The Artist (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
We've updated our news item with the package artwork for each release
Title: The Artist (IMDb)
Starring: Jean Dujardin
Released: 26th June 2012
SRP: $30.99 (DVD)
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced DVD ($30.99) and Blu-ray ($35.99) releases of The Artist which stars Jean Dujardin, Berenice Bejo, James Cromwell, and Penelope Ann Miller. Each will be available to own from June 26th. Extras will include a Q&A with the Filmmakers and Cast, 2 featurettes ("The Artist: The Making Of A Hollywood Love Story", "Hollywood As A Character: The Locations of The Artist"), and a blooper reel. The official package artwork is attached below:
Quote: Hollywood 1927. George Valentin (Jean Dujardin) is a silent movie superstar. The advent of the talkies will sound the death knell for his career and see him fall into oblivion. For young extra Peppy Miller (Berenice Bejo), it seems the sky's the limit - major movie stardom awaits. THE ARTIST tells the story of their interlinked destinies.
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Jean Dujardin
Released: 26th June 2012
SRP: $30.99 (DVD)
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced DVD ($30.99) and Blu-ray ($35.99) releases of The Artist which stars Jean Dujardin, Berenice Bejo, James Cromwell, and Penelope Ann Miller. Each will be available to own from June 26th. Extras will include a Q&A with the Filmmakers and Cast, 2 featurettes ("The Artist: The Making Of A Hollywood Love Story", "Hollywood As A Character: The Locations of The Artist"), and a blooper reel. The official package artwork is attached below:
Synopsis
Quote: Hollywood 1927. George Valentin (Jean Dujardin) is a silent movie superstar. The advent of the talkies will sound the death knell for his career and see him fall into oblivion. For young extra Peppy Miller (Berenice Bejo), it seems the sky's the limit - major movie stardom awaits. THE ARTIST tells the story of their interlinked destinies.
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
Sweeeet! One of the best covers I've seen in a long time. The "5 Academy Awards" text should have been red. Still, can't wait to check this out.
Even the dog looks exhausted and dissatisfied with the cover. A terrible film and probably the worst Best Picture winner in a long time - well, since Crash.
Worthy of movie of the year. Agree with the horrible cover art!
Saw this yesterday. It so deserves the Best Picture Oscar. It's absolutely wonderful! I sat there with a big smile on my face from start to finish. Bérénice Bejo should've won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar. There really was no competition.
Overrated. It's literally Anchorman minus the comedy, color, sound, and entertainment.
Alright, that artwork is just goofy-looking.
Wow, way to screw up that artwork Sony. If this was an Anchor Bay release I bet they would've used the very classy poster. Oh well, still getting the blu-ray.
I had thought this was coming out in April so by the time my theater got this I figured on just renting it. But then they changed the date and it was gone here. So I missed it theatrically and will definitely rent it.
So how long will Sony have a deal with Weinstein now? It started with them, and then went to Anchor Bay, and now Sony again I suppose?
So how long will Sony have a deal with Weinstein now? It started with them, and then went to Anchor Bay, and now Sony again I suppose?
I'm going to watch this with sub-titles.
Horrible horrible cover art. Couldn't they just have stayed with the poster? F**king stupid Sony. I wanted a combo pack too.
I should Netflix this. I'm trying to, for once, see Oscar-nominated movies earlier than 5 years after they come out.
Dogggg
Had this release on pre-order until they changed the release date. Went with the French Edition Prestige instead. The artwork is a lot more beautiful and you get the soundtrack and a DVD copy of the film as well. 
the kings speech and the artist got what they deserved. screw the social network and saving (america won the war) private ryan.
The Academy loves the Weinsteins.
They've been tireless campaigners for their pick every year. No other production company is as effective as them.
That's why we got Shakespeare In Love over the arguably much superior Saving Private Ryan or The Thin Red Line, a bootload of Oscars for The English Patient and last year The King's Speech.
I honestly don't feel that The Artist deserves the Oscar, it's flawed in many ways, but the competition isn't very strong this year and the Weinsteins have played their cards very well so far.
They've been tireless campaigners for their pick every year. No other production company is as effective as them.
That's why we got Shakespeare In Love over the arguably much superior Saving Private Ryan or The Thin Red Line, a bootload of Oscars for The English Patient and last year The King's Speech.
I honestly don't feel that The Artist deserves the Oscar, it's flawed in many ways, but the competition isn't very strong this year and the Weinsteins have played their cards very well so far.
stevepulaski wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: My cynical self tells me that "The Artist" is only going to win the Academy award because it spells Oscar bait. You're willing to tell me a silent movie about Hollywood romance is better than finding your purpose in life ("Hugo"
, making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.
You're a little flirtatious, aren't you.
I sort of agree. I'd like to see "The Descendants," "Hugo," or even "Midnight in Paris" take home Best Picture. But "The Artist" truly is a wonderfully energetic film, full of physical comedy, humor, sorrow, and energy. In order to make a good silent film, you need a solid story and a great bunch of physical actors. "The Artist" has both. It's probably my second favorite film of the year after "The Descendants."
Also, glad I'm not the only one who thinks "The Social Network" deserved it more than "The King's Speech." But the Academy loves them some period pieces.
Damn. I guess I'll take my chance on this one then!
, making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.You're a little flirtatious, aren't you
.I sort of agree. I'd like to see "The Descendants," "Hugo," or even "Midnight in Paris" take home Best Picture. But "The Artist" truly is a wonderfully energetic film, full of physical comedy, humor, sorrow, and energy. In order to make a good silent film, you need a solid story and a great bunch of physical actors. "The Artist" has both. It's probably my second favorite film of the year after "The Descendants."
Also, glad I'm not the only one who thinks "The Social Network" deserved it more than "The King's Speech." But the Academy loves them some period pieces.
Damn. I guess I'll take my chance on this one then!
horrorfan25 wrote: My cynical self tells me that "The Artist" is only going to win the Academy award because it spells Oscar bait. You're willing to tell me a silent movie about Hollywood romance is better than finding your purpose in life ("Hugo", making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.
You're a little flirtatious, aren't you.
I sort of agree. I'd like to see "The Descendants," "Hugo," or even "Midnight in Paris" take home Best Picture. But "The Artist" truly is a wonderfully energetic film, full of physical comedy, humor, sorrow, and energy. In order to make a good silent film, you need a solid story and a great bunch of physical actors. "The Artist" has both. It's probably my second favorite film of the year after "The Descendants."
Also, glad I'm not the only one who thinks "The Social Network" deserved it more than "The King's Speech." But the Academy loves them some period pieces.
, making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.You're a little flirtatious, aren't you
.I sort of agree. I'd like to see "The Descendants," "Hugo," or even "Midnight in Paris" take home Best Picture. But "The Artist" truly is a wonderfully energetic film, full of physical comedy, humor, sorrow, and energy. In order to make a good silent film, you need a solid story and a great bunch of physical actors. "The Artist" has both. It's probably my second favorite film of the year after "The Descendants."
Also, glad I'm not the only one who thinks "The Social Network" deserved it more than "The King's Speech." But the Academy loves them some period pieces.
I absolutely loved this movie. It was unlike anything I've seen before. I saw Moneyball and the Descendants. I thought Moneyball was good and the Descendants was ok. I did not see Hugo or any of the other nominated movies. But honestly...I really hope the Artist wins. It seems like the majority of people want the oscars to go a "different" route. And I don't think there is anything more "different" than the Artist.
P.S. Day one buy for me.
P.S. Day one buy for me.
My cynical self tells me that "The Artist" is only going to win the Academy award because it spells Oscar bait. You're willing to tell me a silent movie about Hollywood romance is better than finding your purpose in life ("Hugo", making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.
, making do with the best you're given ("Moneyball", and riding out your overwhelming emotions ("The Descendants". Then again, the Academy thought "The King's Speech" was better than "The Social Network" last year.
ILDC wrote: Movie Dude wrote: ILDC wrote: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, not Anchor Bay?
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
But don't they still own a stake?
They probably do.
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
But don't they still own a stake?
They probably do.
Movie Dude wrote: ILDC wrote: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, not Anchor Bay?
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
But don't they still own a stake?
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
But don't they still own a stake?
ILDC wrote: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, not Anchor Bay?
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
I think Anchor Bay's deal with The Weinstein Company probably expires when the movie comes out in April.
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, not Anchor Bay?
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Interviews
Thrilling Reviews
Straw Dogs
UK - BD RB
Relic, The
US - BD
Funny Games
UK - DVD R2
John Wick: Volume 2
US - BD RA
Pacific Heights
AU - DVD R4
Unseen Reviews
Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka
UK - DVD R2
Stuff, The
UK - BD RB
Body Double
UK - DVD | BD
Capricorn One
UK - BD RB
Sacha Guitry: Four Films 1936-1938
US - BD RA
Most Talked About
The Changeling
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Pacific Rim: Uprising
US - BD RA
I Feel Pretty
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Isle of Dogs
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Shout Select Announcements
US - BD RA
