Cookies on DVDActive
DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is assumed that you agree to this.
 
Leaderboard Extra
Images Removed?

Forums - General Chat - Images Removed? 

Reply 

Message Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.
Not Registered?
Forgotten Details?
Additional Options These options are not required but may be useful.
Existing Posts
Quote: Originally posted by Chris Gould
Nowt wrong with a bit of camel toe.


I understand, thanks for spreading the vibe.
Especially when said camel has a painted on shoe.
Nowt wrong with a bit of camel toe.

Quote: Originally posted by Chris Gould
They weren't animated in the traditional sense. It was just two images showing in sequence, not a bird taking her bra off or owt.

I'm not particularly in favour of the swear filter or the new image rules, but they are apparently necessary to keep the site in the black so what do you do?

Maybe one day I'll wn the lottery, then I could have a naked Asian babe yelling fuck off as my sig Wink

Still your showing the split.  Shame on you.
oh dude, mine showed no t@a. it wouldn't even be considered as erotic.  I've seen more skin on the beach.  I think your going a little extreme in your removals.  Of course my current sig is hopefully approved.  Just a little more strap seen which is purely cosmetic.  Geesh %#=)9*

If she isn't decent, I'll eat Ashl...I mean I'll eat my hat.
Quote: Originally posted by Jonny "Me You"
I try to keep my sig's PG-13. That's why you havent seen any of Monica Bellucci naked, rolling around in water Wink


Dammit Jonny!!! Very Happy

And Chris, fight the power! Love that sig!
They weren't animated in the traditional sense. It was just two images showing in sequence, not a bird taking her bra off or owt.

I'm not particularly in favour of the swear filter or the new image rules, but they are apparently necessary to keep the site in the black so what do you do?

Maybe one day I'll wn the lottery, then I could have a naked Asian babe yelling fuck off as my sig Wink
Maybe I am easily amused, but I think it is funny that we have an admin grumbling about the images.  

Chris, maybe the only thing that was wrong with the previous images was that they were "animated"  Wink
Quote: Originally posted by Jonny "Me You"
I try to keep my sig's PG-13. That's why you havent seen any of Monica Bellucci naked, rolling around in water Wink
I was hoping that sometime a sig like that would come by.Wink
LMAO very funny.
I've found a way to get explicit images onto the site without falling foul of our new Gestapo-esque 'rules'.
Quote: Originally posted by floyd dylan
I suppose having an extreme close up avatar of a woman receiving a double entry would be out of the question then?


Quote: Originally posted by floyd dylan
It is of my grandmother Wink
LOL!

Thanks Floyd, made my day!
I try to keep my sig's PG-13. That's why you havent seen any of Monica Bellucci naked, rolling around in water Wink
Mal
Quote: Originally posted by Danny Boy
Why are you giving us the choice for sigs but with rules to follow? Confused

I do not like defining rules, so there were none before. Any that are added will be kept to a minimum.
It is of my grandmother Wink
Just use good judgment when selecting an image for your signature if you choose to have one. A good rule of thumb for what is meant by 'family friendly' is don't use an image that you wouldn't want your grandmother seeing associated with you.
I suppose having an extreme close up avatar of a woman receiving a double entry would be out of the question then?
- -
Quote: Originally posted by Malcolm Campbell

Only three rules:

- Signatures should be no larger than 400 pixels wide and 200 pixels high
- They should not be animated
- Must be suitable for a family audience
.


Why are you giving us the choice for sigs but with rules to follow? Confused
What does suitable for the family audience mean since most of the pictures I've seen on here don't strike me as "family friendly"!

I guess I am one of the few that wouldn't mind a ban on all images.  I just don't see that they actually add anything to the message boards.
Sounds mighty fair to me. Mine's just in the ball park. Hope those rules stay the same, come DVDActive.
Mal
Just had a bit of a mad signature cull, been planning to do it for a few weeks.

Only three rules:

- Signatures should be no larger than 400 pixels wide and 200 pixels high
- They should not be animated
- Must be suitable for a family audience

The last two were added fairly recently.

It's just a way of preventing the signatures getting too distracting, whilst allowing people to view the website from locations like at work.
Images Removed?
I've noticed that many signatures now have a message from one of you guys, with some new restrictions. Now, I'm not complaining or anything, but perhaps we can get a list of what is approvable now, so we won't get in trouble in the future? Very Happy