The Time Traveler's Wife (US - DVD R1 | BD)
Warner Home Video has announced DVD and Blu-ray releases of the film
Title: The Time Traveler's Wife (IMDb)
Starring: Eric Bana
Released: 9th February 2010
SRP: $28.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Warner Home Video has announced DVD ($28.98) and Blu-ray ($34.87) releases of The Time Traveler's Wife which stars Eric Bana, and Rachel McAdams. Each will be available to own from the 9th February. As far as we know, the only extra material on the DVD release will be a Love Beyond Words featurette in which Rachel McAdams, Eric Bana, director Robert Schwentke, and screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin recount the popular tale's journey. The Blu-ray release will include that, along with a Unconventional Love Story featurette in which Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana explore defining moments in their characters' relationship, and a digital copy of the film. We've attached our first look at the official package artwork below:



News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Eric Bana
Released: 9th February 2010
SRP: $28.98 (DVD)
Further Details:
Warner Home Video has announced DVD ($28.98) and Blu-ray ($34.87) releases of The Time Traveler's Wife which stars Eric Bana, and Rachel McAdams. Each will be available to own from the 9th February. As far as we know, the only extra material on the DVD release will be a Love Beyond Words featurette in which Rachel McAdams, Eric Bana, director Robert Schwentke, and screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin recount the popular tale's journey. The Blu-ray release will include that, along with a Unconventional Love Story featurette in which Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana explore defining moments in their characters' relationship, and a digital copy of the film. We've attached our first look at the official package artwork below:



News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
Existing Posts
Pass
I don't think it has hit theatres down under - if it does of course....
I just love time travel as a dramatic / sci-fi device, so the comments saying that it was "confusing" and "sad" just make me want to see it more.
good looking cover art.
DestroVega wrote: My fiance' has been telling me she wants to see this since seeing the first trailer, as she says it's her favorite book... I really didn't want to see it then, after reading the comments, I hope she hits her head, gets amnesia only on her tastes of novels, and I don't have to suffer through this.
It's not bad by any means. But it does depend on whether you can accept the basic premise, whether you'll like it or not. And if you or your g.f. loves Rachel McAdams -- she just sparkles here.
It's not bad by any means. But it does depend on whether you can accept the basic premise, whether you'll like it or not. And if you or your g.f. loves Rachel McAdams -- she just sparkles here.
Looked pretty bad. Wont be seeing.
My fiance' has been telling me she wants to see this since seeing the first trailer, as she says it's her favorite book... I really didn't want to see it then, after reading the comments, I hope she hits her head, gets amnesia only on her tastes of novels, and I don't have to suffer through this.
stevepulaski wrote: Looked pretty cliche and bland. Not interested.
You actually just described the whole movie, lol
You actually just described the whole movie, lol
Looked pretty cliche and bland. Not interested.
Will Netflix this movie for my mom and my sisters.
Pure c**p.
Yeh i forgot about the valentine thing, LOL they want as much profit as they can(TRY TO) get
I went to a matinee just because at the time I already saw District 9 and Inglourious Basterds, so had nothing left to see and was bored. It caught my interest, but it's like every other chick flick out there. I'll take a pass on a purchase. I have several Blu-rays to buy in December. District 9, Inglourious Basterds, and 9.
matt86 wrote: This is taking a while. What did it hit theatres in august/sept? Like others though i didnt care for this film. I didnt hate it but it was just lacking that something
With Valentine's Day the following week, the Feb. release date seems ideal. A long time after the theatrical window, but ideal nonetheless.
With Valentine's Day the following week, the Feb. release date seems ideal. A long time after the theatrical window, but ideal nonetheless.

This was a great movie. I normally hate time travel movies (too confusing for me) but this was surprisingly effective. Probably because I've had a huge Rachel McAdams crush since "Mean Girls" back in 2004. I'd love any movie she was in. But it sucks we have to wait until February...of course Warner Brothers would try to cash in on the Valentine's Day date.
For a film of it's genre, the slow weepy drama, there were some good moments, and the director's style was well placed. Eric Bana was as exceptional as always, but McAdams, well, never watched a film with her in before, only film I'll intend to watch now is Sherlock Holmes, she was awful in this.
I enjoyed this, really glad they kept the great poster art. Probably buy the Blu when it gets cheap.
Beautifully-shot movie with an interesting story -- plus the Rachel McAdams factor in. She was REALLY good in this pic. Eric Bana was pretty good too. And this is Bruce Joel Rubin's best script, the other romantic drama he did was the cheesy "Ghost."
Happy to see that New Line/Warners is going the OAR-only route for the DVD, but disappointed with the special features.
Happy to see that New Line/Warners is going the OAR-only route for the DVD, but disappointed with the special features.
It was pretty good, but holy s**t was it confusing.
I was expecting a nice, romantic fantasy type of
story. What a let-down. Slow, boring, confusing,
dark, sad and then credits rolled.
Wrong choice for the male lead. The supporting
roles didn't really help either. Rachel McAdams
is perfect as always but still...
Year's biggest disappointment.
story. What a let-down. Slow, boring, confusing,
dark, sad and then credits rolled.
Wrong choice for the male lead. The supporting
roles didn't really help either. Rachel McAdams
is perfect as always but still...
Year's biggest disappointment.
This is taking a while. What did it hit theatres in august/sept? Like others though i didnt care for this film. I didnt hate it but it was just lacking that something
I was quite disappointed in this movie, but have been curious when it would end up getting released. Don't think I'll bother watching it again though. I love Rachel McAdams and this looked like a big guilty pleasure, but the leads had no chemistry and I really didn't care very much about what was going on. It was OK, just nothing great. Wish it had been better.
Glad they used the theatrical art for the cover. It's gorgeous.
Glad they used the theatrical art for the cover. It's gorgeous.
I'm surprised this is being released in February. I was expecting this one out by Christmas.
Anyway, liked this one, didn't love it. Will buy eventually.
Anyway, liked this one, didn't love it. Will buy eventually.
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Articles





New Easter Eggs





Reviewer Agony





Most Talked About




