Are there any technical differences between Region 2 and 4 DVDs in general? (Other than the actual region!). Am I correct in assuming they are both PAL, 25fps, etc?
2) Has the UK version of this box-set been cut again (I think the cut applied to the headbutting between Morpheus and Smith in the bathroom in the first film - not aware of any other cuts - if anyone knows of any, please enlighten me).
3) If it has been cut, do you recommend getting the Region 4 version as a way of obtaining an uncut version of the film? I assume packaging, content, extras, etc will all be identical, the only differences being the region of the discs, and the films not bein man-handled by the BBFC?
Thanks for your time!
The are no technical differences, the UK release is cut, and if you prefer PAL to NTSC then there's nothing wrong with the R4 release (or another R2 release).
I bought the original R4 of the Matrix but then didn't buy the sequels because I thought they would bring out a box set and liuckily I was right! It's a pity they didn't release this earlier for other people....
by the way - well done again Chris for a great comparison.
by the way - well done again Chris for a great comparison.
Wow, the difference between the two transfers are amazing by looking at those screen shots. Thanks for the article.
Great job.
Chris, you once again do a brilliant job with your comparisons. The differences are amazing. Keep up the great job for this site.
I picked these movies up and have yet 2 watch them but i will. Luckaly i wasn't a big matrix fan when it first came out and i'm happy to have waited 4 this new set. Thanks Chris 4 these great comparisons (laong with star wars).
MATRIX
I bought the Region 4 version of The UMC and noticed something weird.
When I watch The Matrix instead of the code writing THE MATRIX it just has MATRIX. This only occurs at the start of the film (and during the credits it says THE MATRIX) but why the hell does it just say MATRIX? I have the old DVD (region 4) of The Matrix and that has MATRIX so why the change? (BTW, Reloaded and Revolutions both have THE MATRIX RELOADED; THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS)
When I watch The Matrix instead of the code writing THE MATRIX it just has MATRIX. This only occurs at the start of the film (and during the credits it says THE MATRIX) but why the hell does it just say MATRIX? I have the old DVD (region 4) of The Matrix and that has MATRIX so why the change? (BTW, Reloaded and Revolutions both have THE MATRIX RELOADED; THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS)
Matrix Box Set in Region 2 (UK)
Is the Region 2 (UK) ULTIMATE Matrix Box Set the same quality as the NTSC one?
(Just seen R2 is 1406 mins, while R1 is 1518 mins.)
Any chance of another revamp with DTS sound???
Cheers,
Sid
(Just seen R2 is 1406 mins, while R1 is 1518 mins.)
Any chance of another revamp with DTS sound???
Cheers,
Sid
"Matrix" versus "The Matrix"
Over here in the US, i went to this movie in the theaters five times. In one specific theater, they had the code dropping only the word "Matrix" onto the screen. And on the pay-per-view showings on DirecTV in 1999, their letterbox version only said "Matrix" as well (i've got it on VHS, and i've shown people this). I've noted no visual differences between the two, other than the title. Don't know why they did that...
"Matrix" versus "The Matrix"
It is bizarre, eh? My DVD (R4) says it...
I sent Chris some caps a while ago.
I sent Chris some caps a while ago.
I'm sorry, but going back to the original comparison between the "superior" R4 version and the Ultimate Matrix transfer, and now with the addition of the original R1 transfer, I have to say where on Earth are you getting this so-called adjective of "superior" to decribe the R4 version? The original R1 version is clearly superior to the original R4 version. Both in clarity and in contrast.
david, i actually thought the same... until i checked the file size of each screenshot...
for example: Scene Four: "You have a problem with authority, Mr Anderson.":
original region 4 screenshot - 6.85 KB
original region 1 screenshot - 14.63 KB
that might not explain the contrast differences, but provides a partial reason for the other differences.
for example: Scene Four: "You have a problem with authority, Mr Anderson.":
original region 4 screenshot - 6.85 KB
original region 1 screenshot - 14.63 KB
that might not explain the contrast differences, but provides a partial reason for the other differences.
Well, they all look horrible. A great way to make Super 35 look "good" is to bleach everything one colour, in this case green.
Oh, and we wouldn't want any grain visible, I mean that is what actually contains the image. Instead we will try as hard as possible to make this film look like it was shot on video - with a green filter of course.
Oh, and we wouldn't want any grain visible, I mean that is what actually contains the image. Instead we will try as hard as possible to make this film look like it was shot on video - with a green filter of course.



