The Incredible Hulk (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Universal has now provided us with the highres artwork for the 1-disc release
Title: The Incredible Hulk
Starring: Edward Norton
Released: 21st October 2008
SRP: $34.98 (3-Disc)
Further Details:
Universal has announced 1-disc ($29.98), 3-disc ($34.98) and Blu-ray ($39.98) editions of The Incredible Hulk which stars Edward Norton. The only extra material on the 1-disc will be a commentary with Director Louis Leterrier and Tim Roth, and deleted scenes. The 3-disc will include all that, along with featurettes (The Making of Incredible, Becoming The Hulk, Becoming The Abomination, Anatomy of a Hulk Out, From Comic Book to Screen), additional deleted scenes, an alternate opening, and a digital copy of the film. The Blu-ray edition will include all of the above, plus U Control features (Thunderbolt Files, Scene Explorer, Comic Book Gallery, Animated Comic, Picture in Picture). We've attached the artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Edward Norton
Released: 21st October 2008
SRP: $34.98 (3-Disc)
Further Details:
Universal has announced 1-disc ($29.98), 3-disc ($34.98) and Blu-ray ($39.98) editions of The Incredible Hulk which stars Edward Norton. The only extra material on the 1-disc will be a commentary with Director Louis Leterrier and Tim Roth, and deleted scenes. The 3-disc will include all that, along with featurettes (The Making of Incredible, Becoming The Hulk, Becoming The Abomination, Anatomy of a Hulk Out, From Comic Book to Screen), additional deleted scenes, an alternate opening, and a digital copy of the film. The Blu-ray edition will include all of the above, plus U Control features (Thunderbolt Files, Scene Explorer, Comic Book Gallery, Animated Comic, Picture in Picture). We've attached the artwork below:
News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
pretty good sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much better the the first 1
me thinks that they are holding back the REAL art for the extended cut in the US but we will never know.
could you imagine if they released the extended cut as a 1 disker and as so that the digital copy could be tossed to the side and the extended cut put in its place? i hate it when i think about this too much
could you imagine if they released the extended cut as a 1 disker and as so that the digital copy could be tossed to the side and the extended cut put in its place? i hate it when i think about this too much
can't we do a petition to change this art? is it too late? i want the movie poster on the bluray release like region 2 gets.
R2 gets the nice art :'(
i must say i like the single disc art more that the 3-discs art
both completely misrepresent the film
This is one instance where I prefer the one-disk cover art over the 2-disk.. Although if it were up to me I'd use the movie poster art with Ed Norton
i wish that studios would actually use feedback from these boards (>.<
I strongly prefer the 1-disc artwork more. The 3-disc artwork is cheesy but not the worst. But like the above comments said the artwork with the Hulk standing behind Edward Norton would have made a great DVD artwork for the 3-disc and then keep the 1-disc artwork. That way everyone could get what they want.
jp orestes wrote: I never noticed before that the Hulk is absent of the nipples.
They're there.
They're there.
I never noticed before that the Hulk is absent of the nipples.
Bouncy X wrote: lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
no actually you are rather wrong. the incredible hulk had a budget of $150 million, 70-80 million? no one is going to buy that, considering that CGI work is hell of money to show off. the 2003 version had a budget of $137 million, so considering the old one did a little better and its infact the best Hulk for me. Louis Leterrier is a lousy director.
i HATE but with a passion the 3-Disc cover art, its overly animated, it infact looks Video Game-ish. the single disc cover is outstanding!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
no actually you are rather wrong. the incredible hulk had a budget of $150 million, 70-80 million? no one is going to buy that, considering that CGI work is hell of money to show off. the 2003 version had a budget of $137 million, so considering the old one did a little better and its infact the best Hulk for me. Louis Leterrier is a lousy director.
i HATE but with a passion the 3-Disc cover art, its overly animated, it infact looks Video Game-ish. the single disc cover is outstanding!
1-disc artwork added
well we are still waiting for the big Kill Bill set (forgive me its title seems to escape me ATM)
but anyhow even if they do it like the DD directors cut it is still worth a double dip imo.
this to me was one of the best summer movies. i know i know not a big fan of TDK it ran too long. but this isnt the thrad for that sort of thing :-P
but anyhow even if they do it like the DD directors cut it is still worth a double dip imo.
this to me was one of the best summer movies. i know i know not a big fan of TDK it ran too long. but this isnt the thrad for that sort of thing :-P
Bibi wrote: Well, I guess i'd rather wait for the official 3hours extended cut that will probably come up right after this release.
no..they'll probably release it whenever the sequel comes out
no..they'll probably release it whenever the sequel comes out
Well, I guess i'd rather wait for the official 3hours extended cut that will probably come up right after this release.
Actually, this one, IMO, was a smash for the fact that it did better than expected by the studio heads after the bomb which was the 2003 version. I'll get the 1-disc as I never seem to watch the special features. Also, I've noticed the '03 version in the five dollar bin at wal-mart, so, I might pick it up on my way out the door one day.
Bouncy X wrote: lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
Actually, I believe they both had a budget of about $130 mil. Couldn't find anything to back that except the info on box office mojo, but they're usually pretty good. It looks like they both performed about the same. Strange they would consider one a "Smash Hit" and the other a bust.
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
Actually, I believe they both had a budget of about $130 mil. Couldn't find anything to back that except the info on box office mojo, but they're usually pretty good. It looks like they both performed about the same. Strange they would consider one a "Smash Hit" and the other a bust.
i see they've bumped norton off
lee09 wrote: 133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
yeah but the difference is the 03 Hulk cost well over 100 million to make while this new one cost somewhere in the 70-80 million range if i remember right, if im wrong and forget what i say here lol. so while its still not a HUGE hit but its still a decent profit compared to the other.
I'm not an owner of the Blu-Ray but this U-feature thing the scene explorer does that mean we can watch a deleted scene in the middle of the movie so it'd end up fitting?
133 Million smash! Thats hilarious. The Ang Lee version did almost 'exactly' the same as this remake. Univeral you shamed yourself here, and this coming from an avid fan of the studio. Terrible move!
October 21...that's a bit under my expectations.
Dizagaox wrote: bananamana wrote: Whoever you 'got' them from needs a lesson in how to use photoshop well.
They are the covers...
No, they're not.
They are the covers...
No, they're not.
david white wrote: here is my one and only thing about the digital copy BS its not as bad as everyone is making them BUT i see no point in making a second disk all together for something which could easily fit on a standard CD! i mean really now if dvd9s house 8.5GB added the fact that most if not all computers these days have dvd drives then why have a disk devoted to that feature alone!
anyhow i hope that wasn't too bad of a rant.
besides what is the harm in making the disk which houses the DC in one of the paper disk sleeves or in a separate case all together like you see the sets in wal*mart.
also, they could just add extras onto the digital copy like Die Hard 4 did and problem solved. most people, myself inclued, complain about digital copies because they put them on a seperate disc and advertise it as a 2-3 disc collection. if they all followed the Die Hard 4 pattern i doubt anybody would care.
but yeah, its nice to see the confirmation that disc 3 is indeed just a digital copy in this case. what a crock. lol
anyhow i hope that wasn't too bad of a rant.
besides what is the harm in making the disk which houses the DC in one of the paper disk sleeves or in a separate case all together like you see the sets in wal*mart.
also, they could just add extras onto the digital copy like Die Hard 4 did and problem solved. most people, myself inclued, complain about digital copies because they put them on a seperate disc and advertise it as a 2-3 disc collection. if they all followed the Die Hard 4 pattern i doubt anybody would care.
but yeah, its nice to see the confirmation that disc 3 is indeed just a digital copy in this case. what a crock. lol
here is my one and only thing about the digital copy BS its not as bad as everyone is making them BUT i see no point in making a second disk all together for something which could easily fit on a standard CD! i mean really now if dvd9s house 8.5GB added the fact that most if not all computers these days have dvd drives then why have a disk devoted to that feature alone!
anyhow i hope that wasn't too bad of a rant.
besides what is the harm in making the disk which houses the DC in one of the paper disk sleeves or in a separate case all together like you see the sets in wal*mart.
anyhow i hope that wasn't too bad of a rant.
besides what is the harm in making the disk which houses the DC in one of the paper disk sleeves or in a separate case all together like you see the sets in wal*mart.
if those are the dark knight covers I like them and I hope they don't change the artwork.
The local JB HiFi retailer does heaps of 3D covers - lenicular I think they call it.
I will probably get the BD version myself....
I will probably get the BD version myself....
bananamana wrote: Whoever you 'got' them from needs a lesson in how to use photoshop well.
They are the covers...
They are the covers...
damnit is nortons cut gonna be released on dvd or not?
so, there isnt a single disc? only 3-discs edition?
limited edtion GreenRay???
Is green the new blue??
Man that Blu art is soo terrible...
ne1 know if nortons cut will be on dvd as well as blu ray and when it will be relased if its a diff or the same date
Hello All.
I have read on some-one else's site that the Street Date is 21/10/08.
I have read on some-one else's site that the Street Date is 21/10/08.
I second the idea of a green Blu-Ray box.
We really hae to realise, I think, that this really is a different film to the one that Ang Lee did, and not treat it like a sequel...
We really hae to realise, I think, that this really is a different film to the one that Ang Lee did, and not treat it like a sequel...
liono86 wrote: I totally DISAGREE. Now I agree with the whole Hulk smash, b/c, it had a lot of good action in it. But, there def. was interesting character moments. Especially between the Hulk and Betty. I think their chemistry was a whole lot better than that of Bana and Connelly. I especially like the whole part with the Hulk taking Betty off into the wilderness under that cave. It gave the Hulk a very human appeal to him and the closeness him and Betty had. Also, the general was way more bad arse than the Sam Elliot version. This was a way better Hulk than the 2003. Still, Wal-Mart carries the 2003 version in the five dollar bin, so, I might pick it up on my way off of work there one day.
Take another look Liono
I pretty much disagree with everything you just said. Sam Elliott was waay better in the role of Thunderbolt Ross. And I thought Liv Tyler was horrible. I was bored thru almost the entire movie, except for the Abomination battle. Overall I felt it was a bad script that was poorly acted all around. Ang Lee's version was a better "movie" on almost every level.
Take another look Liono
I pretty much disagree with everything you just said. Sam Elliott was waay better in the role of Thunderbolt Ross. And I thought Liv Tyler was horrible. I was bored thru almost the entire movie, except for the Abomination battle. Overall I felt it was a bad script that was poorly acted all around. Ang Lee's version was a better "movie" on almost every level.
Bouncy X wrote: yankeemike81 wrote: Why are people hating the digital Copies
i can't speak for anyone else obviously but personally i just dont get their point. i just dont understand why anyone would want to watch a movie on anything smaller than a television. especially something as small as an Ipod/mp3 player. i realize this is the age where many people watch movies on their PC's and stuff but even that i dont get. sure not everyone has a huge 78 inch widescreen tv but even a 21inch tube tv is MILES better than some pc monitor or mp3 player or whatever.
but again, that's just MY opinion. if the keep making these digital copies, it must be because some people want em.
thus my rant ends. lol
What I hate about them, single disc has the movie and maybe one feature, then they have the 2 disc edition, Disc one same movie and now 10 features, 2nd disc, c**ppy digital download, NO features. SO they could have fut all those features in the one disc edition and gotten rid of the 2 disc. I hate paying for hat extra disc of nothing I am never going to use.
I agree, WHO would want to watch a movie on an IPOD?
i can't speak for anyone else obviously but personally i just dont get their point. i just dont understand why anyone would want to watch a movie on anything smaller than a television. especially something as small as an Ipod/mp3 player. i realize this is the age where many people watch movies on their PC's and stuff but even that i dont get. sure not everyone has a huge 78 inch widescreen tv but even a 21inch tube tv is MILES better than some pc monitor or mp3 player or whatever.
but again, that's just MY opinion. if the keep making these digital copies, it must be because some people want em.
thus my rant ends. lol
What I hate about them, single disc has the movie and maybe one feature, then they have the 2 disc edition, Disc one same movie and now 10 features, 2nd disc, c**ppy digital download, NO features. SO they could have fut all those features in the one disc edition and gotten rid of the 2 disc. I hate paying for hat extra disc of nothing I am never going to use.
I agree, WHO would want to watch a movie on an IPOD?
"Did away with all of the interesting character moments from the first film and went down the 'Hulk smash!' route. Boring. Ropey acting as well. Perhaps if it turns out to be the rumoured 'Ed Norton' cut it will be better."
I totally DISAGREE. Now I agree with the whole Hulk smash, b/c, it had a lot of good action in it. But, there def. was interesting character moments. Especially between the Hulk and Betty. I think their chemistry was a whole lot better than that of Bana and Connelly. I especially like the whole part with the Hulk taking Betty off into the wilderness under that cave. It gave the Hulk a very human appeal to him and the closeness him and Betty had. Also, the general was way more bad arse than the Sam Elliot version. This was a way better Hulk than the 2003. Still, Wal-Mart carries the 2003 version in the five dollar bin, so, I might pick it up on my way off of work there one day.
I totally DISAGREE. Now I agree with the whole Hulk smash, b/c, it had a lot of good action in it. But, there def. was interesting character moments. Especially between the Hulk and Betty. I think their chemistry was a whole lot better than that of Bana and Connelly. I especially like the whole part with the Hulk taking Betty off into the wilderness under that cave. It gave the Hulk a very human appeal to him and the closeness him and Betty had. Also, the general was way more bad arse than the Sam Elliot version. This was a way better Hulk than the 2003. Still, Wal-Mart carries the 2003 version in the five dollar bin, so, I might pick it up on my way off of work there one day.
Bouncy X wrote: kingdbz93 wrote: Now I can understand the convenience of a digital copy on the Blu-Ray edition (for, me I don't have a Blu-Ray drive on my computer, and one reason I was skeptical to start a Blu-Ray collection was because I would be limited to just watching the movies in my living room, but with the digital copy i could watch it on the computer in my room as well) but for a regular DVD it seems pointless.
the digital copies are just standard def, regardless if you're buying the blu-ray version of the movie or not. kinda stupid if you ask me but i'm also one of those people who think the concept of digital copies themselves are stupid so. lol
I know the digital copies are standard def regardless, I was saying having a digital copy on the standard DVD is pretty pointless considering ever computer has a DVD drive. I was saying it makes sense having a digital copy on the Blu-Ray since most people dont have a Blu-Ray drive on their PC yet. Yeah i understand why most people see no point in digital copies, but i stated my reason for liking them above.
the digital copies are just standard def, regardless if you're buying the blu-ray version of the movie or not. kinda stupid if you ask me but i'm also one of those people who think the concept of digital copies themselves are stupid so. lol
I know the digital copies are standard def regardless, I was saying having a digital copy on the standard DVD is pretty pointless considering ever computer has a DVD drive. I was saying it makes sense having a digital copy on the Blu-Ray since most people dont have a Blu-Ray drive on their PC yet. Yeah i understand why most people see no point in digital copies, but i stated my reason for liking them above.
benny102995 wrote: I know this is for the hulk but i got the official cover art for "The Dark Knight". No details released yet.Release date December 8 2008.
The movie will be available in three standard flavors (from left to right): A 2-disc special edition, A 2-disc special edition in a limited Steelbook case, and on Blu-Ray.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/t...
There is also a 2-Disc BatMask edition, seen below.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
The Dark Knight DVD BatPod Giftset
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
Whoever you 'got' them from needs a lesson in how to use photoshop well.
The movie will be available in three standard flavors (from left to right): A 2-disc special edition, A 2-disc special edition in a limited Steelbook case, and on Blu-Ray.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/t...
There is also a 2-Disc BatMask edition, seen below.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
The Dark Knight DVD BatPod Giftset
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
Whoever you 'got' them from needs a lesson in how to use photoshop well.
I know this is for the hulk but i got the official cover art for "The Dark Knight". No details released yet.Release date December 8 2008.
The movie will be available in three standard flavors (from left to right): A 2-disc special edition, A 2-disc special edition in a limited Steelbook case, and on Blu-Ray.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/t...
There is also a 2-Disc BatMask edition, seen below.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
The Dark Knight DVD BatPod Giftset
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
The movie will be available in three standard flavors (from left to right): A 2-disc special edition, A 2-disc special edition in a limited Steelbook case, and on Blu-Ray.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/t...
There is also a 2-Disc BatMask edition, seen below.
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
The Dark Knight DVD BatPod Giftset
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/b...
yankeemike81 wrote: Why are people hating the digital Copies
i can't speak for anyone else obviously but personally i just dont get their point. i just dont understand why anyone would want to watch a movie on anything smaller than a television. especially something as small as an Ipod/mp3 player. i realize this is the age where many people watch movies on their PC's and stuff but even that i dont get. sure not everyone has a huge 78 inch widescreen tv but even a 21inch tube tv is MILES better than some pc monitor or mp3 player or whatever.
but again, that's just MY opinion. if the keep making these digital copies, it must be because some people want em.
thus my rant ends. lol
i can't speak for anyone else obviously but personally i just dont get their point. i just dont understand why anyone would want to watch a movie on anything smaller than a television. especially something as small as an Ipod/mp3 player. i realize this is the age where many people watch movies on their PC's and stuff but even that i dont get. sure not everyone has a huge 78 inch widescreen tv but even a 21inch tube tv is MILES better than some pc monitor or mp3 player or whatever.
but again, that's just MY opinion. if the keep making these digital copies, it must be because some people want em.
thus my rant ends. lol
Michael Cordwell wrote: Awful artwork. Poster was classy and gave a real sense of what the movie was like.
Indeed.
It seems taken from a comic book .
3 disc?! Why ?
Indeed.
It seems taken from a comic book .
3 disc?! Why ?
Leterrier said there probably wouldn't be any real extended cut (the theatrical one is the producers', not Norton's, nor Leterrier's). So don't expect the famous 28' long final battle the Amadeus Cho scenes or the extented scenes with Doc. Samson IN the movie to much.
Hopefully, the Cap America scene might be added (The Arctic alternate opening).
A new cut wouln'd be so hard to do, considering it already exist (Armstrong even had finished the final music score)...
Wait and see, I gess !
Ho, and, by the way: respecting the opinions and taste of others could be nice, from time to time
STOP SAYING SOMEONE IS A D....S BECAUSE HE LIKES SOMETHING YOU DON'T, otherwise don't expect others to respect YOUR opinion either !
Love that green blu-ray banner!!
So do we figure that this alternate opening is that Arctic suicide thing?
got the info- updated
The Incredible Hulk
Release Date- October 21 2008
single disc-unknown features
three disc-possibly 70 minutes of deleted scenes, alternate opening, digital copy, audio commentary, from comic book to screen, becoming the abomination, hulking out on campus, hulking out in the botling plant, hulking out in harlem, becoming the hulk, other features unknown
Blu-Ray-70 minutes of deleted scenes, alternate opening, collectible 3D packaging, BD live features, audio commentary, from comic book to screen, becoming the abomination, becoming the hulk, hulking out in the botling plant, hulking out in harlem, hulking out on campus, other features unknown
no two disc
The Incredible Hulk
Release Date- October 21 2008
single disc-unknown features
three disc-possibly 70 minutes of deleted scenes, alternate opening, digital copy, audio commentary, from comic book to screen, becoming the abomination, hulking out on campus, hulking out in the botling plant, hulking out in harlem, becoming the hulk, other features unknown
Blu-Ray-70 minutes of deleted scenes, alternate opening, collectible 3D packaging, BD live features, audio commentary, from comic book to screen, becoming the abomination, becoming the hulk, hulking out in the botling plant, hulking out in harlem, hulking out on campus, other features unknown
no two disc
Why are people hating the digital Copies so much i think they are good especaily with foxes version that works with itunes it gives you a simple quick way of geting a movie on to your ipod i do use rippers but having to code it right and having to worry about weather or not some movies sync up right and all its a pain in the neck to deal with some times.
but yeah This movie was Great i will deffintly buy it way better than the other version
but yeah This movie was Great i will deffintly buy it way better than the other version
bleh, this 2nd try at Hulk was just an average one at best.
I... actually think the cover is alright.
IDK. didn't see the flick tho.
Rental Fo Sho.
IDK. didn't see the flick tho.
Rental Fo Sho.
My eyes bulged when I saw "3 disc" then went back to normal when I saw "digital copy." Ah well, another movie to put on my iPod.
I am buying this, no doubt. This was a fun movie. I do agree... the cover is lame.
I'm still waiting for the release date to come. Where is it?
So is there any chance of the footage being mixed in with the actual movie? Is anyone going to make the effort to combine the scenes or is that even possible on blu-ray?
Disc three: Digital copy. Plllllease. Stop, the madness!
the green Blu-ray bar looks horrendous.
C'mon. It's not that hard to release Edward Norton's CUT DVD. Honestly, I wanna see them all.
Phil92 wrote: da_hustla wrote: When will the digital copy madness stop ?
When the studios realise that no-one uses it.
They use digital copies as a way not to pay to download it off of iTunes or Netflix or Movielink. Some people use it, not lots of people. Just some. But if you want to stand uncorrected, I'll said it's just a excuse to label it a 2 or 3-disc special edition for no reason at all.
When the studios realise that no-one uses it.
They use digital copies as a way not to pay to download it off of iTunes or Netflix or Movielink. Some people use it, not lots of people. Just some. But if you want to stand uncorrected, I'll said it's just a excuse to label it a 2 or 3-disc special edition for no reason at all.
Vin wrote: Right, will the 70 extra minutes be seamlessly inserted into the movie on the BR version, or is it just 70 minutes worth of deleted scenes?
Looks like all the deleted scenes including the alternate opening (which should be the Antartica opening) will be seperate I think :\
Looks like all the deleted scenes including the alternate opening (which should be the Antartica opening) will be seperate I think :\
Right, will the 70 extra minutes be seamlessly inserted into the movie on the BR version, or is it just 70 minutes worth of deleted scenes?
A green blu-ray box?
yeah weird. And why is there NO Bonus View 1.1 (PiP) on this. It looks like studios is dropping Bonus View 1.1. And going with the VERY lame BD-Live. Hate that s**t
The Blu-Ray Is Green.
What is with the TERRIBLE boxart. Even on the Blu cover
The Digital Copy thing wouldn't be so bad... IF IT FRICKIN' WORKED ON ANY IPOD OR IPHONE!!!!!!!
well least now we know for sure that disc 3 is a digital copy, not that anyone really doubted it but yeah.
If the prebook date is September 9, then the release date will most likely be the October 21 date mentioned earlier.
Found this on BBFC:
Audio Commentary
23 Deleted Scenes 41m 58s
Alternate Opening 2m 33s
From Comicbook to Screen 6m 30s
Becoming the Abomination 10m 13s
Hulking Out on Campus 10m 6s
Hulking Out in the Botling Plant 9m 41s
Becoming the Hulk 9m 19s
Hulking Out in Harlem 7m 55s
Scene Explorer A 26m 41s
Scene Explorer B 26m 41s
Scene Explorer C 26m 41s
Scene Explorer D 26m 41s
Audio Commentary
23 Deleted Scenes 41m 58s
Alternate Opening 2m 33s
From Comicbook to Screen 6m 30s
Becoming the Abomination 10m 13s
Hulking Out on Campus 10m 6s
Hulking Out in the Botling Plant 9m 41s
Becoming the Hulk 9m 19s
Hulking Out in Harlem 7m 55s
Scene Explorer A 26m 41s
Scene Explorer B 26m 41s
Scene Explorer C 26m 41s
Scene Explorer D 26m 41s
Few more details added
kingdbz93 wrote: Now I can understand the convenience of a digital copy on the Blu-Ray edition (for, me I don't have a Blu-Ray drive on my computer, and one reason I was skeptical to start a Blu-Ray collection was because I would be limited to just watching the movies in my living room, but with the digital copy i could watch it on the computer in my room as well) but for a regular DVD it seems pointless.
the digital copies are just standard def, regardless if you're buying the blu-ray version of the movie or not. kinda stupid if you ask me but i'm also one of those people who think the concept of digital copies themselves are stupid so. lol
the digital copies are just standard def, regardless if you're buying the blu-ray version of the movie or not. kinda stupid if you ask me but i'm also one of those people who think the concept of digital copies themselves are stupid so. lol
you might think a 3 disc version is a little overboard but its a 3 disc not a 2 disc because when the movie came out Leterrier said not sure if he was gonna put althe deleted scenes on the 2 disc because it would be too much for one or two discs with the other features so he probally decided to make a 3 disc not a 2 disc so he can put all 70 minutes on the dvd without taking out anyother planned features.
got the info-
The Incredible Hulk
release date-October 21 2008
single disc- unknown features
three disc- probally 70 minutes of addinitional scenes, digital copy, other features unknown
Blu-Ray- 70 minutes of addintional scenes, other features unknown
single disc cover-
http://www.dvdtown.com/images/displaymedia.php?...
no two disc
got the info-
The Incredible Hulk
release date-October 21 2008
single disc- unknown features
three disc- probally 70 minutes of addinitional scenes, digital copy, other features unknown
Blu-Ray- 70 minutes of addintional scenes, other features unknown
single disc cover-
http://www.dvdtown.com/images/displaymedia.php?...
no two disc
Now I can understand the convenience of a digital copy on the Blu-Ray edition (for, me I don't have a Blu-Ray drive on my computer, and one reason I was skeptical to start a Blu-Ray collection was because I would be limited to just watching the movies in my living room, but with the digital copy i could watch it on the computer in my room as well) but for a regular DVD it seems pointless.
This Hulk movie did not suck at all like that Ange Lee c**p. I will be picking this up on Blu-ray so I can enjoy this most awesome comic to film movie :D.
Disappointing artwork.
Pretty good movie. Not as good as the 2003 version.
I'll skip this release.
Pretty good movie. Not as good as the 2003 version.
I'll skip this release.
I Actually Really Liked This One, I Hope I'll Be Picking Up The Blu-Ray.
LostCity wrote: Sorry to say but if you're a fan of the 2003 version you're either a fairy or your taste is in your ass.
Funny, I feel the same way about fans of Vegemite.
Funny, I feel the same way about fans of Vegemite.
I liked the movie, more so than Ang Lee's version, but I was still surprised at how apparently difficult it is to make an extremely good "Hulk" movie. I really enjoyed the first half of "The Incredible Hulk" but once we meet that strange doctor (Mr. Blue) the film went downhill from there and for me at least, didn't recover until the very end (the second to the last sequence and the last sequence with Tony Stark). I've heard the DVD release to be 10/21 but that is tentative and is already a busy day DVD-release wise. I hope the 3-Disc Set is a true 3-Discer and doesn't come with a beyond-pointless digital copy. The director has said that he would put as many of the deleted scenes on the regular DVD as would fit and depending on how many discs it was so hopefully that lends some evidence that it could be a legit 3-Disc Set. The artwork isn't the greatest - way too on the nose. For Special Edition DVD covers, less is more.
I hope thats not the Blu box art.
Hopefully they do happen to change the boxart like they did with the Fountain. The color in this is horrible too, mixing green with purple? MEH and hopefully we do get a 3 hour cut, it's the only way for a good sequel and for Norton to return.
please dear God, change the boxart to the one used in the movie posters, this is godaweful
Now, for those of you who hated it, please don't give me a wedgie but...I actually really liked it, so much I saw it twice. & the cover looks amazing...but I would have done it like this:
single disc cover: poster of Norton forward & hulk backwards.
2-Disc set: this cover.
3-Disc set: I would have tried to find a way for all 3 to be on it. you know like 1, 2, 3....
I know *turns around for wedgie* let the yanking begin...
Zachariah
single disc cover: poster of Norton forward & hulk backwards.
2-Disc set: this cover.
3-Disc set: I would have tried to find a way for all 3 to be on it. you know like 1, 2, 3....
I know *turns around for wedgie* let the yanking begin...
Zachariah
I thought this was a decent movie, more in line with the T.V. show. I didn't care too much for the 2003 film & unless old greenskin was on screen "The Hulk" bored me.
Cover art sucks. Universal should have stuck with the one-sheet artwork.
Cover art sucks. Universal should have stuck with the one-sheet artwork.
harlandarlin wrote: THis movie didn't nail it! It had more action and Ed Norton ws great, but the script should have dove deeper like " Dark Knight" Now dark Knight is a film I saw on opening weekend and it still rings true. I'll never forget it and I want to see again and agin. The Incredible Hulk had a few cool action scenes , but it was dumbed down. Ang lee made a much better film in terms of story, but it lacked action. Everyone lieks to say how bad Ang's film is and trash for teh simple fact that it lacks action. Look beyond that and it's really an artsy and well done film. The more I watch it, the more I love it. A lot of people wrote "Unbreakable" off the same way. But that is also a great film just cause something doesn't move at the speed of M-Tv or a video game doesn't mean it's always trash. I will likely get this film on DVD simply cause I am a hulk fan and i want to see what scenes they stupidly left out. Make mine Ang lee. I hope if there is a next film it will have Angs Story strength and this films action. Check out my blog...
http://anghulkmovie.blogspot.com/
And why is Ed Norton not on the cover???
Oh please. Both 'Unbreakable' and Ang Lee's 'Hulk' are the cinematic equivalent of a steaming pile of horse feces.
http://anghulkmovie.blogspot.com/
And why is Ed Norton not on the cover???
Oh please. Both 'Unbreakable' and Ang Lee's 'Hulk' are the cinematic equivalent of a steaming pile of horse feces.
I hope that the Edward Norton cut gets released. But the way Leterrier talks it doesn't sound good, probably will be just presented as deleted scenes.
I enjoyed Incredible Hulk, though I don't see how people can say its a sequel to Hulk 03. Banner has a completely different origin in this movie.
The back to back poster would be ideal for a cover.
I enjoyed Incredible Hulk, though I don't see how people can say its a sequel to Hulk 03. Banner has a completely different origin in this movie.
The back to back poster would be ideal for a cover.
THis movie didn't nail it! It had more action and Ed Norton ws great, but the script should have dove deeper like " Dark Knight" Now dark Knight is a film I saw on opening weekend and it still rings true. I'll never forget it and I want to see again and agin. The Incredible Hulk had a few cool action scenes , but it was dumbed down. Ang lee made a much better film in terms of story, but it lacked action. Everyone lieks to say how bad Ang's film is and trash for teh simple fact that it lacks action. Look beyond that and it's really an artsy and well done film. The more I watch it, the more I love it. A lot of people wrote "Unbreakable" off the same way. But that is also a great film just cause something doesn't move at the speed of M-Tv or a video game doesn't mean it's always trash. I will likely get this film on DVD simply cause I am a hulk fan and i want to see what scenes they stupidly left out. Make mine Ang lee. I hope if there is a next film it will have Angs Story strength and this films action. Check out my blog...
http://anghulkmovie.blogspot.com/
And why is Ed Norton not on the cover???
http://anghulkmovie.blogspot.com/
And why is Ed Norton not on the cover???
the artwork look creep, but the movie was great
comes out november 25th
Director: Louis Leterrier
DVD publisher: Universal Studios
DVD country: U.S.
Region: 1: US and Canada
Genre: Action-Adventure / Superheroes
Original language: English
Release status: Announced
Screening year: 2008
DVD release date: 2008-11-25
Links: imdb
Director: Louis Leterrier
DVD publisher: Universal Studios
DVD country: U.S.
Region: 1: US and Canada
Genre: Action-Adventure / Superheroes
Original language: English
Release status: Announced
Screening year: 2008
DVD release date: 2008-11-25
Links: imdb
Sorry to say but if you're a fan of the 2003 version you're either a fairy or your taste is in your ass.
And I bet your runner up is V for Vendetta. Pansy.
This has a silly cartoon catchy cover art you know the "extended version" will have the poster art.
And I bet your runner up is V for Vendetta. Pansy.
This has a silly cartoon catchy cover art you know the "extended version" will have the poster art.
Oh, man... gimme some Edward Norton on the cover!
I went to see this because I was bored and tired after work one afternoon -- and I loved it. I'll be purchasing it, for sure.
I went to see this because I was bored and tired after work one afternoon -- and I loved it. I'll be purchasing it, for sure.
Yeah, that cover art sucks. Looks real kiddie as opposed to the much better theatrical poster with the full body shot of Ed Norton and the Hulk's massive frame in the background. Knowing the trend these days, the 3rd disc is probably a lame digital copy of the film.
If I had to choose between this film and Ang Lee's I would have to pick the latter. Lee's film was the introspective Hulk but it was much more engaging and visually superior. However, if you're looking for just "HULK SMASH" then this film is fine enough and enjoyable on only that level really. Unless Norton's longer cut is on this release and proves to be much better. Either way I will be getting this 3-Disc edition and I actually think the artwork is just fine.
i like this cover but it looks too cartoony.
Here's to hoping that somewhere among these three discs an extended cut is included. The main problem with this movie was that it seemed to try too hard to make up for the first film being so slow and cerebral (don't get me wrong, I liked the first film very much) by making it TOO fast, TOO action-oriented, and sans a whole lot of character development.
I'm hoping an extended cut would go some lengths to solve this problem.
I'm hoping an extended cut would go some lengths to solve this problem.
I liked this one better than the first. Can't wait to see the deleted scenes.
I liked this one. Maybe i'll pick this one up.
Missed this in the theaters. Might get the Blu-ray......
The movie from 2003 also get besides the 2 disc SE,a 3 disc LE.
Disc 3 with that Le get a 45 minute making off future.
If it going to be a good 3 disc SE and avaible in my country too,together with Hulk from 2003 and the future Casino Royale 2006 - 3 disc CE (I hope for R2 there change it in a 4 disc CE and at the single of you know my name as disc 4.) it going to be my fourth 3 disc,because i also own the 3 disc LE of Mission Impossible 3.
Disc 3 with that Le get a 45 minute making off future.
If it going to be a good 3 disc SE and avaible in my country too,together with Hulk from 2003 and the future Casino Royale 2006 - 3 disc CE (I hope for R2 there change it in a 4 disc CE and at the single of you know my name as disc 4.) it going to be my fourth 3 disc,because i also own the 3 disc LE of Mission Impossible 3.
What is with these awful covers? That almost looks as fake as the CG in the movie itself.
Yea Ed and Liv weren't really that good, altho they're both good actors....
i hope there is an extended cut cuz this movie and the ang lee version didn't really do it for me. story or characters werent too engaging....
i hope there is an extended cut cuz this movie and the ang lee version didn't really do it for me. story or characters werent too engaging....
LEOohhyeaah wrote: I was actually really entertained by this. Edward Norton was great. Liv Tyler was great. A must buy... for me at least. Great artwork also.
I'm sorry. I couldn't let the "Live Tyler was great" comment go. I found her performance to be terrible. Jen Connelly was waaay better. Overall, I thought this movie was poorly acted and a step back from the original. I'll wait for the bargain bin.
I'm sorry. I couldn't let the "Live Tyler was great" comment go. I found her performance to be terrible. Jen Connelly was waaay better. Overall, I thought this movie was poorly acted and a step back from the original. I'll wait for the bargain bin.
The television series and the 2003 film blew huge chunks, but I found the sequel (don't bother correcting me, the film references events in the 2003 film) more accessible and enjoyable. It was missing some of the character moments that made the first flick bearable, but it moved at a more fast pace and Tim Roth was a way better villain than Nick Nolte's.
I'd be happy just to see a single-disc edition with commentary (preferrably with Leterrier's/Norton's cut) and that deleted Captain America scene Leterrier was talking about. A three-disc edition (particularly with a digital copy) is overkill for this flick.
If there's a movie that deserved a 3-disc set, it's THE DARK KNIGHT or IRON MAN. Not this film.
I'd be happy just to see a single-disc edition with commentary (preferrably with Leterrier's/Norton's cut) and that deleted Captain America scene Leterrier was talking about. A three-disc edition (particularly with a digital copy) is overkill for this flick.
If there's a movie that deserved a 3-disc set, it's THE DARK KNIGHT or IRON MAN. Not this film.
This was just fun. It was an entertaining summer ride that beyond everything else had the Hulk having a good ol' down and dirty fight which superhero movies tend to underplay. It wasn't as personal as the Ang Lee one and certainly didn't do anything new with the franchise, but I'll be getting it as it was a blast. (Please, Please, please innclude the Ed Norton cut!)
ok, THE INCREDIBLE HULK comes out NOVEMBER 25
and THE DARK KNIGHT comes out NOVEMBER 18
and is this the regular thing? like 3-discs? no single disc?
and THE DARK KNIGHT comes out NOVEMBER 18
and is this the regular thing? like 3-discs? no single disc?
Pixarfan517 wrote: Where's the release date for this?
There's no information up there yet.
The release date is October 21.
There's no information up there yet.
The release date is October 21.
Where's the release date for this?
The cover sucks, but this film blows away the Ang Lee version and really captured the magic of the TV series.
I hope one of those discs is the longer cut that Ed Norton was hoping for.
As a Hulk fan, this is indeed a must buy.
I hope one of those discs is the longer cut that Ed Norton was hoping for.
As a Hulk fan, this is indeed a must buy.
Will only buy if there is an extended cut on the release.
the fact that articles refers to it as "cut footage" seems to give the impression it wont necessarily be a longer cut of the movie, but just the cut footage available on disc, like as deleted scenes or something.
but hey, here's hoping i'm wrong.
but hey, here's hoping i'm wrong.
Chaziah wrote: I enjoyed this one quite a bit. I'll pick it up for sure.
A few weeks ago, I saw that the release date was set for September 16. But, this week DVDizzy changed the date to October 21.
I have this title on my "on order" list and it says release date is November 25th,
"Get Smart" December 09th, "Kung Fu Panda" November 18th, and "Wanted" on December 02nd
A few weeks ago, I saw that the release date was set for September 16. But, this week DVDizzy changed the date to October 21.
I have this title on my "on order" list and it says release date is November 25th,
"Get Smart" December 09th, "Kung Fu Panda" November 18th, and "Wanted" on December 02nd
Cover art sucks!! and I agree, digital copies are worthless. knock a few buck off the price of the disk, and keep the stupid thing.
I enjoyed this one quite a bit. I'll pick it up for sure.
A few weeks ago, I saw that the release date was set for September 16. But, this week DVDizzy changed the date to October 21.
A few weeks ago, I saw that the release date was set for September 16. But, this week DVDizzy changed the date to October 21.
will be getting the Blu-Ray.
Damn, Universal sure to like their 3-disc releases....
HD digest wrote:
'Incredible Hulk' Blu-ray Planned with 70 Minutes of Cut Footage
Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 11:00 AM ET
Tags: Disc Announcements, Universal (all tags)
Fans hoping for an even bigger 'Incredible Hulk' need only wait for the upcoming Blu-ray release, which according to the film's director will come with over an hour of cut footage.
In a recent interview with Collider, 'Incredible Hulk' helmer Louis Leterrier revealed that the planned Blu-ray release of the film (which is due to open this Friday) will include no less than 70 minutes of material excised from the theatrical cut.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I want to put [on the Blu-ray] everything we shot," said Leterrier. "I'm not the kind of guy that likes to keep the stuff for myself. In the 70 minutes, there's some great stuff and there's some really horrible stuff, but you'll see it all."
As has been widely publicized, those close to the production have speculated that Leterrier and 'Hulk' star Edward Norton had a famous falling out over the edits made to the movie, which now runs 114 minutes. We'll certainly be looking forward to having all our questions answered by the eventual Blu-ray release.
Though any potential street date for 'The Incredible Hulk' is still far from being announced by Universal, as always, we'll keep you posted on the release as soon as more news comes to us. Stay tuned!
i know it was a premature post 2 months ago but thought i would chip in
copied from http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Disc_Ann...
'Incredible Hulk' Blu-ray Planned with 70 Minutes of Cut Footage
Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 11:00 AM ET
Tags: Disc Announcements, Universal (all tags)
Fans hoping for an even bigger 'Incredible Hulk' need only wait for the upcoming Blu-ray release, which according to the film's director will come with over an hour of cut footage.
In a recent interview with Collider, 'Incredible Hulk' helmer Louis Leterrier revealed that the planned Blu-ray release of the film (which is due to open this Friday) will include no less than 70 minutes of material excised from the theatrical cut.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I want to put [on the Blu-ray] everything we shot," said Leterrier. "I'm not the kind of guy that likes to keep the stuff for myself. In the 70 minutes, there's some great stuff and there's some really horrible stuff, but you'll see it all."
As has been widely publicized, those close to the production have speculated that Leterrier and 'Hulk' star Edward Norton had a famous falling out over the edits made to the movie, which now runs 114 minutes. We'll certainly be looking forward to having all our questions answered by the eventual Blu-ray release.
Though any potential street date for 'The Incredible Hulk' is still far from being announced by Universal, as always, we'll keep you posted on the release as soon as more news comes to us. Stay tuned!
i know it was a premature post 2 months ago but thought i would chip in
copied from http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Disc_Ann...
horrorfan25 wrote: BTW the film is coming out September 16, 2008.
Nope. It's coming out on October 21.
Nope. It's coming out on October 21.
aw the hulk is dancing with another... hulk.
Awfull cover
I never got around to seeing this...but I don't feel like I missed out on an awful lot, I actually like the cover art though so hmm..
Agree with SeeWalk on the cover/poster. I might be tempted if there is the extended cut on blu-ray...otherwise, I will wait for the extended cut to be released, or for this to drop well below the $15 pricetag.
I was actually really entertained by this. Edward Norton was great. Liv Tyler was great. A must buy... for me at least. Great artwork also.
As much as I love the regular poster, I actually really like that cover too. And I also really hope that the release has the extended cut, but since its not advertised on there, I doubt it does. Then again, it says nothing about a digital copy either, and they usually make damn sure that the cover tells you about it. I'm really curious to see what exactly is on these 3 discs.
As the hustla pointed out above, the third disc is just a digital copy, guaranteed.
Why can't they just use the Movie Poster with Norton facing forward and the Hulk facing backwards. That's one of the coolest posters i've ever seen and would make a kick @$$ dvd cover.
horrorfan25 wrote: BTW the film is coming out September 16, 2008.
while i hope you're right, considering how close that date is and there's no spec info or official announcement yet, it doesnt seem likely. though if there's already a cover, maybe the rest will come this week or next.
either way, i enjoyed this very much...over the top cartoony violence is what Hulk shoulda been the first time around. although i'm not one of those 2003 haters, i like the first one too but yeah...this was more up my alley.
and you gotta love the use of the "hulk smash" line....it reminded me of the "i am megatron" line from transformers...they were both so cheesy beyond words and yet so cool at the same time. lol
while i hope you're right, considering how close that date is and there's no spec info or official announcement yet, it doesnt seem likely. though if there's already a cover, maybe the rest will come this week or next.
either way, i enjoyed this very much...over the top cartoony violence is what Hulk shoulda been the first time around. although i'm not one of those 2003 haters, i like the first one too but yeah...this was more up my alley.
and you gotta love the use of the "hulk smash" line....it reminded me of the "i am megatron" line from transformers...they were both so cheesy beyond words and yet so cool at the same time. lol
horrorfan25 wrote: 3-disc? Like other comments that's going WAY over-board. If someone gets the 3-disc treatment it should be 'The dark knight'. I just hope the extras are good. BTW the film is coming out September 16, 2008. Also it would be cool if they threw in the 3 hour movie.
If that release date is true, then Septemeber sure is gonna be a hell of a lot more expensive for me this year than last year. This year, we got Speed Racer, Iron Man, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, and now THIS.
I enjoyed this Hulk version a lot so I'll definitely buying it, but like others said, the 3-disc is a bit much.
If that release date is true, then Septemeber sure is gonna be a hell of a lot more expensive for me this year than last year. This year, we got Speed Racer, Iron Man, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, and now THIS.
I enjoyed this Hulk version a lot so I'll definitely buying it, but like others said, the 3-disc is a bit much.
What a strange state of affairs.
Sweet, a 3 disc set.
I hope we get Nortan's cut of the movie on one of those discs and the Captain America deleted scene.
I hope we get Nortan's cut of the movie on one of those discs and the Captain America deleted scene.
3-disc? Like other comments that's going WAY over-board. If someone gets the 3-disc treatment it should be 'The dark knight'. I just hope the extras are good. BTW the film is coming out September 16, 2008. Also it would be cool if they threw in the 3 hour movie.
Yeah, that art doesn't spoil anything.
I wasn't impressed at all. Which is a shame because I was really hoping they nailed it this time around.
Did away with all of the interesting character moments from the first film and went down the 'Hulk smash!' route. Boring. Ropey acting as well. Perhaps if it turns out to be the rumoured 'Ed Norton' cut it will be better.
Disappointing move...worst then the previous...but ok cover...i like it. Hulk looks better then in the movie :D
The Incredible Hulk
found this info:
2008 Universal 2.35:,
1 DD 5.1;
$29.98 SRP;
Also available in 3-Disc
Special Edition DVD with digital copy
and on Blu-ray Disc
found this info:
2008 Universal 2.35:,
1 DD 5.1;
$29.98 SRP;
Also available in 3-Disc
Special Edition DVD with digital copy
and on Blu-ray Disc
My bet is; Disc one is the 3 hour version, Disc 2 theatrical and commentary, and disc 3 will be the features.
I will for sure get this one hope the bluray art is better the dvd art is a bit lame and cartoonish As for the movie it self i kind of liked it way better than the 2003 version effects where good and the hulk look good also cant wait to c it in high def
This movie was about 2000 times better than that boring, god-awful 2003 version. This had all the action the other was sorely lacking and it moved along at a good pace. This one nailed it where the first one didn't. Good stuff. A definite buy.
da_hustla wrote: When will the digital copy madness stop ?
When the studios realise that no-one uses it.
When the studios realise that no-one uses it.
Pretty good movie. Hope they change the cover. I'm pretty sure this is how the 3 disc will play out :
Disc 1: Movie and commentary
Disc 2: Features, deleted scenes, etc
Disc 3: The stupid ass digital copy of the movie
Just like the 3 disc version of Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Universal Studios will only release the 1 and 3 disc version. So that the only way to get some special features is to pay more and get a wasted third disc. When will the digital copy madness stop ?
Disc 1: Movie and commentary
Disc 2: Features, deleted scenes, etc
Disc 3: The stupid ass digital copy of the movie
Just like the 3 disc version of Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Universal Studios will only release the 1 and 3 disc version. So that the only way to get some special features is to pay more and get a wasted third disc. When will the digital copy madness stop ?
I was kinda disappointed by both versions of Hulk.
They had 2 chances to nail it, and I reckon both don't cut it, for different reasons.
What a bummer, as both movies had so much potential.
Not sure which one I dislike the least.
They had 2 chances to nail it, and I reckon both don't cut it, for different reasons.
What a bummer, as both movies had so much potential.
Not sure which one I dislike the least.
Awful artwork. Poster was classy and gave a real sense of what the movie was like.
3 disc?
Does this mean the rumoured 3 hour version will be on one of the discs?
Does this mean the rumoured 3 hour version will be on one of the discs?
Good movie, but I personally preferred the 2003 version. I'll still pick this up, though.
A 3-Disc is going a little overboard, though.
A 3-Disc is going a little overboard, though.
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot News
Winter's Tale
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Journey to the West
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
The Lego Movie
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Warner Bros July & August Releases
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Reviewer Agony
Top Gun: Collectors Edition
US - BD
Bruno
US - BD
Lucker: The Necrophagous
US - DVD
Emmanuelle in Soho
UK - DVD R2
Danny Roane: First Time Director
US - DVD R1
Unseen Reviews
Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka
UK - DVD R2
Stuff, The
UK - BD RB
Nymphomaniac
UK - DVD R2
Gregory's Girl
UK - BD RB
Pawnbroker, The
US - BD RA
Most Talked About
The Lego Movie
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Fargo: Remastered
US - BD RA
The Monuments Men
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Warner Bros July & August Releases
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
Harry Potter Hogwarts Collection
US - DVD R1 | BD RA
