The Incredible Hulk (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Universal has now provided us with the highres artwork for the 1-disc release
Title: The Incredible Hulk
Starring: Edward Norton
Released: 21st October 2008
SRP: $34.98 (3-Disc)
Further Details:
Universal has announced 1-disc ($29.98), 3-disc ($34.98) and Blu-ray ($39.98) editions of The Incredible Hulk which stars Edward Norton. The only extra material on the 1-disc will be a commentary with Director Louis Leterrier and Tim Roth, and deleted scenes. The 3-disc will include all that, along with featurettes (The Making of Incredible, Becoming The Hulk, Becoming The Abomination, Anatomy of a Hulk Out, From Comic Book to Screen), additional deleted scenes, an alternate opening, and a digital copy of the film. The Blu-ray edition will include all of the above, plus U Control features (Thunderbolt Files, Scene Explorer, Comic Book Gallery, Animated Comic, Picture in Picture). We've attached the artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Edward Norton
Released: 21st October 2008
SRP: $34.98 (3-Disc)
Further Details:
Universal has announced 1-disc ($29.98), 3-disc ($34.98) and Blu-ray ($39.98) editions of The Incredible Hulk which stars Edward Norton. The only extra material on the 1-disc will be a commentary with Director Louis Leterrier and Tim Roth, and deleted scenes. The 3-disc will include all that, along with featurettes (The Making of Incredible, Becoming The Hulk, Becoming The Abomination, Anatomy of a Hulk Out, From Comic Book to Screen), additional deleted scenes, an alternate opening, and a digital copy of the film. The Blu-ray edition will include all of the above, plus U Control features (Thunderbolt Files, Scene Explorer, Comic Book Gallery, Animated Comic, Picture in Picture). We've attached the artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
October 21...that's a bit under my expectations.
133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
I'm not an owner of the Blu-Ray but this U-feature thing the scene explorer does that mean we can watch a deleted scene in the middle of the movie so it'd end up fitting?
lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
i see they've bumped norton off
Bouncy X wrote: lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
Actually, I believe they both had a budget of about $130 mil. Couldn't find anything to back that except the info on box office mojo, but they're usually pretty good. It looks like they both performed about the same. Strange they would consider one a "Smash Hit" and the other a bust.
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
Actually, I believe they both had a budget of about $130 mil. Couldn't find anything to back that except the info on box office mojo, but they're usually pretty good. It looks like they both performed about the same. Strange they would consider one a "Smash Hit" and the other a bust.
Actually, this one, IMO, was a smash for the fact that it did better than expected by the studio heads after the bomb which was the 2003 version. I'll get the 1-disc as I never seem to watch the special features. Also, I've noticed the '03 version in the five dollar bin at wal-mart, so, I might pick it up on my way out the door one day.
Well, I guess i'd rather wait for the official 3hours extended cut that will probably come up right after this release.
Bibi wrote: Well, I guess i'd rather wait for the official 3hours extended cut that will probably come up right after this release.
no..they'll probably release it whenever the sequel comes out
no..they'll probably release it whenever the sequel comes out
well we are still waiting for the big Kill Bill set (forgive me its title seems to escape me ATM)
but anyhow even if they do it like the DD directors cut it is still worth a double dip imo.
this to me was one of the best summer movies. i know i know not a big fan of TDK it ran too long. but this isnt the thrad for that sort of thing :-P
but anyhow even if they do it like the DD directors cut it is still worth a double dip imo.
this to me was one of the best summer movies. i know i know not a big fan of TDK it ran too long. but this isnt the thrad for that sort of thing :-P
1-disc artwork added
Bouncy X wrote: lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
no actually you are rather wrong. the incredible hulk had a budget of $150 million, 70-80 million? no one is going to buy that, considering that CGI work is hell of money to show off. the 2003 version had a budget of $137 million, so considering the old one did a little better and its infact the best Hulk for me. Louis Leterrier is a lousy director.
i HATE but with a passion the 3-Disc cover art, its overly animated, it infact looks Video Game-ish. the single disc cover is outstanding!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
no actually you are rather wrong. the incredible hulk had a budget of $150 million, 70-80 million? no one is going to buy that, considering that CGI work is hell of money to show off. the 2003 version had a budget of $137 million, so considering the old one did a little better and its infact the best Hulk for me. Louis Leterrier is a lousy director.
i HATE but with a passion the 3-Disc cover art, its overly animated, it infact looks Video Game-ish. the single disc cover is outstanding!
I never noticed before that the Hulk is absent of the nipples.
jp orestes wrote: I never noticed before that the Hulk is absent of the nipples.
They're there.
They're there.
I strongly prefer the 1-disc artwork more. The 3-disc artwork is cheesy but not the worst. But like the above comments said the artwork with the Hulk standing behind Edward Norton would have made a great DVD artwork for the 3-disc and then keep the 1-disc artwork. That way everyone could get what they want.
i wish that studios would actually use feedback from these boards (>.<
This is one instance where I prefer the one-disk cover art over the 2-disk.. Although if it were up to me I'd use the movie poster art with Ed Norton
both completely misrepresent the film
i must say i like the single disc art more that the 3-discs art
R2 gets the nice art :'(
can't we do a petition to change this art? is it too late? i want the movie poster on the bluray release like region 2 gets.
me thinks that they are holding back the REAL art for the extended cut in the US but we will never know.
could you imagine if they released the extended cut as a 1 disker and as so that the digital copy could be tossed to the side and the extended cut put in its place? i hate it when i think about this too much
could you imagine if they released the extended cut as a 1 disker and as so that the digital copy could be tossed to the side and the extended cut put in its place? i hate it when i think about this too much
pretty good sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much better the the first 1
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Latest Reviews
Cloud Atlas
US - BD
Daleks: Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. (Doctor Who)
UK - BD RB
Doctor Who and the Daleks
UK - BD RB
Motel Hell
UK - BD RB
Great Escape, The
US - BD RA
Reviewer Agony
Space Buddies
US - BD RA
Moonlight Jellyfish
JP - DVD R2
Jonas Brother: The 3D Concert Experience
US - BD RA
Java Head/Tiger Bay
UK - DVD R2
Hollywood Homicide
US - DVD R1
Hot Articles
Star Wars: The Changes - Part One
DVD | BD
Star Wars: The Changes - Part Three
DVD
Star Wars: The Changes - Part Two
DVD
Old Films on Blu-ray: Are They Worth It?
BD
Will streaming kill physical media?
DVD | HD | BD
Most Talked About
More Scream Factory News
US - BD RA
Texas Chainsaw (2013, 2D)
US - BD RA
Spring Breakers
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Host, The
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Universal Steelbooks
US - BD RA
They are the covers...
No, they're not.