News: The Young Victoria (US - DVD R1

The Young Victoria (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)

Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced this new Emily Blunt movie

Title: The Young Victoria (IMDb)
Starring: Emily Blunt
Released: 20th April 2010
SRP: $27.96 (DVD)

Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced DVD ($27.96) and Blu-ray ($34.95) releases of The Young Victoria for the 20th April. Extras will include deleted and extended scenes, and featurettes ("Making of The Young Victoria", "The Real Queen Victoria", "The Coronation", "The Wedding", "Lavish History: A Look at the Costumes and Locations"). The Blu-ray release will also include additional BD-Live features. We've attached the package artwork for the DVD release below:

Revised Artwork

Original Artwork

News by Tom Woodward

Comments

Reply

Message Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.

Username: Not Registered?

Password: Forgotten Details?

Subject: Message:

Additional Options These options are not required but may be useful. Disable ActiveCode within message Disable Smilies within message Include signature below the message

Existing Posts

Michael Greenwaldt

William Coffey wrote: Jeyl wrote: Tom wrote: Revised artwork added
Aww dang. Now every time I look at the cover art, I'll be reminded that this very nice movie was beaten by Star Trek, and I hated the work done on that film. All it is is pointy ears and aliens who are the epiphany of being used solely as background fodder. All the aliens that were cool looking that did have moments involving the plot and story were all deleted. That's not a good use of makeup! This movie is.

TVT's "makeup" was just hair placement.

The nomination easily could have gone to more deserving movies like District 9 or The Imanginarium of Doctor Parnassus. Or the should-have-been-qualified Drag Me to Hell or Inglourious Basterds.

DRAG ME TO HELL missed out on quite a few deserving technical nominations, like sound, score, and makeup.

iszac

Actually I prefer the previous artwork, although to mention the awards winning, but too much text, spoiled the cover...

MiseryMatt

LOL "Slightly" revised cover art.

William Coffey

Jeyl wrote: Tom wrote: Revised artwork added
Aww dang. Now every time I look at the cover art, I'll be reminded that this very nice movie was beaten by Star Trek, and I hated the work done on that film. All it is is pointy ears and aliens who are the epiphany of being used solely as background fodder. All the aliens that were cool looking that did have moments involving the plot and story were all deleted. That's not a good use of makeup! This movie is.

TVT's "makeup" was just hair placement.

The nomination easily could have gone to more deserving movies like District 9 or The Imanginarium of Doctor Parnassus. Or the should-have-been-qualified Drag Me to Hell or Inglourious Basterds.

Jeyl

Tom wrote: Revised artwork added
Aww dang. Now every time I look at the cover art, I'll be reminded that this very nice movie was beaten by Star Trek, and I hated the work done on that film. All it is is pointy ears and aliens who are the epiphany of being used solely as background fodder. All the aliens that were cool looking that did have moments involving the plot and story were all deleted. That's not a good use of makeup! This movie is.

Tom

Revised artwork added

iconoclast

I liked ms. Blunt in The Wolfman, but this doesn't interest me much

BoBoi

Having said that I thought this was quite good, I would love to have Bright Star on Blu-ray over this one.

bobbywatson

The first half of this is actually quite better than most boring period pieces that plop into arthouse theaters every December. But then it takes a wrong turn and snoozes for the second half.

Blunt is very good, though. She seems to be enjoying herself. And the direction by Jean Marc Vallee is actually pretty lively.

3 out of 5. Nothing more, nothing less.

BoBoi

lee09 wrote: Edgeman05 wrote: Heard this wasnt too good. Will be passing

Holding a 75% Fresh @ Rotten Tomatoes it must be real bad! (sarcastically speaking) http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/young_victoria/
I thought this was good. Blunt was quite delightful. I think RT gives good indication in regards to the quality of films. I just don't trust the general public anymore.

lee09

Edgeman05 wrote: Heard this wasnt too good. Will be passing

Holding a 75% Fresh @ Rotten Tomatoes it must be real bad! (sarcastically speaking) http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/young_victoria/

Edgeman05

Heard this wasnt too good. Will be passing

MiseryMatt

Wanted to see this, I'll check it out. Nice artwork, although Emily Blunt's face looks too perfect. Photoshop much/

Michael Greenwaldt

Really nice artwork. They should have included something about the award noms though.

Anyway, I sadly missed this during the one week it was at my theater. Can't wait to check it out. I love Emily Blunt and really enjoy these kinds of movies.

insurrbution

I checked, it's actually a poster:

http://www.impawards.com/intl/uk/2009/young_vic...

iszac

The cover not bad, at least better than a lot of recent artworks...