Cookies on DVDActive
DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is assumed that you agree to this.
 
Leaderboard Extra
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

Forums - Discs & Movies - The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly 

Reply 

Message Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.
Not Registered?
Forgotten Details?
Additional Options These options are not required but may be useful.
Existing Posts
an MP3 with a high bitrate can sound fine but don't forget people that the equipment that the music is played on can also make a big difference
Also, it depends on what your using to playback the source. DTS contains more information which takes up more room on a DVD than DD.  What I've experianced with some DTS movies, is larger dynamic range, depending on how well it is mixed.  I would prefer a good DTS mix over extra features any day. Unfortunatly the movie industry prefers to put previews, etc., over quality sound on many releases.
Quote: Originally posted by Gabriel Powers
I still remain unconvinced that the majority of DTS tracks actually sound any better to the human ear than their DD counterparts.


I wouldn't go that far, but I've definately heard Dolby that's better. It's a matter of mastering and sound mixing.

I also like how you added MP3 as an example. If an MP3 is properly done, it's near impossible to tell the difference between it and the original CD track. Like the DVD tracks, it's all in how its done.
Quote: Originally posted by Matt Joseph
I'll take a less compressed audio track over a more compressed one any day of the week.


I still remain unconvinced that the majority of DTS tracks actually sound any better to the human ear than their DD counterparts. I know that according to the laws of physics and computing, DTS is the better format, but either most studios neglect to actually capitalize on this or the human ear is incapable of hearing the difference. The difference between an MP3 file when compaired directly to a final production CD track is negligable, and the compression rate is much higher than it is from DD to DTS.

I have been a musician for most of my life, and spent time mastering audio CDs with a friend of mine who is an honest pro at it, I'd like to think that my ears are sensitive enough to tell. However, all those years of playing punk rock in tiny clubs may have taken its toll, I may be totally talking out of my ass.
Quote: Originally posted by rob murray
i dont know if anyone knows this or not, but the Good the Bad and the Ugly is actually an instructional video on how to be a real man

...for those of you who don't know what one is. Wink
i dont know if anyone knows this or not, but the Good the Bad and the Ugly is actually an instructional video on how to be a real man
I'll take a less compressed audio track over a more compressed one any day of the week.
But how good can a DTS soundtrack be from a source as old as that?  I would never buy such a old movie for only a DTS soundtrack.  A soundtrack is only as good as the source material.
Hmmmm...good question. The Collector's Set that came out here awhile back didn't have DTS, but was a teriffic set overall.
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
In Aus, A Fist Full of Dollars and A For a Few Dollars more were just released with DTS tracks, is there any plans to release The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly with a DTS track, or a new boxed set. I'm using all my willpower to hold off.