Battlestar Galactica (UK - DVD R2)
Was the original TV movie from 1978 as good as Scott McKenzie remembered?
In 1978 the world was riding on a sci-fi wave brought on by the release of Star Wars the year before. It was only a matter of time until imitators jumped on the bandwagon and came up with their similar yet legally distinguishable space epics. Now that the movie version of the original Battlestar Galactica is being re-released on the back of the success of the re-imagined series, I’m asking myself whether it was really any good or did I pick this review with rose-tinted specs on?

The Twelve Colonies of Man are on the verge of a truce with their mortal enemies, the Cylons, a race of machines who turned against their makers. Lorne Green plays Adama, commander of the Galactica, one of the five battlestars in the starship fleet. He suspects the Cylons are plotting against the humans, but his warnings are ignored by the elders in favour of a more diplomatic approach when two of the fleet’s fighters run into trouble. The humans are not prepared for the inevitable attack from the Cylons and Adama’s son Zac is killed.
After destroying most of the fleet, the Cylons launch an attack on the colonies, swearing to wipe out Man from the universe. The Galactica escapes from the attack, and together with the survivors from the colonies Commander Adama leads a convoy towards the home of the legendary thirteenth colony of Man—Earth.
This DVD contains the version that was given a theatrical release and is twenty-three minutes shorter than the original movie of the week. With a budget of $7 million, it was the most expensive TV production at the time and each subsequent episode had a budget of $1 million. Even though Battlestar Galactica was conceived as a group of movies rather than a series, we’re firmly in TV sci-fi territory here. The production design owes a lot to Star Wars but the concept of a group of people heading off into the unknown and exploring strange worlds has closer ties with Star Trek.

This theatrical version feels like three episodes glued together. Every forty minutes the story reaches a concluding point and Lorne Green provides a Captain Kirk-style voiceover. The script is also hampered by the need to introduce the characters and allow them to get in and out of scrapes while holding our attention but never settings its sights so high that the resulting series wouldn’t be able to match.
There are exciting battles at the beginning and end (along with a Death Star-style destruction of a planet) but the mid-section lacks urgency. The humans find themselves in a casino nightclub on a human outpost and the writers take the opportunity to develop the characters at the expense of plot development. Even when we find out that the alien hosts have some kind of nefarious plan, it takes a long time to move the story along and while we are supposed to realise that Starbuck is a cheeky Han Solo type, his plan to get out of the military by managing a group of singers makes absolutely no sense given the predicament the human race finds itself in.
Although the special effects are quite impressive for the time (utilising techniques developed by ILM), some shots are recycled fairly often, which would remain a common trait of the series. The need to re-use footage occasionally leads to obvious continuity problems and if I was watching this in the cinema now, I’d feel pretty ripped off.

There are some plus points though. Dirk Benedict as Starbuck will always remain a classic character, essentially the same charmer he played in The A-Team, and Lorne Greene is imposing as Adama in a role that was offered to Mark Hamill. The production design has its highlights as well. The spaceships look great and the playground arguments of which is best—X-Wing or Viper—have now moved to message boards as the fans have grown up. I still think the Cylons look cooler than Stormtroopers, until they start to move of course, where the weight of the suit obviously makes life difficult for the actor inside. A lot of work has gone into creating the world of Battlestar Galactica, implying that these humans are in some way related to our ancestors who built the pyramids, which is reflected in the costumes and naming conventions.
The excessive budget of the production would mean that Battlestar Galactica ended after one series, followed up by the bargain basement travesty of Galactica 1980, which has been disowned by creator Glen A Larson and fans alike. I have to say I was looking forward to watching this, with fond memories of the closest thing we could get to a Star Wars TV series, but after the first forty minutes I found myself watching the clock. It may be worth checking out once for nostalgia value, but true fans of the series have no doubt already picked up the series itself.

Presented in non-anamorphic 16:9, I doubt this print has gone through any kind of re-mastering since it was first released on VHS. There are scratches and dirt on the picture and the model shots—the best bits of the feature—are especially grubby. During the Superman-inspired opening credits, it is difficult to make out the edges of some of the text and large areas of black are grainy and show obvious signs of compression.
One of my fondest memories of Battlestar Galactica that has not been ruined by growing up is the wonderful theme tune. When the orchestra kicks in, we could be forgiven for expecting an experience over and above a movie of the week. The problem is that on this DVD we only get a mono track which significantly reduces its impact. The audio is muffled and the quality can shift drastically from one second to another but never reaches above a level you expect from VHS.
The features aren’t very special at all. Actually, all we get is a lot of text. The production notes are fairly interesting, detailing the concept, the production and the characters but they go on for many pages without an idea of how much is left to read. There are also notes on the creator and three main stars and some web links but there’s no added value on the disc that you can’t find after poking around on the internet for a few minutes.

I'm sorry to say that I was very disappointed, both by the way Battlestar Galactica has aged and the way this feature is presented. The comparisons with Star Wars are unavoidable (Lucas even threatened legal action) and while it may have stood up well in 1978, Battlestar Galactica is really showing its age. The feature has its moments but they are too few and far between and given the lack of extras, there’s not a lot for me to recommend here.

Feature
The Twelve Colonies of Man are on the verge of a truce with their mortal enemies, the Cylons, a race of machines who turned against their makers. Lorne Green plays Adama, commander of the Galactica, one of the five battlestars in the starship fleet. He suspects the Cylons are plotting against the humans, but his warnings are ignored by the elders in favour of a more diplomatic approach when two of the fleet’s fighters run into trouble. The humans are not prepared for the inevitable attack from the Cylons and Adama’s son Zac is killed.
After destroying most of the fleet, the Cylons launch an attack on the colonies, swearing to wipe out Man from the universe. The Galactica escapes from the attack, and together with the survivors from the colonies Commander Adama leads a convoy towards the home of the legendary thirteenth colony of Man—Earth.
This DVD contains the version that was given a theatrical release and is twenty-three minutes shorter than the original movie of the week. With a budget of $7 million, it was the most expensive TV production at the time and each subsequent episode had a budget of $1 million. Even though Battlestar Galactica was conceived as a group of movies rather than a series, we’re firmly in TV sci-fi territory here. The production design owes a lot to Star Wars but the concept of a group of people heading off into the unknown and exploring strange worlds has closer ties with Star Trek.

This theatrical version feels like three episodes glued together. Every forty minutes the story reaches a concluding point and Lorne Green provides a Captain Kirk-style voiceover. The script is also hampered by the need to introduce the characters and allow them to get in and out of scrapes while holding our attention but never settings its sights so high that the resulting series wouldn’t be able to match.
There are exciting battles at the beginning and end (along with a Death Star-style destruction of a planet) but the mid-section lacks urgency. The humans find themselves in a casino nightclub on a human outpost and the writers take the opportunity to develop the characters at the expense of plot development. Even when we find out that the alien hosts have some kind of nefarious plan, it takes a long time to move the story along and while we are supposed to realise that Starbuck is a cheeky Han Solo type, his plan to get out of the military by managing a group of singers makes absolutely no sense given the predicament the human race finds itself in.
Although the special effects are quite impressive for the time (utilising techniques developed by ILM), some shots are recycled fairly often, which would remain a common trait of the series. The need to re-use footage occasionally leads to obvious continuity problems and if I was watching this in the cinema now, I’d feel pretty ripped off.

There are some plus points though. Dirk Benedict as Starbuck will always remain a classic character, essentially the same charmer he played in The A-Team, and Lorne Greene is imposing as Adama in a role that was offered to Mark Hamill. The production design has its highlights as well. The spaceships look great and the playground arguments of which is best—X-Wing or Viper—have now moved to message boards as the fans have grown up. I still think the Cylons look cooler than Stormtroopers, until they start to move of course, where the weight of the suit obviously makes life difficult for the actor inside. A lot of work has gone into creating the world of Battlestar Galactica, implying that these humans are in some way related to our ancestors who built the pyramids, which is reflected in the costumes and naming conventions.
The excessive budget of the production would mean that Battlestar Galactica ended after one series, followed up by the bargain basement travesty of Galactica 1980, which has been disowned by creator Glen A Larson and fans alike. I have to say I was looking forward to watching this, with fond memories of the closest thing we could get to a Star Wars TV series, but after the first forty minutes I found myself watching the clock. It may be worth checking out once for nostalgia value, but true fans of the series have no doubt already picked up the series itself.

Video
Presented in non-anamorphic 16:9, I doubt this print has gone through any kind of re-mastering since it was first released on VHS. There are scratches and dirt on the picture and the model shots—the best bits of the feature—are especially grubby. During the Superman-inspired opening credits, it is difficult to make out the edges of some of the text and large areas of black are grainy and show obvious signs of compression.
Audio
One of my fondest memories of Battlestar Galactica that has not been ruined by growing up is the wonderful theme tune. When the orchestra kicks in, we could be forgiven for expecting an experience over and above a movie of the week. The problem is that on this DVD we only get a mono track which significantly reduces its impact. The audio is muffled and the quality can shift drastically from one second to another but never reaches above a level you expect from VHS.
Features
The features aren’t very special at all. Actually, all we get is a lot of text. The production notes are fairly interesting, detailing the concept, the production and the characters but they go on for many pages without an idea of how much is left to read. There are also notes on the creator and three main stars and some web links but there’s no added value on the disc that you can’t find after poking around on the internet for a few minutes.

Overall
I'm sorry to say that I was very disappointed, both by the way Battlestar Galactica has aged and the way this feature is presented. The comparisons with Star Wars are unavoidable (Lucas even threatened legal action) and while it may have stood up well in 1978, Battlestar Galactica is really showing its age. The feature has its moments but they are too few and far between and given the lack of extras, there’s not a lot for me to recommend here.
Review by Scott McKenzie
Advertisements
MrFlibble
Member
Join Date: July 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8
I enjoyed this at the cinema but I was only 8 at the time. I seem to remember a sequel called 'Mission Galactica : The Cylon Attack'. It was one of the few films available at Radio Rentals (remember them?) when we first got a VHS machine. Don't know if it's available now though, I think it was just a couple of TV episodes stuck together anyway.
Report
Quote
| Reply
MrFlibble wrote: I enjoyed this at the cinema but I was only 8 at the time. I seem to remember a sequel called 'Mission Galactica : The Cylon Attack'. It was one of the few films available at Radio Rentals (remember them?) when we first got a VHS machine. Don't know if it's available now though, I think it was just a couple of TV episodes stuck together anyway.
Yep, it was two episodes stuck together, and so was the third movie, The Conquest of Earth (or something similar) which contained the first episodes of the Kiddie TV series Galactica 80.
Yep, it was two episodes stuck together, and so was the third movie, The Conquest of Earth (or something similar) which contained the first episodes of the Kiddie TV series Galactica 80.
I loved it then, and I love it now.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
Eh??? The new series is infinitely superior to this in terms of character development. The 70s version was campy fun, but it wasn't a particularly serious drama.
Chris Gould wrote: The 70s version was campy fun, but it wasn't a particularly serious drama.
Hehe...yeah I like the old series too, but the new one is much better written. Here's just one example...
Question: Your entire civilization has been destroyed and your race is on the brink of being exterminated by some seriously evil robots who kill without mercy. What do you do?
A) Hightail it out of there as fast as you can and don't look back.
B) Stand your ground and fight to the last man.
C) Stop by the nearest casino and gamble away your life savings while trying to make it with an alien, lounge singing trio.
Hehe...yeah I like the old series too, but the new one is much better written. Here's just one example...
Question: Your entire civilization has been destroyed and your race is on the brink of being exterminated by some seriously evil robots who kill without mercy. What do you do?
A) Hightail it out of there as fast as you can and don't look back.
B) Stand your ground and fight to the last man.
C) Stop by the nearest casino and gamble away your life savings while trying to make it with an alien, lounge singing trio.
Chris Gould wrote: Eh??? The new series is infinitely superior to this in terms of character development. The 70s version was campy fun, but it wasn't a particularly serious drama.
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
Stephen Etherton wrote: I loved it then, and I love it now.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
I think you got that backwards mate.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
I think you got that backwards mate.
Stephen Etherton wrote: I loved it then, and I love it now.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
Right, you're pulling our leg, right?
I mean, I liked the old show... got the DVD, the t-shirt.... but if there's one thing that can't be said about it, it's that it was very superior in characters and storytelling...I mean, there's a reason why it was cancelled after one season.
The remake is far superior in so many ways.
So very superior in characters and story telling compared to the new thing on television going by the same name.
Right, you're pulling our leg, right?
I mean, I liked the old show... got the DVD, the t-shirt.... but if there's one thing that can't be said about it, it's that it was very superior in characters and storytelling...I mean, there's a reason why it was cancelled after one season.
The remake is far superior in so many ways.
Stephen Etherton wrote: Chris Gould wrote: Eh??? The new series is infinitely superior to this in terms of character development. The 70s version was campy fun, but it wasn't a particularly serious drama.
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
You mean you don't like chicks?
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
You mean you don't like chicks?
Bruno Billion wrote: Stephen Etherton wrote: Chris Gould wrote: Eh??? The new series is infinitely superior to this in terms of character development. The 70s version was campy fun, but it wasn't a particularly serious drama.
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
You mean you don't like chicks?
Sounds like it, don't it?
It's people like this who can't accept change that really irritate me. It's these same kind of people who don't like the Star Wars prequels simply because of the CG visuals....or the SE versions of the originals for the same reason.
The new BSG is so much more superior to the original show that I keep wishing I was watching the new version when I try watching the old one. Recently I tried rewatching the old series and I could only muster through the first 5 or 6 episodes, including the 3-part pilot that make up the theatrical movie. Surprisingly the new series takes a lot of minor plot points of the old show and expands on them and makes whole episodes out of them. Thus expanding the Galactica universe.
...but...but... but... Starbuck is a chick!!! A Cylon is a sexy chick!!! > LOL < I said better characters, not better character developement. I miss the old one, I still wish Richard Hatch's revival had taken hold (it worked on Star Trek). Starbuck was a player, he was a womanizer, he was ... well, now he is a chick!!!
I refuse change. It just is not BG, but on it's own, not a bad show, but I continue to compare the two.
As for the Quiz: Naturally, since I love the old show so much, I'd stop at the casino, and check out some multi eye'd, multi mouthed lounge singers, of course.
You mean you don't like chicks?
Sounds like it, don't it?
It's people like this who can't accept change that really irritate me. It's these same kind of people who don't like the Star Wars prequels simply because of the CG visuals....or the SE versions of the originals for the same reason.
The new BSG is so much more superior to the original show that I keep wishing I was watching the new version when I try watching the old one. Recently I tried rewatching the old series and I could only muster through the first 5 or 6 episodes, including the 3-part pilot that make up the theatrical movie. Surprisingly the new series takes a lot of minor plot points of the old show and expands on them and makes whole episodes out of them. Thus expanding the Galactica universe.
Bruno Billion wrote:
You mean you don't like chicks?
Ouch. I am being bombarded here. I will stand by opinion, though. Although, for the record, I do like chicks, and if I ever had to get into a big wrestling match with a Cylon, I may choose the new version over the chrome (seen through a light filter 70s version), I don't see a point to change a character so abrubtly. Imagine in the possible new 'Young Star Trek' being advertised now, (for diversity) if they decided to make a hot young sexy Russian lady be the new Checkov? [I doubt Sulu would be the only one who did not care].
I'll block my good 'ol memories one day and give it a fresh chance to enjoy the stories and all, but at the end I still think the original will be more fun to watch. Maybe not as thought provoking, but on a fun level, that is all. Just more of my 2cents here.
Lincoln6Echo wrote: It's people like this who can't accept change that really irritate me. It's these same kind of people who don't like the Star Wars prequels simply because of the CG visuals....or the SE versions of the originals for the same reason.
To bad about being irritated, but it is very wrong to put me in that grouping. I like most things when it makes sense and updated and a lot of changes I have seen in things. I just never saw Lucas re-imagine the saga, and make Chewie a female for no reason, and make Stormtroopers females who try to seduce Han.
You mean you don't like chicks?
Ouch. I am being bombarded here. I will stand by opinion, though. Although, for the record, I do like chicks, and if I ever had to get into a big wrestling match with a Cylon, I may choose the new version over the chrome (seen through a light filter 70s version), I don't see a point to change a character so abrubtly. Imagine in the possible new 'Young Star Trek' being advertised now, (for diversity) if they decided to make a hot young sexy Russian lady be the new Checkov? [I doubt Sulu would be the only one who did not care].
I'll block my good 'ol memories one day and give it a fresh chance to enjoy the stories and all, but at the end I still think the original will be more fun to watch. Maybe not as thought provoking, but on a fun level, that is all. Just more of my 2cents here.
Lincoln6Echo wrote: It's people like this who can't accept change that really irritate me. It's these same kind of people who don't like the Star Wars prequels simply because of the CG visuals....or the SE versions of the originals for the same reason.
To bad about being irritated, but it is very wrong to put me in that grouping. I like most things when it makes sense and updated and a lot of changes I have seen in things. I just never saw Lucas re-imagine the saga, and make Chewie a female for no reason, and make Stormtroopers females who try to seduce Han.
I've not seen much of the new show so far because I didn't like the Mini Series, I thought that a lot of the things that made the orginal interesting were changed for no reason and it was almost a Blade Runner TV show with space ships.
i.e. the replicants err Cylons, taking revenge on their human creators.
Having heard a lot of good things I'm going to start watching the new version though.
i.e. the replicants err Cylons, taking revenge on their human creators.
Having heard a lot of good things I'm going to start watching the new version though.
New version is definitely superior. It's been critically hailed up and down as one of the best shows on TV, and rightfully so.
Lincoln6Echo wrote: It's people like this who can't accept change that really irritate me. It's these same kind of people who don't like the Star Wars prequels simply because of the CG visuals....or the SE versions of the originals for the same reason.
Do you really think that's the reason people don't like the prequels? Because they have CGI in them? It's more to do with the fact that they are just poorly scripted, directed and acted compared to the original three. Also, the additional footage (not just CGI) in the original films screwed up the pacing in a number of areas.
It's not about accepting change, it's about preserving the memory of something you love. The makers of BSG haven't gone around deleting the original mini-series, nor do they deny its existence and claim that the new version is the only 'true' one. That's what pisses SW fans off - the fact that they aren't given a choice (well not a legal, high quality one anyway).
Do you really think that's the reason people don't like the prequels? Because they have CGI in them? It's more to do with the fact that they are just poorly scripted, directed and acted compared to the original three. Also, the additional footage (not just CGI) in the original films screwed up the pacing in a number of areas.
It's not about accepting change, it's about preserving the memory of something you love. The makers of BSG haven't gone around deleting the original mini-series, nor do they deny its existence and claim that the new version is the only 'true' one. That's what pisses SW fans off - the fact that they aren't given a choice (well not a legal, high quality one anyway).
Yep, even as a kid I hated this, and I still do.
The great thing with the new show is that it talks about 'The cycle of time' - everything has happened before and will happen again . . .
. . . which means, effectively, that the new show can be seen as a sequel or a prequel to the original Galactica!!!!
. . . which means, effectively, that the new show can be seen as a sequel or a prequel to the original Galactica!!!!
I loved the old BSG but if I saw it now especially after seeing the 2004 update I'd no doubt think what a pile of tripe it is. It was good in it's day but the new version is literally amazing. Great characters, actors(actresses), stories, writing & absolutely enthralling drama.
So Starbucks a chick, so what? she's made the role hers, yes she's different but in many ways she's the same. She sleeps around, drinks to excess, smokes , gambles, flouts regulations, disrespects & strikes superior officers. Her Starbuck has more flaws and layers than the original but then so does every single character get developed into 3 dimentional flawed & real people. it's updated to reflect the times and isn't needlessly changing things. I could understand if we saw a hollywood update that changed it into some Starky & Hutch type update, that would be pointless. But what they have done is made BSG into a terrific drama that non scifi fans can love too.
It's dark, gritty, exciting, dramatic and all I can say is God I hope they can maintain the quality because there aren't enough QUALITY sci-fi shows like BSG 2004 around.
As for the Trek comment I'd truley welcome Trek given a complete makeover BSG style. I think Trek is scifi from the past and if it has a future it needs to be re imagined. I don't think it necessarily has to have Kirk/spock/chekov/sulu as a woman , I'd prefer it just was set in the future & re-invented. Bold, Brave, interesting, good characters, actors & stories not safe, bland & predictable.
snowman08 wrote:
I loved the old BSG but if I saw it now especially after seeing the 2004 update I'd no doubt think what a pile of tripe it is. It was good in it's day but the new version is literally amazing. Great characters, actors(actresses), stories, writing & absolutely enthralling drama.
So Starbucks a chick, so what? she's made the role hers, yes she's different but in many ways she's the same. She sleeps around, drinks to excess, smokes , gambles, flouts regulations, disrespects & strikes superior officers. Her Starbuck has more flaws and layers than the original but then so does every single character get developed into 3 dimentional flawed & real people. it's updated to reflect the times and isn't needlessly changing things. I could understand if we saw a hollywood update that changed it into some Starky & Hutch type update, that would be pointless. But what they have done is made BSG into a terrific drama that non scifi fans can love too.
It's dark, gritty, exciting, dramatic and all I can say is God I hope they can maintain the quality because there aren't enough QUALITY sci-fi shows like BSG 2004 around.
As for the Trek comment I'd truley welcome Trek given a complete makeover BSG style. I think Trek is scifi from the past and if it has a future it needs to be re imagined. I don't think it necessarily has to have Kirk/spock/chekov/sulu as a woman , I'd prefer it just was set in the future & re-invented. Bold, Brave, interesting, good characters, actors & stories not safe, bland & predictable.
Like I said before, I will eventually watch it with a fresh perspective, but my main point is the original is just plain fun. Gabriel's & Snowman08's comments are well placed, and actually make me more interested in the new incarnation, now I just need to find the time. I'll get around to it one day. Chris Gould's comments about changes are dead on, too. Interesting comments about all this.
I loved the old BSG but if I saw it now especially after seeing the 2004 update I'd no doubt think what a pile of tripe it is. It was good in it's day but the new version is literally amazing. Great characters, actors(actresses), stories, writing & absolutely enthralling drama.
So Starbucks a chick, so what? she's made the role hers, yes she's different but in many ways she's the same. She sleeps around, drinks to excess, smokes , gambles, flouts regulations, disrespects & strikes superior officers. Her Starbuck has more flaws and layers than the original but then so does every single character get developed into 3 dimentional flawed & real people. it's updated to reflect the times and isn't needlessly changing things. I could understand if we saw a hollywood update that changed it into some Starky & Hutch type update, that would be pointless. But what they have done is made BSG into a terrific drama that non scifi fans can love too.
It's dark, gritty, exciting, dramatic and all I can say is God I hope they can maintain the quality because there aren't enough QUALITY sci-fi shows like BSG 2004 around.
As for the Trek comment I'd truley welcome Trek given a complete makeover BSG style. I think Trek is scifi from the past and if it has a future it needs to be re imagined. I don't think it necessarily has to have Kirk/spock/chekov/sulu as a woman , I'd prefer it just was set in the future & re-invented. Bold, Brave, interesting, good characters, actors & stories not safe, bland & predictable.
Like I said before, I will eventually watch it with a fresh perspective, but my main point is the original is just plain fun. Gabriel's & Snowman08's comments are well placed, and actually make me more interested in the new incarnation, now I just need to find the time. I'll get around to it one day. Chris Gould's comments about changes are dead on, too. Interesting comments about all this.
It is a shame they didn't spend the time and remaster this one....
I like both the old and the new - I look at this being a great story and this story then being "re-magined" and this time it worked. I hold them both on the same level
I like both the old and the new - I look at this being a great story and this story then being "re-magined" and this time it worked. I hold them both on the same level
This is a legend. I watched at least almost all the two seasons of the new show and it's not only boring it's full of mistakes, one of the them appear here just to be cut, I mean burocracy, so many political things doesn't work in a situation like this, and Glenn Larson knew it but Ronald D. Moore do anything he can to make more slow the story, keeping alive all the characters even the worst of them (the president and boomer).


General viewing, but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children
Disc Details
Release Date:
28th August 2006
Discs:
1
Disc Type:
Single side, single layer
RCE:
No
Video:
PAL
Aspect:
1.78:1
Anamorphic:
No
Colour:
Yes
Audio:
Dolby Digital Mono English
Subtitles:
English, German, French, Czech, Greek, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Polish, Portuguese, Dutch, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish
Extras:
Production Notes, Cast And Filmmakers Notes, Web Links
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
Richard A Colla
Cast:
Dirk Benedict, Richard Hatch, Lorne Green, Jane Seymour, Herb Jefferson Jr, Maren Jensen
Genre:
Action and Sci-Fi
Length:
125 minutes




