Still say X2 and Hulk beat the c**p out of ANY of the Superman films every day of the week. Despite some questionable tactics, Singer got the job done on the X-men films.

What exactly, from a critical standpoint, is wrong with Hannibal? Is it too silly? Too Gory? I've yet to read a convincing indictment of the film beyond the usual "It sucks".

I'll agree with Matt here.  I remembered being very psyched when Hannibal (the book) was released.  I read it with a few days of being released and was shocked about how I\'ll conceived the novel was considering the time lapsed from Silence of the Lamb (nearly 10 years)!  Hannibal, the film, was one of the rare cases of the movie being better than the book.  Then again, that isn't really saying much seeing how bad the book was.

I really liked Red Dragon.  I can't really pinpoint a reason why.  Maybe I just really liked Ralph Fiennes as Dolorhide.  I think this movie suceeded despite Rattner due to some really good actors.

FangsFirst wrote: Darren Russell wrote: The recent Swamp Thing movie, a DC product, was AWFUL! didn't they learn from the mistake that was the 80s movie?  I guess not.

Wasn't that Man-Thing, the Marvel character? (or did I miss something beyond that silliness?)
That said, the Swamp Thing TV show (live action) was quite good and fairly close to being in keeping with... well the Len Wein/Bernie Wrightson Swampy. Alan Moore's wouldn't translate too well.


You're right, it was Man-Thing...and man was that thing awful!! LOL