Rudy Guy wrote:
Anyone think (hope) there will be an Avengers mega-set once the whole Avengers setup runs it's course next year?

If anything it'll look exactly like this http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51J3Ym5gY... just a repackage of the stuff from Paramount. Same c**p, different box.

Disney is releasing "The Avengers" next year, both theatrically and on home video (as well as "Iron Man 3" the year after). Strange thing is, the official "Avengers" website and poster has the Paramount logo on it.

The best Paramount can do is they'll probably package up all four Marvel films they've released so far when "Captain America" hits DVD, Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D.

I liked this way more than I thought I was going to. Hemsworth owned as Thor as did Hiddleston as Loki. As stated before, this one was going to be tricky to make fit seamlessly into the established Marvel-Verse thus far, but IMO I think they did a darn fine job. I'm not going to say they knocked it out of the park, but I think they came fairly close.

Anyone think (hope) there will be an Avengers mega-set once the whole Avengers setup runs it's course next year?

I'd love to see a set, chock full o' features including Iron Man I and II, Thor, Captain America and of course, The Avengers. I know Leterrier's Hulk should be in there as well given the Tony Stark Cameo, but with the actor change from Norton to Ruffalo in The Avengers (Both fine choices but I REALLY wanted to see Norton carry on as Banner) it might make for an odd fit.

hogaburger wrote:  If they left out Kat Dennings...

Don't you bad mouth Kat Dennings!! She was awesome!!

Awesome cover art. This film was better then I expected it to be.  I enjoyed the new age twist.

Hail to the Hammer!!! Norse Mythology is awesome. In fact, all mythology is awesome. So much better then the Jesus Mythology. Wow tangent.

Taylor wrote: Thor is at 77% on RT. Green Lantern is at 26%. What critics are you reading? :s

I rarely use RT as a guidance. I read some critics reviews on Metacritics when GL came up. Some of them said that GL is comparable to Thor in its mediocrity. Even Ebert said that GL is better than Thor. Still, I'm looking forward to rent both of 'em.

I was hoping for THOR to be just as good as the IRON MAN movies, but I was wrong. No, it's not a terrible movie, but it really wasn't that great. The story was a bit decent, just the CGI, the script, the action, the visuals and the special effects were lame. It could've been a whole lot better and needed a lot more work. I'm going to more likely skip the Blu-Ray and assuming that "Super 8" is on Blu-Ray Combo Pack (which I'm hearing it is), I'll save my dough for that one instead.

Enjoyable, but forgettable; nothing particularly stuck with me since seeing it two months ago.

other than it being a 3D bluray...anything special about the "Limited 3D Edition?"  

Now that's how you do covers, folks.

Gorgeous.

Love the colours too.

i never expected to like THOR...at all but i did! it was very enjoyable. i totally loved Jaimie Alexander as Sif! she owned!

 Way better than I expected.

I liked Thor quite a bit, but I thought X-Men was better. Really excited for Cap as well

Haven't seen this yet. Critics have been comparing this with Green Lantern as the most mediocre superhero movies this year yet (Cap'll come soon). So, is this better than GL?

Cool covers btw.

Walking into "Thor", I was brought with skepticism but also excitement. Fortunately, I felt more like the latter. This was an entertaining film with some funny one-liners, boasts of action, and a great sense of depth. The script was a bit of a take it or leave it affair, but everything else about the production was just great. My only complaint is that it starts out slow, some of the scenes are cliche, and the film was a bit on the long side. Other than that, solid film 8/10. Will I snag the Blu-ray 3D combo pack? If it hits a decent price.