Warner Bros. 90th Anniversary (US - DVD R1 | BD RA)
Warner Home Video has announced the plans for their 90th anniversary in 2013.
WARNER BROS. CELEBRATES ITS
90TH ANNIVERSARY IN 2013 WITH
“BEST OF WARNER BROS.” COLLECTIONS
90TH ANNIVERSARY IN 2013 WITH
“BEST OF WARNER BROS.” COLLECTIONS
Burbank, Calif., October 3, 2012 -- One of the most respected, diversified and successful motion picture studios in the world, Warner Bros. began when the eponymous brothers -- Harry, Albert, Sam, and Jack -- incorporated on April 4, 1923. Four years later, the release of The Jazz Singer, the world’s first “talkie,” set a tone of innovation and influence that would forever become synonymous with the Warner Bros. brand. Soon to be 90, Warner Bros. continues to entertain the world with films passionately produced, selectively acquired, carefully preserved and impeccably curated for both the casual and ultimate movie lover to enjoy forever.
As a result of all the films the studio has produced, co-produced (with numerous partners), acquired and distributed, Warner Bros. now boasts the largest film library in the world – 6,800 feature films, with 2,000 films currently available on DVD and Blu-ray™. The library includes 22 Academy Award®*-winning Best Pictures (the most in Oscar® history), and leading franchises such as Harry Potter™, Batman™, Lord of the Rings™, The Matrix and Superman™.
Beginning in January, Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Group (WBHEG) will launch a major Anniversary initiative that will continue through year-end 2013. This includes the release of seven new collections, including two limited and numbered anniversary collections -- 100 films on DVD and 50 films on Blu-ray™, both the largest collections ever released, to date, in their respective formats. The year-long celebration will also include several stand-alone releases of new-to-format classics on Blu-ray™ for the first time, including The Jazz Singer, all three James Dean films (East of Eden, Rebel Without a Cause, Giant), Cabaret and Academy Award® Best Picture Winners Grand Hotel (1932), Mrs. Miniver (1943), and Driving Miss Daisy(1990).
Stated Jeff Baker, WHV’s Executive Vice President and General Manager, Theatrical Catalog, “As the recognized leader in theatrical library market share, we’re delighted to be celebrating our 90th with the largest, most compelling film collections in home entertainment history. We’ve put a lot of thought and care into the selection of these classics, and I think the results will be something movie fans -- from the casual to the dedicated – will embrace.”
Finally, WBHEG will have a year-long trade program supported by an online and social media campaign. The campaign is designed to celebrate the films representing The Best of Warner Bros, by artfully connecting with movie-lovers through the memories that mirror, resemble, or remind them of their favorite movies. The microsite www.bestofwb.com will serve as the central hub for all content and provide fans with a richer and more integrated experience.
The Collections
The Best of Warner Bros. 100 Film DVD Collection*: 100 movies including all 22 of Warner Bros. library’s Best Picture ™ Winners and two new documentaries (details below) on 55 discs presented in book style premium packaging.

The Best of Warner Bros. 50 Film Blu-ray™ Collection* includes 50 movies and the two new documentaries on 52 discs, also presented in book style premium packaging. It will introduce several new-to-Blu-ray film titles, including Grand Hotel, Mrs. Miniver, and Driving Miss Daisy.

Both of the above are limited and numbered collections and each includes a collectible poster and series of art cards featuring movie poster designs created by legendary American graphic designer Bill Gold.
Gold, who worked with Hollywood's greatest filmmakers, including Clint Eastwood, Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick, Elia Kazan, and Ridley Scott, had this to say:
"My 65-year career began with Yankee Doodle Dandy and Casablanca and continued on to every Clint Eastwood picture from Dirty Harry to Mystic River (and I came out of retirement to design the poster for J. Edgar). In my wildest dreams I could not have foreseen the world I would inhabit and the joy it would bring me over the years. Every poster I worked on had a story to tell, and I'm delighted to be able to share a sampling of some of them in these collections."
The Best of Warner Bros. 20 Film DVD Collections will be released throughout the year in five separate sets. Each features a gem-packed collection of 20 essential movie classics in five major genres: Best Pictures (January), Musicals (February), Romance (April), Comedy (July) and Thrillers (September).

The Best of Warner Bros. Animation Collections will be released throughout the year in three separate animation sets. Each features animation at its best in three key brands Hanna-Barbera (May), Looney Tunes (June) and DC Comics (August).
The Best of Warner Bros. Superman Collection (May) features 9 essential Superman live action television and animated television shows in one collection.
Two New Documentaries to Celebrate Warner Bros. 90th Anniversary
Created specially for this anniversary, Tales from the Warner Bros. Lot is a full-length documentary that features some of Warner Bros.’ top talent and executives giving an inside look at the history of the studio. In on-the-lot interviews, stars including Clint Eastwood, Steve Carell, Morgan Freeman, Martin Sheen, along with current and former studio toppers Barry Meyer, Alan Horn, Bob Daly, and Terry Semel, and others, recount personal reflections and anecdotes about their experiences at the studio. Tales from the Warner Bros. Lot was produced by documentarian Gary Khammar (It’s So Audrey! A Style Icon) and producer Bill Gerber (Gran Torino).
Now, for the first time, home viewers can take the hugely popular Warner Bros Studio VIP Tour in this new documentary produced exclusively for the 90th Anniversary collections. In The Warner Bros. Lot Tour, an official WB Lot Tour Guide gives guests a “virtual” tram ride (of what some 200,000 annual visitors experience) -- an extraordinary opportunity to see first-hand where movie magic happens at the world’s busiest motion picture and television studio. Unlike a theme park, the Tour represents a rare and intimate “behind-the-scenes” look at real Hollywood, winding through back lot streets, sound stages, sets and craft shops.


News by Matt Joseph
Advertisements
Existing Posts
RThomas wrote: ILDC wrote:
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
True. I remember that the New Line head took great pride at one time for having never met his counterpart at Warner Bros, given the autonomy New Line was awarded from Time Warner.
Anyway, the entire New Line studio is now managed by Warner Bros., so having LOTR in a collection isn't such a big deal to me. That's as if you didn't want any First National Pictures in a Warner collection, given that Warner bought the studio in 1929 and merged in 1936. Does anybody complain when "Little Caesar" gets included under the WB moniker?
Given the number of "MGM" oldies box sets that consist merely of United Artists productions, I don't see the issue with LOTR and Warner...
But who has more inherited titles, Warner or MGM? Movies like Casablanca could count as inherited, being managed for years by MGM/Turner.
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
True. I remember that the New Line head took great pride at one time for having never met his counterpart at Warner Bros, given the autonomy New Line was awarded from Time Warner.
Anyway, the entire New Line studio is now managed by Warner Bros., so having LOTR in a collection isn't such a big deal to me. That's as if you didn't want any First National Pictures in a Warner collection, given that Warner bought the studio in 1929 and merged in 1936. Does anybody complain when "Little Caesar" gets included under the WB moniker?
Given the number of "MGM" oldies box sets that consist merely of United Artists productions, I don't see the issue with LOTR and Warner...
But who has more inherited titles, Warner or MGM? Movies like Casablanca could count as inherited, being managed for years by MGM/Turner.
ILDC wrote:
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
True. I remember that the New Line head took great pride at one time for having never met his counterpart at Warner Bros, given the autonomy New Line was awarded from Time Warner.
Anyway, the entire New Line studio is now managed by Warner Bros., so having LOTR in a collection isn't such a big deal to me. That's as if you didn't want any First National Pictures in a Warner collection, given that Warner bought the studio in 1929 and merged in 1936. Does anybody complain when "Little Caesar" gets included under the WB moniker?
Given the number of "MGM" oldies box sets that consist merely of United Artists productions, I don't see the issue with LOTR and Warner...
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
True. I remember that the New Line head took great pride at one time for having never met his counterpart at Warner Bros, given the autonomy New Line was awarded from Time Warner.
Anyway, the entire New Line studio is now managed by Warner Bros., so having LOTR in a collection isn't such a big deal to me. That's as if you didn't want any First National Pictures in a Warner collection, given that Warner bought the studio in 1929 and merged in 1936. Does anybody complain when "Little Caesar" gets included under the WB moniker?
Given the number of "MGM" oldies box sets that consist merely of United Artists productions, I don't see the issue with LOTR and Warner...
Amazing.
HagenDarth wrote: Lord of the Rings as part of the "best of WB?" what a sham...New Line wasn't part of WB at the time, and I seriously doubt WB would have the guts to bankroll the films...'oh, let's buy New Line and now we can present LOTR as our own property...'
It's not as bad as the many titles originally from studios like MGM. A more honest name would be something like "Best of the WB Vaults".
RThomas wrote: HagenDarth wrote: Lord of the Rings as part of the "best of WB?" what a sham...New Line wasn't part of WB at the time, and I seriously doubt WB would have the guts to bankroll the films...'oh, let's buy New Line and now we can present LOTR as our own property...'
New Line was a part of Time Warner at the time LOTR was greenlit (they bought the studio back in 1996) and the entire studio is now managed through Warner Bros after The Golden Compass flopped. Technically, they merged with Warner Bros and the new company kept the Warner Bros moniker.
Funny that you react to this and not to Gone With The Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Ben-Hur, North by Northwest, 2001 or dozens of major titles in the collections that are only Warner Bros because Ted Turner bought the entire MGM catalog in the 80s.
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
It's not as bad as the many titles originally from studios like MGM. A more honest name would be something like "Best of the WB Vaults".
RThomas wrote: HagenDarth wrote: Lord of the Rings as part of the "best of WB?" what a sham...New Line wasn't part of WB at the time, and I seriously doubt WB would have the guts to bankroll the films...'oh, let's buy New Line and now we can present LOTR as our own property...'
New Line was a part of Time Warner at the time LOTR was greenlit (they bought the studio back in 1996) and the entire studio is now managed through Warner Bros after The Golden Compass flopped. Technically, they merged with Warner Bros and the new company kept the Warner Bros moniker.
Funny that you react to this and not to Gone With The Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Ben-Hur, North by Northwest, 2001 or dozens of major titles in the collections that are only Warner Bros because Ted Turner bought the entire MGM catalog in the 80s.
There's still a big difference between being directly owned by Time Warner and between being directly owned by Warner Bros.
HagenDarth wrote: Lord of the Rings as part of the "best of WB?" what a sham...New Line wasn't part of WB at the time, and I seriously doubt WB would have the guts to bankroll the films...'oh, let's buy New Line and now we can present LOTR as our own property...'
New Line was a part of Time Warner at the time LOTR was greenlit (they bought the studio back in 1996) and the entire studio is now managed through Warner Bros after The Golden Compass flopped. Technically, they merged with Warner Bros and the new company kept the Warner Bros moniker.
Funny that you react to this and not to Gone With The Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Ben-Hur, North by Northwest, 2001 or dozens of major titles in the collections that are only Warner Bros because Ted Turner bought the entire MGM catalog in the 80s.
New Line was a part of Time Warner at the time LOTR was greenlit (they bought the studio back in 1996) and the entire studio is now managed through Warner Bros after The Golden Compass flopped. Technically, they merged with Warner Bros and the new company kept the Warner Bros moniker.
Funny that you react to this and not to Gone With The Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Ben-Hur, North by Northwest, 2001 or dozens of major titles in the collections that are only Warner Bros because Ted Turner bought the entire MGM catalog in the 80s.
Lord of the Rings as part of the "best of WB?" what a sham...New Line wasn't part of WB at the time, and I seriously doubt WB would have the guts to bankroll the films...'oh, let's buy New Line and now we can present LOTR as our own property...'
UPDATE
Warner Home Video has removed The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Extended Edition) from their 2013 release calendar as it has not been formally confirmed.
Warner Home Video has removed The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Extended Edition) from their 2013 release calendar as it has not been formally confirmed.
I'm just waiting for the Ultimate Batman Trilogy...
Plus I can't imagine who'd shell out all that cash for 100 movies on DVD and not Blu-ray...
Plus I can't imagine who'd shell out all that cash for 100 movies on DVD and not Blu-ray...
What about the original batman movies on Blu-ray? Those are OOP.
Why not do these sets during the 100 year anniversary like Universal and Paramount? 90th anniversary is lame.
Why not do these sets during the 100 year anniversary like Universal and Paramount? 90th anniversary is lame.
Knowing Warner Bros., I'd be really surprised if the Dark Knight Trilogy Ultimate Collector's Edition had new video transfers. But if they manage to fix the over-sharpening on TDK they just might get a sale from me.
It's their 90th anniversary, so why not release all 100 films in the DVD collection on Bluray as well? That's a tipping point for me. I'd love the Bluray set, but I'd also love the complete DVD set. Either way, love the idea for this release.
Even knowing that they are going to put out a collectors set for Dark Knight Trilogy, still going to be hard passing up on the individual release this December. I'll wait and see on the Ultimate Collectors Edition I suppose.
Discs slid into slots....no thanks.
Is rebel included? I would LOVE to see that in a bluraybook package. It'd be the perfect contender for one IMO
Rebel without a Cause and Right Stuff. Right here. Gimme. Gimme.


