Talk about a movie that had quite a potential, but the trailer messed it up entirely. Plus, where I live, the french title completely blew it for the intended "suspense", shall we say... plus, the features for this edition make it a day-one pass for me.

I just noticed that Summit's releases never contain much features, unless the title is Twilight. Two features for this movie? Come on, Blu-Ray has almost unlimited space compared to DVD, and they don't take any advantage whatsoever of this medium. Hell, bring back VHS, I say.

I actually saw this at the theater. Started out OK but became very ridiculous as it went on and the ending resolution was a joke. Very dissapointing.

Wow, I know stuff comes out quickly nowadays but still, this was lightning fast.

No need to even bother with this one, its very dumb and shoulda stuck with its basic premise which was good enough. Whats up with the trailer needing commentary? I swear there are some odd choices these days and by banks of all people???

Wow, is this a joke advertisement? 19mil box office is a travesty, especially for a movie with such a wide release. I heard this sucked, so I passed in theaters, and will be passing up the DVD. Got awful reviews too.

What does that mean "Trailer with commentary by Elizabeth Banks" ???

That would be pretty sad if Summit could only get Banks to do a commentary track on a 2 1/2 minute trailer.

This was one of those 'should-I-watch-or-should-I-not-watch' movies. I didn't see this film, but on the case of being original and fresh, I've never heard a story like this before. Maybe I'll rent. The artwork is terrible by the way.

Jeyl wrote: Apologies to Sam Worthington, but he does nothing for me. Even in Avatar I couldn't find myself to care for him no matter how enduring he tried to be. I think that's the main reason I didn't want to see this film.

Yeah. Like, of course, he's crazy stupid-ass hot, but he's still not much of an actor.

So this is a movie starring Sam Worthington, am I right? Because, you know, I can't tell for sure from the cover...

;-D

7958NHZY wrote: The original artwork was better

Why did they change it?

Because it was better, of course. ;-D

I will probably rent it even though I have read bad reviews on this one.  The cover art is pretty bad and boring

From regular moviegoers I've heard good things. And judging from the B+ CinemaScore I'd say most enjoyed it. It really didn't help it out at the Box Office opening against The Grey. Most males opted for that. Anyway, it looks like an entertaining flick for a rental. I thought Worthington was really good in The Debt.

Simon77 wrote: Come on, Blu-Ray has almost unlimited space compared to DVD, and they don't take any advantage whatsoever of this medium. Hell, bring back VHS, I say.

I would rather have a bare-bones Blu-ray disc than the awful quality of a VHS any day. Personally I rarely watch the special features anyway. If I do it has to be for a film I really love and even then I don't always. I'm more interested in the movie itself. I still do think it's cool when they include a lot of special features though in case I might want to watch them .