i12bnmovie wrote: The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Last Film.  They won't make anymore.

That's true. For me the series always rested on the kids and now that their films are over with I really don't have an interest to see the others made.

iconoclast wrote:  
Seriously, you can't say c**p on this site, that's f**king ridiculous, are their 4 year olds on this site, or just Mormons?

(OFF-TOPIC) The site said from the get-go (all those years ago) that the word was the most-used word in any forum site.  In order for the boards to not get clogged with this word, they added it to the language filter to deter people from using it and making them use more imaginative ways to comment on a movie.  It's genius and mature of them to do so, unlike so many movie and game forum sites.

(ON-TOPIC)
I was extremely underwhelmed with the first movie in this franchise that I never got around to "Prince Caspian."  This one doesn't look any better, thus I will avoid it as well.  Gimme Harry Potter any day.  I would much rather see "His Dark Materials" be finished than the "Narnia" franchise continue.

^They made more from this film then Caspian, even though you might not see it by looking at box office gross alone. You have to take into account the production budget which was much lower in Dawn Treader then Caspian. Looking at that this movie was much more profitable. If they keep the budget the same or even lower and still make $360+ million, they will keep making money.

Damn, I was hoping the kids would join Michael Apted in the commentary the way they did with Andrew Adamson for the first two DVDs.

Interesting that there doesn't seem to be any signs of a one-disc DVD release.  That's rare, these days.

Nakedman wrote: And for such a big budget I felt the movie was really quite lacklustre and cheap looking... especially that dragon.

I think the VFX is on par with the first two. Try and compare it later if u don't believe me. It's the 3D that sucks. The dragon was supposed to be clumsy & goofy looking since it transformed from the clumsy & goofy looking Eustace. The monster at the ending was good.

Well Caspian Is An A$$HOLE AND Aslan Is Everything And @Disciple Yes Your Collection Is really Huge Really Really Huge Congrats You Look Like A Rich Boy

This is totally off topic, but Saccyind, here's a list of all of My Narnia collectibles: http://forum.narniaweb.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&am... (a bit out of date though, need to update.)

Turns out I didn't miss it. Easily the best of the three films and one of my favorite books of the series. I did think the ending was a bit too preachy though. The film was lacking a decent lesson compared to the others.

As a huge Narnia fan and the proud owner of the biggest collection of Narnia collectibles & merchandise (related to the films)in the world, I have to say that I was hugely disappointed by this film.

It's a total mess of a film that does almost nothing right. The beginning and the end of it were brilliant, so was Will Poulter as Eustace, but the seven swords and the green mist ruined it for me.

Also, I'm surprised this wasn't nominated in the "Most Eye Gouging Mis-Use of 3-D" category of the Razzies.

Btw, the art work for this is a lot better than the absolutely horrible posters they released for it (that were made by amateurs).

Extras:

* Deleted Scenes (The Kids In Narnia…, Eustace II, Mutiny, Caspian Doubt) (05:35)
* Music Video: There´s A Place For Us (By Carrie Underwood). (00:59)
* VFX Reel – Progression With Optional Commentary By Michael Apted And Mark Johnson. (12:58)
* Good vs. Evil: Battle On The Sea. (10:53)
* Portal To Narnia: A Painting Comes To Life. (07:20)

Gabe Powers wrote: You guys that are happy with the box office take have to keep in mind that the cost doesn't include advertising costs (probably $50 to $100 million), and that half the money made goes to the theaters. I hope for the fans' sake they make more, but it sounds like they barely broke even on this one.

The budget was an estimated $140-$155M, which is a lot less than what "Prince Caspian" cost to make and market (and it wasn't promoted heavily, I only noticed two TV spots for it). Not to mention it's Fox's first $100M grossing film in over a year. It probably won't cost as much to make "Silver Chair" or "Magician's Nephew" due to a new cast of characters.

Fox deserves a decent franchise other than "Avatar", "Wimpy Kid" and their "X-Men" franchises.

You guys that are happy with the box office take have to keep in mind that the cost doesn't include advertising costs (probably $50 to $100 million), and that half the money made goes to the theaters. I hope for the fans' sake they make more, but it sounds like they barely broke even on this one.

It opened with $24M, but had a good 5x multiplier throughout the holiday season. It had decent word-of-mouth, and it was far better than what the critics said it was.

Although I hadn't read the source novel it was based on, maybe that's why some fans are riled about the changes.

Not that I care but ud figure a 3d bluray would come as welll. I didn't care for this one, just kinda boring to me but oh well

I'm glad that this film finally reached the 100mil mark in the US and is doing extremely well in the foreign box office. This was really good and that means we may get another Narnia film. Over 350mil worldwide and still hasn't reached Japan and Venezuela yet.

Pretty good movie. Better than the second one IMO... almost as good as the first.