The most dissappointg movie of the summer! It has the worst thought most predictable ending of all, it's not enough, and WHERE THE HELL ARE MY SENTINELS!!!

Wrong information, even though I love DVDActive, this site reviewed the dvd and it DOES infact feature DTS, and not only DTS but DTS-ES.

http://dvdauthority.com/reviews.asp?reviewID=4789

Doesn't that have it on the R2 as well?

Excuse me I typed it wrong. Doesn't the R2 two disc set have exactly what the R3 set does?

People are criticizing the screenwriters for the lackluster story, but it seems that they have forgotten that Zak Penn had co-written the screen story for "X2" with Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris. Penn was the only screenwriter holdover from "X2" when Singer, Dougherty and Harris left to do "Superman Returns". (He and Simon Kinberg co-wrote "Last Stand" together, it wasn't a draft by the former being rewritten by the latter.)

Of course, Penn had also co-written lackluster films such as "Elektra" and "Suspect Zero", so his screenwriting skills are mixed at best.

I'm getting the UK 2 disc set. That way I'll have it!

Yep lots. Check out the R4 link above and R2 link below (about 4 hours worth):

UK: http://www.cd-wow.com/detail_results_2.php?prod...

USA: http://www.cd-wow.us/detail_results_2.php?produ...

* HK Region 3 - 2 Disc SE
* £11.99 delivered from the UK site
* $22.95 delivered from the USA site
* All the 2 Disc SE Extras
* AND English DTS

I'll preorder for sure but next month it's to early to preorder now.

If you have a multiregion player it's a no brainer, why pay more for the R1 which has A LOT less extras and NO DTS?

X-Men 3 The R3 Version of Xmen 3 apparently has a DTS Soundtrack. Was visting www.cdwow.com and they have it up for pre-order for £12. Same features as the R2 2 Disk Edition.

Might be worth visiting.

As suspected R4 is getting the 2 Disc version straight away, expect the UK R2 to follow suit. With the R1 sometime later:

http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/788067

I'll be getting the 2 Disc version and if an Extended Cut comes I'll upgrade to that too.

okay I own the fist two,  but defenetly buying the trilogy, if it comes with more than 3 disks (this means bunch of extra matirial.

The collectors editon in the US is two disc.

Ezy DVD do have some excelent tin cases....

F#&% I can't believe Fox is doing this! I'm in denial but i'm almost positive a SPECIAL "Adamantium Clawed Edition" (or something stupid like that) will come out next year! i've been waiting for this DVD and I was hoping for a 2 DISC set...I'm very disappointed. I was thinking about getting the CE but if the comic book is the only thing that makes the two versions different I think I'll just get the One disc "Special Edition" I'm only buying it because the movie's the bomb and because I can't wait to have it in my hands...but I don't know what I'll do when the 2 disc special edition comes out next year or later on...we all know it's coming....ON THE OTHER HAND! I'm glad to see that Jean Grey has FINALLY made it into an X-Men DVD cover! But I'm still not happy that she's behind Storm....just cuz Halle plays her. GOSH! Jean will always be better than Storm! FOX SUCKS for double dipping!

Well...no dts...and it's an god-awful movie...so I think I'll pass, not worth completing the trilogy just one you want to forget like Aliens vs. Predator.

the region 4 edition has finally been announced:
http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/788067

Disc Two:

    * Director Brett Ratner’s production diary
    * Documentary on evolution of X-Men Trilogy
    * 3 featurettes, including making of Golden Gate Bridge scene
    * 8 vignettes on special effects, fly training, weapons
    * And much more!

these are from the tin version exclusive to ezydvd:

FRONT


BACK


i'm glad we're getting a 2-disc version straight up, but it's a shame the US will probably have to wait until wolverine comes out.

zoolerscom wrote: I totally agree with you. Save for Lex Luthor, I thought Superman Returns was awesome. and for some reason, I liked Fantastic Four. Now,before anyone chewsmy head off, I'mnot a huge Fantastic Four fan, and I knowthat the movie screwed a lot of things up, but for some reason I enjoyed it. However, it didn't hold up aswell on repeat viewings, but still not as bad as X3.

Were you replying to me?

I think the cover looks better now that I can see it better. I just wish they didn't change the trilogy box so much, becuase it looked a bit better before. The CE art takes the crown though. I hope the eventual 2-Disc art is good.

yankeemike81 wrote: Eliason A. wrote: Pulled a Munich. Mediocre 1-Disc DVD. Defintely better CE. Hopefully, both will be available everywhere.

This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.Have  you seen V For Vendetta, united 93, or pirates of the caribean 2 this is not the best movie of the year. I'm not a huge singer fan but I still fell that Xmen 2 is the best and out of those movies this doesnt compare. now I liked xmen 3 but I felt it was rushed and could have been so much beter if they wanted to be  by the way ill rent this maybe pick it up wen x3.2 comes out  

I would replace Pirates 2 with Superman. POTC was just as bad as X3 but more fun... and it was funnier.

Well I guess I can settle for a Dolby Digital EX track. The artwork sucks for the single edition though. Much rather ahve the CE but don't think I want to pay an extra $10 for cool cover art and a comic book.

overall I like the cover, but I hate the quote, it just sounds silly when you say it out loud. I would have rather seen nothing there, but if they must they should put the tagline, "Take a Stand", that would have been cooler. But anyways I cant wait to get this, I love the X-Men films!

I enjoyed Superman Returns much more than X3.  For that matter, I think I liked last year's Fantastic Four better than X3.

I will likely get SR the week of release.  But I'll wait for X3 to turn up used at Blockbuster; it's not worth paying full price IMO.

hm, I hope it will be different. I am buying the R2NL 2 disc release, that's practically almost the same as R2UK, so can't wait to see it.

they messed up on the 1-disc art soooo much. thank God, they're putting the poster as the CE art. Might pick that one up. this movie was just an 8/10 for me.

Chris Gould wrote: There's no such thing as Dolby 6.1 EX. It's 5.1 EX, because the sixth channel is matrixed. Dolby even write it that way themselves. It's interesting to note that only the standard edition says 6.1 EX. No mention of that soundtrack is included with the PR for the Collector's Edition. Make of that what you will.


I think the CE will include the 5.1 EX track... on another site it says the CE will have all the features on the regular widescreen edition (the DVD will probably be packaged in a slipcase with the comic book). It's more than likely both editions will have the 5.1 EX track.

the one disc set artwork is c**p. the collectors it good

Eliason A. wrote: Pulled a Munich. Mediocre 1-Disc DVD. Defintely better CE. Hopefully, both will be available everywhere.

This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.Have  you seen V For Vendetta, united 93, or pirates of the caribean 2 this is not the best movie of the year. I'm not a huge singer fan but I still fell that Xmen 2 is the best and out of those movies this doesnt compare. now I liked xmen 3 but I felt it was rushed and could have been so much beter if they wanted to be  by the way ill rent this maybe pick it up wen x3.2 comes out  

I won't answer that. Oh wait I just did since a nonanswer is still an answer.

Anyone else notice that they couldn't bear to write out X3? Everyone was referring to it as X3 but even on the spine of the regular edition it just reprints the graphic of the claws over the X rather than just spelling out "X3." On the trilogy box, it's "X2: Xmen United" but not "X3: Last Stand" "Xmen: Last Stand." Weird.

I am still going to wait for the X3.2 release that is sure to come. While the extras are decent, there still seems to be some holding back on the real goods here.

I don't understand, like with Potter, why companies can not create unified cases for movies in franchises. The cover art for this is so much different than the previous two. It probably doesn't matter much to the companies, but to the collector, it is nice to have a franchise set that looks like it belongs together. I know Fox is still pissed at Singer, but they don't have to go out of their way to make sure X3 looks nothing like the other two movies because of some piss contest with the former director.

Further details, and highres artwork added. Fox has confirmed no DTS, although a Dolby Digital 6.1 EX track will be included instead...

 I'll get the Collector's set 'cause it's the only one with nice art.

PotterBoy wrote: So no 2-DISC?

Yes a 2-disc is coming in October..

Amazon.co.uk is already taking orders for the 6-disc trilogy

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000EO...

So there you have it !!

Let's face it, both SR and X3 were disappointing. X3 had lots of flashy effects to keep the kiddies entertained but the writing was pish. Halle Berry was dreadful too. Superman Returns just rehashed the plot of the first film, Lex wants real estate, uses Kryptonite to hurt Superman, girlfriend feels sorry for Superman and lets Lex down. Lois was completely miscast too, where's the 70's skank lookalike? The first two with Chris Reeves are the best. For the record, the only decent film this year so far is V for Vendetta.

Just dissapointed with it. I didn't hate it and as a stand alone movie it's o.k., but there's so much more they could have done with these characters and storylines they introduced. I am pissed at Singer for leaving X-Men to do Supes, but theat doesn't prevent Superman Returns from being a better film.

Also, since Fox is the most predictable studio ever concerning Double-Dips, I'll just wait for the inevitable 2-Disc 6 months later.

the only times I get 2 discs editions is when that's the only version of a film out. I don't believe in paying extra cash for a 2 discs edition if there's a single disc. I mean, if I do watch the special features, I just scam through them, and, only watch once, if that. So, I'll be just fine on Oct. 3rd when the single disc of The Last Stand comes out. Also, the cover art isn't all that bad. And, I'm sure that's just a rough cut of the cover art anyway.

Mark Buchanan wrote: Frank The Rabbit wrote: I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT BUYING THIS FILM!!! IT WAS ONE OF THE WORST MOVIES TO COME OUT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!!! ALMOST AS BAD AS CATWOMAN OR FANTASTIC 4!!! WE SHOULD BOYCOTT THIS DVD!!! DON'T BUY IT SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'S AN X-MEN MOVIE!!! YOU'RE LETTING THE STUDIO WIN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RELEASE ANY OLD HUNK OF RUSHED, RATNERIZED TURD AND THE SHEEP WILL BUY IT!!!

Remember your pills.  Quit shouting!  This ain't the Taliban...we can have our own opinions here.  I liked the movie and will buy it.  If you don't want to buy it then DONT!  It's that simple.
Yes, you absolutely can have your own opinion, as I can also. Just because I said that I didn't understand why anyone would be willing to buy it does not mean that I said you COULD NOT buy it. Of course, if you like it you can go out and buy it. I was just suggesting that we should not let the studios profit off of the X-Men name because they know that the fans of the previous entries (which I am) will buy it (which I will not) simply because of the title whether or not there is any real quality (ie cohesive plot) to the film.

Xmen 3 sortaof sucked... I'll probably still pick it up though.

Bryan Singer is a MUCH better director!

Frank The Rabbit wrote: I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT BUYING THIS FILM!!! IT WAS ONE OF THE WORST MOVIES TO COME OUT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!!! ALMOST AS BAD AS CATWOMAN OR FANTASTIC 4!!! WE SHOULD BOYCOTT THIS DVD!!! DON'T BUY IT SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'S AN X-MEN MOVIE!!! YOU'RE LETTING THE STUDIO WIN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RELEASE ANY OLD HUNK OF RUSHED, RATNERIZED TURD AND THE SHEEP WILL BUY IT!!!

Remember your pills.  Quit shouting!  This ain't the Taliban...we can have our own opinions here.  I liked the movie and will buy it.  If you don't want to buy it then DONT!  It's that simple.

TheGodfather wrote: I bet in Singers mind he wanted to do X3 after seeing the box office takings of both films on thier opening weekends
X3: $105 MILLION 4 DAYS
SUPERMAN RETURNS: $73MILLION 5 DAYS
OOPS!
Watched this having watched both the 1st and 2nd on the same day and it's quite a fittin end to the trilogy, but I do have 1 problem with the whole trilogy....
WHERE THE FLYING F**K IS GAMBIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm....

I prefer quality over quantity.   Little Man beat Clerks 2 last week at the box office.  Does that make Little Man a better cinematic achievement or of any value?   Most of your mainstream movies kills the independent circuit right down the middle...does that make the mainstream movies BETTER?!?!

Anyone that says X-MEN 3 is the best movie of the year are obviously blinded people that completely ignores the flaws within.

As for Superman...personally, I preferred Supes Return over X3.  Why?  It was longer...so I got my f**king money's worth.  It was executed much more efficient.  It had more of a satisfying climax.  And the writing was fairly solid.

Besides effects, and effects alone...is there any good qualities of X3?  

im waiting for Xmen 3.7, with an additional trailer or some c**p.  nah, ill just not bother my tits!

If I find I can't hold out for the inevitable 2-disc edition in the future, I'll probably only get the standard edition.  Awful artwork though.

X3 was the biggest dissapointment of the year. Awful script. Forced Acting. But some action scenes were cool, only some. Some were downright boring, definately the worst of the series, but I might pick up the awful looking one-disker just for a couple scenes that worked. Superman is a far superior film... FAR.

How can you people expect many action scenes in a movie where they have to introduce the characters first. Just look at batman begins the same amount of action as returns. Both movies where incredible.
The sequels will be action packed Singer said it himself at comic can and Bale has said the same about batmans sequel

You don't get it, Singer was forced to choose between X-Men 3 and Superman.  If he had chosen to do X-Men 3 first and wait on Superman, Warner Bros. would have gone ahead and hire a different director and still make Superman for this year, (like Fox did with Ratner and X-Men.)  In the end Singer had to choose and he went with Superman since he loves the character and thought he had a good idea.  In the end I would have liked to see him stay with X-Men, but he saved Superman from the horros of McG directing it.  By the way, while I liked X-Men: The Last Stand, Superman Returns was way better and is one of the best movies of the year.

So no 2-DISC?

One thing that is clear here, is it isn't as good cinematically, or on a substance level, as the second film. I guess it's true, the third part in the trilogy is always the weakest. That isn't necessarily the case. I mean, look at the Lord of the Rings as a whole - the third act is without a doubt, the best. But looking back at the trilogies of movies, it stands to be true. Godfather. Star Wars. The Omen (the fourth does not count, in my book).

In any case, the special effects of X3 stands alone as the best of all three films. That goes without saying. There are a lot of jaw-dropping moments that involve the special effects.

And like most movies, when style is being used more, substance lacks. And that is the case for this film. Not to mention doing something a lot of comic-book geeks fear in a comic book movie, stuffing too much in one package deal.

Certainly, it's no B&R. It has cheesy lines, but the film itself is not cheesy. There are some silly moments, but the film itself, is not silly. On the other hand, it could have been so much better. And once again, I completely blame the studio. Why is it, time is more spent on the predecessor, than the films that follow? Terminator 3. Jurassic Park 3. Both horrible attempts resulted as a piss poor script, a rush production, and an impossible dead-line, just to make fast-cash, when a better, bigger, and ultimately history-in-the-making film could be made instead, if time was spent more on the substance of the story. What was Chris Rock's point at the Oscars a couple of years ago, "WAIT!"

Because Bryan Singer left X3 to go to something that was actually needed a little more, Fox hand-picked the first director it can get, and rushed the production, just to make a point.

I like Brett Ratner. And I don't blame him for the flaws of this film. I blame the studio, and the writers.

Even at the moment my eyes saw the film for the first time, I made mental notes on the flaws.

A) we go from one subplot to another. This was done in the first, but was handled much better. For instance, Angel. We see a back-flash of Angel as a kid. It's a given, when this occurs, that Angel plays a big role in the film. NOPE! One of my co-workers said it best, "they could've gotten anyone to do Angel, at that rate, what a waste of Ben Foster". I completely agree.

B) the Phoenix sub-plot was also mis-handled. We really don't get a clear idea on this tragic character. The way the writers handled her, it was almost as a complete knock off of Carrie, in so many ways. In fact, expanding on that...I was waiting for a punch-line like, "Don't get the Phoenix angry, you won't like me when I am angry."

C) the "cure". one thing that was remarkable about X2, was its subtle allegory on the gay commute. so ideally, when an idea like "a cure to make mutants non-mutants to the norm", the subtle issue here would be unmistakable as an emotional and hard-hitting thing to watch. and ultimately, this is where "the war" would come in at, which was foreshadowed the whole entire film. and yet, we see a few protests, and a slight little "march", THAT'S IT.

D) Rouge. She played such a huge role in the first film, and as the series winded down, her role got trimmed to just basically a cameo. The whole love triangle bit could have also been executed a little more. I mean, come on...we got a guy who can't touch his girlfriend, and if he does, he'll die. That's perfect melodrama right there. And yet, he is played off like a typical horn-dog. As a result, I had no feel of this entire sub-plot one bit. In fact, by the end of the film, when she got her "abortion" (those that seen the movie, will get the pun on that!), I thought to myself, who-cares.

E) there are also continuity problems. in one single scene, it goes from day to night in matter of seconds. And I know I am not the only one that noticed it.

A film that is by all accounts, a slightly above average summer film. Nothing more, nothing less. I did expect more...and was somewhat disappointed. If anything, the film should have been longer. 30 to 40 minutes longer, me thinks. Maybe, just maybe, the Phoenix story line could be perfected to its rightful potential. The issues with the "cure" could have been played around a little more. Angel could have had more screen-time, so we as an audience, can actually CARE about him. And even the love triangle bit would be slightly better as a whole. It's amazing what time can do. That's still a lot to cover in a two hour movie. But hey, multiple subplots worked for LOTR and Star Wars, it can work with the "X" series. It's all about quality in writing and pacing. You can go on forever with one single sub-plot, but you can't jump from one to another with unsatisfying consequences.

In conclusion, I enjoyed this movie greatly, but find, like a lot of films, the foundation sloppy. And the foundation is the writing. Great movies aren't made with a solid cast or an expensive budget....it's made with a fantastic script. You would think, Hollywood has grasped this by now...after all these years of failed attempts. Guess not.

LMAO the best quote they could find for the cover was "Adrenaline-fueled fun"

Kyle Mertes wrote: Oh, and FYI, Ratner has already stated that there will be a Director's Cut of this.  He claims there was quite a bit cut, but not for time constraint reasons.  He wanted these scenes specifically for the DVD...

Really? I read an interview a few months ago asking him if he has footage he cut from "X3" for time reasons from the movie and he said specifically that everything he shot was in the film (save for one extended sequence he cut for time reasons). If we get an extended edition of X3, chances are that scene will be in there and nothing else (I'd be surprised if there was more footage than what was claimed to be).

The standard artwork stinks (too many people on it), but the collector's edition artwork is amazing and what should've been the artwork for the regular DVD. I'll get the CE instead.

However, it's sad to see that so many people say that "Superman Returns" was a disappointment and that they prefer "X3" to it. SR had some incredible action sequences that eclipse that of X3 and while it was a talky film, it kept me riveted from beginning to end. In fact, many people raved about "Batman Begins" and didn't like "Superman Returns" because it didn't have "enough action". In fact, "Batman Begins" and "Superman Returns" had roughly the same amount of big action sequences.

"X3" is an entertaining, yet shallow, movie and none of the big twists and character deaths never really moved me. "Superman Returns" is a film that had both style and substance (and had scenes that nearly moved me to tears); "X3" is a movie that got by on style.

Not terrible, not great just sticks somewhere between X1 and X2. Juggarnaut was great but they forgot about him at the end, Kelsey Grammer didn't quite portray Beast even though he was perfect to portray him, Famke Jannsen seemed to be too inhuman, Storm's big role is all forgotten at the end, Colossus is never used and portrayed badly, No Nightcrawler etc. My X3 complain list goes on and on. The flick made me even worry that all the next blockbusters could be screwed up: Superman, Transformers, Spiderman 3... I don't hate Brett Ratner for this, but I wouldn't let him direct another comic movie. I MAY buy this, but only because it's X-men.

Love the artwork - great summer popcorn flick.  I'll get the collector's edition.

Gonna be getting it at some point but not yet right away.
I already own the 4 disc set from the first two part, so I kinda expected that a 6 disc trilogy set was gonna be released? Ow well, maybe later :D

Frank The Rabbit wrote: I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT BUYING THIS FILM!!! IT WAS ONE OF THE WORST MOVIES TO COME OUT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!!! ALMOST AS BAD AS CATWOMAN OR FANTASTIC 4!!! WE SHOULD BOYCOTT THIS DVD!!! DON'T BUY IT SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'S AN X-MEN MOVIE!!! YOU'RE LETTING THE STUDIO WIN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RELEASE ANY OLD HUNK OF RUSHED, RATNERIZED TURD AND THE SHEEP WILL BUY IT!!!I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU'RE YELLIN ABOUT!!!

I'm with everyone else. The "Collector's Edition" is so over the top lame, that there is sure to be a double dip. I'll just rent the single disc to satisfy my need to watch the movie until then.

Exactly Stephen I couldn't agree more, especially when it was 30 odd minutes shorter than Part 2 (X2 - 130 minutes, X-Men 3 - 100 minutes, neither exact times).

elle_driver wrote: I don't understand why this movie has been so looked down upon. To me it was just as good as the previous two.
How long ago did you watch them? There's no way X-Men 3 is as good as the previous 2, particularly X-Men 2. Both the previous films created a real 3-D world we can believe in, with real life like characters. In the case of X-Men 2 this world is opened up even further.

Agreed X-Men 3 is better than most think but it's story is weak in many places, opting for action over story.

elle_driver wrote: just don't like Brett Ratner and decide to hate, or be disappointed by, his movies before they actually see them...
Agreed most don't give Ratner a chance but that is because whilst he was perfect for the Rush Hour films anything weightier he has proven he can't handle it.

I liked Red Dragon but that film was saved mostly because of the excellent cast and source material than any directing talent. The X-Men world is a big in-depth one Ratner struggles.

Very disappointing flick, dunno about purchasing it. Terrific how Ratner made mention that only one scene of his was cut and a wad of deleted scenes are included in the specs.


But I guess people who love a generic pheno.....menon will dig it.

I don't understand why this movie has been so looked down upon. To me it was just as good as the previous two. Maybe that's because I'm not such a serious comic book fan, by maybe it's because people, for some reason, just don't like Brett Ratner and decide to hate, or be disappointed by, his movies before they actually see them...

Anyway, I do hope they change the art, and I'm definitely getting the Collector's Edition.

Have to agree with zoolerscom, they went seriously far away from the comics here and botched the third part to the vastly superior previous entries. Beast was awesome and was extremely underused (cyclops has been short changed through all 3 films but this was ridiculous). The inevitable double dip for this title is becoming all too infuriatingly common, I really hope a DTS track is announced at least. Superman Returns was a much stronger and emotionally involving picture than this (although it too felt a bit "rushed into production"-ish}...and this one had much more melodrama (I hasten to add very "rushed" melodrama with no time for anything but the next visual effect let alone give the audience a moment or 2 to grieve the multiple
character dispatches). Brett Ratner has no sense of pacing at all... he took a suspence masterpiece of a novel like Red Dragon and removed any shread of suspense..? I mean how do you screw up something so proven... the guy directs like he was reared in the art of film making by 30 second commercials or mtv
 ( I know that those fields are his background but that's really not an excuse, other commercial advertising/ music video
directors have made wonderful films). Not trying to bash just
seriously critique his work, he should have stayed with light comedies.

the single disc art bites.  inferior to the cover art from the first two films.   I do want to see X3 and will be glad when the 2 disc CE is out next year  (just wish they could do it now instead of a double dip).

It was okay, not terrible, but nothing spectacular.

$10 more for a comic book and no DTS track. Whats the deal Fox?

RentFreak610 wrote: I'll get the 2-disc

I hate to say it but there is no 2-disc DVD. The Collector's Edition is just the standard DVD with different packaging and a 100-pg comic book.

I dont really care for thc comic book and I am a poor college student so I'm just going for the standard single-disc DVD like I mostly do. I only have time to watch the movie and not hrs of bonus material. But it is sad there is no making of featurettes on this edition.

As for the film, I thought it was on par with "X-Men". Great bit not amazing as "X2: X-Men United". A lot of things about "X-Men: The Last Stand" were dissapointing but the end result was really good. Overall I liked it. 8/10

I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT BUYING THIS FILM!!! IT WAS ONE OF THE WORST MOVIES TO COME OUT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!!! ALMOST AS BAD AS CATWOMAN OR FANTASTIC 4!!! WE SHOULD BOYCOTT THIS DVD!!! DON'T BUY IT SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'S AN X-MEN MOVIE!!! YOU'RE LETTING THE STUDIO WIN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RELEASE ANY OLD HUNK OF RUSHED, RATNERIZED TURD AND THE SHEEP WILL BUY IT!!!

The film was enjoyable, and the artwork is very good...BUT WHY Is FOX HOLDING BACK AGAIN WITH THIS DVD RELEASE!(Sorry about the caps). Everyone knows that there will be a 2-Disc on the way, I mean there isn't even a making of featurette on this! Sadly, I will end up buying this because I'm too impatient to wait for the 2-Disc(Which hopefully at least be an extended cut).

Damn Fox and their unevitable bells and whistles edition next summer.  This movie was decent but the script was certainly not as good as the first two (Ratner tried hard though).  I'll buy it, but the second two were the superior films.

Why the Hell DOES Angel have an X-Suit on?

Is there some deleted scene where he ISN'T flying around either shirtless or in some revealing shirt that causes the girls to giggle and gossip in the theater?

This movie was awful.  But that's what you get with a mediocre director and a hack screenwriter, I suppose.  Fox pissed away everything that made the first two worthwhile by rushing this one through production.  Way to go.  

probably the 2-disc will come out before WOLVERINE comes out (like with FANTASTIC FOUR, which I'm expecting to come out next year along with FF2)

Coming from Fox, I am not surprise. Wait for another 6 months and they will release a 2-disc set. Besides, the single disc edition looks pretty bare bones-commentary tracks and alternate endings-I'll pass for now.

I'll pick up that X-Men Trilogy since I don't own the previous versions.

Thank you Ellason. I thought I was the only one who liked X3.

Pulled a Munich. Mediocre 1-Disc DVD. Defintely better CE. Hopefully, both will be available everywhere.

This is one of the year's best. The people who worship Singer and bash this film can screw off. It rapes Superman Returns. Must buy.

William Coffey wrote: No DTS and terrible art?!

Shoot me, please.

It may include DTS yet - still awaiting the full details...

Only 1 disc, and since this is Fox, I'm pretty sure there's going to be a 2-disc edition next year...unrated, of course.  

I like both cover-arts.

Didn't get to see it and I'm looking forward to it, so I'll be getting this as soon as possible.

No DTS and terrible art?!

Shoot me, please.