Star Wars Trilogy (US - DVD R1)
Lucasfilm has sent over art for a new 3-disc limited edition set
Title: Star Wars Trilogy
Starring: Harrison Ford
Released: 6th December 2005
SRP: $49.98
Lucasfilm and Fox Home Entertainment have released artwork for a limited edition Star Wars Trilogy set. The three-disc package will be available to own in both widescreen and full screen editions from the 6th December this year. Each should set you back around $49.98. As far as we know these will be the special editions only I'm afraid! Each film will carry a THX enhanced English Dolby Digital 5.1 EX track, along with an audio commentary for each film, and easterggs. We've attached the boxset artwork below:




News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Harrison Ford
Released: 6th December 2005
SRP: $49.98
Further Details
Lucasfilm and Fox Home Entertainment have released artwork for a limited edition Star Wars Trilogy set. The three-disc package will be available to own in both widescreen and full screen editions from the 6th December this year. Each should set you back around $49.98. As far as we know these will be the special editions only I'm afraid! Each film will carry a THX enhanced English Dolby Digital 5.1 EX track, along with an audio commentary for each film, and easterggs. We've attached the boxset artwork below:




News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Jonny "Me You"
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,863
It never ceases to amaze me how much some people miss by not properly reading or looking at the artwork.

Report
Quote
| Reply
Ok....
Wtf is the point? Jesus christ Lucas, you fucking greedy ass bastard!
Quote: Originally posted by Anthony Nunez
Wtf is the point? Jesus christ Lucas, you fucking greedy ass bastard!
Yes, 'cuz he's holding a gun to your head saying, "Buy it, buy it..." It's just a repackage of the previous box set without the bonus disc.
Wtf is the point? Jesus christ Lucas, you fucking greedy ass bastard!
Yes, 'cuz he's holding a gun to your head saying, "Buy it, buy it..." It's just a repackage of the previous box set without the bonus disc.
uhhh as much as i love and live my life by star wars there is no way id pick this up. Id buy just the box though, it is kinda nice
GET A GRIP PEOPLE ! NO ONE IS SAYING YOU HAVE TO BUY IT. TAKE A BREATH AND RELAX !
again ?
what is this release twelve of the star wars trilogy box set ???
I love that people react in an extremely negative way like SW is the only thing to ever be re-released on DVD or VHS...
Star Wars Box Set
I have to say I have been very disappointed by this news and Lucas's past DVD releases (as well as 20th Century Fox as a whole). I am an avid DVD collector and I felt that the Star Wars box set release last year was made of flimsy, bad quality cardboard. Also, rather than using DVD cases that give the "bare bones" style of packaging (which was also used on the Indy collection), a box set more like the Matrix Ultimate Collection or Godfather DVD Collection would of made the set so much more desirable. I actually hope they release each of the movies separately in their own individual box sets like the Lord of the Rings Extended Edtions that have all 3 releases of the movies with 4 discs (1 extra disc for bonus features). You could choose to buy them all separately or together that way. Although, I really have no hope that this will happen because Fox's DVD releases in general have been declining as of late. The double dipping is getting to be so predictable, that I just wait the necessary amount of mounths for the release of the 2-disc special edition/unrated/director's cut. Also, remember the nice Collector's Edition box sets that were numbered on the spine that included the Alien movies? Well even those are being replaces with DVD cases with slip covers. Fox really needs to listen to the fans and not their wallets!
Dream on...
You have a better chance ropin' and brandin' Paris H, than you do getting the Original Editions! -Theyhavent milked these dry yet-not by a long shot!
Yeehaw! Get along 'lil doggie!
Yeehaw! Get along 'lil doggie!
I love the new box art, but I want extras like deleted scenes included (which were absent from the first DVD release and they do exist).
That HAS to be the Original Trilogy
There is no logistical reason to even consider having two box sets of the same movies released within a year of each other. Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
Absolutely no need for this. I'm not even sure why they didn't just print up more copies of the existing set. Unless the supplement disc will be incorporated into the mega set we all expect in the future. Yeah, thats probably it!
Quote: Originally posted by David Kampling
...Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
You are dreaming
...Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
You are dreaming
Quote: Originally posted by David Kampling
There is no logistical reason to even consider having two box sets of the same movies released within a year of each other. Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
DUDE..It's puff puff give man, don't hog it!!
There is no logistical reason to even consider having two box sets of the same movies released within a year of each other. Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
DUDE..It's puff puff give man, don't hog it!!
This one just has Christmas cash-in stamped all over it
Hmm.. easter eggs.
Does the first release have easter eggs on the movie discs? I know there are some on the bonus disc, but on the movie discs?
Does the first release have easter eggs on the movie discs? I know there are some on the bonus disc, but on the movie discs?
Christensen should have been nowhere near ROTJ
Quote: Originally posted by Matt Thompson
You'd pay $50 for an 80-year-old to play Anakin Skywalker?
Hell, yes, I'd rather see a 78-year old Sebastian Shaw play Anakin. Shaw's face was the one we see behind the mask, he is the one who should have been the spirit of Anakin. Putting Cristensen in that scene ruined it for me, Lucas only did it to tie it in with the PT.
And I don't want to hear "they're his films, he can do what he wants with them". Next thing you know he'll digitally replace all the Ewoks with Wookies just because he originally wanted it to be on Kashyyk, not Endor. If I had known all those changes would have been made, I wouldn't have bought the updated set. Any talk of "his spirit is young because that's what he looked like before turning to the dark side" or "Lucas can do whatever he wants" is just bull**it posturing.
You'd pay $50 for an 80-year-old to play Anakin Skywalker?
Hell, yes, I'd rather see a 78-year old Sebastian Shaw play Anakin. Shaw's face was the one we see behind the mask, he is the one who should have been the spirit of Anakin. Putting Cristensen in that scene ruined it for me, Lucas only did it to tie it in with the PT.
And I don't want to hear "they're his films, he can do what he wants with them". Next thing you know he'll digitally replace all the Ewoks with Wookies just because he originally wanted it to be on Kashyyk, not Endor. If I had known all those changes would have been made, I wouldn't have bought the updated set. Any talk of "his spirit is young because that's what he looked like before turning to the dark side" or "Lucas can do whatever he wants" is just bull**it posturing.
Quote: Originally posted by Fake Shemp
Hell, yes, I'd rather see a 78-year old Sebastian Shaw play Anakin. Shaw's face was the one we see behind the mask, he is the one who should have been the spirit of Anakin. Putting Cristensen in that scene ruined it for me, Lucas only did it to tie it in with the PT.
And I don't want to hear "they're his films, he can do what he wants with them". Next thing you know he'll digitally replace all the Ewoks with Wookies just because he originally wanted it to be on Kashyyk, not Endor. If I had known all those changes would have been made, I wouldn't have bought the updated set. Any talk of "his spirit is young because that's what he looked like before turning to the dark side" or "Lucas can do whatever he wants" is just bull**it posturing.
You're damn right he did it to fit in with the PT. It's a bit ludicrous that Anakin, who was no older than 45 when he died, suddenly looks like a senior citizen. Simple solution: Don't buy the discs. He doesn't owe you anything, and you don't waste your money.
Quote: Originally posted by David Kampling
There is no logistical reason to even consider having two box sets of the same movies released within a year of each other. Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
Fox doesn't have any power -- they're just the distributors. LucasFilm owns the movies themselves.
Hell, yes, I'd rather see a 78-year old Sebastian Shaw play Anakin. Shaw's face was the one we see behind the mask, he is the one who should have been the spirit of Anakin. Putting Cristensen in that scene ruined it for me, Lucas only did it to tie it in with the PT.
And I don't want to hear "they're his films, he can do what he wants with them". Next thing you know he'll digitally replace all the Ewoks with Wookies just because he originally wanted it to be on Kashyyk, not Endor. If I had known all those changes would have been made, I wouldn't have bought the updated set. Any talk of "his spirit is young because that's what he looked like before turning to the dark side" or "Lucas can do whatever he wants" is just bull**it posturing.
You're damn right he did it to fit in with the PT. It's a bit ludicrous that Anakin, who was no older than 45 when he died, suddenly looks like a senior citizen. Simple solution: Don't buy the discs. He doesn't owe you anything, and you don't waste your money.
Quote: Originally posted by David Kampling
There is no logistical reason to even consider having two box sets of the same movies released within a year of each other. Lucasfilm knows how much money they are loosing to those out there who are copying the laserdisc onto DVD, and they're going to cash in on that. From what I see there, nothing is mentioned as "special" and yes, I realize that this is the actual trilogy in Luca's mind. However, doesn't fox have the final say in the matter? I think when it all comes down to it, fox can over rule Lucas on anything if they really wanted to, and this might be the time for them to do it. Because you know the Blu-Ray 6 Disc set is coming next year, and they will most likely have 3-4 versions of each movie on each disc, maybe only 2 versions on the PT though. This will be Fox remastering the original trilogy in high definition so they can make money on it....if they dont do this, they're crazy.
Fox doesn't have any power -- they're just the distributors. LucasFilm owns the movies themselves.
no extras? why bother...
Just in time for Christmas.....
Clearly, this bare-bones set is being released by Fox in order to make some quick money during the holiday season. Holiday shoppers will see this box on the shelves and buy it as a gift -- it's that simple. You can't blame Fox for trying to milk more money out of SW, but this is pretty pathetic, nonetheless. And like many other posters have stated, I also think the packaging for the SW Original Trilogy last year was awful. SW is one of the most important films of the 20th century and it was given a dime-a-dozen boring packaging treatment. Mind-boggling.
Are you people saying that you would prefer a flimsy digipak over protective Amaray cases? That you want packaging that falls apart, ala The Alien Quadrilogy, or packaging that is more susceptible to damaging the only thing that really matters--the discs themselves? I am consistently amazed at how much stock some readers on this site put into the packaging of DVDs, decrying a release based not on the content itself but the wrapper. I have no problem with the packaging of last year's release, and quite honestly, unless the packaging is defective, I never give it much thought in the first place. If it bothers you that much, you obviously have access to a computer and thereby the means to make you own packaging; it ain't rocket science to design and create your own DVD covers.
Well, I had bought the original trilogy Special Edition DVDs when you could find them on the Asian market for something like $10 for the three movies, so that's fine with me.
Now, if they were releasing the theatrical versions, that would be so great... We want the Ewok song! We want the original Lap Ti Nek song! We want Han Solo to murder Greedo in cold blood!
Now, if they were releasing the theatrical versions, that would be so great... We want the Ewok song! We want the original Lap Ti Nek song! We want Han Solo to murder Greedo in cold blood!
Quote: Originally posted by Matt Joseph
I am consistently amazed at how much stock some readers on this site put into the packaging of DVDs, decrying a release based not on the content itself but the wrapper. .
Apparently, you're easilly amazed. Of course the content is what matters, but an attractive package is always nice, especially for a much-beloved and influential/important film such as SW. Most people enjoy looking at nice things - you can actually sell a book by its cover.
I am consistently amazed at how much stock some readers on this site put into the packaging of DVDs, decrying a release based not on the content itself but the wrapper. .
Apparently, you're easilly amazed. Of course the content is what matters, but an attractive package is always nice, especially for a much-beloved and influential/important film such as SW. Most people enjoy looking at nice things - you can actually sell a book by its cover.
Thank you, folks
Your insane ramblings about a reissue with a different slipcover has provided me with endless entertainment.
Seriously kids, they're only movies and no one is holding a gun to your head to repurchase them,especially if the content is the same as it was last year (save the bonus disc).
Seriously kids, they're only movies and no one is holding a gun to your head to repurchase them,especially if the content is the same as it was last year (save the bonus disc).
Hayden Christansen at the end of ROTJ removed?
I wouldn't WANT Hayden Christiansen removed from the end of ROTJ. I like it better with him in it. It makes more sense to the story to have him there and looks better too. AND it connects the prequels to the original saga logically with him in it. Besides, Christiansen far better looking than the 80 year old they had in the original. If anything, I would like to see Padme thrown in at the end too, this way Luke would finally get a chance to see what a hottie his mother was and would give a nice happy ending to Anakin and Padme.
The ONLY one who should have a problem with a young Christiansen at the end of ROTJ is Yoda, because Christiansen gets to look all pretty at the end while he still looks like a 900 year old frog fossil!
The ONLY one who should have a problem with a young Christiansen at the end of ROTJ is Yoda, because Christiansen gets to look all pretty at the end while he still looks like a 900 year old frog fossil!
PUT PADME AT THE END OF ROTJ TOO!
And like someone else posted, it made no sense to have that 80 year old guy at the end in spirit form since Anakin was only about 45 when he died.
Looks better with Christiansen,
Story is better with Christiansen at the end of ROTJ,
ANNNNND I would LOVE it if they put a Padme spirit form in there too. According to Lucas' original draft, only those with compassion can move into the force and still have their own identity. Padme had PLENTY of compassion for Anakin as seen in her last words in Sith so she should be there too.
Looks better with Christiansen,
Story is better with Christiansen at the end of ROTJ,
ANNNNND I would LOVE it if they put a Padme spirit form in there too. According to Lucas' original draft, only those with compassion can move into the force and still have their own identity. Padme had PLENTY of compassion for Anakin as seen in her last words in Sith so she should be there too.
WTF does Christensen being better looking have to do with anything? As for Padme, it would make no sense. She wasn't a Force user. Who would have taught her to retain her identity? There's no hope for some.
Quote: Originally posted by Chris Gould
WTF does Christensen being better looking have to do with anything? As for Padme, it would make no sense. She wasn't a Force user. Who would have taught her to retain her identity? There's no hope for some.
At some point, Chris, you just gotta cut bait and realize that there are certain aspects of Star Wars that some people just don't get and never will.
WTF does Christensen being better looking have to do with anything? As for Padme, it would make no sense. She wasn't a Force user. Who would have taught her to retain her identity? There's no hope for some.
At some point, Chris, you just gotta cut bait and realize that there are certain aspects of Star Wars that some people just don't get and never will.
Ludicrous?
Quote: Originally posted by Matt Thompson
You're damn right he did it to fit in with the PT. It's a bit ludicrous that Anakin, who was no older than 45 when he died, suddenly looks like a senior citizen. Simple solution: Don't buy the discs. He doesn't owe you anything, and you don't waste your money.
I find that ludicrous. Was Lucas high when he cast Shaw as Vader/Anakin originally? He made a decision, he should stick to it. All he's doing now is called backpedaling. I was only 4 when ROTJ came out, but I can't see people coming out of the theater like, "That was cr*p, Vader couldn't possibly have been that old!"
I personally think it was rather difficult to determine Vader's age with all the scarring and whatnot. I don't think anyone questioned whether Shaw was too old to play Anakin until Lucas removed him from that scene. If Shaw was still alive, I bet he'd be pretty pissed about it.
I just think Lucas is spending way too much time readjusting the OT when he could be making VII, VIII, and IX. If he really cared about his precious stories, he'd finish the series instead of leaving it hanging. All this removing and adding of cr*p to the OT is retarded, and it's all a marketing ploy, it has nothing to do with art. If he's that concerned about perfecting his "art" from 20+ years ago, he can take the billion dollars he's sitting on and go invent a time machine. If he has a brain in his head, he'll make the last three chapters; SW is the only thing he's ever had real success with anyway(IMO), and if he strays from that, all the SW fans will resent him for it.
For the record, had I known those changes had been made to the OT, I wouldn't have bought the set.
You're damn right he did it to fit in with the PT. It's a bit ludicrous that Anakin, who was no older than 45 when he died, suddenly looks like a senior citizen. Simple solution: Don't buy the discs. He doesn't owe you anything, and you don't waste your money.
I find that ludicrous. Was Lucas high when he cast Shaw as Vader/Anakin originally? He made a decision, he should stick to it. All he's doing now is called backpedaling. I was only 4 when ROTJ came out, but I can't see people coming out of the theater like, "That was cr*p, Vader couldn't possibly have been that old!"
I personally think it was rather difficult to determine Vader's age with all the scarring and whatnot. I don't think anyone questioned whether Shaw was too old to play Anakin until Lucas removed him from that scene. If Shaw was still alive, I bet he'd be pretty pissed about it.
I just think Lucas is spending way too much time readjusting the OT when he could be making VII, VIII, and IX. If he really cared about his precious stories, he'd finish the series instead of leaving it hanging. All this removing and adding of cr*p to the OT is retarded, and it's all a marketing ploy, it has nothing to do with art. If he's that concerned about perfecting his "art" from 20+ years ago, he can take the billion dollars he's sitting on and go invent a time machine. If he has a brain in his head, he'll make the last three chapters; SW is the only thing he's ever had real success with anyway(IMO), and if he strays from that, all the SW fans will resent him for it.
For the record, had I known those changes had been made to the OT, I wouldn't have bought the set.
How stupid. They could of added the second trilogy with it as a 6-disc Star Wars collection. I'm hoping that it'll happen.



