Saw Trilogy (UK - DVD R2)
We also have specs and artwork for the Lionsgate release of this horror trilogy...
Title: Saw Trilogy (IMDb: 1, 2, 3)
Starring: Tobin Bell
Released: 26th February 2007
SRP: £34.99
Further Details:
Lionsgate Home Entertainment has announced the release of the Saw Trilogy for the 26th of February, priced at around £34.99. Full specs for the release can be found below, along with the artwork.
Saw Uncut
Saw II
Saw III
News by Chris Gould
Starring: Tobin Bell
Released: 26th February 2007
SRP: £34.99
Further Details:
Lionsgate Home Entertainment has announced the release of the Saw Trilogy for the 26th of February, priced at around £34.99. Full specs for the release can be found below, along with the artwork.
Saw Uncut
- Music Video by Fear Factory: 'Bite The Hand That Bleeds'
- Unrated Version of the Music Video
- Making of the Music Video
- 'Sawed Off': Mini Featurette
Saw II
- Feature Length Director and Actor Commentary
- Jigsaw’s Game
- The Head Trap
- The Needle Pit
- The Hand Trap
- The Furnace
- Storyboard Comparisons
Saw III
- The Traps of Saw III
- The Details of Death: The Props of Saw III
- Darren’s Diary: Anatomy of a Director
- Three Commentaries Including Director, Writer and Producers
- Deleted Scenes and More
News by Chris Gould
Advertisements
The only one that is any decent is "Saw III", the rest are horrible.
Steven Carrier wrote: The only one that is any decent is "Saw III", the rest are horrible.
I disagree. Saw 2 was enjoyable, escapist and moved along at a good pace. Saw 3 was boring, boring, boring. There's only so much you can do with four characters. There was no twist, and if that ending was supposed to be a twist, then the writers need help. The photography and the style felt like a parody of the first two Saw films. Everything was so dark that I could barely pick out details. The brain surgery scene was neither shocking or gross, as it was just a medical procedure. The rib-cage ripper was cartoonish and uninteresting. Gah! Saw 3 was one of the most disappointing films I've EVER seen. I can't compute how annoyed I was with the film. And if anybody tries to tell me that there was subtext, I'm going to have an Ultimate Showdown of Destiny on your ass.
I disagree. Saw 2 was enjoyable, escapist and moved along at a good pace. Saw 3 was boring, boring, boring. There's only so much you can do with four characters. There was no twist, and if that ending was supposed to be a twist, then the writers need help. The photography and the style felt like a parody of the first two Saw films. Everything was so dark that I could barely pick out details. The brain surgery scene was neither shocking or gross, as it was just a medical procedure. The rib-cage ripper was cartoonish and uninteresting. Gah! Saw 3 was one of the most disappointing films I've EVER seen. I can't compute how annoyed I was with the film. And if anybody tries to tell me that there was subtext, I'm going to have an Ultimate Showdown of Destiny on your ass.
neither of the sequels had a 'twist'; they were both utterly predictable.
The second one was predictable, but I liked it anyway. The third one ties together nicely, but while it's not predictable I don't think it was a huge surprise. Of the various reveals in Saw III I liked the last one most. The best part of the movie, however, was the first seven or so minutes, the pre-credit sequence, which almost made me jump up and down in the theater. Squirm-tastic!
Chris Gould wrote: neither of the sequels had a 'twist'; they were both utterly predictable...amen to that.
nice package!!!
i hope the make it for R1
i hope the make it for R1
Nice package, but where's the commentary on Saw 1? Frankly, Saw 1 is my favorite, due to the likeable characters, Saw 2 was terrible, and I have yet to see Saw 3 (though I will).
The first one was great, the second was medciocrity personified, and I haven't seen the third yet.
£ukasz D wrote: Chris Gould wrote: neither of the sequels had a 'twist'; they were both utterly predictable...amen to that.
SPOILERS!
Spoiler So you guessed about how the kid was in the safe the whole time at the end of Saw II? Right...
END SPOILERs!
SPOILERS!
Spoiler So you guessed about how the kid was in the safe the whole time at the end of Saw II? Right...
END SPOILERs!
Trilogy? If it were only stopping in the third installment. Why not a SAW 8th-drilogy. LOL seriously.
SAW series are already a joke.
SAW series are already a joke.
As usual, the UK gets all the cool stuff.
I can't really see the point in this other than the studio trying to squeeze more money out of people - we know there is a 4th movie coming and most people if they wanted any of these would have them by now....
Quote: SPOILERS!
There are spoiler tags you know. Anyway, that wasn't the twist. The twist was that Spoiler Jigsaw's previous victim was now his protégé.
There are spoiler tags you know. Anyway, that wasn't the twist. The twist was that Spoiler Jigsaw's previous victim was now his protégé.
But there's a fourth one on the way? Does that mean a quadrilogy will be out next year?
The Missus dragged one of us to see Saw III at the cinema, with the preparation of screening the first two in advance. The makers of the Saw movies do like nicking the odd thing from Dario Argento, don't they? (specifically, the use of a creepy puppet ala Deep Red and the bullet-through-the-spyhole gag from Opera).
Images from Don't Go In The House must have stayed with them when they saw it, as the freezing-room sequence from Saw III had strikingly similar visuals, albeit using the polar opposite in climate.
The thing that bugged the most about Saw III was that it negated the entire premise of the movies, in that the poor schmucks who are targeted for the lessons actually learn nothing through them, as the fates of those from the previous films are revealed to be erring on the dead side of things. With the predicable "choice" at the end of Saw III and even the outcome of Jigsaw's protege, it means that none of the main players learned anything at all.
There is speculation that the fourth movie is a prequel, and it might be that with nowhere else to go with it, they are trying to undo some of the damage Saw III has done to the reputation of the series. OK, there are those who say that it "raises the series to a level which makes the trilogy a fully-rounded, cohesive story", but just linking disparate events to other characters is not that ingenious.
It's not c**p, but it does the others (especially the first movie) an injustice.
Images from Don't Go In The House must have stayed with them when they saw it, as the freezing-room sequence from Saw III had strikingly similar visuals, albeit using the polar opposite in climate.
The thing that bugged the most about Saw III was that it negated the entire premise of the movies, in that the poor schmucks who are targeted for the lessons actually learn nothing through them, as the fates of those from the previous films are revealed to be erring on the dead side of things. With the predicable "choice" at the end of Saw III and even the outcome of Jigsaw's protege, it means that none of the main players learned anything at all.
There is speculation that the fourth movie is a prequel, and it might be that with nowhere else to go with it, they are trying to undo some of the damage Saw III has done to the reputation of the series. OK, there are those who say that it "raises the series to a level which makes the trilogy a fully-rounded, cohesive story", but just linking disparate events to other characters is not that ingenious.
It's not c**p, but it does the others (especially the first movie) an injustice.
With a 4th one on the way, you know an anthology package is on the way...
i nedd download this movie
cool packaging. i hope R1 dvd has the same artwork.
Terrible movies, just terrible. Any movie that uses gore for gore's sake is terrible. You want a good thriller that treats its audience like intelligent individuals then see Se7en.
Kaya Savas wrote: Terrible movies, just terrible. Any movie that uses gore for gore's sake is terrible. You want a good thriller that treats its audience like intelligent individuals then see Se7en.
In terms of serial killer movies like Saw, the only ones necessary are, in order:
Manhunter,
Silence of The Lambs,
and Seven.
Everything has been said with those movies. They are the final word. Let's move on with our lives.
In terms of serial killer movies like Saw, the only ones necessary are, in order:
Manhunter,
Silence of The Lambs,
and Seven.
Everything has been said with those movies. They are the final word. Let's move on with our lives.
hey just found out there is a saw 2 director cut of saw 2 any new on this???????
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Easter Eggs
Faculty, The
AU - DVD R4
Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King - Special Extended Edition, The
US - DVD R1
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
DVD
Mexican, The
US - DVD R1
Charlie's Angels 2: Full Throttle
UK - DVD R2
Hot Interviews
Rick Dean
DVD
David Prior: Part Two
DVD
Andrew Ellard
DVD
The Hitcher Team
DVD
Ricky Gervais Part Two
DVD
Award Winning
Ross Noble: Randomist
UK - DVD R2
Bernie
US - BD RA
Blade Runner: The Final Cut
UK - HD
Thousand Words, A
US - BD RA
Death Race: Unrated
US - BD
Most Talked About
Friday the 13th: The Complete Collection
US - BD RA
Evil Dead (2013)
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Warner Bros Horror Titles
US - BD RA
Walking Dead: Season 3, The
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Disney June Animation 2-Packs
US - BD RA
Though it is only a repackage of all 3..
I'll wait for the POSSIBLE R1 trilogy giftset they will release just before SAW IV