Drive Angry (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Summit Entertainment will release the new Nicolas Cage movie May 31st
Title: Drive Angry (IMDb)
Starring: Nicolas Cage
Released: 31st May 2011
SRP: $26.99 (DVD)
Further Details:
Summit Entertainment has announced DVD ($26.99), 2D Blu-ray ($30.49), and 3D Blu-ray ($34.99) releases of Drive Angry for May 31st. Extras on the DVD will include an audio commentary with filmmakers Patrick Lussier and Todd Farmer, deleted scenes with filmmaker commentary, and 2 featurettes ("How To: Drive Angry", "Milton's Mayhem"). The Blu-ray releases will include the audio commentary and deleted scenes, plus dynamic "scene specific" features including interviews with cast and filmmakers and more. We've attached a trade advertisement with some early package artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Nicolas Cage
Released: 31st May 2011
SRP: $26.99 (DVD)
Further Details:
Summit Entertainment has announced DVD ($26.99), 2D Blu-ray ($30.49), and 3D Blu-ray ($34.99) releases of Drive Angry for May 31st. Extras on the DVD will include an audio commentary with filmmakers Patrick Lussier and Todd Farmer, deleted scenes with filmmaker commentary, and 2 featurettes ("How To: Drive Angry", "Milton's Mayhem"). The Blu-ray releases will include the audio commentary and deleted scenes, plus dynamic "scene specific" features including interviews with cast and filmmakers and more. We've attached a trade advertisement with some early package artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
nicolas cage has finally found the roles that he needs to stick with. this is his best action role in years with the lovely amber heard who gives a great supporting performance along side the talented william fitchner. entertaining over the top action from start to finsh involving high speed car chases & shootouts which is y im def going own this one esp again nic cage.
Simon77 wrote: I wanted to see it in theaters, but the manager pulled the movie out after only five days... will probably rent it at best.
Who can smell the title for the DTV sequel? "Drive Angry 2: Drive Angrier", or unless they want to go the other way: "Drive Happy" and turn it in a comedy starring Seann William Scott...
Errr. I can't STAND DTV sequels!!! They are so awful.
Who can smell the title for the DTV sequel? "Drive Angry 2: Drive Angrier", or unless they want to go the other way: "Drive Happy" and turn it in a comedy starring Seann William Scott...
Errr. I can't STAND DTV sequels!!! They are so awful.
Campy Nic Cage is always good fun....
I wanted to see it in theaters, but the manager pulled the movie out after only five days... will probably rent it at best.
Who can smell the title for the DTV sequel? "Drive Angry 2: Drive Angrier", or unless they want to go the other way: "Drive Happy" and turn it in a comedy starring Seann William Scott...
Who can smell the title for the DTV sequel? "Drive Angry 2: Drive Angrier", or unless they want to go the other way: "Drive Happy" and turn it in a comedy starring Seann William Scott...
C'Mon Nicolas Cage. Enough c**py movies...if you have one more c**py movie to give us, give us NATIONAL TREASURE 3.
I'll probably blind buy this.
I'm quite an apologetic for Nicolas Cage. When he is right for a role, you can't get any better. Even when he's terrible I find him enormously entertaining. And Fichtner is awesome.
I'm quite an apologetic for Nicolas Cage. When he is right for a role, you can't get any better. Even when he's terrible I find him enormously entertaining. And Fichtner is awesome.
Matt Thompson wrote: My source is the writer of the film, who also acts in it. And I've heard from multiple people that it came in a shade under $20 million total.
That's a good source, but considering this IS the internet where every lunatic (no offense) can spout whatever he/she wants I'm still gonna go ahead and agree with Wikipedia/IMDb.
That's a good source, but considering this IS the internet where every lunatic (no offense) can spout whatever he/she wants I'm still gonna go ahead and agree with Wikipedia/IMDb.
jan_tran wrote: Matt Thompson wrote: Its budget wasn't near $50 million. Less than half that.
Although both Wikipedia and IMDb aren't the most reliable of sources these days both of them report a estimated budget of $45-50 million, so unless you got a stronger source that claims different I'm gonna go ahead and agree with them.
My source is the writer of the film, who also acts in it. And I've heard from multiple people that it came in a shade under $20 million total.
Although both Wikipedia and IMDb aren't the most reliable of sources these days both of them report a estimated budget of $45-50 million, so unless you got a stronger source that claims different I'm gonna go ahead and agree with them.
My source is the writer of the film, who also acts in it. And I've heard from multiple people that it came in a shade under $20 million total.
LOL yeh we were getting carried away with the quoting huh? They make it so easy on this site
Quoting is art.
horrorfan25 wrote: matt86 wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: matt86 wrote: I loved piranha and machete and usually most movies like this but this one sucked bad. It had the right idea but was never as fun or over the top as it should have been. The action scenes are poorly directed. I also liked shoot em up a lot but this one just missed the mark and the 3d was wasted
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
Yeh I guess I worded it wrong but I like movies that can sometimes make the most of their R rating. True Paul wasn't as tounge in cheek but I see what u mean. I recall tropic thunder and pineapple express, both really earned their R ratings but IMO better results. I just meant Paul as a similar case of a movie made by peop,e given enough freedom to make the movie they want but not living up to it's potential
I wouldn't necessarily categorize "Paul" with the other films. "Paul" is a funny movie that doesn't intend to be bad. It intends to be good. The others were so bad they were great!
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
Yeh I guess I worded it wrong but I like movies that can sometimes make the most of their R rating. True Paul wasn't as tounge in cheek but I see what u mean. I recall tropic thunder and pineapple express, both really earned their R ratings but IMO better results. I just meant Paul as a similar case of a movie made by peop,e given enough freedom to make the movie they want but not living up to it's potential
I wouldn't necessarily categorize "Paul" with the other films. "Paul" is a funny movie that doesn't intend to be bad. It intends to be good. The others were so bad they were great!
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
matt86 wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: matt86 wrote: I loved piranha and machete and usually most movies like this but this one sucked bad. It had the right idea but was never as fun or over the top as it should have been. The action scenes are poorly directed. I also liked shoot em up a lot but this one just missed the mark and the 3d was wasted
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
I wouldn't necessarily categorize "Paul" with the other films. "Paul" is a funny movie that doesn't intend to be bad. It intends to be good. The others were so bad they were great!
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
I wouldn't necessarily categorize "Paul" with the other films. "Paul" is a funny movie that doesn't intend to be bad. It intends to be good. The others were so bad they were great!
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
The film looks terrible. Really like the artwork though, UK artwork is even better.
horrorfan25 wrote: matt86 wrote: I loved piranha and machete and usually most movies like this but this one sucked bad. It had the right idea but was never as fun or over the top as it should have been. The action scenes are poorly directed. I also liked shoot em up a lot but this one just missed the mark and the 3d was wasted
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
Yeh an just like the movie Paul this weekend, I really wanted to like this but it just never let itself go and be crazy dumb fun.
I love they're using the theater poster art
matt86 wrote: I loved piranha and machete and usually most movies like this but this one sucked bad. It had the right idea but was never as fun or over the top as it should have been. The action scenes are poorly directed. I also liked shoot em up a lot but this one just missed the mark and the 3d was wasted
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
While I liked the movie, I can see how you think. "Piranha" and "Machete" had so many money shots, while "Drive Angry" had like one or two.
Matt Thompson wrote: Its budget wasn't near $50 million. Less than half that.
Although both Wikipedia and IMDb aren't the most reliable of sources these days both of them report a estimated budget of $45-50 million, so unless you got a stronger source that claims different I'm gonna go ahead and agree with them.
Although both Wikipedia and IMDb aren't the most reliable of sources these days both of them report a estimated budget of $45-50 million, so unless you got a stronger source that claims different I'm gonna go ahead and agree with them.
I loved piranha and machete and usually most movies like this but this one sucked bad. It had the right idea but was never as fun or over the top as it should have been. The action scenes are poorly directed. I also liked shoot em up a lot but this one just missed the mark and the 3d was wasted
jan_tran wrote: Matt Clipp wrote: I love the fact that the promo proudly states "$12 million in domestic box office".
My first thoughts exactly, they omitted the lovely fact it had a $50 million budget.
Its budget wasn't near $50 million. Less than half that.
My first thoughts exactly, they omitted the lovely fact it had a $50 million budget.
Its budget wasn't near $50 million. Less than half that.
i actually enjoyed this movie. it's a fun, silly action/horror-lite movie. Cage was actually decent in this (much to my surprised. i don't know why i just can't get into him). Amber Heard was great as was baddie Billy Burke. William Fichtner was awesome and the best thing in the movie (naturally. he's superb). and 2D was just fine with this. sorry but 3D is overrated and should be over with.
I wish Amber Heard liked men.
I agree with everyone else. Such a fun movie. Here's what I'd call a fun movie marathon:
#1- GRINDHOUSE (Blu-ray) Vivendi Entertainment edition
#2- MACHETE (Blu-ray)
#3- DRIVE ANGRY (3D Blu-ray)
#4- PIRANHA (3D Blu-ray)
Considering I have #1, #2, and #4, I might as well buy this one.
#1- GRINDHOUSE (Blu-ray) Vivendi Entertainment edition
#2- MACHETE (Blu-ray)
#3- DRIVE ANGRY (3D Blu-ray)
#4- PIRANHA (3D Blu-ray)
Considering I have #1, #2, and #4, I might as well buy this one.
Saw it twice in theaters. SUCH A FUN MOVIE! It's completely nuts. Will be getting the 3D Blu.
Saw it 3 times, it's just a fun great film, a must buy to me, 2D of course, but even then.
Matt Clipp wrote: I love the fact that the promo proudly states "$12 million in domestic box office".
My first thoughts exactly, they omitted the lovely fact it had a $50 million budget.
My first thoughts exactly, they omitted the lovely fact it had a $50 million budget.
i really wanted to see this, but missed it since it didnt last long. cant wait to check it out.
I love the fact that the promo proudly states "$12 million in domestic box office". What an accomplishment! But in all honesty, I really wanted to go see this movie but my local theater took it away before I got the chance to (probably due to that small $12 million gross). I'm definitely going to check it out on DVD.
Even though this is really bad, it was one hell of an entertaining flick. Where else can you see Nicolas Cage drinking out of a skull? May rent this.
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Interviews
Doug Naylor
DVD
Sheldon Hall
DVD
Bruce Boxleitner Interview: Area 51
DVD | BD
Jo Brand
DVD
David Prior: Part One
DVD
Unseen Reviews
Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka
UK - DVD R2
Stuff, The
UK - BD RB
Feminist Horror Double Feature
US - BD RA
Blue Ruin
US - BD RA
Sweet Smell of Success
UK - DVD R2
Horrific Reviews
Night of the Livng Dead
UK - BD RB
Cabin Fever: Unrated Director's Cut
US - BD
Vineyard, The
UK - DVD R2
Land of the Dead: Director's Cut
UK - DVD R2
Feast
UK - DVD R2
Most Talked About
The Fault in Our Stars
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Godzilla
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Disney Animation
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
WB October 2/3/4 Film Collections
US - BD RA
Draft Day
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
