X-Men: The Last Stand (US - DVD R1)
Fox Home Entertainment has sent over details on the recent Brett Ratner movie which will be released on DVD in three versions incl...
Title: X-Men: The Last Stand (IMDb)
Starring: Hugh Jackman
Released: 3rd October 2006
SRP: $29.98 & $39.98
Further Details:
Fox has announced standard ($29.98) and collector's ($39.98) editions of X-Men: The Last Stand which stars Hugh Jackman. Both will be available to own from the 3rd October this year. Each will include an anamorphic widescreen transfer, along with both English Dolby Digital 5.1 and Dolby Digital 6.1 EX tracks. Extras will include a director & writer commentary by Brett Ratner, Zack Penn, and Simon Kinbergten, a producer commentary by Avi Arad, Lauren Shuler Donner, and Ralph Winter, deleted and extended scenes with optional commentary, three alternate endings, two sets of menus, trailers, an inside look at A Night at the Museum, and two eastereggs (one of the Beast reciting Shakespeare and the other of the X-Jet landing in Washington, D.C.). The collector's edition will include all of the above, along with a 100-page commemorative book with an all-new story penned by Marvel Comics master Stan Lee himself. Lastly, a three-disc set containing all three X-Men films will be available for around $44.98.




News by Tom Woodward
Starring: Hugh Jackman
Released: 3rd October 2006
SRP: $29.98 & $39.98
Further Details:
Fox has announced standard ($29.98) and collector's ($39.98) editions of X-Men: The Last Stand which stars Hugh Jackman. Both will be available to own from the 3rd October this year. Each will include an anamorphic widescreen transfer, along with both English Dolby Digital 5.1 and Dolby Digital 6.1 EX tracks. Extras will include a director & writer commentary by Brett Ratner, Zack Penn, and Simon Kinbergten, a producer commentary by Avi Arad, Lauren Shuler Donner, and Ralph Winter, deleted and extended scenes with optional commentary, three alternate endings, two sets of menus, trailers, an inside look at A Night at the Museum, and two eastereggs (one of the Beast reciting Shakespeare and the other of the X-Jet landing in Washington, D.C.). The collector's edition will include all of the above, along with a 100-page commemorative book with an all-new story penned by Marvel Comics master Stan Lee himself. Lastly, a three-disc set containing all three X-Men films will be available for around $44.98.




News by Tom Woodward
Advertisements
$10 more for a comic book and no DTS track. Whats the deal Fox?
wasn't that great...
the movie tried to focus on two topics and neither had potentially established...
but ok. comic book version to put in the collection lol
it's surely not great, but not as close to be as bad as Catwoman...
Also FF had Jessica Alba!!!!!!!!!
the movie tried to focus on two topics and neither had potentially established...
but ok. comic book version to put in the collection lol
it's surely not great, but not as close to be as bad as Catwoman...
Also FF had Jessica Alba!!!!!!!!!
It was okay, not terrible, but nothing spectacular.
Eliason A. wrote:
This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.
Although I think this is the third "best" in the trilogy, I totally agree with you that it totally "rapes" Superman Returns. That movie was a disappointment and a half. I think they messed up the 1 disc cover art though, but it doesn't matter... I'll be picking up the CE.
This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.
Although I think this is the third "best" in the trilogy, I totally agree with you that it totally "rapes" Superman Returns. That movie was a disappointment and a half. I think they messed up the 1 disc cover art though, but it doesn't matter... I'll be picking up the CE.
the single disc art bites. inferior to the cover art from the first two films. I do want to see X3 and will be glad when the 2 disc CE is out next year (just wish they could do it now instead of a double dip).
Oh my god, this was one of THE worst movies I've seen this year. I was pissed off at 10 minutes into it. It doesn't carry over the stories started in X2. Jean as Phoenix is completely wasted. She juststands aroundlike a terminator with a blown fuse. The Iceman/Pyro feud is given about 5 minutes screen time, and THAT justends in a head-butt. Yes, a frigging head-butt! They kill off characters, justso they can pose their movie as "edgy". Then they top everything off at the end by suggesting "eh, maybe all that DIDN'T happen..." Hey FOX, thanks insulting the audiences intelligence. I never had a problem with Ratner until this movie. He has about 20 shots of forest tops, TRYING to give this movie an "epic" feel. He basically just tries to copy Singer's style, which SOUNDS like a good idea, but its like watching someone trace the Mona Lisa and saying "hey, that's pretty good! it almost looks like the real thing."
Just everything about this movie blows. the cure storyline is never fleshed out. I think we all agree that Halle Berry is the worst actor/actress in the whole series, but they make Storm the main X-Man character, and its just an obvious attempt to please Berry's ego. She is made team leader and possible future Head-Master, even though she has done NOTHING in the movies to suggest she is capable of handling either duties. Cyclops is brushed aside merely because Marsden is in Superman. Beast, Angel, and Juggernaut are ALL wasted. The Omega mutants suck and are pointless. Wolverine is turned into a complete moron. I mean, I can go on and on....The way I figure is if your a fan of the X-men comics, you should and probably DO hate this movie, but if the extent of your knowledge is from the movies, you'll like this, but I can't see how,because it insults the intelligence of any viewer with an IQ over 7, and doesn't reward you with our patience over the cliffhanger endings of the 2nd movie.
On that note, I will be, unfortunately, be buying this movie, because I HAVE to finish the trilogy, and I am a dvd and comic-book w***e.
NOW,if someone can please explaing to me HOW this garbage is even REMOTELY better than the first two, or even a half-way decent movie in general.
And by the way.....Superman Returns (save for the continued c**ppy version of Lex Luthor) was really, really good. Even the romance....you spooks.
Just everything about this movie blows. the cure storyline is never fleshed out. I think we all agree that Halle Berry is the worst actor/actress in the whole series, but they make Storm the main X-Man character, and its just an obvious attempt to please Berry's ego. She is made team leader and possible future Head-Master, even though she has done NOTHING in the movies to suggest she is capable of handling either duties. Cyclops is brushed aside merely because Marsden is in Superman. Beast, Angel, and Juggernaut are ALL wasted. The Omega mutants suck and are pointless. Wolverine is turned into a complete moron. I mean, I can go on and on....The way I figure is if your a fan of the X-men comics, you should and probably DO hate this movie, but if the extent of your knowledge is from the movies, you'll like this, but I can't see how,because it insults the intelligence of any viewer with an IQ over 7, and doesn't reward you with our patience over the cliffhanger endings of the 2nd movie.
On that note, I will be, unfortunately, be buying this movie, because I HAVE to finish the trilogy, and I am a dvd and comic-book w***e.
NOW,if someone can please explaing to me HOW this garbage is even REMOTELY better than the first two, or even a half-way decent movie in general.
And by the way.....Superman Returns (save for the continued c**ppy version of Lex Luthor) was really, really good. Even the romance....you spooks.
Have to agree with zoolerscom, they went seriously far away from the comics here and botched the third part to the vastly superior previous entries. Beast was awesome and was extremely underused (cyclops has been short changed through all 3 films but this was ridiculous). The inevitable double dip for this title is becoming all too infuriatingly common, I really hope a DTS track is announced at least. Superman Returns was a much stronger and emotionally involving picture than this (although it too felt a bit "rushed into production"-ish}...and this one had much more melodrama (I hasten to add very "rushed" melodrama with no time for anything but the next visual effect let alone give the audience a moment or 2 to grieve the multiple
character dispatches). Brett Ratner has no sense of pacing at all... he took a suspence masterpiece of a novel like Red Dragon and removed any shread of suspense..? I mean how do you screw up something so proven... the guy directs like he was reared in the art of film making by 30 second commercials or mtv
( I know that those fields are his background but that's really not an excuse, other commercial advertising/ music video
directors have made wonderful films). Not trying to bash just
seriously critique his work, he should have stayed with light comedies.
character dispatches). Brett Ratner has no sense of pacing at all... he took a suspence masterpiece of a novel like Red Dragon and removed any shread of suspense..? I mean how do you screw up something so proven... the guy directs like he was reared in the art of film making by 30 second commercials or mtv
( I know that those fields are his background but that's really not an excuse, other commercial advertising/ music video
directors have made wonderful films). Not trying to bash just
seriously critique his work, he should have stayed with light comedies.
errr is it just me or is famke's head on the standard version abnormally large????!!!!
I don't understand why this movie has been so looked down upon. To me it was just as good as the previous two. Maybe that's because I'm not such a serious comic book fan, by maybe it's because people, for some reason, just don't like Brett Ratner and decide to hate, or be disappointed by, his movies before they actually see them...
Anyway, I do hope they change the art, and I'm definitely getting the Collector's Edition.
Anyway, I do hope they change the art, and I'm definitely getting the Collector's Edition.
SWEET!!!
im getting the collector's edition
im getting the collector's edition
Very disappointing flick, dunno about purchasing it. Terrific how Ratner made mention that only one scene of his was cut and a wad of deleted scenes are included in the specs.
But I guess people who love a generic pheno.....menon will dig it.
But I guess people who love a generic pheno.....menon will dig it.
Agreed that DVD stinks of a re-release. Where's the rumoured extended cut? Where's the DTS? Where's the second disc of extras?
I'm waiting to see what's released internationally, fingers crossed the UK at least gets the proper DVD.
Also agreed the cover art is a bit lame.
Angel never wore an X-Men suit and that Trilogy box set just looks like all 3 in a box (i.e - not a proper box set). I've always hated that stupid X2 retitle for the North American market, clearly was to keep Bryan Singer happy but it was so unneeded. The rest of the world just called it X-Men 2.
I'm waiting to see what's released internationally, fingers crossed the UK at least gets the proper DVD.
Also agreed the cover art is a bit lame.
Angel never wore an X-Men suit and that Trilogy box set just looks like all 3 in a box (i.e - not a proper box set). I've always hated that stupid X2 retitle for the North American market, clearly was to keep Bryan Singer happy but it was so unneeded. The rest of the world just called it X-Men 2.
elle_driver wrote: I don't understand why this movie has been so looked down upon. To me it was just as good as the previous two.
How long ago did you watch them? There's no way X-Men 3 is as good as the previous 2, particularly X-Men 2. Both the previous films created a real 3-D world we can believe in, with real life like characters. In the case of X-Men 2 this world is opened up even further.
Agreed X-Men 3 is better than most think but it's story is weak in many places, opting for action over story.
elle_driver wrote: just don't like Brett Ratner and decide to hate, or be disappointed by, his movies before they actually see them...
Agreed most don't give Ratner a chance but that is because whilst he was perfect for the Rush Hour films anything weightier he has proven he can't handle it.
I liked Red Dragon but that film was saved mostly because of the excellent cast and source material than any directing talent. The X-Men world is a big in-depth one Ratner struggles.
How long ago did you watch them? There's no way X-Men 3 is as good as the previous 2, particularly X-Men 2. Both the previous films created a real 3-D world we can believe in, with real life like characters. In the case of X-Men 2 this world is opened up even further.
Agreed X-Men 3 is better than most think but it's story is weak in many places, opting for action over story.
elle_driver wrote: just don't like Brett Ratner and decide to hate, or be disappointed by, his movies before they actually see them...
Agreed most don't give Ratner a chance but that is because whilst he was perfect for the Rush Hour films anything weightier he has proven he can't handle it.
I liked Red Dragon but that film was saved mostly because of the excellent cast and source material than any directing talent. The X-Men world is a big in-depth one Ratner struggles.
I definate buy, but I'd say there was issues with this move. I liked it, but they tried to cram to much into the film, and therefore did not have time to develope the individual stories as good as they could have. There was enough 'ideas' in this flick for three movies. Most of it rocked, but the rest just did not have time or room to rock. So much in so little time.
Exactly Stephen I couldn't agree more, especially when it was 30 odd minutes shorter than Part 2 (X2 - 130 minutes, X-Men 3 - 100 minutes, neither exact times).
I smell a double dip folks. There is no doubt we will be a X3.2, no doubt about it.
I never got to see this, but from everyone I know who did see it loved it. I personally can't wait to see it on DVD. Definite rental, but will hold off purchasing until the "real" 2-disk is released.
I never got to see this, but from everyone I know who did see it loved it. I personally can't wait to see it on DVD. Definite rental, but will hold off purchasing until the "real" 2-disk is released.
I'm with everyone else. The "Collector's Edition" is so over the top lame, that there is sure to be a double dip. I'll just rent the single disc to satisfy my need to watch the movie until then.
Eliason A. wrote:
This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.
Buddy, you are just pissing off the "Superman Returns" fans here (including myself). You are asking to be flamed, and you really don't want that.
I liked the movie, but like the first, it wanted to cram in as much story and characters in a short running time as possible. The second one was better in terms of a better story and scope, but the third one was better-paced and a bit more satisfying than the first. If anyone is going to put the blame on someone, it is the screenwriters (Brett Ratner did a fair job of maintaining the look, overall acting and tone of the first two films, but he can be blamed for wanting to keep the running time under two hours) for trying to do too many things at the same time. Still, I like it.
I prefer "Superman Returns" (as that movie had a more dramatic story and better-paced) over "X3", but the DVD release stinks of a double-dip -- they should've released a 2-disc set from the get-go (like "X2"
.
This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.
Buddy, you are just pissing off the "Superman Returns" fans here (including myself). You are asking to be flamed, and you really don't want that.
I liked the movie, but like the first, it wanted to cram in as much story and characters in a short running time as possible. The second one was better in terms of a better story and scope, but the third one was better-paced and a bit more satisfying than the first. If anyone is going to put the blame on someone, it is the screenwriters (Brett Ratner did a fair job of maintaining the look, overall acting and tone of the first two films, but he can be blamed for wanting to keep the running time under two hours) for trying to do too many things at the same time. Still, I like it.
I prefer "Superman Returns" (as that movie had a more dramatic story and better-paced) over "X3", but the DVD release stinks of a double-dip -- they should've released a 2-disc set from the get-go (like "X2"
Frank The Rabbit wrote: I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT BUYING THIS FILM!!! IT WAS ONE OF THE WORST MOVIES TO COME OUT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!!! ALMOST AS BAD AS CATWOMAN OR FANTASTIC 4!!! WE SHOULD BOYCOTT THIS DVD!!! DON'T BUY IT SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'S AN X-MEN MOVIE!!! YOU'RE LETTING THE STUDIO WIN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RELEASE ANY OLD HUNK OF RUSHED, RATNERIZED TURD AND THE SHEEP WILL BUY IT!!!I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU'RE YELLIN ABOUT!!!
Play are advertsiing the R2 version as '2 disks' so I will be picking that one up I think.
Gonna be getting it at some point but not yet right away.
I already own the 4 disc set from the first two part, so I kinda expected that a 6 disc trilogy set was gonna be released? Ow well, maybe later :D
I already own the 4 disc set from the first two part, so I kinda expected that a 6 disc trilogy set was gonna be released? Ow well, maybe later :D
Believe R3 will get the 2-disc w/ collectable pkg. just like the HK Fantastic Four w/ model...
Love the artwork - great summer popcorn flick. I'll get the collector's edition.
I was so amazed how well this film turned out. The webmaster of a site I visit frequently hit it right on the head in his review: This was in fact a revenge project against Bryan Singer for leaving during pre-production to do Superman Returns. This film was written, filmed, and rushed out the gate to beat Superman to theaters, and is much better, IMO. Even though everyone I saw it with griped about everything not being accurate to the comics, it all worked as a film. Great acting, great story, SPECTACULAR visual effects, awesome music (in my car right now, LOL) this has been my 2nd favorite film of the summer. X-Men was good, X2 was excellent, this was really good.
Oh, and FYI, Ratner has already stated that there will be a Director's Cut of this. He claims there was quite a bit cut, but not for time constraint reasons. He wanted these scenes specifically for the DVD...
Oh, and FYI, Ratner has already stated that there will be a Director's Cut of this. He claims there was quite a bit cut, but not for time constraint reasons. He wanted these scenes specifically for the DVD...
Not terrible, not great just sticks somewhere between X1 and X2. Juggarnaut was great but they forgot about him at the end, Kelsey Grammer didn't quite portray Beast even though he was perfect to portray him, Famke Jannsen seemed to be too inhuman, Storm's big role is all forgotten at the end, Colossus is never used and portrayed badly, No Nightcrawler etc. My X3 complain list goes on and on. The flick made me even worry that all the next blockbusters could be screwed up: Superman, Transformers, Spiderman 3... I don't hate Brett Ratner for this, but I wouldn't let him direct another comic movie. I MAY buy this, but only because it's X-men.
This film was pure c**p from beginning to end. It had a grand total of two scenes that had the same quality as the two previous movies. And while Superman Returns was just barely decent, at least it felt like a real film and not some rushed tv production.
Kyle Mertes wrote: Oh, and FYI, Ratner has already stated that there will be a Director's Cut of this. He claims there was quite a bit cut, but not for time constraint reasons. He wanted these scenes specifically for the DVD...
Really? I read an interview a few months ago asking him if he has footage he cut from "X3" for time reasons from the movie and he said specifically that everything he shot was in the film (save for one extended sequence he cut for time reasons). If we get an extended edition of X3, chances are that scene will be in there and nothing else (I'd be surprised if there was more footage than what was claimed to be).
The standard artwork stinks (too many people on it), but the collector's edition artwork is amazing and what should've been the artwork for the regular DVD. I'll get the CE instead.
However, it's sad to see that so many people say that "Superman Returns" was a disappointment and that they prefer "X3" to it. SR had some incredible action sequences that eclipse that of X3 and while it was a talky film, it kept me riveted from beginning to end. In fact, many people raved about "Batman Begins" and didn't like "Superman Returns" because it didn't have "enough action". In fact, "Batman Begins" and "Superman Returns" had roughly the same amount of big action sequences.
"X3" is an entertaining, yet shallow, movie and none of the big twists and character deaths never really moved me. "Superman Returns" is a film that had both style and substance (and had scenes that nearly moved me to tears); "X3" is a movie that got by on style.
Really? I read an interview a few months ago asking him if he has footage he cut from "X3" for time reasons from the movie and he said specifically that everything he shot was in the film (save for one extended sequence he cut for time reasons). If we get an extended edition of X3, chances are that scene will be in there and nothing else (I'd be surprised if there was more footage than what was claimed to be).
The standard artwork stinks (too many people on it), but the collector's edition artwork is amazing and what should've been the artwork for the regular DVD. I'll get the CE instead.
However, it's sad to see that so many people say that "Superman Returns" was a disappointment and that they prefer "X3" to it. SR had some incredible action sequences that eclipse that of X3 and while it was a talky film, it kept me riveted from beginning to end. In fact, many people raved about "Batman Begins" and didn't like "Superman Returns" because it didn't have "enough action". In fact, "Batman Begins" and "Superman Returns" had roughly the same amount of big action sequences.
"X3" is an entertaining, yet shallow, movie and none of the big twists and character deaths never really moved me. "Superman Returns" is a film that had both style and substance (and had scenes that nearly moved me to tears); "X3" is a movie that got by on style.
art work sucks what happened to beast and why is angel on the cover he was in the movie for a minute literally can we collectively retcon this movie and do it the right way I'm still buying it cause I'm the juggernuat B#@%h
LMAO the best quote they could find for the cover was "Adrenaline-fueled fun"




woa, dude, what did you think was so bad about it!!?? Some things were dissapointing, but in NO WAY was this the worst film in 10 years. If you honestly think that, you dont see many movies.