The Hills Have Eyes 2 (US - DVD R1)
Fox Home Entertainment confirms a July street date for the recent horror sequel
Title: The Hills Have Eyes 2 (IMDb)
Starring: Daniella Alonso
Released: 17th July 2007
SRP: $29.98
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has announced horror sequel The Hills Have Eyes 2 which stars Daniella Alonso, Jacob Vargas, Jessica Stroup, and Michael McMillan. The Martin Weisz directed film will be available to own from the 17th July, and should retail at around $29.98. The unrated cut of the film will be presented in both anamorphic widescreen, and full screen - along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 track. Extras will include an alternate ending, deleted scenes, an Exploring the Hills: The Making of The Hills Have Eyes 2 featurette, a Fox Movie Channel Presents: Life After Film School with Wes Craven feature, a Mutant Attacks featurette, a Birth of a Graphic Novel featurette, a gag reel, and trailres. Art is attached:
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Daniella Alonso
Released: 17th July 2007
SRP: $29.98
Further Details:
Fox Home Entertainment has announced horror sequel The Hills Have Eyes 2 which stars Daniella Alonso, Jacob Vargas, Jessica Stroup, and Michael McMillan. The Martin Weisz directed film will be available to own from the 17th July, and should retail at around $29.98. The unrated cut of the film will be presented in both anamorphic widescreen, and full screen - along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 track. Extras will include an alternate ending, deleted scenes, an Exploring the Hills: The Making of The Hills Have Eyes 2 featurette, a Fox Movie Channel Presents: Life After Film School with Wes Craven feature, a Mutant Attacks featurette, a Birth of a Graphic Novel featurette, a gag reel, and trailres. Art is attached:
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisement
SlitherThru
Member
Join Date: July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 151
Loved the first one but heard a lot of negative things about this one. Will have to pick up the unrated cut and check it out.
Report
Quote
| Reply
horrible horrible movie... the first one was awesome.. this one... horrible!
This came out in theatres? When?
CAN'T WAIT!!!WILL BUY
they should add ". . . and more c**p than ever before."
I haven't seen it, but it can't possibly be worse than the original Hills Have Eyes Part Two, unless it also features a picnic scene and a dog flashback.
No dog flashback. Saw it at the theatres. More like a gory version of "Southern Comfort."
Southern Comfort is a movie I should own.
Horrible movie. One of the worst horror movies I have ever seen.
It's pretty bad. The fact it's completely boring is its biggest sin. Quite a bit worse than Hills '06.
I liked the Hills remake. I will watch the sequel. Love that unrated cover art.
saw this on my birthday i almost shot myself afterwards, this was god awful what a huge dissapointment i did a questionaire at end of the film i ripped the movie to shreds
I enjoyed this film, I'll be picking up the unrated version.
I didn't rate the remake but I'll probably buy this when it's cheap.
Awesome artwork
stupid movie!!!! I knew it was going to be wack when the replace the director and when they put flex alexander in it reminder snakes on the plane he was in that pic too.
Ok, so I'm flipping through the channels to seewhat was coming on latyer that evening on a premium channels, so i see The Hills Have Eyeys 2, i looked at the description and the year was 2007, i knew it had to be a mistake, it turned out to be the original Eyes 2, oh well somebody made a mistake, anyway, i really liked the first one, will wait for when it is really on max or HBO...
I am not even going to bother watching this garbage.
Didn't see the remake, don't plan on ever watching it or this.
I was thrown for a loop when I read that a theater in New York somewhere accidentally showed this film to a sold out crowd of parents and kids waiting to watch The Last Mimzy. Apparently one of the film's most gruesome scenes is the prologue. Kids literally jumped up screaming and fled the theater as the parents followed and unleashed hell on the employees of the theater. The reels got mixed up and the workers very quickly corrected it, refunded the parents' money plus gave them free movie tickets and showed the right film.
Why is horror nowadays limited to in your face blood and guts and gore? What happened to suspense? What happened to psychological terror?
I was thrown for a loop when I read that a theater in New York somewhere accidentally showed this film to a sold out crowd of parents and kids waiting to watch The Last Mimzy. Apparently one of the film's most gruesome scenes is the prologue. Kids literally jumped up screaming and fled the theater as the parents followed and unleashed hell on the employees of the theater. The reels got mixed up and the workers very quickly corrected it, refunded the parents' money plus gave them free movie tickets and showed the right film.
Why is horror nowadays limited to in your face blood and guts and gore? What happened to suspense? What happened to psychological terror?
Part 1 was awesome, great special effects, but this i may just rent, heard bad things.
Yeah, so are there any spiders in this one. I plan on buying it and seeing it with my friend who has arachnophobia. If there are can you please describe it? Is it fat and hairy? Because he can handle the little ones.
Like the cover.
Kyle Mertes wrote: Why is horror nowadays limited to in your face blood and guts and gore? What happened to suspense? What happened to psychological terror?
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
Okay, so I've heard that there are spiders in this movie. Too bad for all arachnophobics(Is that even a word?)out there.
Matt Thompson wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: Why is horror nowadays limited to in your face blood and guts and gore? What happened to suspense? What happened to psychological terror?
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
Shows you how much horror I watch, don't it? Hehe.
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
Shows you how much horror I watch, don't it? Hehe.
Matt Thompson wrote: Kyle Mertes wrote: Why is horror nowadays limited to in your face blood and guts and gore? What happened to suspense? What happened to psychological terror?
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
It's what the majority of the public wants, which is why they're released.
I actually enjoyed this remake and plan on picking up the unrated cut.
Horror's been that way for the last thirty years. It's always been primarily made up of dodgy gore flicks.
It's what the majority of the public wants, which is why they're released.
I actually enjoyed this remake and plan on picking up the unrated cut.
MIGHT buy. this one was very borderline for me.
The first remake was awesome. This one however was one of the worst movies that I've seen. Absolutely terrible!!
i dont care... im getting this...
Ok, why is people saying "liked the first one, hated this one?" I mean, c'mon guys, The Hills Have Eyes remake wasn't that good anyway. The sequel, IMO, isn't any worse. I probably won't buy it, but, i'd watch it maybe once more.


