The Blind Side (US - DVD R1 | BD)
Warner Home Video reveals details on DVD and Blu-ray releases of the movie
Title: The Blind Side (IMDb)
Starring: Sanda Bullock
Released: 23rd March 2010
SRP: $27.87 (DVD)
Further Details:
Warner Home Video has announced DVD ($27.87) and Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($35.99) releases of The Blind Side which stars Sandra Bullock, Tim Mcgraw, and Kathy Bates. Each will be available to own from the 23rd March. The only extra material on the DVD release will be additional scenes. The Blu-ray release will include those, along with an interview with Michael Oher, featurettes ("Sidelines: Conversations on the Blind Side", "Acting Coaches: Behind the Blind Side", "The Story of Big Quinton"), and a digital copy of the film. We've attached the official package artwork for each of the releases below:
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Sanda Bullock
Released: 23rd March 2010
SRP: $27.87 (DVD)
Further Details:
Warner Home Video has announced DVD ($27.87) and Blu-ray/DVD Combo ($35.99) releases of The Blind Side which stars Sandra Bullock, Tim Mcgraw, and Kathy Bates. Each will be available to own from the 23rd March. The only extra material on the DVD release will be additional scenes. The Blu-ray release will include those, along with an interview with Michael Oher, featurettes ("Sidelines: Conversations on the Blind Side", "Acting Coaches: Behind the Blind Side", "The Story of Big Quinton"), and a digital copy of the film. We've attached the official package artwork for each of the releases below:
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
this was not oscar worthy , it sure came off as a disney film instead of a drama that it should have bin , bullocks performance was dull and not believable to me, one of the worst of the year in my opinion.
Interesting ass....I mean front cover...
Look what the shading does to her....
Look what the shading does to her....
Butt double!
Dogville wrote: Her butt is SO photoshopped.
Photoshop or not...it's hot! I'm sure it's his own, he did play football after all, must keep in sha - oh...HER butt!
Nevermind. Carry on.
Photoshop or not...it's hot! I'm sure it's his own, he did play football after all, must keep in sha - oh...HER butt!
Nevermind. Carry on.
Her butt is SO photoshopped.
Expect it to change, it got nominated for Best Picture and Best Actress.
DVD artwork added...
Well, being Australia's biggest Sandra Bullock fan, I'd say this is by far the Best film she has done since Two Weeks Notice and Miss Congeniality. The Proposal was excellent too. Shame about "All about Steve". Why on earth did she go do that film? That ruined her comeback for 2009!!!
Michael Greenwaldt wrote: Yeah, I had absolutely no problem with Kyle's comment. I'm glad to give a reason as to why I wasn't impressed. The comment I did have a problem with was the one by stevepulaski, which was just rude. I'm not allowed to say I didn't like this movie?
You're allowed to say whatever you want.
You're allowed to say whatever you want.
LOL! 'Sandra Bullock INSPIRES big sales'.
There's just something so... greedy with that sentence.
There's just something so... greedy with that sentence.
Yeah, I had absolutely no problem with Kyle's comment. I'm glad to give a reason as to why I wasn't impressed. The comment I did have a problem with was the one by stevepulaski, which was just rude. I'm not allowed to say I didn't like this movie?
Whoa whoa whoa time out!?? These guys were completely civil with each other. There was not one inflammatory comment between the two.
Pixarfan517 wrote: Michael Greenwaldt wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
WHOA, WHOA, WHOA!!! GUIES, TIME OUT!!!!
Kyle, just because he doesn't like something doesn't mean you have to go budding in to his comment. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. No one's going to like the same exact movies you like. For instance, I know many people who don't like Pixar movies as much as I do, or Night at the Museum 2. Guess what? Do I make a big deal outta it? No. Do I make a big deal outta it because they make a big deal outta it? I'll tell 'em, look, it's just my opinion. No one's going to force you to like or dislike something just because they like it/dislike it. I see people who don't like "Finding Nemo." My dad didn't like "WALL-E." My sister didn't think Night at the Museum 2 was as good as the first. My friends don't like every movie I like, so what?
Michael - the kid, SJ, had nothing really to do with the movie. He was just trying to help Oher. I can find some cute kid movies to be annoying, like "Martian Child." I mean I like cute kid movies like "August Rush" and "Where the Wild Things Are." Yes, some people do make fun of me, but you know what - that's their loss. It's fine if you don't like movies about cute kids, guess what, not everyone's going to agree. Not everyone's going to agree with you that "The Blind Side" is a phony movie. Guess what? Many people like many different things.
And Kyle, just because he posted his opinion on something doesn't necessary mean that you have to comment on it, especially without quoting it first!
OK. Kapeesh.
Michael Greenwaldt wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
WHOA, WHOA, WHOA!!! GUIES, TIME OUT!!!!
Kyle, just because he doesn't like something doesn't mean you have to go budding in to his comment. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. No one's going to like the same exact movies you like. For instance, I know many people who don't like Pixar movies as much as I do, or Night at the Museum 2. Guess what? Do I make a big deal outta it? No. Do I make a big deal outta it because they make a big deal outta it? I'll tell 'em, look, it's just my opinion. No one's going to force you to like or dislike something just because they like it/dislike it. I see people who don't like "Finding Nemo." My dad didn't like "WALL-E." My sister didn't think Night at the Museum 2 was as good as the first. My friends don't like every movie I like, so what?
Michael - the kid, SJ, had nothing really to do with the movie. He was just trying to help Oher. I can find some cute kid movies to be annoying, like "Martian Child." I mean I like cute kid movies like "August Rush" and "Where the Wild Things Are." Yes, some people do make fun of me, but you know what - that's their loss. It's fine if you don't like movies about cute kids, guess what, not everyone's going to agree. Not everyone's going to agree with you that "The Blind Side" is a phony movie. Guess what? Many people like many different things.
And Kyle, just because he posted his opinion on something doesn't necessary mean that you have to comment on it, especially without quoting it first!
OK. Kapeesh.
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
WHOA, WHOA, WHOA!!! GUIES, TIME OUT!!!!
Kyle, just because he doesn't like something doesn't mean you have to go budding in to his comment. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. No one's going to like the same exact movies you like. For instance, I know many people who don't like Pixar movies as much as I do, or Night at the Museum 2. Guess what? Do I make a big deal outta it? No. Do I make a big deal outta it because they make a big deal outta it? I'll tell 'em, look, it's just my opinion. No one's going to force you to like or dislike something just because they like it/dislike it. I see people who don't like "Finding Nemo." My dad didn't like "WALL-E." My sister didn't think Night at the Museum 2 was as good as the first. My friends don't like every movie I like, so what?
Michael - the kid, SJ, had nothing really to do with the movie. He was just trying to help Oher. I can find some cute kid movies to be annoying, like "Martian Child." I mean I like cute kid movies like "August Rush" and "Where the Wild Things Are." Yes, some people do make fun of me, but you know what - that's their loss. It's fine if you don't like movies about cute kids, guess what, not everyone's going to agree. Not everyone's going to agree with you that "The Blind Side" is a phony movie. Guess what? Many people like many different things.
And Kyle, just because he posted his opinion on something doesn't necessary mean that you have to comment on it, especially without quoting it first!
OK. Kapeesh.
I agree with almost everything you say here. And good call pointing out what true great child performances can be ("Ponette" ). That's really rare. While "The Blind Side" was clearly catered to the crowd pleasing movie going audience, complete with adorable kids, I found it far more digestable than the syrupy kids (and families) in "Dan in Real Life" and the adult children in "It's Complicated". Bottom line (for me), "The Blind Side" was a nice and harmless film, and Bullock did turn in a great performance, but she absolutely and most definitely does NOT deserve the Oscar for Best Actress. That's just crazy talk. Every actress you mentioned turned in far superior performances. And I'd like to throw Michelle Monaghan's performance in there too for "Trucker". But personally I'd like to see Streep win.
Michael Greenwaldt wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
Michael Greenwaldt wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
Kyle Mertes wrote: I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
This movie was completely phony. Just mainstream, cringe-worthy garbage, IMO. Easily one of the most overrated movies of the year. Entertainment-wise it’s alright, not boring or anything. It’s just not a good movie. The audience I saw it with ate it right up. I hated how everyone was laughing at all of the unbelievably grating cutesy humor involving the little boy. And I can't tell you how many times they rely on him to get a laugh. I cannot stand cutesy kids in movies, especially when they use them THIS often. What gets under my skin the most is how everyone finds it so funny. Sometimes cute kids work ( Jerry Maguire, for instance, or the absolute best example, Ponette), but here it wasn't charming (not to me at least). It was such an obvious and cheap attempt at humor.
Anyway, Sandra is just fine. I really like her as an actress, but this is not an award-worthy performance. Maybe an MTV Movie Award, but not Oscar-worthy. There are much more deserving female performances this year. For example, Carrey Mulligan ( An Education), Emily Blunt ( The Young Victoria), Zooey Deschanel ( 500 Days of Summer), Abbie Cornish ( Bright Star), Melanie Laurent ( Inglourious Basterds), Meryl Streep (She was wonderful in Julie & Julia - though she’s great in everything she does), Michelle Monaghan (for the little-seen Trucker), or even Amy Adams for Sunshine Cleaning or, don’t laugh, but Vera Farmiga or Isabelle Fuhrman for Orphan (not the kind of movie that usually gets nominated, BUT these two performances were d*mn good - at least Farmiga is getting attention for her work in the year’s best film - Up in the Air), all of whom were better than Bullock. I wouldn’t mind her being nominated, but she doesn’t deserve to win, not for this movie. Just my opinion…
Parents Television Counseling: Seal of Approval? Now thats just dumb.
Michael Greenwaldt wrote: I despised this movie. Will definitely pass.
Shut up.
Shut up.
I will bet that the cover will change since she won the Golden Globe, and IF she gets the Oscar for this, it will be more definite!!
I'll Netflix this one. I've heard good things, but I am weary of inspirational sports movies.
Matt Clipp wrote: I can't wait to own this so I can watch it again and again!
Its a movie that I would see only once.
Its a movie that I would see only once.
loved this movie. will pickup for sure
This was my favorite film of 2009. Went in, knew nothing about the movie at all, and came out extremely satisfied. Sandra Bullock was just amazing. I can't wait to own this so I can watch it again and again!
worth a rental
I didn't like this that much. Bullock was okay in this, awards worthy? No. She definitely wasn't better than Mulligan or Sidibe this year, she didn't deserved the Globe. But this is Bullock's year and what she achieved in terms of BO Success cannot be understated.
Never got around to this one. Will rent.
I will buy, because this was a terrific movie. However, I DESPITE the Blu-Ray getting all of the extras, but the existence of the combo pack makes up for this.
Loved this movie. I didn't think I would since I'm not a fan of inspirational sports films, but, this was great! Well def. pick up the blu. Oh, and thanx for making it a combo pack with a standard dvd. Now I can play it anywhere.
Chris Burge will be happy.
I actually enjoyed this movie. It was actually much better than Sandra Bullock's really stupid summer hit, "The Proposal."
I actually enjoyed this movie. It was actually much better than Sandra Bullock's really stupid summer hit, "The Proposal."
This is still playing at our first-run theater. A lot of folks loved it and are either watching it again or recommending it to friends.
I so can't wait for this movie on Blu-ray!! Sandra Bullock was amazing!! Day one purchase for me!!
Fantastic film! I will definitely be picking up a copy.
^ Hataaaa Michael. Never got around on seeing it. Will rent on Blu for sure.
Better than i thought but it wasnt groundbreaking. I think i was so relieved over the awful "all about steve" that ANYTHING sandra did would be ok with me. This avoided a lot of usual cliches but still had problems. Also the little boy in it was one of the ugliest things ever put on the silver screen.
I will rent it, but if the extras are worthy I'll give it a buy.
Well, 2009 was certainly a big year for Ms. Bullock, and this movie was a big reason why. Guess I'll check it out, since I never got around to seeing it in the theater....
I have yet to hear anything negative (save for the first post here). Why didn't you like it, Mr Greenwaldt?
I will be Netflixing this one. Sandra Bullock has always been one of my favorites despite her hit-and-miss decisions for film roles.
I will be Netflixing this one. Sandra Bullock has always been one of my favorites despite her hit-and-miss decisions for film roles.
I haven't seen it but have heard good things. Might just be a blind buy for me.
I despised this movie. Will definitely pass.
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Articles
Star Wars: The Changes - Part One
DVD | BD
Star Wars: The Changes - Part Two
DVD
Why Widescreen?
DVD
Blu-ray vs. HD DVD: The Anti-Fanboy View
HD | BD
Subwoofer Group Test - £250 to £350
DVD
Unseen Reviews
Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka
UK - DVD R2
Stuff, The
UK - BD RB
Body Double
UK - DVD | BD
Capricorn One
UK - BD RB
Blues Brothers 2000
UK - BD RB
Hot Easter Eggs
Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me
US - DVD R1
Batman Begins: Special Edition
HK - DVD R3
Blade
US - DVD R1
Agent Cody Banks
UK - DVD R2
Beach, The
US - DVD R1
Most Talked About
Ghost in the Shell
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Synapse Films Updates
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Boss Baby
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Unforgettable
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
