Lions for Lambs (US - DVD R1)
Fox sends over details on a new film directed by and starring Robert Redford
Title: Lions for Lambs (IMDb)
Starring: Robert Redford
Released: 8th April 2008
SRP: $29.98
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has officially announced Lions for Lambs which stars Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise. This new thriller will be available to own from the 8th April, and should retail at around $29.98. The film itself will be presented in anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include an audio commentary by director Robert Redford, a “The Making Of Lions For Lambs” featurette, a “Script To Screen” featurette, a “United Artists Legacy” featurette, and the theatrical teaser and trailer. We've attached our first look at the package artwork below:

News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Robert Redford
Released: 8th April 2008
SRP: $29.98
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has officially announced Lions for Lambs which stars Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise. This new thriller will be available to own from the 8th April, and should retail at around $29.98. The film itself will be presented in anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include an audio commentary by director Robert Redford, a “The Making Of Lions For Lambs” featurette, a “Script To Screen” featurette, a “United Artists Legacy” featurette, and the theatrical teaser and trailer. We've attached our first look at the package artwork below:

News by Tom Woodward
Advertisement
I've been thinking about getting some prescription sleeping medication...maybe this will be cheaper than a visit to the doctor and a pharmacist.
LOL....so mean.....
I have no interest in this either.
I have no interest in this either.
^^agreed
Well at least for once on a DVD cover, the names matched with the positions of the actors..
I might be the one of the few who actully enjoyed this one. But i'm a sucker for anything having to do with politics or the middle east.
When will the Hollywood liberal elite realize that most Americans are not interested in seeing these anti-American films?
This isn't gonna turn into another political argument is it...
At least the Floating heads have part of a body and as mentioned earlier, the names are lined up too. Too bad I won't be wasting my 90min on this piece of anti-American garbage.
How do you know this film is garbage if you aren't willing to give it the time? I had no interest to see it either, until my English professor gave extra credit for those who saw it and wrote a paper on how they felt about it. I was surprised to find it very engaging, well-written, and to the point. It's definitely not for everyone, but that doesn't make it a bad film. I won't be buying it, but I recommend at least one watch.
Although I agreed with most of the arguments made in this movie, watching it, I still felt like I was being smacked over the head with its ideals. This movie made almost no attempt to try and organize its arguments in at least a semi enganing, cinematic way.
And that college kid really pissed me off!
And that college kid really pissed me off!
Is this anti-American though?
Surely not seeing as it's in Afghanistan.
After all;
America, Britain and OTHERS are there under a U.N. mandate.
It was a known terrorist planning, training and staging area.
We are there WITH Afghan troops fighting perhaps the most repugnant, oppressive, backwards, murderous, sadistic, intolerant, own people murdering regime in the world.
Quite frankly if you're against America or anyone being in Afghanistan (which is completely different from the con-job farce of Iraq) for any kind of 'moral' or ideological reasons then you have to look deep inside yourself and wonder why.
Unless you approve of terrorist bases, women being kept prisoner in their own homes, converts being executed and teachers being beheaded in front of their female students.
Anyone actually seen it?
Surely not seeing as it's in Afghanistan.
After all;
America, Britain and OTHERS are there under a U.N. mandate.
It was a known terrorist planning, training and staging area.
We are there WITH Afghan troops fighting perhaps the most repugnant, oppressive, backwards, murderous, sadistic, intolerant, own people murdering regime in the world.
Quite frankly if you're against America or anyone being in Afghanistan (which is completely different from the con-job farce of Iraq) for any kind of 'moral' or ideological reasons then you have to look deep inside yourself and wonder why.
Unless you approve of terrorist bases, women being kept prisoner in their own homes, converts being executed and teachers being beheaded in front of their female students.
Anyone actually seen it?
I think Tom Cruise is extremely pathetic. And I don't plan to follow his movies.
I heard this sucked...probably wont even waste my time with it.
That background may not have been a good choice as it sort of matches the behavior of Redfords flesh. Wish Cruise was wearing his Scientology Medallion of Freedom thingy on this cover.
(FYI, names have to follow billing and/or contracts, that's why the names don't always correspond to the art below them... and frankly, the art shouldn't have to.)
(FYI, names have to follow billing and/or contracts, that's why the names don't always correspond to the art below them... and frankly, the art shouldn't have to.)
Ugh I hate that cover. And this movie was about an hour too long.
I like that cover, despite the fact that Robert Redford looks like an old woman.
Lincoln6Echo wrote: When will the Hollywood liberal elite realize that most Americans are not interested in seeing these anti-American films?
Please,please,please stop getting it twisted. Anti-American?What dream world are you living in? Most of these films are made because some Americans simply cannot stand what the country has become, are sick of sugar coated lies found on TV Broadcast News Stations and politicians that lie bluntly on huge issues. The whole "you are either with us or against the country" attitude is destroying America.
I am sick of movies about the present state of things too and passed on this one. Even though Redford is a great actor and director.The cover would have looked better without the talking heads on top.
Please,please,please stop getting it twisted. Anti-American?What dream world are you living in? Most of these films are made because some Americans simply cannot stand what the country has become, are sick of sugar coated lies found on TV Broadcast News Stations and politicians that lie bluntly on huge issues. The whole "you are either with us or against the country" attitude is destroying America.
I am sick of movies about the present state of things too and passed on this one. Even though Redford is a great actor and director.The cover would have looked better without the talking heads on top.
The most disappointing Oscar-hyped movie this year!
And that cover looks a lot like Hollywoodland's.
And that cover looks a lot like Hollywoodland's.
I love how badly this bombed.
I liked the film, although it needed some restructuring (the subplot concerning Robert Redford's character, the slacker student and the two Iraq soldiers could've been better written or done away with entirely). Basically, what made the whole movie was the subplot with Cruise and Streep's characters was just riveting... Cruise just nails the part of a slick, corrupt politician perfectly. The movie would've been terrific had the entire film been centered around those two. But the other actors were wasted, such as a shame, as even Redford himself was underutilized.
As for the DVD, I'll wait for a price reduction and then get it.
As for the DVD, I'll wait for a price reduction and then get it.
Taylor wrote: I love how badly this bombed. 
Amen, brother, amen
Amen, brother, amen
As someone in the military and who went with people in the military and actualy served in the Middle East a couple of tours, I feel the movie had an excellent message. Not sure how many of the negative comments are from "armchair patriots". If your an armchair patriot then yes the movie would have offended you.
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
ill probly have to buy this movie whenever i find it cheap because eventhough this movie expectedly bombed I still find it hard to beleive Tom Cruise and Robert Redford together along with Meryl Streep can be bad so ill have to find out the hard way and see for my self i guess
Lincoln6Echo wrote: When will the Hollywood liberal elite realize that most Americans are not interested in seeing these anti-American films?
Americans, Americans, Americans - there are other nations too, you know, or do you ? And those just might have dvd players aswell - ever heard that kind or rumour, back in the ignoraceville - you seem to live in ?
Americans, Americans, Americans - there are other nations too, you know, or do you ? And those just might have dvd players aswell - ever heard that kind or rumour, back in the ignoraceville - you seem to live in ?
The cover looks ok, but I thought the poster was better. And haven't seen this one yet.
carlvjack wrote: As someone in the military and who went with people in the military and actualy served in the Middle East a couple of tours, I feel the movie had an excellent message. Not sure how many of the negative comments are from "armchair patriots". If your an armchair patriot then yes the movie would have offended you.
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
Then I refer you to my post above concerning Afghanistan specifically.
Answers would be nice.
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
Then I refer you to my post above concerning Afghanistan specifically.
Answers would be nice.
nefilim wrote: Lincoln6Echo wrote: When will the Hollywood liberal elite realize that most Americans are not interested in seeing these anti-American films?
Americans, Americans, Americans - there are other nations too, you know, or do you ? And those just might have dvd players aswell - ever heard that kind or rumour, back in the ignoraceville - you seem to live in ?
Thats kind of an ignorant statement there.You are stereotyping all of us. If you think we are all fat, uneducated ,only eat fast food, enjoy war, ignore the existence of other countries...etc. You sir are wrong. About half the country did not vote for Shrubya and wanted no war, remember that. America is very diverse like most countries.
I'm not standing on a pedestal so please do me a favor and get off yours. If you are directing that comment directly at Lincoln6Echo, then my bad. Can we get back to talking about movies now?
Americans, Americans, Americans - there are other nations too, you know, or do you ? And those just might have dvd players aswell - ever heard that kind or rumour, back in the ignoraceville - you seem to live in ?
Thats kind of an ignorant statement there.You are stereotyping all of us. If you think we are all fat, uneducated ,only eat fast food, enjoy war, ignore the existence of other countries...etc. You sir are wrong. About half the country did not vote for Shrubya and wanted no war, remember that. America is very diverse like most countries.
I'm not standing on a pedestal so please do me a favor and get off yours. If you are directing that comment directly at Lincoln6Echo, then my bad. Can we get back to talking about movies now?
Dave Brock wrote: carlvjack wrote: As someone in the military and who went with people in the military and actualy served in the Middle East a couple of tours, I feel the movie had an excellent message. Not sure how many of the negative comments are from "armchair patriots". If your an armchair patriot then yes the movie would have offended you.
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
Then I refer you to my post above concerning Afghanistan specifically.
Answers would be nice.
That is what confused me about the movie and I felt the writers and director kind of messed up with the direction of the film. They were talking about how the media fell for the big push for the Iraq war but instead focused on some soldiers going to Afghanistan.
What I "think" the director was trying to do but did not emphasize enough was how much attention was focused on Iraq and the government lost focus on Afghanistan.
Tom Cruise hit the nail on the head about where our country's focus though when he said that Afghanistan will always be a third world country at best but Iraq has potential.
I was reminded from the college class scene how many people love to watch the war on Fox News and try to be macho via proxy but very few will actually serve to make a real point as to why they believe the way they believe.
I agree the best part of the movie was Tom Cruise's character
Then I refer you to my post above concerning Afghanistan specifically.
Answers would be nice.
That is what confused me about the movie and I felt the writers and director kind of messed up with the direction of the film. They were talking about how the media fell for the big push for the Iraq war but instead focused on some soldiers going to Afghanistan.
What I "think" the director was trying to do but did not emphasize enough was how much attention was focused on Iraq and the government lost focus on Afghanistan.
Tom Cruise hit the nail on the head about where our country's focus though when he said that Afghanistan will always be a third world country at best but Iraq has potential.
Sam Spade wrote: I'm not standing on a pedestal so please do me a favor and get off yours. If you are directing that comment directly at Lincoln6Echo then my bad. I am ... Sam Spade wrote: Can we get back to talking about movies now? ... my pleasure.





Quote: Robert Redford, Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep deliver “three knockout performances” (Vue Weekly) in this powerful, provocative thriller that explores the consequences of taking a stand. An idealistic professor (Redford) in California attempts to inspire a student to do more with his life, while a charismatic Senator (Cruise) in Washington D.C. pitches a new Middle East war strategy to a probing TV journalist (Streep). And halfway across the world, two of the professor’s former students are trapped behind enemy lines in Afghanistan, fighting for freedom—and their very lives. As the tension mounts and the bullets fly, these Americans will change each other’s lives and the world in ways they never could have imagined.