Untraceable (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Sony has now revealed the final artwork for this recent Diane Lane thriller
Title: Untraceable (IMDb)
Starring: Diane Lane
Released: 13th May 2008
SRP: $28.95
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced Untraceable which stars Diane Lane, and Colin Hanks. The Gregory Hoblit directed crime thriller will be available to own from the 13th May, and should retail at around $28.95. The film itself will be presented in anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a filmmaker commentary, and 4 behind the scenes featurettes. A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96. This will include the above, along with a picture-in-picture feature that includes storyboards, production pics, and behind the scenes footage.




News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Diane Lane
Released: 13th May 2008
SRP: $28.95
Further Details:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced Untraceable which stars Diane Lane, and Colin Hanks. The Gregory Hoblit directed crime thriller will be available to own from the 13th May, and should retail at around $28.95. The film itself will be presented in anamorphic widescreen, along with an English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track. Extras will include a filmmaker commentary, and 4 behind the scenes featurettes. A Blu-ray release will also be available for $38.96. This will include the above, along with a picture-in-picture feature that includes storyboards, production pics, and behind the scenes footage.




News by Tom Woodward
Advertisement
Existing Posts
Out performs Rambo?
Please...
Please...
lee09 wrote: Phil92 wrote: lee09 wrote: BoBoi wrote: They should have gone with the original poster instaed, well a lot of movies should...
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
Whats TT?
The title. I've noticed that movie posters usually ALWAYS have it at the bottom, yet the DVD covers have it at the top.
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
Whats TT?
The title. I've noticed that movie posters usually ALWAYS have it at the bottom, yet the DVD covers have it at the top.
Phil92 wrote: lee09 wrote: BoBoi wrote: They should have gone with the original poster instaed, well a lot of movies should...
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
Whats TT?
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
Whats TT?
I never liked that cursor on Diane Lane's mouth.
lee09 wrote: BoBoi wrote: They should have gone with the original poster instaed, well a lot of movies should...
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
And you also would've moved the TT to the top.
BoBoi wrote: They should have gone with the original poster instaed, well a lot of movies should...
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
Just make my own mock-up cover:

If you wanted to go a little more professional with the Blu artwork then you would've placed the "Experience High Definition" label that Sony always slaps into their covers. Its more precise then.
I heard some pretty bad things about this movie. Maybe they should change the name to "Unwatchable".
Not a fan of the new artwork. What they were originally going to use for the art was much better.
They should have gone with the original poster instaed, well a lot of movies should...
Just make my own mock-up cover:
Just make my own mock-up cover:
yep, the new artwork looks just plain bad.
first some of you guys thought the previous artwork was horrible. Wich i thought was very good. Now they change it and its even worse and you also think so. And now you want the previous one you also thought was bad. Damn not to be drag. But when the hell are you satisfied
I liked the movie a lot. I completely agree that people love violence. I don't know why people are hating on it since it's being hypocritical and really true at the same time! I mean, Funny Games had the same message, as well as Never Back Down. There are at least 3 movies out this year where their message is "Violence is bad."
The cover screams "$5.50 bin at Wal*Mart." Based on the trailer, it'll be there soon after release.
Was it really necessary for Sony to add Colin Hanks into the artwork? The orginal poster version was better.
I love Diane Lane, but thought this was more of a B movie. It does remind me of a feature length version of a Criminal Minds episode.
I love Diane Lane, but thought this was more of a B movie. It does remind me of a feature length version of a Criminal Minds episode.
I liked the original artwork alot better then the final version. Oh well still a blind buy for me.
Too much stuff going on on the cover, looks like a strait to dvd movie.
JosephNYC wrote: Which is the final artwork?? I'm hoping it's the one with Diane's face, it's sooo much better.
Sorry, it's the other one. Thank God for customs!
Sorry, it's the other one. Thank God for customs!
Not like it matters to me, but the new artwork totally sinked this movie more than it is.
I really liked this movie. It was pretty gripping and disturbing. But that new cover art... oh dear!
Which is the final artwork?? I'm hoping it's the one with Diane's face, it's sooo much better.
Oh dear, final artwork looks horrible...
The poster was such awesome one...
The poster was such awesome one...
Oh no! They ruined it! Oh well, the artwork suits the movie. BAD!
The original artwork was way better. This looks like some c**ppy DTV movie now.
Final artwork added...
This Is Like Watching A Bad Espiode Of Criminal Minds...Actually This Whole Movie Was Stolen From Criminal Minds Season One Espiode One
I heard mixed reviews about this one, but I do plan on seeing it. I'll rent it first and if I like it, I might buy it.
That was rather quick...
I'll rent it on Blu-ray.
I'll rent it on Blu-ray.
Good movie I thought. Some really disturbing torture and deaths and quite a suspenseful ending. Diane Lane was great!
Last time I was this bored during a horror/thriller was Captivity. This was a better film, but was still pretty dull and dragged at various points. The idea is brilliant,it's just with films such as the Saw series this really had little to offer that hadn't been done better already.
Might pick up the R2 when it gets to about £5-7 mark though.
Might pick up the R2 when it gets to about £5-7 mark though.
Quite possibly the worst movie I've watched at the Cinema.
Avoid it, it's not even worthy of DTV status.
Avoid it, it's not even worthy of DTV status.
Earl Dittman of Wireless Magazine RAVED about it in the previews. Definitely a must see for me...
...NOT!
...NOT!
The Cover would have look great if they just put Diane Lane's face on their, now that's a mess!
Have not seen this, probably going to wait for another BD BOGO, or Sale to pick this up.
Have not seen this, probably going to wait for another BD BOGO, or Sale to pick this up.
Why sucj terrible Art for such a AWESOME Movie???
ehhh... might rent it. It didnt look a bit appeling.
The film's story goes out of it's way to rob the film of any suspense. I didn't like the identity of the serial killer being revealed early on.
I'm surprised that they didn't use the quote from Roger Ebert. He gave the film a good review, and he's a reliable critic, which would have made it seem more impressive. I really enjoyed the film and am surprised that there are actually any extras considering that the film didn't even make back its budget worldwide. I'll definitely be getting the blu ray.
The artwork looks worse than the cover! But was the film good? That's my question.
That's kind of ridiculous that they're using the quote from a "First Look" review. But I heard mixed things about this one, I thought it looked good so I'll rent it at least.
This was a decent, but by no means great movie. Diane Lane was solid, but the plot was a little underwhelming. It's definitely a worthy rental.
Much better without the cursor hand. I still have no interest in seeing this, however.
I wanted to see this, will blind buy
I'm glad they got rid of that little hand on the cover. It looked like it was about to pick her nose.
So sad. This had so much potential, but it was all wasted. Now, it's just another second-rate thriller.

