There's also a TON of amazing fan posters out there.

How cool would something like this be for a blu-ray cover.

I really want to strangle everyone with nail-spiked gloves that decides to use atrocious photoshopped garbage like this for the cover of the bd/dvd instead of one of the posters used for the theatrical release which is always 9999x better.

Yeah also why the hell did they change the font to that generic one?  The 80s-style font is one of the most distinctive aspects of the poster and the opening credits.  I swear the idiots that make the decisions for the cover art for the home release are from the bizarro planet.

http://a4.idata.over-blog.com/300x400/4/04/95/1...

Ok that poster does use the font that is on this updated cover but still, it doesn't mean it's the better one and has to be used for the home release, ugh.

I will rent this after waiting a extra 28 days after the release at Netflix

Obviously the people that made this movie have no control over the cover art, that is horrendous! Pete Hammond has zero credibility why replace a New York Times quote...even Pete Travers (Rolling Stone) would be better, he just called it his favourite film of the year.

I never seen this film, but I made my dad see it and he said it was one of the worst films he has ever seen. He said that the main charcter hardly said anything in the movie and that there wasn't even that much driving. Me, on the other hand, really want to watch this movie. Ryan Gosling is one of the best actors of our generation and I agree with almost everything that movie critic Peter Travers says. Maybe I'll rent. The artwork is terrible.

Wow, worst cover art ever for one of the years best...lame!

I never thought I'd be saying this about a movie's artwork but... where is the hot pink!?!? So many great posters for this movie and that photoshopped mess is what they're going for. Yikes.

And I don't care about digital copies that much, but ultraviolet is terrible.

No I'm not saying its pretentious because its artsy.  It's pretentious because people are making it out to be this unbelievably incredible film when it its not that original.  The film was very dull in my point of view and way too unrealistic.  Ryan Gosling wasn't that great.  He was definitely good and carried the film nicely but not Oscar-worthy.  The soundtrack is effing amazing!  That deserves the Oscar.

I wish the title was in hot pink like on most of the posters and promo material.

goavs9601 wrote: All I said is that its artsy.  I have no problem with films being artsy.  I was just warning people who didn't know.  But the film is still pretty pretentious.

Why is it that when a film is artsy it's automatically labeled pretentious?

One of the best films of the year for sure. I LOVED it. Ryan Gosling is AMAZING and deserves an Oscar nomination for his performance. This deserves several nominations, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Supporting Actress (Carey Mulligan). Can't wait to buy it.

And I agree with everyone on the soundtrack. It's fantastic. The film isn't for everyone though. WOM among mainstream viewers who expected an action film was toxic. I've been trying to prepare my friends who want to see it for what kind of film it actually is because I know they'll hate it otherwise. They were expecting an action film from the ads and title.

djblack1313 wrote: I LOVE THIS MOVIE!!! i've seen it 4 times and i love it each and every time. i also worhsip the soundtrack (Night Call & A Real Hero being my fave songs!). this, HANNAH and ATTACK THE BLOCK were my favorites of the year.  

I haven't seen ATTACK THE BLOCK yet but DRIVE and HANNA are two of my very favorites this year too, along with 50/50 and BRIDESMAIDS.

btw the screener online is a tad different in places than the theatrical cut. nothing major but it's different.

This was the best movie of the year so far, It's a definite first day BD pick for sure. It's been hard to top....

one of my favorite movies of the year

like most everyone else...i loved this movie too.  and the soundtrack...totally awesome!!!

slapshot63 wrote: And the "Drive" part of it doesn't just mean driving, its metaphorical about the drive that people have to accomplish things.
I choose to look at the title as synonymous with "purpose", which the protagonist finds in his simple relationship with Irene and Benicio.

Great movie. Probably nitpicking here, but could have done without the overkill elevator scene

Love this movie, one of the best of the year. The reason its slower at the start is so it can develop its characters so that when the action does come we care. I recomend everyone to see it but I question the replay value. It's well worth seeing at least once

I love this movie. It has an excess of nuance and a vibe that I found completely irresistible. Managed to see it 5 times in theaters and I'll still pick up the Blu-ray on day one. Hopefully the cover art keeps that pink cursive straight out of an 80's teen magazine.

Liked it, but incredibly overrated.  Prob won't buy it unless it's like 10-15 bucks one day.