Simpsons Movie, The (US - DVD R1)
Gabe takes a look at the new animated film based on the obscure 90's sit-com
Feature
Lisa Simpson convinces Springfield to clean up the polluted lake. Meanwhile, Homer Simpson adopts a pig. ‘Spider Pig’ fills a silo with its excrement, and in a moment of weakness Homer dumps it into the lake, pushing the pollution beyond the brink and turning Springfield into an official environmental hazard. President Schwarzenegger seals Springfield in a giant fibreglass dome, and the angry population chases the Simpsons to Alaska, where things get worse.

Nothing can kill The Simpsons, and I have no idea why. Fox television is notorious for cancelling show after show before giving it a fair shake, but for some reason they can’t seem to let their original cash cow go, even though it hasn’t been remotely relevant for more than a decade. A freaking decade!. I was one of those idealistic fans that refused to admit that the show had been slowly sliding into mediocrity since just after its fifth or six season, but eight blahgillion episodes later I’m unable to lie to myself any more. The television incarnation of the lovable yellow family hasn’t made me laugh heartily for a very long time.
I originally saw the severely belated motion picture under mild protest, but left the theatre with a general sense of basic satisfaction (how’s that for a vague analysis?). I probably should’ve left well enough alone, because this second viewing on DVD was an arduous experience. The Simpsons Movie is just about the most average, middle of the road, half and half thing ever made. Ideally the film seems to be aimed at people that have watched between ten and twenty episodes of the series. Anyone coming in blind won’t have any idea what’s going on because none of the characters, specifically not the guest cast, are properly introduced or structured. This should please series fans who’d probably rather not sit through redundant exposition, however, these people will have already seen everything here on a smaller production scale.

This isn’t the first time Homer has lost the respect of his family. This isn’t the first bump in Homer and Marge’s marriage. This isn’t the first time Bart has bonded with Flanders, the first time Homer’s had an epiphany while hallucinating, or the first time the Simpsons have run for their lives from Springfield. This isn’t even the first time Springfield’s been stuck on the verge of utter destruction. Even the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie, based on a relatively repetitive and plot-less series, had something new to add to the property.
The animation looks good, sometimes successfully wrenching a giggle through pure slapstick appeal, and the melding of traditional cell and computer generated mediums is satisfactory. Homer’s Eskimo induced nightmare and the action finale are both particularly impressive. All the actors bring their A-game, specifically Nancy Cartwright, Yeardly Smith and Julie Kavner, who give Bart, Lisa, and Marge a touch of emotional depth beyond what they normally display in the series. Bart’s drunken hotel exploits (“I’m troubled”), Lisa’s adorable moments with her new boyfriend Colin, and Marge’s taped confession to Homer are all standout sequences in a painfully average feature.

Video
I gave the Futurama disc a pass because I knew my Fox studio supplied check disc was not dual-layered, and assumed that the compression noise wouldn’t show on the real discs consumers would later buy. This time I have to acknowledge the compression noise because it’s pretty obnoxious. I’m going to assume that the final release will look better, but based on what I’ve got here things are blocky, pixilated and lumpy, especially during quick movement. If this disc is to be believed the colours are quite vibrant, details sharp, and overall it should be impressive, especially on Blu-ray. I’m also happy that the producers went with the full scope ratio, adding a whole lot of theatrical appeal.
Audio
Having The Simpsons in 5.1 Dolby Digital surround is pretty cool, I will admit. Animated productions with a decent budget are always fun in surround sound, and the sound designers here have gone all out. The 2.35:1 ratio sets the film apart from the series, but the full surround sound is the real seller here. Of course all these well mixed voices and sound effect are nothing without a musical score, and this one, by Hans freaking Zimmer (?!?) is really over the top, but fitting. The reprise of the ‘Spider Pig’ during Homer’s hallucination was one of two belly laughs the movie got out of me.

Extras
Both commentary tracks make me want to like the movie more than I do, mostly because I really like the people behind the film, and came to like them through the Futurama commentaries. The first commentary, which features James L. Brooks, Matt Groening, Al Jean, Mike Scully, David Silverman, and actors Dan Castellaneta, Yeardly Smith, actually pauses when a big point must be made. It’s kind of shocking the first time it happens, especially since I had no idea it was going to happen. Most of the commentary is devoted to the many, many changes made to the script during production. The effort that went into producing such an utterly average feature is rather depressing, but it sounds like these folks understand where they fell short. Strangely the actors are almost silent, it’s almost like Yeardly Smith and Dan Castellaneta are sharing a mic and can’t speak at the same time. The directors-only track (with David Silverman, Mike B. Anderson, Steven Dean Moore and Rich Moore) is pretty repetitive coming after the other track and its pauses, but it’s nice for completests and technical junkies.

There are six deleted scenes, fully produced, with an introduction from producer Al Jean. Based on the commentary tracks I’m assuming that there’s actually about thirteen hours worth of deleted footage, but this is probably the only stuff that made it to completed animation. Really none of the scenes would’ve added anything but a few jokes to the final film, though it’s interesting to note that the first deleted scene features an alternate Russ Cargill design (though Albert Brooks’ performance is more or less identical).
Then we’ve got four ads for the movie described as featurettes in the press materials. ‘Homer’s Monologue on the Tonight Show’ is exactly what it sounds like, and not very funny. ‘The Simpsons Judge American Idol’ is exactly what it sounds like, and I’m sure it would be funny if I watched American Idol and hated the judges. ‘Homer Introduces American Idol’ is exactly what it sounds like, and not very funny. ‘Let’s All Go to the Lobby’ is that same old reel where snacks sing a song about eating them, then Homer sneaks up behind them and eats them. Aqua Teen Hunger Force did it better.
The lacklustre disc ends with a bunch of teasers and trailers for the film, including the one that ripped off the South Park movie’s awesome idea.

Overall
The Simpsons Movie is a vanilla effort from a hard working team that just can’t seem to find any new ideas after almost two decades and more than four hundred episodes. There’re a few laughs, some nice animation, and the performers are in top form, but the film itself isn’t really worth more than one viewing in my book. The relatively scant extras in the day and age of mammoth multi-disc sets leads me to believe a double dip may be on the horizon, and the film’s worldwide gross of more than $525 million smackers leads me to believe a sequel won’t be too far behind.
Review by Gabriel Powers
Advertisements
Existing Posts
mc_serenity wrote: You're comparing "The Simpsons" to "Star Wars"? *starts laughing uncontrollably* Ah, you're funny.
No I wasn't. It was an inside joke aimed at Gabe; nothing to do with you or anyone else.
thebestmofo wrote: Hey, a critic who can't take criticism!
So what, Gabe isn't allowed to defend his position?
No I wasn't. It was an inside joke aimed at Gabe; nothing to do with you or anyone else.
thebestmofo wrote: Hey, a critic who can't take criticism!
So what, Gabe isn't allowed to defend his position?
Hey, a critic who can't take criticism!
Gabe Powers wrote: They sent me a single layered burned disc
How professional...
How professional...
They sent me a single layered burned disc, and it looked like s**t. I'm hoping that my negative video review will insure they send me a final product next time around, but I doubt it.
The screencaps look dark and muted. Are they a good representation of the video quality Gabe? I seem to remember the movie as having far more contrast in the theater and it definitely did on the HD trailers that came out for it.
Great job on the review, though I loved the movie. I laughed throughout the whole thing. Maybe I enjoyed it because I haven't watched a "new" episode of the series since at least season 11 or 12. I have all 10 DVD releases and love them, probably haven't gotten to the mediocre episodes yet.
Oh thank God Tyler, for a second I thought you were going to go the other way.
Whoa whoa whoa. No need to compare The Simpsons to Family Guy. Say what you will about the mediocrity of The Simpsons after nearly 20 seasons, but Family Guy just freakin' sucks. Matt Groening and co. at mediocre will always be funnier than Seth MacFarlane at full power.
Gabe Powers wrote:
First you say it's still relevent, now you say it never was? Perhaps you should stop with the reactionary statements and think out these arguments.
It's relevant in my interpretation of the word, as in "a viable entertainment product that people want to see." In your interpretation, not so much. It seems like you're of the opinion that this show was at one point something more than it is now, which is a fun way to pass 22 minutes. It was funnier once, sure, but it was never Shakespeare.
Gabe Powers wrote:
Look, sorry for the words in your mouth, usually these kinds of reactioanry posts are from people that don't get the point of critisism and personal opinion (see: Rotten Tomatoes' message board), but the classic Simpsons (I'd say seasons 3 to maybe 8) made valid social and political points all the time.
Eh, I don't see that. Funnier, maybe, but I never thought of the Simpsons as being a veiled social or political satire. I have seasons 1-4, 6 and 8 on DVD and can't recall anything other than witty slapstick comedy. I mean, "Boondocks" the Simpsons ain't...
First you say it's still relevent, now you say it never was? Perhaps you should stop with the reactionary statements and think out these arguments.
It's relevant in my interpretation of the word, as in "a viable entertainment product that people want to see." In your interpretation, not so much. It seems like you're of the opinion that this show was at one point something more than it is now, which is a fun way to pass 22 minutes. It was funnier once, sure, but it was never Shakespeare.
Gabe Powers wrote:
Look, sorry for the words in your mouth, usually these kinds of reactioanry posts are from people that don't get the point of critisism and personal opinion (see: Rotten Tomatoes' message board), but the classic Simpsons (I'd say seasons 3 to maybe 8) made valid social and political points all the time.
Eh, I don't see that. Funnier, maybe, but I never thought of the Simpsons as being a veiled social or political satire. I have seasons 1-4, 6 and 8 on DVD and can't recall anything other than witty slapstick comedy. I mean, "Boondocks" the Simpsons ain't...
Chris Gould wrote: It's like Star Wars all over again. For the record, I was mildly entertained by this film, but I certainly wouldn't buy it.
You're comparing "The Simpsons" to "Star Wars"? *starts laughing uncontrollably* Ah, you're funny.
Seriously, I enjoyed this film. It was essentially a long episode but I wasn't bored. Even after rewatching the movie I still laughed and enjoyed myself. Heck, I even giggle when I remember a funny line or scene in the film.
And Gabe, the reason why Hans Zimmer scored that film was because James L. Brooks (and the producers of the show) dragged him on to it, and Zimmer was unsure if he was the right guy for it. He did a fine job straddling the line between his own distinct style and paying homage to Elfman and Alf Clausen's sound for the TV series. If Brooks weren't so adamant, we'd probably get Alf Clausen or even Elfman to work on the film.
You're comparing "The Simpsons" to "Star Wars"? *starts laughing uncontrollably* Ah, you're funny.
Seriously, I enjoyed this film. It was essentially a long episode but I wasn't bored. Even after rewatching the movie I still laughed and enjoyed myself. Heck, I even giggle when I remember a funny line or scene in the film.
And Gabe, the reason why Hans Zimmer scored that film was because James L. Brooks (and the producers of the show) dragged him on to it, and Zimmer was unsure if he was the right guy for it. He did a fine job straddling the line between his own distinct style and paying homage to Elfman and Alf Clausen's sound for the TV series. If Brooks weren't so adamant, we'd probably get Alf Clausen or even Elfman to work on the film.
Steven Ray wrote: I couldn't say I loved this film and I would say that the South Park and Futurama movies are better, but gosh darn if this film didn't remind me why I used to watch The Simpsons everyday (at 6:30 and 7:30 in syndication and on Sundays for new episodes) back when I was in elementary/jr. high. I haven't watched new episodes of the Simpsons in at least 7 years, but this film had me smiling.
I somewhat agree with it...except that I was all hyped up by the Simpsons Movie, I never really made a chance to see it, which, even owning all available seasons on DVD, is a shame...but I lost interest, I also used to watch the syndicated versions (2) and two more in spanish on one day, that's four doses of yellowness!!
I somewhat agree with it...except that I was all hyped up by the Simpsons Movie, I never really made a chance to see it, which, even owning all available seasons on DVD, is a shame...but I lost interest, I also used to watch the syndicated versions (2) and two more in spanish on one day, that's four doses of yellowness!!
It's like Star Wars all over again. For the record, I was mildly entertained by this film, but I certainly wouldn't buy it.
ticktock wrote:
Nice way of putting words in someone's mouth: I never said that I loved this movie or that I had even seen it at all. And when I say "mindless entertainment" I pretty much mean any sitcom, whether it be great or not. I personally don't see how a 22 minute cartoon sitcom can be made to be anything but. Relevant? The Simpsons? How could it ever have been in the first place? While the earlier seasons granted were funnier, I don't see how that would make them any more relevant than any of the episodes out today. Being funnier does not equate to relevance.
First you say it's still relevent, now you say it never was? Perhaps you should stop with the reactionary statements and think out these arguments.
Look, sorry for the words in your mouth, usually these kinds of reactioanry posts are from people that don't get the point of critisism and personal opinion (see: Rotten Tomatoes' message board), but the classic Simpsons (I'd say seasons 3 to maybe 8) made valid social and political points all the time.
Nice way of putting words in someone's mouth: I never said that I loved this movie or that I had even seen it at all. And when I say "mindless entertainment" I pretty much mean any sitcom, whether it be great or not. I personally don't see how a 22 minute cartoon sitcom can be made to be anything but. Relevant? The Simpsons? How could it ever have been in the first place? While the earlier seasons granted were funnier, I don't see how that would make them any more relevant than any of the episodes out today. Being funnier does not equate to relevance.
First you say it's still relevent, now you say it never was? Perhaps you should stop with the reactionary statements and think out these arguments.
Look, sorry for the words in your mouth, usually these kinds of reactioanry posts are from people that don't get the point of critisism and personal opinion (see: Rotten Tomatoes' message board), but the classic Simpsons (I'd say seasons 3 to maybe 8) made valid social and political points all the time.
I like that everytime I decide to stop watching the simpsons a good episode convinces me not to...I agree that it definately lost its touch but people still watch, so it stays on. I liked the movie more on its second viewing. I'll probpably pick it up. Man Gabe you were really tough on the review,but its your opinion.
Mal wrote: Was watching an old episode the other day, it's surprising how clever Homer was compared to modern episodes. The film was fun for me but the humour didn't appear to be as multilayered as it used to be.
Yeah, check out the first season... Homer gets embarrassed in public by Marge! The show is just so different now... it would be nice if they would actually show Homer at work once in a while as well.
Yeah, check out the first season... Homer gets embarrassed in public by Marge! The show is just so different now... it would be nice if they would actually show Homer at work once in a while as well.
Gabe Powers wrote: ticktock wrote: Gabe Powers wrote: ticktock wrote: Sorry, but I quit reading the review after you referred to the Simpsons as "obscure". Uhhh, obscure means "relatively unknown"...how the freak are the Simpsons relatively unknown???? We're talking a series that's pure Americana and has probably the most recognizable characters outside of Star Wars. Did you mean "obtuse," perhaps?
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
No, you obviously didn't get the sarcasm, or you wouldn't have written a paragraph long diatribe. Maybe my joke wasn't funny, but don't lie and say you got it.
Personally I don't buy the mindless entertainment excuse, The Simpsons use to actually have wit and a genuine satirical bite, now it's just The Family Guy with yellow skin. In my eyes 'mindless entertainment' is usually average entertainment, hence the 5/10 rating. My use of the world 'relevent' has nothing to do with monetary gain or public popularity, just like your critisism has nothing to do with my word usage and everything to do with the fact that I didn't love the same movie you did.
Nice way of putting words in someone's mouth: I never said that I loved this movie or that I had even seen it at all. And when I say "mindless entertainment" I pretty much mean any sitcom, whether it be great or not. I personally don't see how a 22 minute cartoon sitcom can be made to be anything but. Relevant? The Simpsons? How could it ever have been in the first place? While the earlier seasons granted were funnier, I don't see how that would make them any more relevant than any of the episodes out today. Being funnier does not equate to relevance.
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
No, you obviously didn't get the sarcasm, or you wouldn't have written a paragraph long diatribe. Maybe my joke wasn't funny, but don't lie and say you got it.
Personally I don't buy the mindless entertainment excuse, The Simpsons use to actually have wit and a genuine satirical bite, now it's just The Family Guy with yellow skin. In my eyes 'mindless entertainment' is usually average entertainment, hence the 5/10 rating. My use of the world 'relevent' has nothing to do with monetary gain or public popularity, just like your critisism has nothing to do with my word usage and everything to do with the fact that I didn't love the same movie you did.
Nice way of putting words in someone's mouth: I never said that I loved this movie or that I had even seen it at all. And when I say "mindless entertainment" I pretty much mean any sitcom, whether it be great or not. I personally don't see how a 22 minute cartoon sitcom can be made to be anything but. Relevant? The Simpsons? How could it ever have been in the first place? While the earlier seasons granted were funnier, I don't see how that would make them any more relevant than any of the episodes out today. Being funnier does not equate to relevance.
I'll pick it up. I liked it in the theater, but thought it was just a REAL good episode, but compared to the last few years, it did not have to streatch much to pass the series.
Gabe, sarcasm was well placed ad easily read, the jokes were fine, too. Nice review.
Extra Tidbit: Our local Meijers Department Store here in Kentucky is giving away a half dozen doughnuts with the purchase of this DVD on it's release date. hmmmmmmmmmm.... doughnuts.
Gabe, sarcasm was well placed ad easily read, the jokes were fine, too. Nice review.
Extra Tidbit: Our local Meijers Department Store here in Kentucky is giving away a half dozen doughnuts with the purchase of this DVD on it's release date. hmmmmmmmmmm.... doughnuts.
I enjoyed the movie for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, we got to enjoy it on a much wider scale. With the TV show boxed in at 1:33:1, we finally got to see The Simpsons in a 2:35:1 ratio, which is pretty damn cool for an animated film. Visually, I thought it looked great. Secondly, they managed to push the envelope to an extent that wouldn't have ever been allowed on TV. Not drastically mind you, but it was there, and funny as hell I might add.
It wasn't drop dead hilarious, but I thought the film as a whole was very enjoyable, even if it was an episode stretched to 90 minutes. To me it definitely didn't disappoint. But hey, different strokes for different folks.
But as far as I'm concerned, to enjoy the film's eye candy, you have to get the widescreen edition. After seeing how it looked theatrically, I shudder to think how it looks pan & scanned.
It wasn't drop dead hilarious, but I thought the film as a whole was very enjoyable, even if it was an episode stretched to 90 minutes. To me it definitely didn't disappoint. But hey, different strokes for different folks.
But as far as I'm concerned, to enjoy the film's eye candy, you have to get the widescreen edition. After seeing how it looked theatrically, I shudder to think how it looks pan & scanned.
The movie wasn't perfect, but it's certainly better than the past 5 or so seasons put together, and I'm eagerly awaiting a sequel. In fact I say cancel the show and focus on movies!
I've never minded the Simpsons but it tries too hard to be funny, cramming in as many gags as possible in a short amount of time in the hope that some will work. Personally i find Adultswim's Home Movies to be much wittier and funnier than anything South Park, Family Guy or The Simpsons could achieve. To me the characters are very lifelike and the comedy is not forced. I don't know anyone like Homer Simpson but i've known plenty of people like Coach Mcguirk.
Was watching an old episode the other day, it's surprising how clever Homer was compared to modern episodes. The film was fun for me but the humour didn't appear to be as multilayered as it used to be.
He's right. Relevance means how relevant it is to the culture. At this point in its history, The Simpsons is as disposable as the rest. Great animation in a plot not worth a second viewing, considering I've seen previous episodes do it better.
actually Zimmer only wrote the new family theme which sounds just like Elfman's theme and arranged a couple of cues but that's it. his team did everything else
the whole score sounds like Danny Elfman, meets John Powell and John Debney which is great. about the only decent thing about the movie
the whole score sounds like Danny Elfman, meets John Powell and John Debney which is great. about the only decent thing about the movie
ticktock wrote: Gabe Powers wrote: ticktock wrote: Sorry, but I quit reading the review after you referred to the Simpsons as "obscure". Uhhh, obscure means "relatively unknown"...how the freak are the Simpsons relatively unknown???? We're talking a series that's pure Americana and has probably the most recognizable characters outside of Star Wars. Did you mean "obtuse," perhaps?
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
No, you obviously didn't get the sarcasm, or you wouldn't have written a paragraph long diatribe. Maybe my joke wasn't funny, but don't lie and say you got it.
Personally I don't buy the mindless entertainment excuse, The Simpsons use to actually have wit and a genuine satirical bite, now it's just The Family Guy with yellow skin. In my eyes 'mindless entertainment' is usually average entertainment, hence the 5/10 rating. My use of the world 'relevent' has nothing to do with monetary gain or public popularity, just like your critisism has nothing to do with my word usage and everything to do with the fact that I didn't love the same movie you did.
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
No, you obviously didn't get the sarcasm, or you wouldn't have written a paragraph long diatribe. Maybe my joke wasn't funny, but don't lie and say you got it.
Personally I don't buy the mindless entertainment excuse, The Simpsons use to actually have wit and a genuine satirical bite, now it's just The Family Guy with yellow skin. In my eyes 'mindless entertainment' is usually average entertainment, hence the 5/10 rating. My use of the world 'relevent' has nothing to do with monetary gain or public popularity, just like your critisism has nothing to do with my word usage and everything to do with the fact that I didn't love the same movie you did.
I couldn't say I loved this film and I would say that the South Park and Futurama movies are better, but gosh darn if this film didn't remind me why I used to watch The Simpsons everyday (at 6:30 and 7:30 in syndication and on Sundays for new episodes) back when I was in elementary/jr. high. I haven't watched new episodes of the Simpsons in at least 7 years, but this film had me smiling.
Gabe Powers wrote: ticktock wrote: Sorry, but I quit reading the review after you referred to the Simpsons as "obscure". Uhhh, obscure means "relatively unknown"...how the freak are the Simpsons relatively unknown???? We're talking a series that's pure Americana and has probably the most recognizable characters outside of Star Wars. Did you mean "obtuse," perhaps?
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
No, I got the sarcasm. It's just sorely misplaced is all.
And we can debate the semantics regarding relevance all day long, but I don't really feel like going there right at this moment. All I can say is that if you can't understand why Fox is hesitant to let such a lucrative franchise vanish off the airways then maybe you're in the wrong business. I don't know about you, but to me 170 million-plus domestic box office take shows its relevance to me as a viable entertainment product. They make it and people want to see it - how much more "pertinent" would you wish a television series to be? I mean, after all, it's not the cure for cancer; it's just fun, mindless entertainment.
You included the screenshot of Homer giving the finger! Coolness!

horrorfan25 wrote: I actually agree it was a very good film. Lots of big laughs and the characters each did a good performance. Although I disagree that it couldn't be better. It actually could if they took out Bart's genitals, Two male cops kissing, and the f word gestures used by Homer Simpson. And it would get an A+. In my book it deserves a B.
What are you, a Puritan? A Puritan using the name horrorfan25?
What are you, a Puritan? A Puritan using the name horrorfan25?
MikeT wrote: Not getting this. I know they will bring out a two-disc edition one of these days. I'll wait for that.
oh you're so right....its obviously there will be, i mean this is Fox, they're known for releasing a barebones followed by a special edition 6 months later... and yet..im buying it anyway..go me being easy and gullible..lol
as for the movie, i thought it was great...i've been watching since the beginning more or less and i guess i'm in the low percentage who still loves the show and doesnt think anything is wrong but yeah. lol
oh you're so right....its obviously there will be, i mean this is Fox, they're known for releasing a barebones followed by a special edition 6 months later... and yet..im buying it anyway..go me being easy and gullible..lol
as for the movie, i thought it was great...i've been watching since the beginning more or less and i guess i'm in the low percentage who still loves the show and doesnt think anything is wrong but yeah. lol
ticktock wrote: Sorry, but I quit reading the review after you referred to the Simpsons as "obscure". Uhhh, obscure means "relatively unknown"...how the freak are the Simpsons relatively unknown???? We're talking a series that's pure Americana and has probably the most recognizable characters outside of Star Wars. Did you mean "obtuse," perhaps?
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
I'm glad to see sarcasm isn't lost on you.
Relevant: Bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent.
Popular is not part of the equation. The show is popular because it is familiar, not because it's relevant.
And I own seasons 4 and 5 on dvd.
Gabe, do you have any of the seasons on DVD?
Sorry, but I quit reading the review after you referred to the Simpsons as "obscure". Uhhh, obscure means "relatively unknown"...how the freak are the Simpsons relatively unknown???? We're talking a series that's pure Americana and has probably the most recognizable characters outside of Star Wars. Did you mean "obtuse," perhaps?
Well I lied and have gone back to read the rest of the review. "Hasn't been relevent in a decade?" Are you SERIOUS? Maybe the quality has fallen off considerably, but relevence isn't based on quality alone. The Simpsons, in this PAST DECADE, consistantly have top selling DVDs, merchandise, toys, and the show itself still pulls in decent ratings. That, to me, shows a semblence of "relevence".
Well I lied and have gone back to read the rest of the review. "Hasn't been relevent in a decade?" Are you SERIOUS? Maybe the quality has fallen off considerably, but relevence isn't based on quality alone. The Simpsons, in this PAST DECADE, consistantly have top selling DVDs, merchandise, toys, and the show itself still pulls in decent ratings. That, to me, shows a semblence of "relevence".
I didn't like it at all... the reviewer was right... a FEW laughs and plotlines that were already in TV episodes... nothing I would watch again.
Not getting this. I know they will bring out a two-disc edition one of these days. I'll wait for that.
I actually agree it was a very good film. Lots of big laughs and the characters each did a good performance. Although I disagree that it couldn't be better. It actually could if they took out Bart's genitals, Two male cops kissing, and the f word gestures used by Homer Simpson. And it would get an A+. In my book it deserves a B.
I truly loved this movie. There could be no better way to bring the Simpsons to the big screen than what was done here. Just the experience of seeing the Simpsons on a movie screen during a midnight screening was enough of a rush, but the HUGE laughs and great character moments brought me right back to the mid-90s Simpsons era. Good times.


Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13
Disc Details
Release Date:
18th December 2007
Discs:
1
Disc Type:
Single side, dual layer
RCE:
No
Video:
NTSC
Aspect:
2.35:1
Anamorphic:
Yes
Colour:
Yes
Audio:
Dolby Digital 5.1 English, Dolby Digital 2.0 English
Subtitles:
English, French, Spanish
Extras:
Producers, Writers, Directors and Cast Commentary, Directors Commentary, Deleted Scenes, Promos, Trailers
Easter Egg:
No
Feature Details
Director:
David Silverman, Mike B. Anderson, Steven Dean Moore and Rich Moore
Cast:
Dan Castellaneta, Yeardly Smith, Nancy Cartwright, Julie Kavner, Harry Shearer, Hank Azaria
Genre:
Animation and Comedy
Length:
87 minutes
Ratings
Amazon.com
FOLLOW DVDACTIVE
Follow our updates
OTHER INTERESTING STUFF
Award Winning





Reviewer Agony





Released Soon





Most Talked About




