Scream 4 (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
We now have a list of special features and cover artwork for this horror sequel
Title: Scream 4 (IMDb)
Starring: Neve Campbell
Released: 4th October 2011
SRP: $29.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Anchor Bay and The Weinstein Company have announced DVD ($29.98) and Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($39.99) releases of Scream 4 for October 4th. Both products are likely to feature: a making-of, an alternative opening, an extended ending, deleted/extended scenes and a gag reel. Cover artwork, as well as the trade advertisement are included below; there is also a trailer.





News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Neve Campbell
Released: 4th October 2011
SRP: $29.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Anchor Bay and The Weinstein Company have announced DVD ($29.98) and Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($39.99) releases of Scream 4 for October 4th. Both products are likely to feature: a making-of, an alternative opening, an extended ending, deleted/extended scenes and a gag reel. Cover artwork, as well as the trade advertisement are included below; there is also a trailer.





News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Matt Clipp
Member
Join Date: July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 193
Hate the cover art, but loved the movie! Glad it's finally been announced, even though we have to wait another 3 months for it (and we've been waiting 3 months just to hear an announcement!)
Report
Quote
| Reply
I loved the previous three installments, but this movie was absolutely dreadful and by far the worst movie of the year.
pitdeadite wrote: I loved the previous three installments, but this movie was absolutely dreadful and by far the worst movie of the year.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
horrorfan25 wrote: pitdeadite wrote: I loved the previous three installments, but this movie was absolutely dreadful and by far the worst movie of the year.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Like the simplicity of the DVD cover, don't mind the floating heads blu-ray cover... just a shame the film is such complete and utter s**te. 1, 2 and 3 are all far superior! Said it before and will say it again, Scream 3 gets some seriously unfair press, yet has one of the best scenes of the entire franchise (Sidney being chased through the Woodsborough set).
pitdeadite wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: pitdeadite wrote: I loved the previous three installments, but this movie was absolutely dreadful and by far the worst movie of the year.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Wow. You really hated it THAT much? The lowest rating I can see someone giving this film, which is still pretty harsh, is a 2.5/5. There's no way it deserves like 1/5 or a 0.5/5. The acting was solid, the film kept my interest throughout, the kills were gruesome, and the script was very well-written. I agree the first two "Screams" were a lot better, but this one was a nifty, little sequel that improved on what went wrong with "Scream 3". Now "The Rite" and "Arthur", those were just AWFUL. My god, I was so bored I wanted to kill myself. At least "Scream 4" kept my interest.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Wow. You really hated it THAT much? The lowest rating I can see someone giving this film, which is still pretty harsh, is a 2.5/5. There's no way it deserves like 1/5 or a 0.5/5. The acting was solid, the film kept my interest throughout, the kills were gruesome, and the script was very well-written. I agree the first two "Screams" were a lot better, but this one was a nifty, little sequel that improved on what went wrong with "Scream 3". Now "The Rite" and "Arthur", those were just AWFUL. My god, I was so bored I wanted to kill myself. At least "Scream 4" kept my interest.
Why did they not use the DVD cover for the Blu-ray as well???
that's funny how the BR got the c**ppy cover! LOL. finally the BR'ers get screwed over (regarding a cover) instead of it being the other way around.
horrorfan25 wrote: pitdeadite wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: pitdeadite wrote: I loved the previous three installments, but this movie was absolutely dreadful and by far the worst movie of the year.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Wow. You really hated it THAT much? The lowest rating I can see someone giving this film, which is still pretty harsh, is a 2.5/5. There's no way it deserves like 1/5 or a 0.5/5. The acting was solid, the film kept my interest throughout, the kills were gruesome, and the script was very well-written. I agree the first two "Screams" were a lot better, but this one was a nifty, little sequel that improved on what went wrong with "Scream 3". Now "The Rite" and "Arthur", those were just AWFUL. My god, I was so bored I wanted to kill myself. At least "Scream 4" kept my interest.
I found the writing to be atrocious. Ever watch a "Friday the 13th" sequel and say to yourself how stupid those kids act. Well those dumb kids are geniuses compared to the returning cast of characters. Those kids usually one get one chance to be placed in that type of situation. But to be placed in that situation four times and you still haven't learned anything....it boggles the mind. I'm not a stickler for realism or anything, but why aren't Gail and Sidney showed handling and packing firearms? Or even show them taking self-defense classes. Just something to let the audience know that these characters are able to survive with some intelligence and not just sheer luck. Not to mention, that was the worst motive for a serial killer yet. "SCREAM 3" can breathe a sigh of relief, now that it is no longer the 'black sheep' of the family.
Sit through "The Rite" and "Arthur" and then tell me this movie was the worst of the year.
Still saying it.
Wow. You really hated it THAT much? The lowest rating I can see someone giving this film, which is still pretty harsh, is a 2.5/5. There's no way it deserves like 1/5 or a 0.5/5. The acting was solid, the film kept my interest throughout, the kills were gruesome, and the script was very well-written. I agree the first two "Screams" were a lot better, but this one was a nifty, little sequel that improved on what went wrong with "Scream 3". Now "The Rite" and "Arthur", those were just AWFUL. My god, I was so bored I wanted to kill myself. At least "Scream 4" kept my interest.
I found the writing to be atrocious. Ever watch a "Friday the 13th" sequel and say to yourself how stupid those kids act. Well those dumb kids are geniuses compared to the returning cast of characters. Those kids usually one get one chance to be placed in that type of situation. But to be placed in that situation four times and you still haven't learned anything....it boggles the mind. I'm not a stickler for realism or anything, but why aren't Gail and Sidney showed handling and packing firearms? Or even show them taking self-defense classes. Just something to let the audience know that these characters are able to survive with some intelligence and not just sheer luck. Not to mention, that was the worst motive for a serial killer yet. "SCREAM 3" can breathe a sigh of relief, now that it is no longer the 'black sheep' of the family.
No audio commenatary by Wes......? Not like him not to do one. Hmmm...
Wes, Hayden, Emma, and Neve recorded a commentary. Hopefully it just didn't make the press release.
I'm one of those weirdos who likes all the sequels -- Scream 3 is uneven, but quite good in spots (and nowhere near as vile as its internet reputation would have you believe).
I'm one of those weirdos who likes all the sequels -- Scream 3 is uneven, but quite good in spots (and nowhere near as vile as its internet reputation would have you believe).
It seem the special features as lack as the previous films, but I'll still getting it.
The DVD cover is much more better than the blu-ray's floating heads!
The DVD cover is much more better than the blu-ray's floating heads!
This year has been full of mediocre movies all over the place. This is the only film this year I've gone to see twice. It wasn't all great as some of the humor was a bit off track, but you can't beat that ending. I thought that was pure brilliance! This is on my list to buy come October. I hope they include a feature commentary. They were done for the previous three, and that's usually my favorite special feature, anyway.
-NJM
-NJM
NickMichalak wrote: This year has been full of mediocre movies all over the place. This is the only film this year I've gone to see twice. It wasn't all great as some of the humor was a bit off track, but you can't beat that ending. I thought that was pure brilliance! This is on my list to buy come October. I hope they include a feature commentary. They were done for the previous three, and that's usually my favorite special feature, anyway.
-NJM
I have to agree. I LOVED the ending.
Spoiler I like that how the other films just were like, killer's dead, they pop up, and kill them again. But this one dragged it out a little bit more. The hospital scene was awesome!
And actually, I have to say, the BEGINNING, I thought was even better. I loved the way they...
Spoiler incorporated the 'Stab' films into the opening, and kept faking it out
I thought the movie was a great return to the franchise. I love the 'Scream' movies, but in comparison, 'Scream 3' was a letdown in my opinion. I didn't like the "supernatural" elements of it, when the first two felt more like it COULD happen. 'Scre4m', I thought, was entertaining throughout.
-NJM
I have to agree. I LOVED the ending.
Spoiler I like that how the other films just were like, killer's dead, they pop up, and kill them again. But this one dragged it out a little bit more. The hospital scene was awesome!
And actually, I have to say, the BEGINNING, I thought was even better. I loved the way they...
Spoiler incorporated the 'Stab' films into the opening, and kept faking it out
I thought the movie was a great return to the franchise. I love the 'Scream' movies, but in comparison, 'Scream 3' was a letdown in my opinion. I didn't like the "supernatural" elements of it, when the first two felt more like it COULD happen. 'Scre4m', I thought, was entertaining throughout.
Better than Scream 3 and yet Scream 4 left me disappointed
The best of the sequels! I'll buy it the week it comes out. I actually enjoyed it more than Scream. Drew Barrymore's death scene is brilliant, but I like Scream 4 the best. Scream is still a great horror movie though. Although I'm not the biggest fan of Scream 2 except the first two death scenes.
love the scream movies!! wes craven never disappoints me :D and 6 days before my bday!!! just in time!!!!!
This will be a first day buy for me. Not that it was a great Scream movie. Part 2 still holds that title for.me. I am just glad there are deleted scenes. I was an extra in the movie and the one scene I was in the most, the recreation of the fountain scene in the first one, got cut out. Hopefully will be one of the deleted scenes since it was in the trailer and the marketing stills. Still, it was alright of a movie. Didn't guess the killer at all.


