E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Universal Studios Home Entertainment has announced Anniversary Editions
Universal Studios Home Entertainment has announced DVD and Blu-ray Anniversary releases of E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial for October this year. The only extra material on the DVD release will be deleted scenes, and 3 features ("Steven Spielberg & E.T.", "A Look Back", "The E.T. Reunion"). The Blu-ray release will also include the following additional featurettes ("The E.T. Journals", "The Evolution and Creation of E.T.", "The Music of E.T.: A Discussion with John Williams", "The 20th Anniversary Premiere"), a Designs, Photographs and Marketing section ("E.T. Designs by Production Illustrator Ed Verreaux", "E.T. Designs by Carlo Rambaldi", "Spaceship Designs by Ralph McQuarrie", "Designs by Production Illustrator Ed Verreaux", "Production Photographs", "Marketing E.T."), the original theatrical trailer, a Special Olympics TV spot, and a digital copy of the film.

News by Tom Woodward

News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
This release still doesn't have the alternate ending that the ginormous laserdisc box set has. Really glad I'm holding onto that. But the picture quality on the Blu-Ray is just effing STELLAR. Definitely happy with it.
EDIT: The only thing I miss about the 20th Anniversary Edition was the live orchestra track and the crowd noises from the 2002 gala premiere. Totally worth putting up with the mindless PC alterations to hear that lovely score recreated live.
EDIT: The only thing I miss about the 20th Anniversary Edition was the live orchestra track and the crowd noises from the 2002 gala premiere. Totally worth putting up with the mindless PC alterations to hear that lovely score recreated live.
I loved E.T. as a kid. I remember when I first watched it and how I enjoyed it. I even love the 20th anniversary edition that came out in 2002. Definitely first day purchase for me.
Spielberg didn't misinterpret anything
@thedaz - Spielberg didn't misinterpret anything from the fans, it was HIS choice not to include the 2002 version of the film because he regrets ever making it....he felt that it took away from the magic of the original version (something that I wish he could pass on to Lucas), as well as taking away from the time period that it was filmed in, by having all those terrible special effects added. I understand that it is nice to include ALL the versions.....and I wouldn't be opposed to have all of them....but I'm just glad that Spielberg recognizes that adding updated special effects doesn't necessarily make the film better. So, in this case, I'm not bother that he's only including the original because it the FAR SUPERIOR version of the film.
SIDE NOTE: Spielberg actually said that he wasn't interested in including it in this release when he was being interviewed at one of the conventions (dont remember which one).
TAKE NOTE GEORGE LUCAS!!!
SIDE NOTE: Spielberg actually said that he wasn't interested in including it in this release when he was being interviewed at one of the conventions (dont remember which one).
TAKE NOTE GEORGE LUCAS!!!
The only reason that I'd want the 2002 version is for the live performance of the score that they did at the premiere. And I'm really glad that solar system tour garbage from the last release isn't on the blu.
I wish they'd include harrison fords deleted scene and any others we havent seen. The documentary before showed the filming of it and portions of it but i want to see the actual scene itself. I also hope theres a neat booklet or some form of insert. Thats something dvds stopped doing long ago and i always missed that.
A very thoughtful underlining of our point, Primogen18.
Britain had been living with terrorist acts in our country for decades, and the knee-jerk reaction at the mere mention of such things had long-since past. For America, such a concept was pretty much a new thing, so overreaction and hypersensitivity was understandable.
Still, it's good to see that the original version of ET is being released on Blu!
The Wilson Bros
Britain had been living with terrorist acts in our country for decades, and the knee-jerk reaction at the mere mention of such things had long-since past. For America, such a concept was pretty much a new thing, so overreaction and hypersensitivity was understandable.
Still, it's good to see that the original version of ET is being released on Blu!
The Wilson Bros
Wilson Bros wrote: The most grossly offensive change made for the 20th anniversary edition was switching the line "you're not going as a terrorist!" to the idiotic "you're not going as a hippie!", which seems to suggest that it was more socially acceptable to go out in fancy dress as a terrorist than as a peaceful flower-child.
It was almost certainly altered because it was only about a year since September 11th 2001, and the mere mention of the word "terrorist" caused knee-jerk reactions.
The Wilson Bros
It wasn't buildings collapsing that the terrorists actually wanted, it's Americans to bend to their will and be afraid of anything mentioning anything about buildings, guns, explosions, etc. They got exactly what they wanted which was America as a whole suddenly becoming ultra-sensative to every little thing enough to feel the need to make changes in classic films. Suddenly everyone gave a c**p when they never did before and I was so glad when people got over it. It's also why posters from a local metal band were ripped down from my college campus by faculty after 9/11 because there happen to be a picture of a gun on the cd art.
I am happy they forgot about the 2002 version. Subtle FX changes aside, the other changes were just a testament of needless and fear-induced censorship.
It was almost certainly altered because it was only about a year since September 11th 2001, and the mere mention of the word "terrorist" caused knee-jerk reactions.
The Wilson Bros
It wasn't buildings collapsing that the terrorists actually wanted, it's Americans to bend to their will and be afraid of anything mentioning anything about buildings, guns, explosions, etc. They got exactly what they wanted which was America as a whole suddenly becoming ultra-sensative to every little thing enough to feel the need to make changes in classic films. Suddenly everyone gave a c**p when they never did before and I was so glad when people got over it. It's also why posters from a local metal band were ripped down from my college campus by faculty after 9/11 because there happen to be a picture of a gun on the cd art.
I am happy they forgot about the 2002 version. Subtle FX changes aside, the other changes were just a testament of needless and fear-induced censorship.
Never got the 2002 DVD release, which I regretted for a while, but have been waiting for a Blu Ray, I'll be getting this first day no question.
Bouncy X wrote: can't believe it just clicked now but.....a digital copy AND ultra violet? wasn't ultra violet created to replace the digital ones so there wouldnt be an extra disc that would be rendered useless once the expiration hits months or a year later?The ultimate goal of Ultraviolet is to get all the studios under one digital copy umbrella, but it needs a lot of work. I imagine including both kinds of digital copies is a way to quell the massive backlash from consumers. Just try and read the Amazon reviews for the US version of Deathly Hallows Part 2.
The most grossly offensive change made for the 20th anniversary edition was switching the line "you're not going as a terrorist!" to the idiotic "you're not going as a hippie!", which seems to suggest that it was more socially acceptable to go out in fancy dress as a terrorist than as a peaceful flower-child.
It was almost certainly altered because it was only about a year since September 11th 2001, and the mere mention of the word "terrorist" caused knee-jerk reactions.
The Wilson Bros
It was almost certainly altered because it was only about a year since September 11th 2001, and the mere mention of the word "terrorist" caused knee-jerk reactions.
The Wilson Bros
Actually last year Spielberg had a public press conference about this release as he wanted to ask the fans directly if they wanted the 2002 version released on blu-ray with the original version (as he admitted some of the alterations were wrong and were loathed, i.e. the walkie talkies). The fans unaminously told him face to face that they DID NOT want the 2002 version. So Spielberg gave the fans what they wanted.....poor guy can't win sometimes!
can't believe it just clicked now but.....a digital copy AND ultra violet? wasn't ultra violet created to replace the digital ones so there wouldnt be an extra disc that would be rendered useless once the expiration hits months or a year later?
I wonder if the live orchestral score option will be included on this one...
So can you buy this version which is what A lot of the effects were updated (subtly) like spaceship the flying, E.T. running, his facial movements were enhanced and there was an extra scene of Elliot giving him a bath.
7958NHZY wrote: Kind of pointless to make it a Blu-ray/DVD combo since I bought the original DVD release in 2002
all blu-ray/dvd combos are pointless in my eyes. what's next, are they gonna offer music cd combos with a cassette? i guess i wouldnt mind as much if they didnt charge more but alas they always do around here.
all blu-ray/dvd combos are pointless in my eyes. what's next, are they gonna offer music cd combos with a cassette? i guess i wouldnt mind as much if they didnt charge more but alas they always do around here.
7958NHZY wrote: Kind of pointless to make it a Blu-ray/DVD combo since I bought the original DVD release in 2002
Yes, because you are everyone...
Yes, because you are everyone...
Kind of pointless to make it a Blu-ray/DVD combo since I bought the original DVD release in 2002
I suspect you're in the minority here...
I never saw the updated version of the film - even when I purchased the DVD release which had both in it.
The idea of a CGI "E.T." running around or in the bath or whatever just offended me. Then there was the removal of the FBI guns in the escape scene where they made the FBI hold walkie-talkies instead...
No. Don't want the CGI update.
At a recent Academy event, Spielberg asked an audience of nearly 3000 if they cared if they got the 2002 cut. He only saw a single hand.
Kinda said it all. I'm sorry if you feel attached to the 2002 cut, but at least you'll have the DVD which your Blu player will upconvert. As for myself and most of my friends... it'll never be seen.
thedaz wrote: This is starting to look like the 2002 version won't be included. This may sound odd, but that has me feeling a little worried.
I totally get all the Lucas movie-tinkering backlash, but this is going too far the other way.
I wonder if Spielberg has misheard the fans on this one. I think most would appreciate having both the 1982 and 2002 versions on Blu-ray.
I think Ridley Scott totally gets it. Blade Runner is the perfect example. I love having ALL the versions in HD. It adds to the overall appreciation of the movie.
I saw E.T. in the cinema when I was 12 and then again when I was 32. Both releases have meaning for me. There are things about the updated version I quite like and have become attached to.
I'd be seriously bummed not to have the option to enjoy both the 1982 and 2002 versions.
If this doesn't have the 2002 version but DOES have Digital Copy and Ultraviolet (both useless IMO), I'd be very disappointed.
At least the cover is pure perfection. It couldn't be better.
The idea of a CGI "E.T." running around or in the bath or whatever just offended me. Then there was the removal of the FBI guns in the escape scene where they made the FBI hold walkie-talkies instead...
No. Don't want the CGI update.
At a recent Academy event, Spielberg asked an audience of nearly 3000 if they cared if they got the 2002 cut. He only saw a single hand.
Kinda said it all. I'm sorry if you feel attached to the 2002 cut, but at least you'll have the DVD which your Blu player will upconvert. As for myself and most of my friends... it'll never be seen.
thedaz wrote: This is starting to look like the 2002 version won't be included. This may sound odd, but that has me feeling a little worried.
I totally get all the Lucas movie-tinkering backlash, but this is going too far the other way.
I wonder if Spielberg has misheard the fans on this one. I think most would appreciate having both the 1982 and 2002 versions on Blu-ray.
I think Ridley Scott totally gets it. Blade Runner is the perfect example. I love having ALL the versions in HD. It adds to the overall appreciation of the movie.
I saw E.T. in the cinema when I was 12 and then again when I was 32. Both releases have meaning for me. There are things about the updated version I quite like and have become attached to.
I'd be seriously bummed not to have the option to enjoy both the 1982 and 2002 versions.
If this doesn't have the 2002 version but DOES have Digital Copy and Ultraviolet (both useless IMO), I'd be very disappointed.
At least the cover is pure perfection. It couldn't be better.
Although I still believe that the Go-Motion effects were (and still) a little dated, I'm getting a copy of the movie on Blu-ray with no questions asked.
Fingers crossed that Universal doesn't wipe out every ounce of detail with DNR give the image an obnoxious orange tint like they did with The Big Lebowski...of course they will, their only decent catalog releases are Psycho and To Kill a Mockingbird, but still. Let's hope.
My favourite movie of all-time! 
As for the 2002 version, I don't mind it but I didn't like the removal of the guns and I always thought the bath scene was cute but ET's facial expressions were slightly off. He seemed to go from slightly docile to a little peppy just for that scene.

As for the 2002 version, I don't mind it but I didn't like the removal of the guns and I always thought the bath scene was cute but ET's facial expressions were slightly off. He seemed to go from slightly docile to a little peppy just for that scene.
not too surprised the 2002 edition isnt there but at least they have ported over all the extras from that release. so this just means i'll ditch the dvd copy and replace it with the dvd of the 2002 version. 
i never got the whole hoopla over that one, the enhancements to ET himself look great and makes him even more lifelike. and as for the walkie talkie issue, there are such small scenes that its not even noticeable unless you've seen the movie a bazillion times. i recently watched the 2002 version and i wasnt even sure where the guns belonged because the only two scenes that made sense for it were so short they zipped by.
but anyway, both versions were available back then so b***hing was pointless. and it looks like its only the original this time so there ya go. people can breathe again. lol

i never got the whole hoopla over that one, the enhancements to ET himself look great and makes him even more lifelike. and as for the walkie talkie issue, there are such small scenes that its not even noticeable unless you've seen the movie a bazillion times. i recently watched the 2002 version and i wasnt even sure where the guns belonged because the only two scenes that made sense for it were so short they zipped by.
but anyway, both versions were available back then so b***hing was pointless. and it looks like its only the original this time so there ya go. people can breathe again. lol
Nightmare wrote: What is the difference between the 1982 and 2002 versions I'd really like to know please
People told you already, but if you want it more specifically (from IMDb Alternate Versions entry):
Quote: A special 20th Anniversary edition (with a digitally remixed soundtrack, additional footage and computer-generated enhancements to existingscenes) was released in March 2002. It included the following include the following changes:
a new, CGI-enhanced scene showing E.T. and Elliot taking a bath together. The scene was originally sc**pped because Spielberg thought the animatronic effects weren't up to par;
for the "E.T. phone home" dialogue scenes, CGI has been used to make E.T.'s lips movement match the words more closely;
a longer version of the Halloween sequence;
in the original release, the government agents pursuing E.T. and Elliot had weapons in their hands; the new edition digitally replaces them with walkie-talkies/
changes in dialogue: Elliot's mother's prohibition to go trick-or-treating dressed as "a terrorist" has been changed to "a hippie"
People told you already, but if you want it more specifically (from IMDb Alternate Versions entry):
Quote: A special 20th Anniversary edition (with a digitally remixed soundtrack, additional footage and computer-generated enhancements to existingscenes) was released in March 2002. It included the following include the following changes:
a new, CGI-enhanced scene showing E.T. and Elliot taking a bath together. The scene was originally sc**pped because Spielberg thought the animatronic effects weren't up to par;
for the "E.T. phone home" dialogue scenes, CGI has been used to make E.T.'s lips movement match the words more closely;
a longer version of the Halloween sequence;
in the original release, the government agents pursuing E.T. and Elliot had weapons in their hands; the new edition digitally replaces them with walkie-talkies/
changes in dialogue: Elliot's mother's prohibition to go trick-or-treating dressed as "a terrorist" has been changed to "a hippie"
I hated the CG ET myself...
thedaz wrote: A lot of the effects were updated (subtly) like spaceship the flying, E.T. running, his facial movements were enhanced and there was an extra scene of Elliot giving him a bath.
Guns were also digitally replaced with walkie talkies, which always bugged me. In principle, I like the idea of both versions being on the release, but I know I would never touch the 2002 version.
Guns were also digitally replaced with walkie talkies, which always bugged me. In principle, I like the idea of both versions being on the release, but I know I would never touch the 2002 version.
When he first announced this release at some convention or another, Spielberg asked the assembled masses if anyone would miss the 2002 version of the film if it wasn't included. The answer was a resounding no, hence its omission.
It's been a while since I've watched it, so I'll do my best.
A lot of the effects were updated (subtly) like spaceship the flying, E.T. running, his facial movements were enhanced and there was an extra scene of Elliot giving him a bath.
A lot of the effects were updated (subtly) like spaceship the flying, E.T. running, his facial movements were enhanced and there was an extra scene of Elliot giving him a bath.
What is the difference between the 1982 and 2002 versions I'd really like to know please
This is starting to look like the 2002 version won't be included. This may sound odd, but that has me feeling a little worried.
I totally get all the Lucas movie-tinkering backlash, but this is going too far the other way.
I wonder if Spielberg has misheard the fans on this one. I think most would appreciate having both the 1982 and 2002 versions on Blu-ray.
I think Ridley Scott totally gets it. Blade Runner is the perfect example. I love having ALL the versions in HD. It adds to the overall appreciation of the movie.
I saw E.T. in the cinema when I was 12 and then again when I was 32. Both releases have meaning for me. There are things about the updated version I quite like and have become attached to.
I'd be seriously bummed not to have the option to enjoy both the 1982 and 2002 versions.
If this doesn't have the 2002 version but DOES have Digital Copy and Ultraviolet (both useless IMO), I'd be very disappointed.
At least the cover is pure perfection. It couldn't be better.
I totally get all the Lucas movie-tinkering backlash, but this is going too far the other way.
I wonder if Spielberg has misheard the fans on this one. I think most would appreciate having both the 1982 and 2002 versions on Blu-ray.
I think Ridley Scott totally gets it. Blade Runner is the perfect example. I love having ALL the versions in HD. It adds to the overall appreciation of the movie.
I saw E.T. in the cinema when I was 12 and then again when I was 32. Both releases have meaning for me. There are things about the updated version I quite like and have become attached to.
I'd be seriously bummed not to have the option to enjoy both the 1982 and 2002 versions.
If this doesn't have the 2002 version but DOES have Digital Copy and Ultraviolet (both useless IMO), I'd be very disappointed.
At least the cover is pure perfection. It couldn't be better.
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Articles





Award Winning





New Editorials





Most Talked About




