horrorfan25 wrote:  Yet, strangely, they wanted to see Narnia. And let me tell you, that movie was boring. It wasn't bad, it just wasn't entertaining.

Perhaps they wanted to see Narnia 3 more coz it will be the last time to see the original cast together again. And, you gotta admit that a movie about voyage is far more attractive than a 'princess movie'.

mc_serenity wrote: A very amusing and clever film. It honestly felt like a 2D animated film animated with CG, I can very much see all the characters rendered equally well with pencil sketches and in-betweens.

yeah i agree, i mean just like at the faces of the two leads, its totally the disney style they've used countless times before but now in CGI. i mean Rapunzel herself has the same face as Ariel, Belle, Jane and most of the animated female leads from the 90s and early 00s animated movies. its pretty cool to see them "upgrade" their style into the computer age. not that they should stop cel animation but this is a good step forward.

matt86 wrote: It's funny I'm with u guys, I have zero desire to see this but I'll rent it cuz the good reviews. It just looks kinda dull to me. Sometimes if u put pixar in front of something critics are easy to call it a masterpiece. It's annoying blockbusters rentals now are usually void of special features and I don't have blurray on my Netflix. If blockbuster gets the bd then I'll try to rent it

This isn't Pixar, it's Disney.

A very amusing and clever film. It honestly felt like a 2D animated film animated with CG, I can very much see all the characters rendered equally well with pencil sketches and in-betweens.

No, they don't. I didn't expect much from this movie, but I heard it was really good. Might blind buy. Paul F. Tompkins has a voice in it, so that will warrant at least one watch.

This is one Disney animated movie that didn't fit my interest in seeing. Maybe if I hear people talking about it and saying it's good, I'll watch it when it's on Instant Viewing from Netflix.