Saw V: Unrated (US - BD RA)
Gabe isn't surprised at the decline in Jigsaw's creativity, but it's still pretty sad
Feature
Jigsaw is back, again. Well, sort of, technically he’s still dead, but thanks to the advent of the flashback, and the addition of a new apprentice in the fourth film (who was apparently there the whole time), his games go on. And on. And on.

When’s the last time the fifth film in a series was anything more than a parody of the previous entries? Nightmare on Elm Street 5, the one were Freddy tries to have a dream baby? Despite the best intensions of director Stephen Hopkin’s, Freddy’s fifth movie is pretty much a joke. How about Friday the 13th Part 5, the one without Jason or his mother? Well, it’s not quite as bad as the die-hards will have you believe, but it’s hard to remember anything specific about it. Halloween, The Howling, Children of the Corn, these series were long dead before they even made it to number five. What hope does a film like Saw V have, especially after the lacklustre fourth entry?
The Saw franchise continues to define its narrative with one of the most convoluted timelines in film history, a fact which many fans seem to confuse with intelligent, or intricate writing. Where once I was at least a little impressed by the Saturday Morning Matinee storytelling style, and how stringently the producers were sticking to it, I now find myself frustrated that the first acts are elongated ‘previously on’ messages, and the last acts are elongated trailers for the next in the series. It’s supposed to flow like one super-movie, but it comes off more as a series of cutting room rejects used for padding. The number of flashbacks required to tell the story of the latest film verge on parody, and God help anyone who didn’t see the previous four films, in order, seconds before seeing the fifth, because any time they allude without a flashback the expectation is left entirely on you.

Perhaps the most hair-pullingly stupid aspect of these last two films, Saw V especially, is the way each plays as two half films, one continuation of the Jigsaw storyline, and the other an almost entirely unrelated set of characters in traps. There’s almost no effort made to connect the stories anymore. If you were to delete the traps and flashbacks from the second, third, fourth, and fifth movies you’re left with a series of thirty minute movies about arguing cops. Of course, if you deleted the traps and flashbacks you wouldn’t exactly have a Saw movie, and Lionsgate knows that name branding is important. Actually, if studio really wants to continue telling increasingly shallow minded series of stories about death-traps they should probably look into video games. The narrative sections of the film already ebb and flow like skippable cut-scenes, stopping for the ‘game’ every ten minutes or so.
Video
Once again, if you skipped my review of Repo! The Genetic Opera, Lionsgate didn’t send me the Blu-ray versions of their latest two releases until the Monday before release. I had already written about the quality of the A/V on the DVDs, and decided to do a more direct comparison between the two than I normally would.

First time director David Hackl, who acted as assistant director on other films in the series, does a perfect Darren Lynn Bousman impersonation, keeping the series visually consistent (take that as you will). All the familiar primary tints and the deep blacks are here, as are those rich blood reds. In high definition any of the transfer’s short comings are a direct effect of the film’s singularly grimy style. The overall darkness of the frame doesn’t open the transfer up to a whole lot of strong detail, and leads to a bit of image loss due to grain. The blacks are indeed black, creating a thick inky outline for the whole of the film, which both defines the details, and creates a sort of flatness to the composition. Colours are also simply and graphically defined, though the sickly mix of blue and yellow lighting does lead to some soft gradations on figures and faces.
The DVD, on the other hand, is a pretty big disappointment in the video department. The blacks are deep, and the colours plenty bright, but the lines that separate them are a mess. It appears someone pushed the sharpness levels too far, and the resulting edge enhancement is a major problem. There are issues with interlacing effects, a general lack of quality detail, and a slight loss of the more subtle lighting.
Audio
Has anyone else noticed the lack of DTS sound on DVD since the advent of Blu-ray? The old Saw DVDs always seemed to have awesome DTS tracks (at least the second releases), but since part four they don’t seem to care anymore. This Dolby Digital EX track is nothing to sneeze at though, unless you’re allergic to heavy bass and unmotivated rear channel effects. The Blu-ray’s ramped-to-the-extreme DTS-HD Master Audio Track is, of course, the superior, but there aren’t any complaints from me on either account. Again, the Saw brand continues, including all those zippy camera moves that inexplicably create a whoosh sound on the soundtrack. It’s very silly, but it sounds pretty great on the track, which also features some very busy music, screaming, and machinery sound during the louder than hell trap scenes. The DTS track is particularly wide in scope, and features a bass track to knock you off your couch.

Extras
Extras begin with two commentary tracks, one featuring director David Hackl and first assistant director Steve Webb (who I’m sure is being groomed for Saw VIII, and the other with producers Mark Burg and Oren Koules, and executive producers Peter Block and Jason Constantine. Hackl and Webb start rambling right off the bat, but start to get into a decent groove after a while, if not a slightly too self congratulatory. I definitely caught a Canadian accent in there a few times too. Last time around the producers’ track was much less informative than the director track, but this time around I think that tonally I prefer the less personal approach that the producer track takes. It’s a sort of sad truth that this is a producer directed series at this point, and the producers actually know more about where the franchise is going than the directors.
I should note that there was talk on horror sites of the director’s cut being much longer and re-ordered. Assuming the IMDb.com length is accurate, this version is only a few minutes longer, and there’s no mention of scene re-ordering on either commentary track that I caught.
Next are a series of featurettes concerning the film’s traps. The first four featurettes (‘The Pendulum Trap’, ‘The Cube Trap’, ‘The Coffin Trap’, and ‘The Fatal Five’) cover the mechanics of the trap in the film, the mechanics of the real-life trap, the make-up effects required to make the trap believable, and the safety precautions taken. They’re made up of behind the scenes footage, interviews, and footage from the final film. The last featurette, ‘Slicing the Cube’, covers the editing process of the Cube Trap. I must say I continue to be impressed with the practical effects in these films. Almost all the traps actually work. The problem with the featurettes is there’s no ‘play all’ option, which is silly when you consider that none of them are longer than eleven minutes (most are only five), and each one has its own end credits.

The DVD finishes up with a Saw V trailer, and trailers for other Lionsgate releases. The only Blu-ray only extras are MOLOG and bookmark options.
Overall
Ah, but wait, while looking up plot information on the previous films (because who can remember this shit?) I see that wikipedia has a listing for a Saw videogame, set to come out in October of this year, just in time for Saw VI (I assume). Maybe they’re actually aiming to make these films increasingly video-game-like, to ease their audience into the prospect. The films have become an unfortunate parody of what started as a decent idea, and the only reason to keep watching from a non-fan point of view is the occasionally impressive acting, mostly Tobin Bell, who still chills as Jigsaw, even in this small capacity.
*Note: The images on this page are not representative of the Blu-ray release.
Review by Gabriel Powers
Advertisement
Existing Posts
They should really skip the back stories - most people who would bother with this would know it anyway...
I like all the movies more or less. I'm definitely going to see Saw VI when it comes out.
I only liked the 1st Saw. Just viewed the 3rd & 4th films recently and wow, what turds... I don't want these films to stop however, since they are creating a larger Lionsgate! This company has come a long way in the past few years (including turning its back on Canada a bit...), and really it is because of this franchise more than any of their other films.
i hate that i bought this movie cuz it really wasn't that great, but since i'm a completist with o.c.d. i couldn't let this flick NOT be on my shelf with the rest of the saw movies...did the same thing with indiana jones...
gotta admit, the table saw trap still makes me cringe
gotta admit, the table saw trap still makes me cringe
Saw
On a little side note, here in the UK, Thorpe Park is opening Saw: The Ride. It looks like a very good rollercoaster which is SAW themed and licenced from the movies......will it never end (although to be fair I liked Saw, Saw 3 and Saw V).
F.
F.
I considered considering Empire as a good part 5, but I really think of the series as two trilogies. I think the Saw producers really ran out of ideas with 3, which was probably my favorite one as a non-fan. I felt they found something new to do with the formula, and it was the last time the traps had anything to do with the rest of the story.
I think the only 'Part 5' movie to ever actually be good was The Empire Strikes Back.
Even with Star Trek, the 5th film is pretty much accepted as the worse entry of the entire series (of films).
Saw is no different. I agree with Gabe, this movie is the worst yet. I am still a bit of a fan of the franchise. I enjoyed the first two immensely, and 3 and 4 somewhat...but then V was a pointless, boring, disappointing entry in the series. I stopped buying them (The Unrated version of part III was the last one I bought...though they wouldn't double-dip it, but I was an idiot to think that, and then I never bought one again), too. Think I will just see them once from here on out, and if they continue to slide downhill (and quite frankly, why wouldn't they?) eventually I will stop seeing them altogether.
Even with Star Trek, the 5th film is pretty much accepted as the worse entry of the entire series (of films).
Saw is no different. I agree with Gabe, this movie is the worst yet. I am still a bit of a fan of the franchise. I enjoyed the first two immensely, and 3 and 4 somewhat...but then V was a pointless, boring, disappointing entry in the series. I stopped buying them (The Unrated version of part III was the last one I bought...though they wouldn't double-dip it, but I was an idiot to think that, and then I never bought one again), too. Think I will just see them once from here on out, and if they continue to slide downhill (and quite frankly, why wouldn't they?) eventually I will stop seeing them altogether.
Krishna Jaipersad wrote: I do believe in Friday the 13th (part 4): The Final Chapter, Jason was very much doing what he does best!!! He & his mother did not appear in Part 5: A New Beginning. There was a Jason impersonator doing all the killing instead!!!
S**t, I keep typing bad numbers lately. Of course I meant part 5, that was the whole point of the paragraph. Friday 4 is the best Jason movie, I agree.
S**t, I keep typing bad numbers lately. Of course I meant part 5, that was the whole point of the paragraph. Friday 4 is the best Jason movie, I agree.
Just been there. They had it but the box was bent out of shape and wasn't working right so I passed. Picked up Wanted instead.
Gene Lariv wrote: horrorfan25 wrote: I just bought the Unrated collector's edition of Saw V and it rocks! It has the spinning blade, the sound chip of Jigsaw, and a booklet of photos from the movie. I highly recommend it to any Saw fanatic. I have to disagree with your review. I really liked Saw V. I thought it was underrated and actually pretty good.
I couldn't by the Uncut Collector's Edition cause Walmart didn't have any in stock anywhere so I had to by the Unrated Director's Cut instead. When I get the chance, I'll look elsewhere.
I bought mine at Best Buy
I couldn't by the Uncut Collector's Edition cause Walmart didn't have any in stock anywhere so I had to by the Unrated Director's Cut instead. When I get the chance, I'll look elsewhere.
I bought mine at Best Buy
these movies suck and should be euthanized.
The first Saw film was pretty good. The second sucked, and I gave up after that.
horrorfan25 wrote: I just bought the Unrated collector's edition of Saw V and it rocks! It has the spinning blade, the sound chip of Jigsaw, and a booklet of photos from the movie. I highly recommend it to any Saw fanatic. I have to disagree with your review. I really liked Saw V. I thought it was underrated and actually pretty good.
I couldn't by the Uncut Collector's Edition cause Walmart didn't have any in stock anywhere so I had to by the Unrated Director's Cut instead. When I get the chance, I'll look elsewhere.
I couldn't by the Uncut Collector's Edition cause Walmart didn't have any in stock anywhere so I had to by the Unrated Director's Cut instead. When I get the chance, I'll look elsewhere.
Michael Friedrichsen wrote: The ending does noyt make any sense at all. Saw 1 and 2 great est of them sucks emensely
So they are both the "great est" and they suck immensely at the time?? That is pretty awesome. lol
So they are both the "great est" and they suck immensely at the time?? That is pretty awesome. lol
The scene of the guy strapped to the table being sliced by the pendulum is much gorier on the unrated DVD then it was in the R-version. Other than that, I didn't really notice any other additions in the unrated version (although I just skimmed through the DVD).
I like Gabe's review. I didn't mind SAW V and thought it was decent, but I do agree with Gabe's point about the film feeling like two separate entities that don't fully mesh. I am also getting tired of so much backstory-flashback nonsense which is way beyond convoluted at this point (you needed to take a notepad into part IV ). Hopefully, part VI will drop all the baggage and just move forward instead of constantly looking back.
I like Gabe's review. I didn't mind SAW V and thought it was decent, but I do agree with Gabe's point about the film feeling like two separate entities that don't fully mesh. I am also getting tired of so much backstory-flashback nonsense which is way beyond convoluted at this point (you needed to take a notepad into part IV ). Hopefully, part VI will drop all the baggage and just move forward instead of constantly looking back.
The ending does noyt make any sense at all. Saw 1 and 2 great est of them sucks emensely
I just bought the Unrated collector's edition of Saw V and it rocks! It has the spinning blade, the sound chip of Jigsaw, and a booklet of photos from the movie. I highly recommend it to any Saw fanatic. I have to disagree with your review. I really liked Saw V. I thought it was underrated and actually pretty good.
Another worthy entry into the "SAW" franchise. I can't wait for part 6.
I do believe in Friday the 13th (part 4): The Final Chapter, Jason was very much doing what he does best!!! He & his mother did not appear in Part 5: A New Beginning. There was a Jason impersonator doing all the killing instead!!!


This product has not been rated
Disc Details
Release Date:
20th January 2009
Discs:
2
Disc Type:
Blu-ray Disc
RCE:
No
Video:
1080p
Aspect:
1.78:1
Anamorphic:
No
Colour:
Yes
Audio:
DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 English
Subtitles:
English HoH, Spanish
Extras:
Director/ Assistant Director Commentary, Producers Commentary, ‘The Pendulum Trap’, ‘The Cube Trap’, ‘The Coffin Trap’, ‘The Fatal Five’, 'Slicing the Cube', MOLOG, Trailers, Digital Copy
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
David Hackl
Cast:
Scott Patterson, Costas Mandylor, Tobin Bell, Betsy Russell, Julie Benz
Genre:
Horror
Length:
92 minutes

