yeah they already announced a bigger multi disc edition will come out this november. i assume that'll also have both 2D and 3D versions and it'll probably be the first movie to take advantage of 3D tvs. so no more red/blue glasses...woo. lol

i'll just wait til november cuz i'm a sucker for extras. but i dont care about 3D, while neat to see it added nothing so 2D is enough.

I don't really plan on buying a 3D TV. I might get this by using a part of a 60 dollar gift card I got off my rewards points at Best Buy. The movie overall was just okay.

Not one of the best movies ever, but a damn good one at that. Day 1 purchase

great movie!  Although it ripped off a of a few movies, I enjoyed this movie a lot.  Not as good as The Hurt Locker or Inglourious Basterds, but it was still great.  I'm not buying into this 3d gimmick.  I won't buy into this whole 3D blu-ray mess until they have the technology where I don't have to wear $100 glasses to watch the film ontop of the expensive 3D TV and 3D Blu-ray Player.  Plus they'll probably charge $40 for the actual 3D blu-ray disks.  Rip OFF!

Will rent this version.

Um, yeah, I'll wait til hell gets iced before I buy the tenth anniversary Jake Sully Parapelegic 3-D multi disc N'avi edition to AVATAR.
The  multi-disc blu-ray will sit in its own wheel chair & will give off a Pandora glow when the sun goes down. 20th Century Fox is going to re-release this so many times over the next ten years, I get sick just thinking about it.

BBF1983 wrote: Enjoyed the movie. Special effects amazed me. HOWEVER, the story/plot was extremely unoriginal. It was almost an EXACT copy of Dances with Wolves.

Except for the fact that Dances With Wolves was essentially a retelling of Pocahontas during the Civil War. Everyone seems to forget this fact.

Actually, if I were to say it ripped off anything it would be "A Princess of Mars". Much more similar given the genre and cultural aspects. I feel bad for Andrew Stanton who has his direct adaptation gearing up.

Regardless, I loved the flick for what it was and thought the story was more than decent enough to give some palpable emotional support to the insane effects. It should be pretty easy to hold off until December, so as long as it's widely known that there's going to be a double dip, I really just don't see a problem with it.

I didn't like this beyond the visual effects. It's okay, but hardly a great film. Although, I did like the 'Creating the World of Pandora' feature, that was really interesting.

One of 2009's best films, so I will buy the DVD without hesitation, it's worth every penny even if they release 3 different versions later.

Since it is more-or-less confirmed that there will be more editions released down the line, I don't think they are being unfair. Remember, Cameron needs to get that couple of hundred million bucks that Avatar lost because of Alice in Wonderland!

I didn't much care for the movie. I saw the best possible presentation - Imax 3D. I don't think I will buy this. It is a technical achievement, but on the whole it is far from satisfactory. And I've just made the transition to HD, so I definately will not be upgrading to 3D soon. And Avatar is almost nothing if not 3D!

I'm a sucker, so I'll most likely end up buying all three Blus. I just really want this movie in my collection. :p

If it means anything, I'm hearing that the PlayStation3 will be upgradable to 3D Blu-ray with just a firmware update. So that just leaves upgrading the TV for some.

MBJ,

"As if we haven't been waiting enough"?  Really?  A December to April wait is considered a long wait now?  ESPECIALLY for the most successful film of all time?  Titanic wasn't available on home video until September of the following year.  December 'til September.  I'm actually surprised Avatar will be available so quickly.  But, considering it has zero extras and the 3-D version will likely still be playing, it's not so crazy.

sad to see this but when it comes down to it i want the movie, i only watch the extras once, bought the 3 disc of 2012 and for what??  
i will get the movie in april  pass on november but might get the 3d next year when it comes out  i am just curious  how the single disc is suppose to be a super bit,  i thought that is why blu ray is?? and with all the space on the disc left, i am curious to find out how better they can make the movie on blu ray making it a super bit disc,  i still think that the studio heads are just saying that to make a excuse for a bare bones disc,
but to put out not one but three different releases in the next 2 years is just plain wrong,  specially in the economy the way it is, to take advantage of the customers like that, that bad boy  disc in april better come to be a damm steel book!!! at least and no price of 24 or 25 dollars barebones should be 19.99 for bluray

Not buying this. I think I'm the only person on the planet who didn't like this film. It was enjoyable, but not as great as some are making it out to be. Big disappointment for me.

*Yawn*
Saw it in IMAX 3d, no home video version will ever come close. The movie was bad anyway.