88 Minutes (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Sony has now provided us with some Blu-ray artwork for the Al Pacino movie
Title: 88 Minutes (IMDb)
Starring: Al Pacino
Released: 16th September 2008
SRP: $28.96
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced 88 Minutes which stars Al Pacino, Alicia Witt, Amy Brenneman, and Leelee Sobieski. The new suspense thriller will be available to own from the 16th September, and should retail at around $28.96. The film itself will be presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a commentary with Director Jon Avnet, an alternate ending, and 2 featurettes ("Director’s Point of View", "The Character Within"). A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96 with identical features. Artwork is attached:
Quote: Al Pacino stars in this riveting thriller about a forensic psychologist who receives a phone call threatening that he has only 88 minutes to live. As the clock ticks away, tension mounts, suspicions rise and blood flows. With a serial killer he helped convict awaiting execution and a copycat killer on the loose, Jack Gramm has 88 minutes to solve the biggest murder of his career: his own.
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Al Pacino
Released: 16th September 2008
SRP: $28.96
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced 88 Minutes which stars Al Pacino, Alicia Witt, Amy Brenneman, and Leelee Sobieski. The new suspense thriller will be available to own from the 16th September, and should retail at around $28.96. The film itself will be presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a commentary with Director Jon Avnet, an alternate ending, and 2 featurettes ("Director’s Point of View", "The Character Within"). A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96 with identical features. Artwork is attached:
Synopsis
Quote: Al Pacino stars in this riveting thriller about a forensic psychologist who receives a phone call threatening that he has only 88 minutes to live. As the clock ticks away, tension mounts, suspicions rise and blood flows. With a serial killer he helped convict awaiting execution and a copycat killer on the loose, Jack Gramm has 88 minutes to solve the biggest murder of his career: his own.
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisement
porkys2248
Member
Join Date: December 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 157
Pass
Report
Quote
| Reply
Heard this movie was terrible. The extras sound so-so. But I guess an average flick gets average extras. Well bring on the artwork.
What an awful movie! And it's longer than 88 minutes, which, if you ask me, is too long already.
elle_driver wrote: What an awful movie! And it's longer than 88 minutes, which, if you ask me, is too long already.
The thing about that is this: At the moment Al Pacino is first told that he has 88 minutes to live, the remaining running time of the movie (including final credits) is 88 minutes (1 hr. 28 mins.).
Does this help?
The thing about that is this: At the moment Al Pacino is first told that he has 88 minutes to live, the remaining running time of the movie (including final credits) is 88 minutes (1 hr. 28 mins.).
Does this help?
88 minutes of my life I'll never get back.
Why was this so horrible? I watched 1 hour of it through alternative means and it seemed like a decent action thriller. Plus, it has a decent cast with Pacino, William Forsyth, Amy Brenneman, Ben McKenzie, Alicia Witt and Neal McDonough.
Is it regarded as bad because it was shelved for almost 2 1/2 years after it was filmed and released in Europe before the U.S.?
Is it regarded as bad because it was shelved for almost 2 1/2 years after it was filmed and released in Europe before the U.S.?
Thought this one was ok. Might buy it on Blu.
Spoiler This movie was garbage. Leelee was the killer trying to make it look like the "real" killer was out and the killer that Pacino put away is wrongly accused. Pure garbage. Pure chit.
Editor's note: If you're going to post massive spoilers, please use the spoiler tags.
Editor's note: If you're going to post massive spoilers, please use the spoiler tags.
BLUDCRIMSON wrote: This movie was garbage. Pure garbage. Pure chit.
Errrr.... Bit of a spoiler there I thinks!
Errrr.... Bit of a spoiler there I thinks!
Edit: Stop posting spoilers.
THANKS FOR SPOILING THE MOVIE TWICE...
and yeah, i heard this was really bad... and it got really bad reviews... it got an F from EW... so i dont know... but my mom is an AL PACINO fan, so i have to buy it for her... lol
and yeah, i heard this was really bad... and it got really bad reviews... it got an F from EW... so i dont know... but my mom is an AL PACINO fan, so i have to buy it for her... lol
Leelee can kill me by smothering me with those sweater puppies.
Next.....
Same cover has "Art of war 2", sony run out of new ideas for covers.
...The Bourne Pacino?
Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
I was thinking the same thing.
I was thinking the same thing.
88 minutes of your life being wasted if you watch this garbage. And I saw this free on the internet.
roadogg31 wrote: Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
I was thinking the same thing.
I will 3rd that thought. I actually laughed out loud at what a blaintant rip off the cover is from Bourne. Sad... just sad
I was thinking the same thing.
I will 3rd that thought. I actually laughed out loud at what a blaintant rip off the cover is from Bourne. Sad... just sad
Thanks for spoiling it, you a$$ clown. I wish they would kick you off the site for that. Why would even post then ending? WHY?
As for the Bourne Pacino...I 4th that thought.
As for the Bourne Pacino...I 4th that thought.
Bludcrimson, your conduct in this thread and others is edging you very close to a ban.
even though that D-Bag spoiled the ending, I'll still check it out.
Can't be as bad as Gigli........
Can't be as bad as Gigli........
Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
LOL
I didn't see this but can it really bad that bad??. It's Pacino for god's sake. He's NEVER boring to watch imo
LOL
I didn't see this but can it really bad that bad??. It's Pacino for god's sake. He's NEVER boring to watch imo
pretty stupid art work... yeah the bourne pacino... lol
Sony's art department needs to be fired. Seriously.....borrowing from the Bourne artwork??
Mmmaaattt Dammmmmooonnnn!
Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Isn't this a remake of something? The plot sounds very familiar....
Worst Nightmare wrote: Isn't this a remake of something? The plot sounds very familiar....
There me be another movie you're thinking of, but off the top of my head, the plot device (a race against time, filmed in "real time" ) is very similar to Depp's Nick of Time, where he had 90 minutes to assassinate the governor or his daughter dies.
There me be another movie you're thinking of, but off the top of my head, the plot device (a race against time, filmed in "real time" ) is very similar to Depp's Nick of Time, where he had 90 minutes to assassinate the governor or his daughter dies.
YlowBstard66 wrote: Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
RalphFiennes wrote: YlowBstard66 wrote: Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
I saw the first preview screening of Righteous Kill a couple months ago, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that it will be the single biggest disappointment you will ever experience in the theater if you walk in with a glimmer of hope that the Pacino/DeNiro team-up will be worth watching. Cause it was a total waste. Can't vouch for this flick, but if RK is any indication, I'm sure it's absolute garbage.
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
I saw the first preview screening of Righteous Kill a couple months ago, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that it will be the single biggest disappointment you will ever experience in the theater if you walk in with a glimmer of hope that the Pacino/DeNiro team-up will be worth watching. Cause it was a total waste. Can't vouch for this flick, but if RK is any indication, I'm sure it's absolute garbage.
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Unseen Reviews
American Teen
UK - DVD R2
Machine Girl, The
UK - BD RB
Prisoner: Cell Block H - Volume 2
UK - DVD R2
Myth, The
UK - BD RB
Rachel Getting Married
UK - BD
Hot Interviews
Ryan Nicholson
DVD
The Hitcher Team
DVD
Mark Rance
DVD
Lancelot Narayan
DVD
David Prior: Part Two
DVD
Hot Easter Eggs
Spider-Man 2: Special Edition
US - DVD R1
Batman Begins: Special Edition
HK - DVD R3
Terminator 2: Judgment Day
US - DVD R1
Alien
US - DVD R1
Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
US - DVD R1
Most Talked About
Crank 2: High Voltage
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
I Love You, Man
US - DVD R1 | BD
The Wizard of Oz
US - DVD R1 | BD
The Last House on the Left
US - DVD R1 | BD
Bug's Life, A
US - BD
