Knight & Day (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
We've updated our news item with the revised artwork as well as disc specs
Title: Knight & Day (IMDb)
Starring: Tom Cruise
Released: 30th November 2010
SRP: $29.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has announced 1-disc DVD ($29.98) and 3-disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($39.99) releases of Knight & Day for November 30th. Extras on the DVD will include a Wilder Knights and Crazier Days featurette, Knight and “Someday” featuring the Black Eyed Peas and Tom Cruise, 2 viral videos ("Soccer", "Kick"), and the theatrical trailer. The Blu-ray release will include all of that, plus additional featurettes ("Knight and Day: Story", "Knight and Day: Scope"), BD-Live features, and a digital copy.
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Tom Cruise
Released: 30th November 2010
SRP: $29.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has announced 1-disc DVD ($29.98) and 3-disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($39.99) releases of Knight & Day for November 30th. Extras on the DVD will include a Wilder Knights and Crazier Days featurette, Knight and “Someday” featuring the Black Eyed Peas and Tom Cruise, 2 viral videos ("Soccer", "Kick"), and the theatrical trailer. The Blu-ray release will include all of that, plus additional featurettes ("Knight and Day: Story", "Knight and Day: Scope"), BD-Live features, and a digital copy.
Revised Artwork
Original Artwork
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Pixarfan517
Member
Join Date: August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,474
Rent.
Report
Quote
| Reply
Yeah rental for sure. Love the cover.
HATED this movie. Had some of the laziest writing that I've ever seen in a movie. I don't want to spoil anything but one device that they use multiple times in the movie when they have no idea how the protagonists will get out of the situation that they put them in really made me angry.
Really? I thought that device was a pretty funny and clever idea since it's a Bond movie told from the Bond girl's perspective. It made sense in the story (and was most likely used to keep the budget down).
I really disliked this film too, but that is some sweet cover art, I must say. Kudos to Fox if they actually stick with it.
VideoETA is showing completely different (and better) cover art. Just throwing that out there. But anyway, I really enjoyed this movie and saw it twice in theaters. It was a perfect combination of action and comedy.
I avoided this. Looked really stupid to me.
Trailers looked fun but I heard otherwise. Will probably redbox it.
Absolutely loved this movie ... it was a really fun movie in a sea of ho-hum (outside of Inception) movies this past summer.
Never seen the movie, but in any case: What's this? An actually good DVD cover? My God, it's a miracle!
What a terrible mess of a movie. The plot device already mentioned is extremely lazy and if it was used to keep the budget down, that's still not a good excuse since this is a big Hollywood movie that should have the budget to deliver what it promises. It doesn't help that neither of the leads can act anymore based on their performance in this film.
I quite liked this to be honest. I mean there were some obvious flaws but it was a decent action comedy to say the least. If it came on TV I would probably watch it again. I certainly enjoyed it a hell of a lot more than The A-Team. But Salt was better than both of them, in my opinion. Can't wait to pick that one up.
This was such a fantastic film. I'm surprised by the comments here. And that plot device, it's not lazy. It's funny. Learn the difference. It's such a shame the film didn't do better. 8/10
It's wank. Learn the difference.
It was actually a well-directed film...but about 10 years too late. Tom still trying to act like he's in his 20s is really starting to reek of star vanity.
Just announce Shrek Forever After now.
Pixarfan517 wrote: Just announce Shrek Forever After now.
..... Wish I was an admin.
..... Wish I was an admin.
Original artwork was better, although on the plain side.
Jeez u guys were right, they did change the artwork. The problem is its about making money b/c the first cover would have been vague i guess. At least in the studios eyes
Original artwork was way better artistically, but you had to know it would go away. People may recognize the artwork and associate with the Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz movie, but in 5 years (when no one remembers this forgettable flick), they would see the artwork that doesn't show stars, and would have no clue. Fox's only options would be to change the artwork now, or re-do the artwork later, which means more $$$ spent.
Hedkickboy wrote: Original artwork was way better artistically, but you had to know it would go away. People may recognize the artwork and associate with the Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz movie, but in 5 years (when no one remembers this forgettable flick), they would see the artwork that doesn't show stars, and would have no clue. Fox's only options would be to change the artwork now, or re-do the artwork later, which means more $$$ spent.
A lot of people actually complained that the original poster didn't have the face of the two stars because it could be a huge selling point.
A lot of people actually complained that the original poster didn't have the face of the two stars because it could be a huge selling point.
You are absolutely right. A lot of people blamed this visual (and the lack of images of the stars) for the films poor box office.
Another reason you just knew they would switch the artwork.
Another reason you just knew they would switch the artwork.
Quick note:
UK and Europe are getting an Extended Cut, but it seems like the US is not based on this info.
UK and Europe are getting an Extended Cut, but it seems like the US is not based on this info.
Wow. F@#$ that new artwork.
Original art work was so much better. Plus the US isnt even getting the Extended Cut 
Revised Artwork are almost always worst than the original...
I like the revised artwork better - Not as stylish as the original, but you need the stars to be featured somewhere on the cover. I agree with the idea that no star photos would be part to blame for B.O. failure.
And no US Extended Cut? I smell a double dip.
And no US Extended Cut? I smell a double dip.
Was pushed into seeing this a second time, but I didn't complain. It was a fun film, Tom Cruise was great as always.
I like the original cover art better.
Revised Artwork sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Interviews
Craig Smith
DVD
Bruce Boxleitner Interview: Area 51
DVD | BD
Sheldon Hall
DVD
David Prior: Part Two
DVD
Doug Naylor
DVD
Hot News
Disney Animation Blu-rays
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Prince of Darkness
US - BD RA
ABC TV
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
The Lovely Bones
US - DVD R1 | BD
Criterion August Releases
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Released Soon
Trouble with the Curve
UK - DVD R2
My Ex 2: Haunted Lover
UK - DVD R2
Django Unchained
UK - DVD R2 | BD RB
Gone in 60 Seconds
UK - BD RB
Beautiful Creatures
US - DVD R1 | BD
Most Talked About
More Scream Factory News
US - BD RA
Texas Chainsaw (2013, 2D)
US - BD RA
Spring Breakers
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Host, The
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Universal Steelbooks
US - BD RA
