Scary Movie 4: Unrated (US - DVD R1)
Gabe laughs exactly three times, and watches clock for nearly 90 minutes...
Feature
Anna Faris and Regina Hall are back, again, as duelling, unfunny idiots Cindy Campbell and Brenda. Director David Zucker, and his ‘crack’ team bring them into a spoof plot mish-mash of Saw, War of the Worlds, The Village, and The Grudge. Craig Bierko guest stars as Tom Ryan, a filler for Tom Cruise's War of the Worlds everyman, Ray Ferrier. Together, these humourless dimwits battle to save the world from a ruthless alien invasion. Cindy moves in next-door to Tom to take care of an invalid in a haunted house, ala The Grudge. The house's resident ghost warns Cindy of the invasion of evil alien ‘Tr-iPods’, and suggests that she go to a local village in order to find the way to stop it. There are a few jabs at the real life Tom Cruise, and some homophobic Brokeback Mountain jokes tossed in for good measure, and Leslie Nealson reprises his role from the previous Scary Movie as the moronic President of the United States.

I don't get it.
I don't get how the same tired jokes about erections and flatulence can still gross over $90 million in the United States alone. Did that many people really like the first three Scary Movies? I'll admit I still remember seeing the original Wayans Bros. film in a crowded urban theatre in South Phoenix, and thinking it was just about the funniest thing ever. Then I rented the DVD and had to turn it off half way through because it was so unbearably awful. Perhaps these movies only work in a crowd. Regardless, I didn't see the other two Scary Movies, and don't imagine they had much to add to the series' credit.
But I find it hard to believe that even in a stadium full of giddy schoolgirls I'd find Scary Movie 4 anything more than mildly amusing. I laughed at exactly three of the film's four hundred thousand gags, and I'll go ahead and ruin them for you here so you don't have to sit through the other eighty minutes of laugh-less boredom. I snickered as the aging Asian man showing Cindy around the Grudge-like haunted house desperately tried to hide the disembodied black ghost hair in the hopes that she wouldn't notice and take the homecare job no one else could. This is probably due to the fact that I've watched about sixteen such films over the last year, and could really relate to the gag. I also chuckled when the alien Tr-iPod's display read ‘destroy humanity’, it was cute, as was the following scene where Tom tries to let his mechanic into the only working van in Jersey (remember the scene from War of the Worlds?), but is foiled by the fact that they keep unlocking and opening the door at the same instant. There, those were the funny bits, use your imagination and save yourselves some money.

I'll give the four (!) writers a lick of credit for finding a way to tie together the main plots of The Grudge, Saw, and War of the Worlds. The overall arc is a little clever, but the lame jokes in between create such a rancid smoke screen it doesn't really matter.
I honestly like Anna Faris, Anthony Anderson, and Craig Bierko. I hope for their sakes that the money was good, because this kind of half-assed fluff simply can't look good on an honest resume. Anderson's been in a brew-full of horrible films, and often still comes out smelling rather rosy, but Faris has become entirely typecast because of this character. She's got a lot of base comedic talent that isn't obvious or well utilized here, but anyone fortunate enough to see Lucky McKee's May or Sophia Coppola's Lost in Translation knows that. Even when typecast, she can really shine. I'm most offended by director David Zucker's implosive work, as he's the one guy on this crew that really should know better; after all, he practically invented the modern film spoof along with his brother Jerry and cohort Jim Abrahams when the team made classics like Kentucky Fried Movie and Airplane!. Perhaps he wasn't the 'brains' of the outfit.
I suppose my biggest problem with the film, and in turn all films in of its ilk, is that I fail to see the point in spoofing such recent and irrelevant films or topics. How many of us are going to remember the 2005 version of War of the Worlds, the American re-make of The Grudge, or even Saw in ten years, let alone find them at all relevant? And for that matter, how many of us even saw The Village? I loved Spielberg's War of the Worlds, but let's be realistic, it wasn't his most memorable picture. I'll concede that black, flowing ghost hair, and Tom Cruise's much mooted Opera freak-out have probably entered the collective zeitgeist, but who cares about a film that's dated before its five month DVD turnaround?

Spoofing broad, engraved subjects makes sense, and some spoofs are truly timeless. For instance, I'm sure that Young Frankenstein and original Looney Tunes shorts will forever prove amusing to countless generations, as will Zucker's original Airplane. One could argue that these films and shorts were made in the hopes of creating some kind of art. Though Warhol fanatics may argue that all product is art when labelled so, I'm pretty sure that all of us, lovers and detractors alike, can agree that Scary Movies 2-4 were made in the pure pursuit of the almighty dollar, not as relevant works of art.
This creates a conundrum for me as an honest reviewer—how can I honestly critique this eighty-three minute commercial? Basically these things are released entirely critic-proof (with a few idiotic exceptions), and I'd even hazard to guess that in the eyes of their fans they couldn't possibly do any wrong. I could rant all day about how this film wasted an hour and twenty-three minutes of my life, and how I wanted to simply stop the disc, throw it out the window and tell the Weinstein Company I never received it and thus couldn't complete my review, but what would be the point. The folks who enjoyed this dreck will still enjoy it, and the creators least of all will give a rodent’s fundament what I think on the way to the bank. And frankly the whole thing makes me feel conceited and arrogant in my personal tastes.
I guess it all goes back to the fact that I just don't get it.

Video
Scary Movie 4 was filmed using the same HD cameras Bryan Singer used on the set of Superman Returns. The HD photography is sharp, but on a standard definition set can look slightly off during movement. It's hard to describe, but there is something ‘different’ about it. Even though I hated the film, I must admit this transfer's near-perfection. The cinematography isn't very imaginative, but it is colourful and gave my set a nice workout. There is little to no artefacting, nor did I encounter any major compression problems.
Audio
There's really nothing here to get excited about, and I'm actually surprised that Zucker and company haven't found a way to make surround sound funny. There are a few War of the Worlds inspired set pieces, but the audio is stilted and weak. I understand that Zucker didn't want the Tr-iPods to be frightening like they were in Spielberg’s film, but when coupled with the (purposefully?) weak special visual effects, these sound effects come across as bargain basement. Music tracks fare better, and the awful hip-hop gives the LFE something to do.
Extras
I had this great line planned for my impending audio commentary review of Scary Movie 4—‘The only thing worse then listening to a bad joke is listening to someone laugh at their own bad joke.’ I held it in my hand and clutched it close to my heart as I started the commentary, featuring director David Zucker, producer Bob Weiss, and co-writer Craig Mazin, but as the track progressed I realized that the creators weren't really all that fond of the film either. For the most part they tell funnier stories about their pasts, even referring specifically to the better jokes of Zucker's earlier films. The track ends with Zucker thanking the viewer for purchasing the disc, followed closely by Mazin shouting a resounding ‘sucker’. It's all too painfully appropriate.

The deleted scenes have all been removed for pacing, and it's obvious. If only Zucker had seen fit to remove a few more scenes, because even at eighty-three minutes the film is sluggish. I really expected some kind of King Kong joke here, but still didn't get one. Why is he on the cover, and what movie preview did I see a spoof of Kong in?
The rest of the disc is fluff. The bloopers are exactly what one would expect—actors forgetting their lines. Sadly it's actually the funnier than anything in the film to watch Faris space out. There are a series of really short featurettes devoted mostly to Zucker butt kissing, and again, watching the aging director laugh on set is actually funnier than anything in the film. On the even less funny and even less interesting end of the spectrum are a few featurettes about the hip-hop ‘stars’ of the film, an elaborate interview prank played by the cast on the disc’s interviewer, and a look at the film's special effects. Personally, I find the inclusion of these rappers entirely placative, but maybe that's just me. As far as the special effects go, were these people actually going for realism? I thought the shoddy CG was part of the joke, but apparently they were meant to be taken seriously. It's kind of sad actually.
Overall
I issue a challenge to the creators of the next film in the Scary Movie franchise (we all know there's going to be one): Make the next film a totally Dadaist and plot-less mess on purpose to test your audience’s endurance and taste. Just film a roomful of topless women on toilets defecating and throwing bowling balls at each other for eighty minutes. I'm serious. Let's make Scary Movie 5 a work of venomous art. How long can the average person laugh at the same thing? When is flatulence officially not funny any more? When do breasts lose their titillation? Extra points if you can convince the audience to where eye-propping apparatuses like that used on Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange.
Review by Gabriel Powers
Advertisements
Existing Posts
Whats so unrated about it?
havent seen it yet looks good though just baught it 2day
They mention a few cuts during the commentary, but the only ones I remeber were during the Opera sequence. Apparently a dude sticking his head up a skirt is 'R' material.
I saw this in the theater and was just wondering why is it unrated and uncensored? I dont remember anything being "dirty"! can someone explain please???
Zucker and Abrahams are the best spoof filmmakers out there. I liked the Wayans brothers, but was not crazy about them. The third one was funny even though its structure was horrible. This movie I honestly didn't laugh as much as I did before. I felt like I was watching a sketch comedy show, no structure equals bad timing and poorly placed jokes. A sight gag can be funny if its placed correctly, but this movie was a mess.
Devon wrote: And as for the "timelessness" of the movie, I don't think Zucker, or the studios have that thought in mind.
I made that pretty clear in my review, I thought.
I made that pretty clear in my review, I thought.
I thought it was pretty good, not as good as the first one, but definetley a buy for me. I hated , hated, Scary movie 1 and 2, the only funny parts in those occur within the first 15 min. And as for the "timelessness" of the movie, I don't think Zucker, or the studios have that thought in mind.
Ok, Ok, I shirley see the error of my ways.....EDIT:
It died with the SECOND entry. (Shoot me, but I thought the first one was actually pretty funny.)
It died with the SECOND entry. (Shoot me, but I thought the first one was actually pretty funny.)
Being a hater of the Scary Movie franchise, I thought this one sucked to, but didn't supremely suckm like parts 2 and 3.
Interesting. I generally hate comedy, but I found this one amusing. Especially with Dr. Phil and Shaq, but that's just me.
A very entertaining review, Gabe. Haven't seen this but surely it can't be worse than Scary Movie 2?
Rapidly losing respect for David Zucker after this and its predecessor. These films were the catalyst for 'Not Another Teen Movie' (parodying other comedies?) and 'Date Movie' (Sample joke: a kid wears a T-shirt saying 'Don't Vote for Pedro'...clever).
Rapidly losing respect for David Zucker after this and its predecessor. These films were the catalyst for 'Not Another Teen Movie' (parodying other comedies?) and 'Date Movie' (Sample joke: a kid wears a T-shirt saying 'Don't Vote for Pedro'...clever).
...and no Scarey Movie 1-4 collectors pack? I dont mind these movies, and although I hated part three when I first saw it, the more I watch it (on one of my local movie channels) it is not so bad. As long as there are good movies made, there will be movies made to make fun of them, and we currently call the franchise Scary Movie.
I too was one of those folks that enjoyed it. Yes it is stupid, pointless, over the top, etc. Uh, that is the point of these movies. If you are wanting smart, dry wit, Woody Allen is the guy for you. If you want turn the noodle off stupid, call in the Zuckers.
Not to say this is as good as Airplane!, but that film is no feast of smart wit itself. You have farts, drool, tits, multi-genre spoofing and Leslie Nielson. Doesn't sound that much different than Scary Movie 4 to me
I caught this film after a VERY hard day at work and it made me laugh and forget about the horrible day I had. That is all you can expect from these.
Not to say this is as good as Airplane!, but that film is no feast of smart wit itself. You have farts, drool, tits, multi-genre spoofing and Leslie Nielson. Doesn't sound that much different than Scary Movie 4 to me

I caught this film after a VERY hard day at work and it made me laugh and forget about the horrible day I had. That is all you can expect from these.
So true Gabe - although I am not ashamed about my fixation with boobs...

Me and my friends like the Scary movie franchise. Sure, it's a lot of hit and miss jokes, but the actors make it worth it. They make some of the lamest jokes work (well at least for me).
The problem here is that when you haven't seen the movie it's spoofing, you might miss the joke.
And for me, all the Zuckermovies are filled with hit and miss jokes, but overall they are enjoyable.
The problem here is that when you haven't seen the movie it's spoofing, you might miss the joke.
And for me, all the Zuckermovies are filled with hit and miss jokes, but overall they are enjoyable.
JckRbbitSlim wrote: This series appeared to die with the third entry, so I skipped out on this one.
Shirley, you can't be serious?!?! It died with the third entry? I always thought these movies were DOA.
Shirley, you can't be serious?!?! It died with the third entry? I always thought these movies were DOA.
These movies are supposed to be dumb and stupid. That's what makes them entertaining even if the laughs are off a bit.
im gonna get this one in a few weeks!!!
i may get the unrated version!!!
i may get the unrated version!!!
The only thing I don't get is that they're spoofing Fantasy and Sci-Fi and Thrillers, not horror (with exception to "The Grudge", but I mean, that was more of a comedy on it's own). The first 2 yes, from "Exorcist" to "...Last Summer", but the last 2 are "Signs" and "The Ring" (again, like "The Grudge" not really a horror). So why the Hell is it called "Scary Movie"? Is it so un-funny that it's actually scary?
Worst Nightmare wrote: Oh well, all I can say is GREAT SCREEN CAP OF THE GIRLS! Cheers Gabe 
That was part of my final statement actually. Just a few changes and we'll have the next in the Scary Movie franchise.

That was part of my final statement actually. Just a few changes and we'll have the next in the Scary Movie franchise.
I saw it and laughed at 4 jokes....
"Give them something pointless and they will flock".
Oh well, all I can say is GREAT SCREEN CAP OF THE GIRLS! Cheers Gabe
"Give them something pointless and they will flock".
Oh well, all I can say is GREAT SCREEN CAP OF THE GIRLS! Cheers Gabe

This was the stupidest movie of 2006. Hands down. I laughed like 3 times as well. The only Scary Movie I found funny was "Scary Movie 3". That was a riot, but "Scary Movie", "Scary Movie 2" and "Scary Movie 4" were mindnumbing.
What I also hated about Part 4 was that they made fun of so many good movies, like "The Village" and "War of the Worlds". I understand that those movies are hated by the general public, but thats only because they dont understand them. They are very underrated films. I think its fine if you dont like a film, just dont go making other movies to bash them, its not fair. For crying out loud, they made fun of "Million Dollar Baby" and "Brokeback Mountain"! Oscar winners for godsakes, two of the best films of the 2000s. Its rediculious.
The Scary Movie series started out as somewhat clever, but now its just absurd. Please stop making these films.
What I also hated about Part 4 was that they made fun of so many good movies, like "The Village" and "War of the Worlds". I understand that those movies are hated by the general public, but thats only because they dont understand them. They are very underrated films. I think its fine if you dont like a film, just dont go making other movies to bash them, its not fair. For crying out loud, they made fun of "Million Dollar Baby" and "Brokeback Mountain"! Oscar winners for godsakes, two of the best films of the 2000s. Its rediculious.
The Scary Movie series started out as somewhat clever, but now its just absurd. Please stop making these films.
These things are too cheap to really bomb and stop being made, though you have to wonder when they'll start going directly to DVD.
If the thing made 90 million dollars there were obviously a whole bunch of people that liked it.
I'm pretty sure Airplane is the one and only pure spoof film I actually like...of course that's not enough to make me buy it or anything. I think you're right for the most part Tyler, though even Hot Shots has lost it too over the years. I prefer alegorical satire that can work even when the audience doesn't get the satire.
I'm pretty sure Airplane is the one and only pure spoof film I actually like...of course that's not enough to make me buy it or anything. I think you're right for the most part Tyler, though even Hot Shots has lost it too over the years. I prefer alegorical satire that can work even when the audience doesn't get the satire.
Tyler Foster wrote: Tony DeFrancisco wrote: I didn't like Top Secret...It's one of my favorites but even if you didn't like it I think it's clearly smarter than the parodies released today...and I think you mean you don't like Leslie Nielsen in Spy Hard (a movie I also disliked), because Nielsen isn't in Mafia!...Ahh yes, that's what I meant... thanks for correcting me.
This series appeared to die with the third entry, so I skipped out on this one. I dunno, Zucker Brothers comedies are so hit and miss, it just gets iritating after a while to wait for the hits after the mondane ridiculousness of it all. I'll watch this one if it comes on T.V. but I can't see spending money on it.
Tony DeFrancisco wrote: I didn't like Top Secret...It's one of my favorites but even if you didn't like it I think it's clearly smarter than the parodies released today...and I think you mean you don't like Leslie Nielsen in Spy Hard (a movie I also disliked), because Nielsen isn't in Mafia!...
I didn't like Top Secret...
Well, but Gabe, do people really remember Airport either? It may have scored all these Oscar nominations but I never hear anyone mention it, so I don't think it's just the fact that they're parodying these lame movies we'll all forget but that they're no longer parodying a genre. Airplane! and Top Secret! and The Naked Gun series work because they stick to essentially one thing and run with it, thus skewering a whole genre of films like Scary Movie is clearly meant to spoof (hence the title) but really kind of fails to. When you parody everything, then you have to devolve to parody a specific movie, and that's specifically why parodying those movies doesn't work. You can make fun of forgettable movies, you just have to make fun of a whole bunch of the same forgettable movies.
The other thing missing from modern spoofs is the seriousness of it all. People making goofy faces really isn't very funny, but people delivering goofy dialogue and making their way through ridiculous scenarios while keeping their steely-eyed determination can be hilarious. Also gone are the truly witty dialogue jokes that were often better than the sight gags, which I haven't really seen in a spoof since Hot Shots! Part Deux. It's all very depressing, but I still don't think the spoof is dead, it's just a long way down the wrong road.
The other thing missing from modern spoofs is the seriousness of it all. People making goofy faces really isn't very funny, but people delivering goofy dialogue and making their way through ridiculous scenarios while keeping their steely-eyed determination can be hilarious. Also gone are the truly witty dialogue jokes that were often better than the sight gags, which I haven't really seen in a spoof since Hot Shots! Part Deux. It's all very depressing, but I still don't think the spoof is dead, it's just a long way down the wrong road.
I liked it too. Better than 3. Oh and the King Kong spoof was in Date Movie (which was terrible). That's probably what you saw.
I found more than three gags funny, as I like Leslie Nielsen in anything he's in (minus Mafia! and Mr. Magoo). But as the director of Airplane!, couldn't Zucker do anything better to help the film? And yes, I agree, give up with the fart, sex, and dick jokes, and get to jokes that are unique.
Hell, I liked it.
i was one of the few who liked this movie


This product has not been rated
Disc Details
Release Date:
15th August 2006
Discs:
1
Disc Type:
Single side, dual layer
RCE:
No
Video:
NTSC
Aspect:
1.85:1
Anamorphic:
Yes
Colour:
Yes
Audio:
Dolby Digital 5.1 English, Dolby Digital 5.1 French
Subtitles:
English, French
Extras:
Commentary with Director David Zucker, Producer Bob Weiss, and Co-Writer Craig Mazin, 15 Deleted Scenes, Bloopers, An Interviewer's Worst Nightmare, Rappers…Actors, The Visual Effects of Scary Movie 4, The Youngbloodz, The Man Behind the Laugh: Director David Zucker
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
David Zucker
Cast:
Anna Faris, Regina Hall, Anthony Anderson, Craig Bierko, Chingy, Phil McGraw, Carmen Electra
Genre:
Comedy
Length:
83 minutes
Ratings
Amazon.com
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Hot Articles





Award Winning





Horrific Reviews





Most Talked About




