thats a very cool cover. whats the creepy o card mean? is it like a slipcase?

It was entertaining, but it could've used a little something more... like a story.

I like the sound of a creepy flesh-like slipcover. Very nice touch.

This cover looks like some c**ppy DTV cover.  I like the poster much better, with Leatherface walking down the highway with the chainsaw in his right hand.  It's much more atmospheric and "classier" cover.

O-card - the cardboard slipcover that may come over top of your DVD.  The 2-disc "Mission: Impossible III", the recent Sony/MGM release of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2", the first pressings of the Flashback Edition of "Dazed and Confused", and quite a few others have this type of packaging.  For some reason, I think that it involves the movie studio's marketing department, as they might see it as not only a flashy thing to include over top of the DVD case, but it may also be a theft deterrent.  People may be less apt to break into something that's got that slipcover over it than to break into something that's just got those adhesive strips down the side.

amazing movie.  Great cover too!!

Gein_Meat wrote: This cover looks like some c**ppy DTV cover.  I like the poster much better, with Leatherface walking down the highway with the chainsaw in his right hand.  It's much more atmospheric and "classier" cover.

Funny. I was gonna say that it should have been the teaser art.

Hopefully, it'll have a DTS-ES track to go with the original.

That's one cool cover! I might buy it based just on the cover, as what little i've seen of it hasn't impressed me. But that's a really cool cover. Maybe it's worth checking out after all?

This one totally rocked. R. Lee Ermey always kicks ass. Definitly a purchase for me.

That's really lame cover art! They should have used the good theatrical poster with Leatherface walking with the chainsaw. I missed it in theaters so I'll rent it on DVD for sure. I'm looking forward to it. From what I hear though it's really disappointing and not as good as the original remake. That sucks too because the original remake was great and better than the original. The cinematography was fantastic! Had it not been for the bad WOM I likely wouldn't have lost a lot of my desire to go see this one.

This movie was trash.  I gave it a 4/10 in a very lengthy review that tore the film apart.  No atmosphere, no tension, shallow & cliché characters, and so much more that ruined a potentially decent film.  Just blunt brutality is all this film had to offer.  Poor carbon copy of Marcus Nispel's film.  The director Jonathan Liebesman has no craftsmanship for tension or actual terror - he just goes for the cheap shock value.  Only fitting that the cover art is c**p too.  They tried resurrecting the franchise only to drive it right back down into the ground.  Give it up, already!  Stop rehashing the same s**t, and try something fresh and remotely original, please.  Though, where remakes are concerned, Alexandre Aja's The Hills Hav Eyes remake shows how to do the genre correctly!

Chris Johnson wrote: mikey mike wrote: without jessica beil walking around in those low jeans I didn't like this like I did with the remake
Jordana Bewster is way cuter and a better actor than Biel is.
HONESTLY, Beil showed 100x more emotional depth than Brewster even tried to tap into in this film.

-NJM

F**k this stupid movie. You people couldn't sound more mentally challenged by praising this moronic film. Remake BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL? Shut the f**k up right now.

The original Massacre is a masterpiece of horror. So many movies have tried to copy the gritty, documentary style look and atmosphere of the film, but none have EVER come close to matching the brilliance of the film. It set a new standard for horror cinema and will forever be a classic of the genre. To say the s**tty, MTV-inspired, dumbed down, blood soaked assery that was the remake came anywhere close to bringing the series to a new high is a horribly untrue statement.

What's worse about this movie is you could've had something much more original and intriguing that what you got. This movie calls itself a prequel; an origin story that will explain how things have become for this family. That idea alone is stupid; when are today's filmmakers, but more than that, today's idiotic "horror fans" gonna realize that the only thing that can make a horror icon scarier is NOT knowing his origins. Leatherface is such a mysterious, scary character; now I'm suppose to believe he's so crazy because he was treated badly as a kid? Give me a f**kin' break.

And then this family has got a murder on their hands, and where you could've had scenes of tension, suspense, horror and drama just by showing a family coping with having to kill people, instead you get the same tired-ass cliches as the remake and all Massacre sequels. NOTHING NEW! NOTHING INTERESTING! IT'S THE SAME S**T!

I can accept movies that are suppose to be "entertaining," but not when they're disgracing the name of a much more important film. F**k this movie.


And the DVD cover is dumb too...

exactly the Phantom cuz they should have rated and unrated in one disc so if they wanna show there friends they can pick which to show.

Umm can you explain to me what an oring is plz b/c I don't get it?

it says "Unrated Cat"