88 Minutes (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Sony has now provided us with some Blu-ray artwork for the Al Pacino movie
Title: 88 Minutes (IMDb)
Starring: Al Pacino
Released: 16th September 2008
SRP: $28.96
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced 88 Minutes which stars Al Pacino, Alicia Witt, Amy Brenneman, and Leelee Sobieski. The new suspense thriller will be available to own from the 16th September, and should retail at around $28.96. The film itself will be presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a commentary with Director Jon Avnet, an alternate ending, and 2 featurettes ("Director’s Point of View", "The Character Within"). A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96 with identical features. Artwork is attached:
Quote: Al Pacino stars in this riveting thriller about a forensic psychologist who receives a phone call threatening that he has only 88 minutes to live. As the clock ticks away, tension mounts, suspicions rise and blood flows. With a serial killer he helped convict awaiting execution and a copycat killer on the loose, Jack Gramm has 88 minutes to solve the biggest murder of his career: his own.
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Al Pacino
Released: 16th September 2008
SRP: $28.96
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced 88 Minutes which stars Al Pacino, Alicia Witt, Amy Brenneman, and Leelee Sobieski. The new suspense thriller will be available to own from the 16th September, and should retail at around $28.96. The film itself will be presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a commentary with Director Jon Avnet, an alternate ending, and 2 featurettes ("Director’s Point of View", "The Character Within"). A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96 with identical features. Artwork is attached:
Synopsis
Quote: Al Pacino stars in this riveting thriller about a forensic psychologist who receives a phone call threatening that he has only 88 minutes to live. As the clock ticks away, tension mounts, suspicions rise and blood flows. With a serial killer he helped convict awaiting execution and a copycat killer on the loose, Jack Gramm has 88 minutes to solve the biggest murder of his career: his own.
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisement
Existing Posts
The retard is actually talking about himself in the third person now. LOL! LostCity, you are Bludcrimson you t**t.
Bludcrimson was actually funny. Thanks for saving me some money. No need to ban the guy though. Maybe he didnt know how to put up the SPOILER banner.
Nice job flexing your power with the whole BAN chit though.
Oh and if he or she got banned shouldnt Thommy long who typed right after about someone killing someone? Sounds like the same spoiler ending to me.
Nice job flexing your power with the whole BAN chit though.
Oh and if he or she got banned shouldnt Thommy long who typed right after about someone killing someone? Sounds like the same spoiler ending to me.
RalphFiennes wrote: Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
i must agree with u... and i can list a bunch of worse films than this, and i have not seen it yet...
but this could not be worse than...
10,000 B.C.
SHUTTER
FOOL'S GOLD
HOW SHE MOVE
IN THE NAME OF THE KING
MAMA's BOY
ONE MISSED CALL
THE SIGNAL
and i could list more...
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
i must agree with u... and i can list a bunch of worse films than this, and i have not seen it yet...
but this could not be worse than...
10,000 B.C.
SHUTTER
FOOL'S GOLD
HOW SHE MOVE
IN THE NAME OF THE KING
MAMA's BOY
ONE MISSED CALL
THE SIGNAL
and i could list more...
RalphFiennes wrote: YlowBstard66 wrote: Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
I saw the first preview screening of Righteous Kill a couple months ago, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that it will be the single biggest disappointment you will ever experience in the theater if you walk in with a glimmer of hope that the Pacino/DeNiro team-up will be worth watching. Cause it was a total waste. Can't vouch for this flick, but if RK is any indication, I'm sure it's absolute garbage.
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
I saw the first preview screening of Righteous Kill a couple months ago, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that it will be the single biggest disappointment you will ever experience in the theater if you walk in with a glimmer of hope that the Pacino/DeNiro team-up will be worth watching. Cause it was a total waste. Can't vouch for this flick, but if RK is any indication, I'm sure it's absolute garbage.
YlowBstard66 wrote: Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
Cracks me up when people say that. Almost as much as "the best/worst movie ever."
Here's a few titles for the sake of perspective:
The Hottie and the Nottie.
Superhero Movie.
Prom Night
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins
The mere presence of Al Pacino probably elevates this above those dregs. I say probably as I haven't seen it yet, but I think we agree that to call this the worst of the year is clearly an exaggeration. Mediocre possibly, which for Pacino is a criminal waste, but I highly doubt it's the worst thing committed to the big screen this year.
Worst Nightmare wrote: Isn't this a remake of something? The plot sounds very familiar....
There me be another movie you're thinking of, but off the top of my head, the plot device (a race against time, filmed in "real time" ) is very similar to Depp's Nick of Time, where he had 90 minutes to assassinate the governor or his daughter dies.
There me be another movie you're thinking of, but off the top of my head, the plot device (a race against time, filmed in "real time" ) is very similar to Depp's Nick of Time, where he had 90 minutes to assassinate the governor or his daughter dies.
Isn't this a remake of something? The plot sounds very familiar....
Lol, That's such a rip-off of the Bourne Supremecy cover. This is probably the worst film of the year, and the reason for which I am no longer anticipating Righteous Kill *cough JON AVNET cough*
Mmmaaattt Dammmmmooonnnn!
Sony's art department needs to be fired. Seriously.....borrowing from the Bourne artwork??
pretty stupid art work... yeah the bourne pacino... lol
Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
LOL
I didn't see this but can it really bad that bad??. It's Pacino for god's sake. He's NEVER boring to watch imo
LOL
I didn't see this but can it really bad that bad??. It's Pacino for god's sake. He's NEVER boring to watch imo
even though that D-Bag spoiled the ending, I'll still check it out.
Can't be as bad as Gigli........
Can't be as bad as Gigli........
Bludcrimson, your conduct in this thread and others is edging you very close to a ban.
Thanks for spoiling it, you a$$ clown. I wish they would kick you off the site for that. Why would even post then ending? WHY?
As for the Bourne Pacino...I 4th that thought.
As for the Bourne Pacino...I 4th that thought.
roadogg31 wrote: Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
I was thinking the same thing.
I will 3rd that thought. I actually laughed out loud at what a blaintant rip off the cover is from Bourne. Sad... just sad
I was thinking the same thing.
I will 3rd that thought. I actually laughed out loud at what a blaintant rip off the cover is from Bourne. Sad... just sad
88 minutes of your life being wasted if you watch this garbage. And I saw this free on the internet.
Invader Bugs wrote: ...The Bourne Pacino?
I was thinking the same thing.
I was thinking the same thing.
...The Bourne Pacino?
Same cover has "Art of war 2", sony run out of new ideas for covers.
Next.....
Leelee can kill me by smothering me with those sweater puppies.
THANKS FOR SPOILING THE MOVIE TWICE...
and yeah, i heard this was really bad... and it got really bad reviews... it got an F from EW... so i dont know... but my mom is an AL PACINO fan, so i have to buy it for her... lol
and yeah, i heard this was really bad... and it got really bad reviews... it got an F from EW... so i dont know... but my mom is an AL PACINO fan, so i have to buy it for her... lol
Edit: Stop posting spoilers.
BLUDCRIMSON wrote: This movie was garbage. Pure garbage. Pure chit.
Errrr.... Bit of a spoiler there I thinks!
Errrr.... Bit of a spoiler there I thinks!
Spoiler This movie was garbage. Leelee was the killer trying to make it look like the "real" killer was out and the killer that Pacino put away is wrongly accused. Pure garbage. Pure chit.
Editor's note: If you're going to post massive spoilers, please use the spoiler tags.
Editor's note: If you're going to post massive spoilers, please use the spoiler tags.
Thought this one was ok. Might buy it on Blu.
Why was this so horrible? I watched 1 hour of it through alternative means and it seemed like a decent action thriller. Plus, it has a decent cast with Pacino, William Forsyth, Amy Brenneman, Ben McKenzie, Alicia Witt and Neal McDonough.
Is it regarded as bad because it was shelved for almost 2 1/2 years after it was filmed and released in Europe before the U.S.?
Is it regarded as bad because it was shelved for almost 2 1/2 years after it was filmed and released in Europe before the U.S.?
88 minutes of my life I'll never get back.
elle_driver wrote: What an awful movie! And it's longer than 88 minutes, which, if you ask me, is too long already.
The thing about that is this: At the moment Al Pacino is first told that he has 88 minutes to live, the remaining running time of the movie (including final credits) is 88 minutes (1 hr. 28 mins.).
Does this help?
The thing about that is this: At the moment Al Pacino is first told that he has 88 minutes to live, the remaining running time of the movie (including final credits) is 88 minutes (1 hr. 28 mins.).
Does this help?
What an awful movie! And it's longer than 88 minutes, which, if you ask me, is too long already.
Heard this movie was terrible. The extras sound so-so. But I guess an average flick gets average extras. Well bring on the artwork.
Pass
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Articles
Star Wars: The Changes - Part One
DVD
'tis the season... DVD Advent Calendar
DVD
Star Wars: The Changes - Part Three
DVD
The Martians Are Coming!
DVD
Star Wars: The Changes - Part Two
DVD
Hot Interviews
Ryan Nicholson
DVD
Dave Filoni Interview
DVD | HD | BD
The Hitcher Team
DVD
David Prior: Part One
DVD
Ricky Gervais Part One
DVD
New Easter Eggs
Moon
UK - BD
Star Wars: The Clone Wars - The Complete Season One
UK - BD
X-Men Trilogy
UK - BD
WALL-E
UK - BD RB
Futurama: Bender's Game
UK - DVD R2 | BD RA/B
Most Talked About
District 9
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Jennifer's Body
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Inglourious Basterds
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Halloween II
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Paranormal Activity
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
