No-ho-ho! No way, man. This movie looks terrible and extremely uninteresting. Paul W.S. Anderson is an awful director, not as awful as Michael Bay of course, but wow. I have no idea why Christoph Waltz agreed to do this. He's an oscar winner for crying out loud! Does he need money, is that why? Logan Lerman looks ridiculous in that wig or extensions or whatever. Almost as if they want us to make fun of him. And it just keeps getting worse. I'm not even gonna start on the art cover. Wow. Just wow. And not in a positive way.

Despite the fact that so much of it was stupid, some of the plot elements failed completely, and some of the CGI was horrific.....it was still an overall entertaining flick.

I liked the movie, but I hate the art

"FUN & ENTERTAINING FOR THE WHOLE FAMILY!"

Makes sense considering it's rated PG-13. Fun for the whole family, as long as they're 13 or older, otherwise you should take extreme caution. What a mess.

Also, this front and center character looks less like he's posing for action and more like he's posing to tell the world "Yes, I am handsome". I guess that's the reason why they threw in Orlando Bloom, because he has trademark on that pose.

Awful cover art. Movie looks pretty piss-poor as well. Pass.

Never saw the film, but man, horrible cover art here.

I really enjoyed the movie; just a two hour unapologetic popcorn film.  And Anderson definitely knows how to shoot 3D.