Apocalypto (UK - DVD R2)
Scott McKenzie takes a look at Mel Gibson's bloodthirsty action movie...
Feature
Jaguar Paw is a young Mayan hunter, helping to provide for his pregnant wife, son and their village by hunting in the jungle with his tribe. Their simple idyllic life is thrown into turmoil when their village is invaded and the men are taken through the jungle to the city to be sacrificed. Jaguar Paw manages to hide his wife and child in a chasm and, after managing to escape from the city, he has to make it back to his family before his captors catch up to him and get medieval on his ass.

Just a few films into his directorial career, one thing is clear: Mel Gibson loves a bit of public torture. William Wallace was ripped to pieces in front of a crowd in Braveheart, Jesus had a hard time all the way through The Passion of the Christ and now we get Mayans chopped up and thrown off the top of a pyramid. According to Mad Max the historian, the past was brutal and he doesn’t think twice about showing us his version of events, whether it’s beheadings, clubbings or a warrior getting his face mauled by a jaguar. We’re not talking the same level of gore as The Passion of the Christ, but Apocalypto is not for the faint hearted.
Apocalypto operates under the pretence that it’s a historical document showing the downfall of the Mayan society. As we follow Jaguar Paw’s journey from the jungle to the heart of the city we can see the slavery and disease that has tipped civilisation past the point of no return. The city-dwelling Mayan leaders are shown as savages, eager to appease their God and maintain the loyalty of their followers with ritual sacrifice. Is this approach racist? Maybe, but certainly not to the same degree as the complaints that were levelled against The Passion. Other than what we see in the background during Jaguar Paw’s journey to the city and back, the actions of the characters serve only to move the story along because beneath the historical epic exterior, Apocalypto is an exciting chase movie that sticks closely to conventions of the action genre.

The story is a simple there-and-back-again chase but the execution is excellent. The idea of a man running for his life is something that anyone can identify with and the handheld camera work means the visuals move as fast as the story. Even though Apocalypto uses unknown actors speaking Mayan dialogue, the film is very easy to get into, more so than Mel Gibson’s last film. Not bound by the scriptures, he can take more time to establish the characters and develop our emotional investment in Jaguar Paw and his family.
There are a couple of minor problems though. Whether the screenwriter had a tight deadline to meet or the filmmakers thought they could somehow throw some lines in to appeal to modern audiences, there are a small number of lines in the screenplay that took me out of the film. Lines like ‘He’s f____d’ and ‘I’m walking here!’ are pure twenty-first century dialogue and could easily have been replaced with a historical alternative. My second complaint is the ending. Taking more than a little inspiration from Predator and other jungle-bound action movies, the event that prompts the resolution comes straight out of Lord of the Flies. The lack of originality is not what irks me though. Without giving too much away, I’ll say that what happens is at odds with the quote at the beginning of the film describing the way a civilisation will destroy itself.

Those complaints aside, there’s a lot to recommend here. Apocalypto is a visceral, non-stop action movie that will keep you gripped from beginning to end. On the other hand, you might want to consult other sources if you want a concise history of the Mayan civilisation. The good significantly outweighs the bad though and if Apocalypto doesn’t excite you, your heart has probably stopped beating.
Video
Apocalypto is presented with a colourful 1.85:1 anamorphic picture. There are very small black bands at the top and bottom of the picture, but I had been hoping for a wider frame given the epic scope of the film. As you will find out in the extra features, the Mexican jungle was picked as the filming location because the foliage isn’t too dense and allows the camera to look deep into the jungle. The picture represents this well, with good detail in the backgrounds.

Audio
There are three audio tracks available: stereo, Dolby 5.1 surround and DTS 5.1. For this review I selected the DTS track and I wasn’t disappointed. Ambient noises sound great coming through the rear speakers and give you a jungle atmosphere in the comfort of your front room. The music and dialogue are pitched at the right level but occasional sound effects are louder, especially the jaguar’s roar, which works well and adds to the excitement of those scenes.

Extras
Mel Gibson and co-producer Farhad Safinia provide a commentary track. Maybe Mel isn’t used to doing commentary tracks or maybe he recorded it late at night while his kids were sleeping but he’s very softly spoken. Their conversations focus heavily on location scouting, casting and the massive amount of work that had to go into the costumes and makeup, especially the city scenes where seven hundred extras were used.
‘Becoming Mayan: Creating Apocalypto’ is a decent making-of featurette showing plenty of on-set footage and interviews with the crew. Be warned if you listen to the commentary track first—the subject matter overlaps quite a lot. A deleted scene is provided with optional commentary but it’s very short. It’s highly unlikely this is the only deleted scene so I have to wonder why they bothered.

Overall
Apocalypto works very well as an action movie, more so than as a historical document. The transfer looks and sounds great but the package is let down by the slight set of extras. This is a must-see movie but I’m expecting a features-loaded special edition to arrive sooner or later.
Review by Scott McKenzie
Advertisements
Darrell Judd
Member
Join Date: March 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 115
Nice, fair review. I picked this up not expecting much (I dont really like subtitled films) and thoroughly enjoyed it. In fact the experience with this led me to give Letters From Iwo Jima and Oldboy a try - thanks to Apocalypto I have discovered a new line of entertainment
Report
Quote
| Reply
If you actually listen to the commentary track they state explicitly that "f**k" (or the word that is the same) was around then and IS historically valid. They make a big point about it in fact and the surprise audiences show.
I thought this was very good indeed and although it owed a fair bit to parts of "last of the Mohicans" in the chase I thought it was a solid, violent and brave work to take into a multi-plex arena.
Quote: The city-dwelling Mayan leaders are shown as savages, eager to appease their God and maintain the loyalty of their followers with ritual sacrifice. Is this approach racist? Maybe,
And i fail to see what is racist about known, proven, documented historical facts. What is this 21st century garbage where all white westerners are scum but other brown skinned people have never done anything bad or icky and all used to dance around meadows of flowers, showering each other with stardust!
NOPE! Even they hacked off heads, and this 21st century PC attitude that just loves to re-write history to please (as long as it's not white, western or especially American history of course) can't change that.
Some little brown skinned lovelies used to eat people too! Yeah.
I thought this was very good indeed and although it owed a fair bit to parts of "last of the Mohicans" in the chase I thought it was a solid, violent and brave work to take into a multi-plex arena.
Quote: The city-dwelling Mayan leaders are shown as savages, eager to appease their God and maintain the loyalty of their followers with ritual sacrifice. Is this approach racist? Maybe,
And i fail to see what is racist about known, proven, documented historical facts. What is this 21st century garbage where all white westerners are scum but other brown skinned people have never done anything bad or icky and all used to dance around meadows of flowers, showering each other with stardust!
NOPE! Even they hacked off heads, and this 21st century PC attitude that just loves to re-write history to please (as long as it's not white, western or especially American history of course) can't change that.
Some little brown skinned lovelies used to eat people too! Yeah.
Nice review. I loved the film too.
Quote: Without giving too much away, I’ll say that what happens is at odds with the quote at the beginning of the film describing the way a civilisation will destroy itself.
A good point you've raised there.
I think it's accepted they did kill each other off more so than what happens at the end, killing them off. They didn't help though of course. Agreed it's not played out very clearly though.
Personally I enjoyed it but felt considering the subject matter the film deserved way more depth. It was mostly a B-Movie which did disappoint me a little, it did look fantastic though. Overall it's worth seeing but not a keeper IMO.
Oh and I've never seen a more ridiculous pregnancy in all my life. I've very little knowledge of the subject but I seriously doubt babies just fall out.
Quote: If you actually listen to the commentary track they state explicitly that "f**k" (or the word that is the same) was around then and IS historically valid. They make a big point about it in fact and the surprise audiences show.
I seriously doubt the Mayan's would've used the word though
A good point you've raised there.
I think it's accepted they did kill each other off more so than what happens at the end, killing them off. They didn't help though of course. Agreed it's not played out very clearly though.
Personally I enjoyed it but felt considering the subject matter the film deserved way more depth. It was mostly a B-Movie which did disappoint me a little, it did look fantastic though. Overall it's worth seeing but not a keeper IMO.
Oh and I've never seen a more ridiculous pregnancy in all my life. I've very little knowledge of the subject but I seriously doubt babies just fall out.
Quote: If you actually listen to the commentary track they state explicitly that "f**k" (or the word that is the same) was around then and IS historically valid. They make a big point about it in fact and the surprise audiences show.
I seriously doubt the Mayan's would've used the word though
Bradavon wrote:
Oh and I've never seen a more ridiculous pregnancy in all my life. I've very little knowledge of the subject but I seriously doubt babies just fall out.
I seriously doubt the Mayan's would've used the word though
Well they did according to the commentary track. They explicitly mention that the word is in ancient Mayan. Swearing as we know it has been around for thousands of years and is well documented.
And you obviously couldn't have an 18 hour labour in a film. It is afterall just that...a film.
Oh and I've never seen a more ridiculous pregnancy in all my life. I've very little knowledge of the subject but I seriously doubt babies just fall out.
I seriously doubt the Mayan's would've used the word though
Well they did according to the commentary track. They explicitly mention that the word is in ancient Mayan. Swearing as we know it has been around for thousands of years and is well documented.
And you obviously couldn't have an 18 hour labour in a film. It is afterall just that...a film.
nice to see u rated it high Scott..just got the R1 Edition two days ago...atill waiting to finde some time to see it - but now i can't wait even more
I may be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure that the events that take place at the end of the film fudges the timeline, but wouldn't it have been neat for Gibson to produce a follow up film in Clint Eastwood fashion that would compare/contrast the Mayans and Spanish Catholics during the possibly mis-timed era this film takes place in? Both pretty bloody and similar situations. Or maybe a straight sequel where the Mayans jump from the frying pan into the fire. I'm guessing that Gibson's religious preference would make that hypothetical film unlikely.
Politically corrections aside (not something Gibson is known for), I was a little disappointed by the last act. It was a little too Predator. Still, a much better film than I expected, some really great performances, and gorgeous set design. And that wonky panther puppet was very amusing.
Politically corrections aside (not something Gibson is known for), I was a little disappointed by the last act. It was a little too Predator. Still, a much better film than I expected, some really great performances, and gorgeous set design. And that wonky panther puppet was very amusing.
You could be right Gabe, it's not the first time Gibson has completely bended reality for his own gain (Braveheart) or been part of a film that too is completely inaccurate (The Patriot, that's not how it happened at all).
Even The Passion there is much debate on how accurate it is.
Every time under the guise of "artistic license" and "it's just a film", fine both Braveheart and Apocalypto are definitely entertaining. It is worrying that a percentage of the audience will take it as gospel though.
Dave Brock wrote: Well they did according to the commentary track. They explicitly mention that the word is in ancient Mayan. Swearing as we know it has been around for thousands of years and is well documented.
No one is doubting that any civilisation swore but the word F**k was known to the Mayans. The word originates from Britain and during the period the film is set no European as yet had visited South America, even the name of the continent came much later. When they did it was even the British who first visited.
Dave Brock wrote: And you obviously couldn't have an 18 hour labour in a film. It is afterall just that...a film.
Obviously but how it is depicted goes to the other end of the extreme and doesn't depict any form of labour at all, the baby in a matter of minutes literally pops out. I hope we all knows it takes longer than that, there weren't even any obvious signs of contractions.
Anyway I'm no expert but they could've least attempted to make it look realistic.
Even The Passion there is much debate on how accurate it is.
Every time under the guise of "artistic license" and "it's just a film", fine both Braveheart and Apocalypto are definitely entertaining. It is worrying that a percentage of the audience will take it as gospel though.
Dave Brock wrote: Well they did according to the commentary track. They explicitly mention that the word is in ancient Mayan. Swearing as we know it has been around for thousands of years and is well documented.
No one is doubting that any civilisation swore but the word F**k was known to the Mayans. The word originates from Britain and during the period the film is set no European as yet had visited South America, even the name of the continent came much later. When they did it was even the British who first visited.
Dave Brock wrote: And you obviously couldn't have an 18 hour labour in a film. It is afterall just that...a film.
Obviously but how it is depicted goes to the other end of the extreme and doesn't depict any form of labour at all, the baby in a matter of minutes literally pops out. I hope we all knows it takes longer than that, there weren't even any obvious signs of contractions.
Anyway I'm no expert but they could've least attempted to make it look realistic.
As far as contractions go it's true, the film didn't really represent the lead up to giving birth (the mother was clearly not having a whale of a time though) but I can tell you, having seen my daughter being born (a water birth) that it does a fairly good job of depicting that sort of delivery. I would say however, based on my limited experience, that the baby should have been paler on exit. I described my daughter being born like a little grey dolphin wriggling and swimming free. Perhaps it might have given the wrong signal to the audience though if they had used a paler, grey colour. It might have come across is if the baby was 'in trouble' shall we say.
So given that they didn't have their main actress pregnant at the time who was also willing to have a live on camera birth with a real baby, I'd be willing to give the production some slack in this regard.
So given that they didn't have their main actress pregnant at the time who was also willing to have a live on camera birth with a real baby, I'd be willing to give the production some slack in this regard.
I think that people are wandering off the issue a little bit. The point I think is....... DID YOU ENJOY THE FILM? If so, great. If not, come up with some constructive criticism instead of disputing or wondering about the etymology of the word "f**k"..... If you want to sit through the joy of child birth and witness an authentic one - watch the Discovery Channel.
Just worry about enjoying films. If you start to analyse them, maybe we take away some of the escapist enjoyment.
Just worry about enjoying films. If you start to analyse them, maybe we take away some of the escapist enjoyment.
I quite agree Darrel, but as 2 people had mentioned that the birth in the film was 'unrealistic' shall we say, I just thought I'd offer a different perspective on it as it's something I've actually seen with my own eyes.
As for the film itself, I bought it as a blind buy and was left underwhelmed by it. After all the hype (which I tried to block out where possible) I was expecting something far more original and gory. Instead I saw the bits of Dances with Wolves, the opening attack from from Conan the Barbarian (and any number of other 'village gets attacked' films, bits of Gladiator rounded off with First Blood. Oh and an episode of Casualty to round things off.
I realise films are largly derivated and I don't usually mind the same ingredients shaken about slightly just as long as the taste is sufficiently different. Apocalypto tasted the same to me.
On the plus side, the jungle looked jungly and I found the idea that civilizations that reach a certain level of decadence tend to implode or destroy themselves interesting. Although I didn't feel that this was the film to fully explore that concept as it was basically a chase film at heart.
Chase films are fine but I don't think this film's target audience is going to be finding subtext and meaning in amongst all the running about. They (as I did) might only pick up on (and discover) those aspects after listening in on the commentary track.
So overall worth a look but I think we've only seen a small percentage of a larger more interesting story and as such Apocalypto is in my eyes a wasted opportunity.
As for the film itself, I bought it as a blind buy and was left underwhelmed by it. After all the hype (which I tried to block out where possible) I was expecting something far more original and gory. Instead I saw the bits of Dances with Wolves, the opening attack from from Conan the Barbarian (and any number of other 'village gets attacked' films, bits of Gladiator rounded off with First Blood. Oh and an episode of Casualty to round things off.
I realise films are largly derivated and I don't usually mind the same ingredients shaken about slightly just as long as the taste is sufficiently different. Apocalypto tasted the same to me.
On the plus side, the jungle looked jungly and I found the idea that civilizations that reach a certain level of decadence tend to implode or destroy themselves interesting. Although I didn't feel that this was the film to fully explore that concept as it was basically a chase film at heart.
Chase films are fine but I don't think this film's target audience is going to be finding subtext and meaning in amongst all the running about. They (as I did) might only pick up on (and discover) those aspects after listening in on the commentary track.
So overall worth a look but I think we've only seen a small percentage of a larger more interesting story and as such Apocalypto is in my eyes a wasted opportunity.
i just cant see how this is a good movie. it just seems to rediculious. i will have to check it out and see for my self. but seriously, mel gibson really needs to make a regular movie that is not based on violence. that will determine if he is a real director and not just good at suspense and gore.
He did. It was called The Man Without a Face. and it was awful.
Great review,one of my favorite films of the year.
I'm retreating under superior firepower. I quite like 'The Man Without a Face'.


Suitable only for persons of 18 years and over
Disc Details
Release Date:
11th June 2007
Discs:
1
Disc Type:
Single side, dual layer
RCE:
No
Video:
PAL
Aspect:
1.78:1
Anamorphic:
Yes
Colour:
Yes
Audio:
Dolby Digital Mayan Stereo, Dolby Digital Mayan 5.1 Surround, Dolby Digital Mayan DTS
Subtitles:
English
Extras:
Filmmakers Commentary, Deleted Scene With Optional Commentary, Becoming Mayan: Creating Apocalypto Featurette
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
Mel Gibson
Cast:
Rudy Youngblood, Dalia Hernández, Jonathan Brewer, Morris Birdyellowhead, Carlos Emilio Báez
Genre:
Action, Adventure and Horror
Length:
132 minutes



