As it's also being re-released in standard 2D version I don't really see why people are getting upset that they are also releasing a 3D version. Surely this is good. It's all about choice. Neither side of the 2D vs 3D argument should be excluded.

Seriously not done with 3D yet huh? I just hope it dies soon. I'd take new ideas of the same old thing. Jurassic park was awesome in 93 but that time has passed. It had its moment.

Saw the trailer for this at a showing of Hansel and Gretel. No kidding, right after that the preview for the Top Gun 3D re-release came up. of course I knew of both already but it was hilarious to see the reaction of those previews back to back. Get used to this though, 3D re-releases are definitely not going anywhere for a while and there are several more movies in the pipeline for them as of now.

I don't know why they'd do a new scan. They just did one two years ago for the previous set.

Chris Gould wrote: It doesn't need a 2D re-release unless they've done a new scan - it's already available in a boxed set for peanuts. This was released in 1993; it was never meant to be 3D and all these post-conversion titles are just devaluing an already disappointing technology.
Could not have said it better Chris
They should be concentrating on releasing Treasures of the Four Crowns instead of converting these