Clerks X (10th Anniversary Edition) (US - DVD R1)
The tenth anniversary special edition of the film that put Kevin Smith on the map
Feature
I have a confession to make. As I was trying to figure out some hip and clever way to open this review, as I try painstakingly hard to do each time I write, I realized why I try so hard to be hip and clever: I am a product of the Kevin Smith/Quentin Tarantino generation. A generation of twenty-somethings that rely on other people’s work to filter into their own. A generation of people that laden others with pop culture references that seemingly make sense to no one but the speaker/writer. People are abound in a haze of confusion when I speak, and I have had my fair amount of detractors that say I write like I speak. So, as can be expected, I was racking my brain for analogies to Star Wars or an eloquent but candid discussion of super hero powers. Then I realized not so much how influential Smith and Tarantino are, rather, I realized that they have tapped into a reservoir of geeks and made it culturally chic to speak in that style of vernacular. I realized that I had always spoke/written like that. I had been shunned most of my years for being a geek and lo and behold, these two stalwarts of cinema come along and just like that, I am accepted. So yes, I am grateful for Smith and Tarantino (yes, I know there are others to thank, but I am reviewing one of Smith’s movies) and I am grateful for his first, and arguably best film, Clerks.

My fellow reviewer Chris already did a stellar review of the previous release of this film so I won’t retread what he has already skilfully laid out and give you a repeat plot summation, but rather look at its significance in the area of filmmaking and what it has done to pop culture lore.
It’s well known that Smith made the movie on a budget of around 27,000 dollars, which is unheard of in this day and age. He took a huge risk financially banking that the film would be a success and that the money would be paid back in full. This could have been an indie cautionary tale of how not to go about making a movie, but as the tale goes, he sold the film to Miramax and has now inspired a legion of pious fans to pursue filmmaking because if he can do it, why can’t they? But not everyone is a fan. In fact, Smith has a line of detractors almost as long as his fan base is.
He is a gifted writer with a rhythm that can be compared to David Mamet or even Tom Stoppard. However, his eye for visuals, or a lack thereof, has lead him down a path to the point that he even heckles himself on this point. Some have argued that he should stick to writing rather than directing, but this lack of vision, in my opinion, served him well with Clerks. It was gritty and had an air of voyeurism to it. Perhaps we were seeing the security camera footage and we didn’t know it? Perhaps this was a documentary detailing the mundane existence of the people that only Tom Waits would sing about? These are people that make up the foundation of America. The people that we really never think twice about after dealing with them. This was their movie.
I don’t think that fancy camera moves or quick jump editing would have served Smith and this film. This was a film that had to be rough around the edges. What we didn’t know was that this was a direct telling of what kind of filmmaker Smith really was. His growth as a filmmaker has been stagnant as his style has remained the same throughout his work. The two shot is his calling card and becomes immediately recognizable with some dialogue. But rather than pile on him for his lack of style, I would like to congratulate him for introducing the characters of this film to the world. The most recognizable duo from this film would be Jay and Silent Bob.

This creation, for which Smith himself originally didn’t intend to play the role of Silent Bob, has seethed into the fabric of reality and no one has been able to clean the stain out. They are everywhere. I recently saw the duo performing, if you want to call it that, on one of those VH-1 I Love the 90s shows. They had a cameo in the movie Scream 3. They have appeared in the sitcom Degrassi: The Next Generation. The drug dealing duo has evolved from a one-note drug dealing duo to, well, maybe they haven’t really evolved. Characters like these don’t necessarily have to evolve, they just have to be. As stated earlier, Smith tapped into a consciousness that hit a chord with a lot of people and Jay and Silent Bob are part of that. While I think he is coming close to bleeding the characters dry, as Clerks 2 is in the works, I commend him for capitalizing on his creation and making the most out of it.
Video
Miramax presents this release in anamorphic 1:85.1 video. The transfer was supervised by Dave Klein, who shot the movie, and truthfully the film looks great. As I had said before the griminess was part of the movie that appealed to me so I am for one glad that there is still a hint of that. There is only so much that can be cleaned up and the transfer from 16mm to HiDef is certainly workable. With the reduction of grain and the contrast a bit sharper, I can’t complain all that much.
Audio
The sound is much better from the previous instalment (Dolby Digital 2.0 versus Dolby Digital 5.1) but there is still much to be desired. Most of the sound seemed to be focused on my centre channel but with this being a dialogue driven movie it wasn’t that upsetting. The upgrade to 5.1 was supervised by Scott Mosier but I can’t help but feel there was something amiss when he did it. This is not a flick to blow out your speakers to but I was still a little disappointed with the sound quality.

Extras
People can say what they want about Kevin Smith as a filmmaker, but as far as his releases go on DVD, he is as magnanimous as they come in terms dishing out the goods for his DVD releases. Clerks X is overloaded with enough material and goods to try the patience of even the most devout Smith apologist. So take a deep breath as this might take awhile. On the first disc you have the original commentary track from the previous release. As with most of the Smith commentaries you get a great amount of self-deprecating humour as well as interesting anecdotes about the production. This man certainly realizes how lucky he is and it comes through when he speaks. The only downfall with this one is that the audio is terrible (sounds like they’re sharing one microphone) and Jason Mewes is horribly inebriated. Fun for some but not what I was looking for.
There is an enhanced playback track that offers trivia and titbits that pop up on the screen. A cool little feature bat sadly repeats most of the information that can be found on the commentary track. Next up is a ‘lost’ scene that was never shot for the film, due to budget restraints, but has been animated and re-voiced in the style of the short lived Clerks cartoon. This was a nice feature that fills in the blank of what happened when Dante and Randall went to the wake. There is even a familiar face, or should I say voice, from Smith’s movie Chasing Amy that shows up.
‘The Flying Car’ is a feature that Smith put together for Jay Leno’s Tonight Show, which has Dante and Randal pontificating on the merits of a flying car while stuck in traffic. There are eight MTV spots featuring Jay and Silent Bob musing on various topics pertaining to the MTV audience. Several induced hearty laughs while several were cringe worthy. The original Clerks audition tapes are just what they advertise. The rest of the disc has the trailer and Soul Asylum music video. Also, Smith introduces each of the pieces and offers some insight to the production. As usual, the introductions can be more entertaining than the pieces themselves. What can I say, as those who have seen An Evening with Kevin Smith can attest, the man knows how to speak!

The second disc has the original print of the movie along with a newly recorded commentary by Smith and the cast of the flick. The original print is dirty and grainy and can actually cause brain damage if viewed for more than an hour. Okay, that last part is completely fabricated, but the print is dirty, which I adore. This is the version that filmed and has the original ending that Smith intended which would have made the film much darker and less audience friendly. The newly recorded commentary track is a nice change from the original as you can clearly hear everyone and no one is drunk. Everyone reminisces about the shoot while dining on food that is delivered in the middle of the track. One of the most amusing bits of the track is how Scott Mosier walked in on Smith’s mother undressing. To say they now share a bond would be understating the case a bit. The other feature is the video commentary which shows the cast watching the movie while commenting. It’s an interesting feature that allows you to see the cast reacting to the movie as well as to each other. It’s not the most functional feature ever but a cool addition nonetheless.
Disc three has an extra that is worth the price of the set all by itself. ‘Snowball Effect: The Story of Clerks’. This is an exhaustive documentary that chronicles Kevin Smith’s rise to fame from his childhood (an amusing anecdote about when his parents like to copulate) to his film school days (how he and Mosier had an agreement that whoever wrote a script first, the other would help out making the movie) to filming Clerks (Jeff Anderson got the part of Randal by accident), all the way to Sundance where it made a buzz (listen for the story of Harvey Weinstein and his De Niro like reaction to the film). You hear from almost every possible person connected to the film and it offers a wonderful view to the painful process of independent filmmaking. Clocking in at ninety-two minutes, it’s one of the better making-of docs that I saw last year.
There are over forty minutes of deleted scenes from the documentary on offer. These were cut for pacing and content but it’s nice to be able to view them as well. Next up is the documentary that Smith and Mosier completed at the Vancouver Film School where they initially met. It is a documentary about the failed attempt at making a documentary. Not the most interesting feature but nice to have anyway. There is the Tenth Anniversary Q & A, which features most all the cast (only Lisa Spoonhaur wasn’t present) and plays much like An Evening with Kevin Smith only with more people. A barrage of questions are fielded from the audience and most everyone gets to say their piece. Entertaining as always and it’s good to see the cast ten years after the film and their reaction to each other. Rounding up the goodies on the third disc are still galleries and journal and articles detailing the rise of the film. You can’t really ask for more.

Overall
This is a must have if you’re a fan of Smith. He has all but put his sweat and blood into this release and it shows. Having two versions of the film is nice and the documentary is a phenomenal extra. Definitely worth the money to but if you have the previous edition, this is the definitive DVD to have if you worship at the alter of Smith.
Review by Greg Dedrick
Advertisements
Existing Posts
This was such a funny movie, I have to buy it soon. Between contractors working on the death star, and my favorite scene of Randall selling cigarettes to a very young girl, this is just a hilarious movie.
Kevin Smith is done for
damorton wrote: You know a director hits rock bottom when they say they are "done" with a piece of work (ex. Smith's "Askewniverse"
only to revisit it after their attempts at something new ("Jersey Girl"
have failed.
R.I.P. Kevin Smith's career. Keep in mind, I am formally a long time fan, but I will not miss his films.
I was thinking the EXACT same thing. KS did "Jay and Silent Bob" and said, "This is it. I'm done with the ViewAskew Universe and moving on to better things." Then he does Jersey Girl and it tanks, and from what I understand he has a tough time getting a respectable gig after that. So what does he do? He goes back and starts pandering for forgiveness from his nerdophile fans. After ONE film. I can see someone going back after ten, fifteen year, but ONE film? Recently there was this "talkback" at Aintitcoolnews.com and KS, a fan of the site, pops up in the forums and responds to EACH AND EVERY PERSON that criticized him (he posted the transcript on his ViewAskew website). The guy is severely self-conscious, as in almost every post his defining argument was, "Pretty much everyone agrees that I've done two great films - Clerks and Chasing Amy, and a film bordering on great with Dogma". Then people would start criticizing his "sell-out" (not my term) work on Jay Leno and he would come back with, "...if they were so bad, how come the ratings for that fifteen minute segment were blah-blah-blah." He used to be considered a cutting-edge indie genius, and now he's forced to justifying his stint on Leno to forum posters?? The guy is obviously self-conscious and is living off the fame of 'Clerks,' which will eventually run out. Then what/
R.I.P. Kevin Smith's career. Keep in mind, I am formally a long time fan, but I will not miss his films.
I was thinking the EXACT same thing. KS did "Jay and Silent Bob" and said, "This is it. I'm done with the ViewAskew Universe and moving on to better things." Then he does Jersey Girl and it tanks, and from what I understand he has a tough time getting a respectable gig after that. So what does he do? He goes back and starts pandering for forgiveness from his nerdophile fans. After ONE film. I can see someone going back after ten, fifteen year, but ONE film? Recently there was this "talkback" at Aintitcoolnews.com and KS, a fan of the site, pops up in the forums and responds to EACH AND EVERY PERSON that criticized him (he posted the transcript on his ViewAskew website). The guy is severely self-conscious, as in almost every post his defining argument was, "Pretty much everyone agrees that I've done two great films - Clerks and Chasing Amy, and a film bordering on great with Dogma". Then people would start criticizing his "sell-out" (not my term) work on Jay Leno and he would come back with, "...if they were so bad, how come the ratings for that fifteen minute segment were blah-blah-blah." He used to be considered a cutting-edge indie genius, and now he's forced to justifying his stint on Leno to forum posters?? The guy is obviously self-conscious and is living off the fame of 'Clerks,' which will eventually run out. Then what/
I don't know what to think of the whole Clerks 2 thing either. I enjoyed Kevin Smith's first three films. Then after that, they sort of steeply decreased in quality. His die-hard fans tend to turn me off alot, too.
Hardly Clerkin' was mentioned at the end of Mallrats. I don't think he's using any subtitle at the moment though. Not sure of what to make of the trailer for Clerks 2...
Arellium wrote: Chris Artuso wrote: Can't wait for Clerks 2: Passion of the Clerks!
There's a sequel? When did this happen?Umm... where have you been?
There's a sequel? When did this happen?Umm... where have you been?
Chris Artuso wrote: Can't wait for Clerks 2: Passion of the Clerks!
There's a sequel? When did this happen?
There's a sequel? When did this happen?
This was okay...It had a couple of very funny moments but overall I fail to see why people love it so much! And as usual Jay was just an obnoxious turd and about as funny as genocide.
This is one of the funniest movies ever. Smith is a genius.
Chris wrote: Quote: So, a child of "the Kevin Smith generation?" I fail to see how that could be. And his revisiting of the film that made his name in the first place (along with the terrible pun title that sounds like it came from an episode of South Park) just makes him look even more like a one-trick pony.
You're a bit behind the times. It's no longer called Passion of the Clerks. He changed it because of the South Park episode. Perhaps he'll use the Hardly Clerkin' title.
From what I remember, the Hardly Clerkin' subtitle was to be for the animated Clerks movie in the works... don't know if that will ever happen though.
You're a bit behind the times. It's no longer called Passion of the Clerks. He changed it because of the South Park episode. Perhaps he'll use the Hardly Clerkin' title.
From what I remember, the Hardly Clerkin' subtitle was to be for the animated Clerks movie in the works... don't know if that will ever happen though.
Great review. Not my favorite Kevin Smith film.
Greg wrote: Hehe....I am just now realizing that Beta doesn't have a future so I'm trying to get caught up with the times. I wanted to review this one due to the massive special features. Plus, I am on the cusp of turning 30 so since kevin is revisiting these characters in the sequel, I thought I would revisit and review them. Thanks for the kind words. You mean Beta DOESN'T have a future
? What will I ever do with my tapes of old mouldy tv shows?
The Curmudgeon wrote: You know, let's be honest about Kevin Smith, here. Really, he's only ever made ONE great film. This one. And it's all went slowly downhill from here.
Clerks - superb. Mallrats - decent. Chasing Amy - painfully average. Dogma - dogsh*t. And the others I won't even mention because they don't even deserve it.
See, I disagree with that entirely. Clerks is great, but very amateurish. Mallrats is the dregs. Really very bad. Chasing Amy is cool, Dogma is very enjoyable, Jay and Bob is a fan movie with some clever bits, while Jersey Girl gets an unnecessarily bad rap.
Quote: So, a child of "the Kevin Smith generation?" I fail to see how that could be. And his revisiting of the film that made his name in the first place (along with the terrible pun title that sounds like it came from an episode of South Park) just makes him look even more like a one-trick pony.
You're a bit behind the times. It's no longer called Passion of the Clerks. He changed it because of the South Park episode. Perhaps he'll use the Hardly Clerkin' title.
Clerks - superb. Mallrats - decent. Chasing Amy - painfully average. Dogma - dogsh*t. And the others I won't even mention because they don't even deserve it.
See, I disagree with that entirely. Clerks is great, but very amateurish. Mallrats is the dregs. Really very bad. Chasing Amy is cool, Dogma is very enjoyable, Jay and Bob is a fan movie with some clever bits, while Jersey Girl gets an unnecessarily bad rap.
Quote: So, a child of "the Kevin Smith generation?" I fail to see how that could be. And his revisiting of the film that made his name in the first place (along with the terrible pun title that sounds like it came from an episode of South Park) just makes him look even more like a one-trick pony.
You're a bit behind the times. It's no longer called Passion of the Clerks. He changed it because of the South Park episode. Perhaps he'll use the Hardly Clerkin' title.
Jersey Jedi wrote: Jese...I'm pretty sure there was no whining at all... just a playful observation is all. I never criticized the quality of the review becasue it is very entertaining in itself. I was simply thinking that reviews are most usefuk/wanted when their subjects are new... that's all...
I guess the jokey nature of that post didn't really come across that well. I've often been accused of having a very dry sense of humour. I must start putting smileys after my posts to avoid confusion...
I guess the jokey nature of that post didn't really come across that well. I've often been accused of having a very dry sense of humour. I must start putting smileys after my posts to avoid confusion...
You know, let's be honest about Kevin Smith, here. Really, he's only ever made ONE great film. This one. And it's all went slowly downhill from here.
Clerks - superb. Mallrats - decent. Chasing Amy - painfully average. Dogma - dogsh*t. And the others I won't even mention because they don't even deserve it.
So, a child of "the Kevin Smith generation?" I fail to see how that could be. And his revisiting of the film that made his name in the first place (along with the terrible pun title that sounds like it came from an episode of South Park) just makes him look even more like a one-trick pony.
Clerks - superb. Mallrats - decent. Chasing Amy - painfully average. Dogma - dogsh*t. And the others I won't even mention because they don't even deserve it.
So, a child of "the Kevin Smith generation?" I fail to see how that could be. And his revisiting of the film that made his name in the first place (along with the terrible pun title that sounds like it came from an episode of South Park) just makes him look even more like a one-trick pony.
Chris wrote: We don't just review new material. Quit your whining.
Jese...I'm pretty sure there was no whining at all... just a playful observation is all. I never criticized the quality of the review becasue it is very entertaining in itself. I was simply thinking that reviews are most usefuk/wanted when their subjects are new... that's all...
Jese...I'm pretty sure there was no whining at all... just a playful observation is all. I never criticized the quality of the review becasue it is very entertaining in itself. I was simply thinking that reviews are most usefuk/wanted when their subjects are new... that's all...
Kevin Smith is done for
You know a director hits rock bottom when they say they are "done" with a piece of work (ex. Smith's "Askewniverse") only to revisit it after their attempts at something new ("Jersey Girl") have failed.
R.I.P. Kevin Smith's career. Keep in mind, I am formally a long time fan, but I will not miss his films.
R.I.P. Kevin Smith's career. Keep in mind, I am formally a long time fan, but I will not miss his films.
I think for a low low budget movie this is a good as it gets
Dammit... Mel Gibson must've b***hed. Oh well, I'm sure it'll be be Smith-tastic.
That's right, I said Smith-tastic.
That's right, I said Smith-tastic.
Chris Artuso wrote: Can't wait for Clerks 2: Passion of the Clerks!Passion of the Clerks is no longer included in the title, it's just Clerks 2 now.
We don't just review new material. Quit your whining.
I got this last year for my birthday. Excellent set, and great review.
i actually just ordered this set from amazon last thursday, along with the animated series of clerks too.
nice review
nice review
Greg Dedrick wrote: They have appeared in the sitcom Degrassi: The Next Generation.
Ummm... Degrassi is not a sitcom!?!?
Ummm... Degrassi is not a sitcom!?!?
Can't wait for Clerks 2: Passion of the Clerks!
Hehe....I am just now realizing that Beta doesn't have a future so I'm trying to get caught up with the times. I wanted to review this one due to the massive special features. Plus, I am on the cusp of turning 30 so since kevin is revisiting these characters in the sequel, I thought I would revisit and review them. Thanks for the kind words.
Jersey Jedi wrote: WOW... how delayed is this review? lolHe's a newcomer, leave him alone... anyway, this review was great, but I kinda disagree with the low score on the video section... but overall, I'd like to see more reviews like this and Devil's Rejects in the future. Keep up the good work.
WOW... how delayed is this review? lol


This product has not been rated
Disc Details
Release Date:
7th September 2004
Discs:
3
Disc Type:
Single side, dual layer
RCE:
No
Video:
NTSC
Aspect:
1.85:1
Anamorphic:
Yes
Colour:
No
Audio:
Dolby Digital 5.1 English
Subtitles:
English, French
Extras:
Disc 1: Cast and Crew Commentary, Enhanced Trivia Track, 'Clerks' the Lost Scene, 'The Flying Car', MTV Spot with Jay and Silent Bob, Theatrical Trailer, Soul Asylum Music Video, 'Clerks' Restoration Intros, Original 'Clerks' Auditions, Disc 2: New Commentary from Cast and Crew, Video Commentary Track, Disc 3: 'Snowball Effect: The Story of Clerks', 'Mae Day: The Crumbling of a Documentary', 10th Anniversary Q & A, Outtakes from 'Snowball Effect', Still Photo Gallery, Original Kevin Smith Journals, Articles and Reviews
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
Kevin Smith
Cast:
Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, Marylin Ghigliotti, Lisa Spoonhauer, Jason Mewes, Kevin Smith, Walter Flanagan, Scott Mosier
Genre:
Comedy
Length:
92 minutes
Ratings
Awards



